What’s Up With Cement Plant Permitting? What’s BACT? Presented by A. A. Linero, P.E.

Download Report

Transcript What’s Up With Cement Plant Permitting? What’s BACT? Presented by A. A. Linero, P.E.

What’s Up With Cement Plant
Permitting?
What’s BACT?
Presented by
A. A. Linero, P.E. Adminstrator
New Source Review Section
June 27, 2001
1
Overview
Kiln Construction is Back
Focus on Preheater/Calciner Process
Formation and Control of Pollutants
What’s Going on in Europe
Some BACT and LAER Ranges
Look at a Current Project
What Next? Questions?
AWMA Conference, June 2001
2
Views are Author’s !
Not Opinions of Florida DEP
We do Case-by-Case Reviews
Literature Search, Not a Technical Paper
As Seen by a Permitting Engineer
There are Very Diverse Opinions
Greatly Simplified
AWMA Conference, June 2001
3
Dry Process Preheater Calciner Kilns
AWMA Conference, June 2001
4
Limited to New Dry Process
Preheater Calciner Kilns
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Rinker Photo By FDEP
5
From Top of Preheater
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Devil’s Slide Photos by FDEP
6
Leaning Tower of Polysius?
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Florida Rock Photo by A. Linero
7
Lot’s of Projects
Production is up Nationwide. 80 Million TPY
Florida Rock – First New Kiln in a Dozen Years
New Plants – CO, FL, MS, NY, TX
Modernizations and Expansions
AL, AZ, CA, CO, FL, IN, MS, SC, TX, UT
Most Require PSD Review and BACT (or LAER)
Others “Net Out” – Switch Wet to Dry Process
AWMA Conference, June 2001
8
Pollutant Formation - NOX
Thermal NOX
Temp. > 1200 OC
Kiln Burner ~ 2000 OC
Oxidizing Conditions
Calciner ~ 1000 OC
Fuel NOX
Kiln and Calciner
Devils’ Slide Photo by FDEP
AWMA Conference, June 2001
9
Pollutant Control - NOX
Minimize T and Raw Materials Fluctuations
Optimum Process and Raw Mix Control
Intelligent Systems – Linkman, PyroExpert
Minimize Primary Air from Coal Mill
Maximize Hot Air From Clinker Cooler
All New Projects Do These Things
AWMA Conference, June 2001
10
Kiln Burner NOX
Graphic Source: F.L.Smidth/Fuller
Multi-channel Burner
Pyrojet, Swirlax, Duoflex, GyroTherm, Rotoflam
Flame Shaping and Localized Reducing Conditions
High Momentum Primary Air Envelope
Compatible with Low NOX. All New Projects Do.
AWMA Conference, June 2001
11
SC Calciner
Staged Combustion (SC)
Lower Stage – Reducing Zone
Tires (15%), TDF, DDF, Bottle Caps
Tertiary Air and Fuel
Upper Stage – Top Air
Florida Rock Installing
Maybe 30 – 45% Reduction
All New Projects Do This
Graphic Source: Polysius
AWMA Conference, June 2001
12
Diaper Derived Fuel?

Devil’s Slide Filmed by FDEP
AWMA Conference, June 2001
13
Tire Gasification and SC
Whole Tires
Maybe 40% Tires
Jura Cement - Wildegg
Possible at Suwannee, FL
Graphic Source: Polysius
AWMA Conference, June 2001
14
SNCR
Ammonia or Urea Injection
High T, Near Calciner
15+ Kilns in Europe
Taiwan
Most Without SC
Zero in U.S.
Graphic Source: Fueltec
AWMA Conference, June 2001
15
SNCR – Problems?
Graphic Source: EnviroCare
Much Resistance in U.S.
“Slip” and Possibility of Detached Plume
Often Occurs Even w/o SNCR
Ammonia Sulfates and Chlorides
Compatibility Question With SC
AWMA Conference, June 2001
16
SNCR – Opacity?
Siggenthal Photo by A. Linero
 No Steam Plume in Dry Preheater Calciner Process
 Baghouse Will Help Ameliorate Problem
 Author saw No Plume at Siggenthal
 Still Getting Plume?
 Manage and Solve Detached Plume Problem
 Well Described by EnviroCare and CTL, Inc.
 Incorporate Into SO2 Control
 Hydrated Lime MicroMist, Avoid Aluminum Dross
AWMA Conference, June 2001
17
SNCR – SC Compatibility
Graphic Source: Jura Zement
For SNCR to Work, Need High T and O2
In SC Calciner, T is High where O2 is “Low”
Outside of Calciner, O2 is “High” and T is “Low”
Is Lower End of Window 800 or 900 OC
Jura Zement Has SC and SNCR and Gasification!
“No Effect on (Pre-SNCR) Excellent Plume Opacity”
No Ammonia Slip (Low Removal Objective?)
AWMA Conference, June 2001
18
Selective Catalytic Reduction
Catalyst and Low T Ammonia Injection
Demonstration Stage at Solnhofen
Extremely Dusty Environment
Or Need to Re-heat Stack Gas
Maybe Exotic Compared to Other Options
Better to See What SC, SNCR, Achieve First
AWMA Conference, June 2001
19
European Emission Limits
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Polysius Graphic Modified by A. Linero
20
SNCR at Leimen Plant - Germany
3.7 lb/ton
2.3 lb/ton
~1.3 ?
Graphic Source: Heidelberger
AWMA Conference, June 2001
21
What is BACT?
Photo Source: RMC Lonestar
 2.5 lb/ton at Kiln Built Circa 1980!
 Slug of 2.3 – 2.9 lb/ton BACTs, e.g. FRI 2.8 in 1996
 ~ 1 lb/ton in Slite, Sweden (80% Reduction)
 ~ 1 lb/ton in Taiwan by SNCR
 ~ 1 lb/ton in 1994 Ash Grove SNCR Test
 ~ 1.2 lb/ton Annual Limit at Holnam Midlothian
 European IPPC BAT (200 – 500 mg/m3)
 Equals 0.9 to 2.3 lb/ton
 LAER? Must Be Near 1 lb/ton. Lower if SCR
AWMA Conference, June 2001
22
Pollutant Formation – SO2
Fuel Sulfur – Kiln/Calciner
Roasting of Pyrites in PH
Graphic Source: F.L.Smidth/Fuller
AWMA Conference, June 2001
23
Pollutant Control – SO2
 Raw Material Selection (Avoid Pyrites!)
 Fine CaO in Calciner Scrubs Kiln ~ 100%
 Move CaO by P to Upper Preheater
 Can Reduce Pyritic Emissions ~ 20-30%
 Capitol Cement and Ash Grove Chanute
 Need More Fuel, Balance Heat
 Capital Investment Looks Low
Graphic Source: F.L.Smidth/Fuller
AWMA Conference, June 2001
24
Pollutant Control – SO2
Pfeiffer Raw Mill
 CaCO3 and Moisture on Raw Mill Surface
 Some of the CaO from D-SOX
 Maybe Together 70+ Percent of Residual SO2
 When Raw Mill Out – Control Gas Temperature
 Spray Fine Ca(OH)2 Mist into Conditioning Tower
 Not Enough - More Conventional Scrubbers
 Achieve as much as 90 Percent Removal
AWMA Conference, June 2001
25
Effect of Raw Materials
& Process on SO2
Florida Rock Photo By FDEP
 PH/Calciner Kilns in TX – 1000’s of TPY of SO2
 High Pyrites in Raw Materials
 Wet Kilns in Florida – 1000’s of TPY of SO2
 Fuel Sulfur, No Calciner - less Self Scrubbing
 PH/Calciner Kilns in Florida – << 100 TPY
 No Pyrites in Raw Materials
 Florida Rock Kiln, Rinker Modernization
 From 1000+ TPY to ~ 20 TPY
AWMA Conference, June 2001
26
What is BACT?
 < 0.23 (or Better) in Florida With No Controls
 ~ 0.05 at Siggenthal by (Incidental) Coke Filter
 ~ 1.3 lb/ton at TXI Midlothian to Avoid PSD
 < 1 lb/ton at Slite, Sweden (90% Reduction)
 European IPPC BAT (200 – 400 mg/m3)
 Equals 0.9 to 1.8 lb/ton
 D-SOx & Lime Mist With Moderate Pyrites
 90 % Scrubber Control With Very High Pyrites
AWMA Conference, June 2001
27
Pollutant Formation - CO & VOC
CO From Incomplete Combustion
Very Little VOC From Kiln and Calciner
Evolution in Preheater
Organic Carbon from Raw Materials
Carbon from Coal Ash
VOC from Mill Scale, etc.
AWMA Conference, June 2001
28
Pollutant Control - CO & VOC
 Hot Excess Air, Mixing
 Tertiary Air After Calcining
 E.G. Pyrotop after SC
 Raw Material Selection – e.g. Millscale
 ~ 70% VOC Reduction at Florida Rock
 Must Install Continuous Monitor
 Grind and Introduce Directly into Kiln
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Graphic Source: KHD
29
Regenerative Thermal Oxidation
Texas Cement Midlothian
About 10 Modules
Area of a Football Field
Enter Market at Earliest Date
Avoid PSD Delays “up to 3 Years”
$17,500,000 for RTO
$13,000,000 for SO2 Scrubber
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Graphic Sources: Durr/Reeco
30
Active Coke Filter
Siggenthal Switzerland
In Conjunction with Dried Sludge Burning
$15,000,000 Partly Funded by Zurich
“Environmentally Friendly Dried Sludge Burning”
Concern Was Thallium and Mercury (on Cows?)
Also Cleans up, SO2, dioxin/furan, and Ammonia
With SNCR Constitutes POLVITEC by Polysius
AWMA Conference, June 2001
31
What is BACT?
VOC = ~ 0.1 lb/ton in Florida (Hard to Meet!)
VOC = ~ 0.026 lb/ton at TXI (By RTO - LAER?)
CO = ~ 2 – 3.6 lb/ton in Florida
CO = ~ 6 – 8 lb/ton in SC
CO = ~ 0.37 lb/ton at TXI (By RTO - LAER?)
AWMA Conference, June 2001
32
European Rule 2000/76/EG
Pollutant
Dust
NOX
SO2
Mercury
Fluorides
TOC
CO
Concentration
30 mg/m3
500 mg/m3 *
800 mg/m3 **
50 mg/m3 ***
0,05 mg/m3
1 mg/m3
10 mg/m3 ***
_
Process Limit
~ 0.14 lb/ton
~ 2.3 lb/ton *
~ 3.7 lb/ton **
~ 0.23 lb/ton ***
~ 0.00023 lb/ton
~ 0.0046
~ 0.046 lb/ton ***
* New Sources
** Existing Sources (Swedish non-EU standard is 200 mg/m3 ~ 0.9 lb/ton)
*** Non Raw Material-Specific Emission
AWMA Conference, June 2001
33
European Rule 2000/76/EG
Pollutant
Chlorides
Cd and Thallium
Sb+As+Pb+Cr+
Co+Cu+Mn+Ni+V
Dioxin and Furan
AWMA Conference, June 2001
Concentration
10 mg/m3
0.05 mg/m3
Process Limit
~ 0.046 lb/ton
~ 0.00023 lb/ton
0.5 mg/m3
0.1 ng ITEQ/m3
~ 0.0023 lb/ton
34
Ozone Non-Attainment Area
Pollutant
Requirement
Top Limit
Technology
NOX
LAER
~1
SNCR
VOC
LAER
0.026
RTO
SO2
BACT
0.23
Varies
~0.74
Scrubbers
CO
BACT
0.37
RTO
~3.5
Materials?
(4121 tpy)
(129 tpy)
(850 tpy)
(3983 tpy)
1.
2.
3.
Draft
Limit
Proposed Control
3.61
SC
2.82,3 SC & SNCR(?)
~0.11
Materials?
Initial Limit is 3.6 lb/ton during first two years by Staged Combustion 12-Month Average
Limit is stepped down from 3.6 to 2.8 lb/ton between years 2 and 3
Company proposes LAER after 38 months of operation. Department sets LAER (2007 ??)
AWMA Conference, June 2001
35
Final Thoughts
 4000 TPY of NOX equates to
 50 Gas-fired Combined Cycle Plants = to 12,500 MW
 At 3 million Btu/ton of Clinker
 3.6 lb NOX /ton limit equates to
 1.2 lb NOX/million Btu heat input
 Order of magnitude > than new coal power plant
 Two orders > greater than gas-fired power plant
 Some low hanging fruit to pick here.
AWMA Conference, June 2001
36
AWMA Conference, June 2001
37