E-169: Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures A proposal for experiments at the SABER facility J.B.

Download Report

Transcript E-169: Wakefield Acceleration in Dielectric Structures A proposal for experiments at the SABER facility J.B.

E-169: Wakefield Acceleration
in Dielectric Structures
A proposal for experiments at the
SABER facility
J.B. Rosenzweig
UCLA Dept. of Physics and Astronomy
SLAC EPAC - December 4, 2006
E169 Collaboration
Qu i c k T i m e ™ a n d a
T I F F (U n c o m p re s s e d ) d e c o m p re s s o r
a re n e e d e d t o s e e t h i s p i c t u re .
UCLA
H. Badakov, M. Berry, I. Blumenfeld, A. Cook, F.-J. Decker,
M. Hogan, R. Ischebeck, R. Iverson, A. Kanareykin, N. Kirby,
P. Muggli, J.B. Rosenzweig, R. Siemann, M.C. Thompson,
R.
Tikhoplav, G. Travish, D. Walz
Department
of Physics and Astronomy, University of California, Los Angeles
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
University of Southern California
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Euclid TechLabs, LLC
Collaboration spokespersons
Proposal Motivation
 Take advantage of unique experimental
opportunity at SLAC
 SABER: ultra-short intense beams
 Advanced accelerators for high energy frontier
 Promising path: dielectric wakefields
 Extend successful T-481 investigations
 Dielectric wakes >10 GW
 Complete studies of revolutionary technique
Colliders and the energy frontier
 Colliders uniquely explore
energy frontier
 Exp’l growth in equivalent
beam energy w/time
 Livingston plot: “Moore’s
Law” for accelerators
 We are now falling off plot!
 Challenge in energy, but
not only…luminosity as well
QuickTime™ and a
TIFF (LZW) decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
Meeting the energy challenge
 Avoid gigantism
 Cost above all
 Higher fields give physics
challenges
 Linacs: accelerating fields
 Enter world of high energy
density (HED) physics
 Impacts luminosity
challenge…
HED in future colliders:
ultra-high fields in accelerator
 High fields in violent
accelerating systems
d
Linear accelerator schematic
eE z /mc  ~ 1
 High field implies small 
 Relativistic oscillations…
 Limit peak power
 Limit stored energy
 Diseases
 Breakdown, dark current
 Pulsed heating
 Where is source < 1 cm?
 Approaches
 High frequency, normal cond.
 Superconducting
 Lasers and/or plasma waves
Qu i c k T i m e ™ a n d a
Ph o t o - J P EG d e c o m p re s s o r
a re n e e d e d to s e e th i s p i c t u re .
z
Scaling the accelerator in size
 Lasers produce copious power (~J, >TW)
 Scale in size by 4 orders of magnitude
  < 1 m challenge in beam dynamics
 Reinvent the structure using dielectric
Resonant dielectric
structure schematic
 To jump to GV/m, only need mm-THz
 Must have new source…
Possible new paradigm for high field
accelerators: wakefields
 Coherent radiation from bunched, v~c e- beam
 Any impedance environment
 Non-resonant, short pulse operation possible
 Also powers more exotic schemes
 Plasma, dielectrics…
 Intense beams needed by other fields
 X-ray FEL, X-rays from Compton scattering
 THz sources
High gradients, high frequency, EM power
from wakefields: CLIC @ CERN
CLIC drive beam
extraction structure
Power
CLIC 30 GHz,
150 MV/m structures
CLIC wakefield-powered resonant scheme
The dielectric wakefield accelerator
 Higher accelerating gradients: GV/m level
 Dielectric based, low loss, short pulse
 Higher gradient than optical? Different breakdown mechanism
 No charged particles in beam path…
 Use wakefield collider schemes
 Afterburner possibility for existing accelerators
 CLIC style modular system
 Spin-offs
 THz radiation source
Dielectric Wakefield Accelerator
Overview
 Electron bunch ( ≈ 1) drives Cerenkov
*
wake in cylindrical dielectric structure
Variations on structure features
Multimode excitation
 Wakefields accelerate trailing bunch
 Mode wavelengths

Design Parameters
a,b
z
n 

4 b  a
 1
n
 Peak decelerating field





Ez on-axis, OOPIC
4N b re mec 2
eEz,dec 
 8

a
 z  a
  1

Transformer ratio
E
R  z,acc  2
E z,dec
Extremely good
beam needed
Experimental Background
Argonne / BNL experiments
E vs. witness delay
 Proof-of-principle experiments
(W. Gai, et al.)

ANL AATF
 Mode superposition
(J. Power, et al. and S. Shchelkunov, et al.)

ANL AWA, BNL
 Transformer ratio improvement
(J. Power, et al.)
 Beam shaping
 Tunable permittivity structures

For external feeding
(A. Kanareykin, et al.)
Tunable permittivity
Gradients limited to <50 MV/m by available beam
T-481: Test-beam exploration
of breakdown threshold
 Leverage off E167
 Existing optics
 Beam diagnostics
 Running protocols
 Goal: breakdown studies
 Al-clad fused silica fibers
 ID 100/200 m, OD 325 m, L=1 cm
 Avalanche v. tunneling ionization
 Beam parameters indicate ≤12
GV/m longitudinal wakes
 30 GeV, 3 nC, z ≥ 20 m
 48 hr FFTB run, Aug. 2005
 Follow-on planned, no time
T-481 “octopus” chamber
T481: Beam Observations
 Multiple tube assemblies
 Alignment to beam path
 Scanning of bunch lengths for
wake amplitude variation
 Excellent flexibility: 0.5-12 GV/m
QuickTime™ and a
H.264 decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
 Vaporization of Al cladding…
dielectric more robust
 Observed breakdown threshold
(field from simulations)
 4 GV/m surface field
 2 GV/m acceleration field!
 Correlations to post-mortem
inspection
View end of dielectric tube; frames sorted
by increasing peak current
Breakdown Threshold
Observation
Breakdown Camera Pixel Sum
2.40 10 7
08170cs
2.20 10 7
2.00 10 7
1.80 10 7
1.60 10 7
1.40 10 7
1.20 10 7
1.00 10 7
0
50
100
Bunch Length Variable
[rms XRAY]
150
200
OOPIC Simulation Studies
 Parametric scans
 Heuristic model benchmarking
 Determine field levels in
experiment
1.5 10
Multi-mode excitation
10
E_dec,max (OOPIC)
E_acc max (OOPIC)
E_dec,theory
10
E (V/m)
1 10
z
Single mode excitation
5 10
9
0
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
a (m)
Example scan, comparison to heuristic model
Fundamental 
T-481: Inspection of Structure Damage
Damage consistent with beam-induced discharge
ultrashort
bunch
Bisected fiber
longer
bunch
Aluminum vaporized from pulsed heating!
Laser transmission test
Proposal: E169 at SABER
 Research GV/m acceleration scheme in DWA
 Push technique for next generation accelerators
 Goals






Explore breakdown issues in detail
Determine usable field envelope
Coherent Cerenkov radiation measurements:
Explore alternate materials
Explore alternate designs and cladding:
Varying tube dimensions
 Impedance change
 Breakdown dependence on wake pulse length
Proposal: E-169 at SABER
High-gradient Acceleration
Goals in 3 Phases
 Phase 1: Complete breakdown study
 explore (a, b, z) parameter space
Alternate cladding
Alternate materials (e.g. diamond)
Explore group velocity effect T  Ld /c  vg  Ld / c 1
 Coherent Cerenkov (CCR)
measurement

z
r
≥ 20 m
U
25 GeV
Q
3 - 5 nC
< 10 m
A. Kanareykin
 Total energy gives field measure
 Harmonics are sensitive z diagnostic
eNb E z,dec Ld
2
2
2
 nN b re me c 2 z 2 Ld
UC 
Un 
2ab  a

2

2 
 

n z

exp 



 2b  a  1  
8  1 z   1a



CVD deposited diamond
E-169 at SABER: Phase 2 & 3
 Phase 2: Observe acceleration
z
r
 10 cm tube length
 longer bunch, z ~ 150 m
 moderate gradient
Qu i c k T i m e ™ a n d a
T I F F (L Z W ) d e c o m p re s s o r
a re n e e d e d to s e e t h i s p i c t u re .
 Single mode
Phase 3: Scale to 1 m fibers

 Alignment
 Group velocity….
*
Before & after momentum distributions (OOPIC)
Ez on-axis
150 m
< 10 m
energy
25 GeV
Q
3 - 5 nC
Experimental Issues: THz Detection
 Conical launching horns
 Impedance matching to free space
 Direct radiation forward
 Signal-to-noise ratio
 Background of CTR from tube end
 SNR ~ 3 - 5 for 1 cm tube
 Detectors
 Pyroelectric
 Golay cell
 Helium-cooled bolometer
 Michelson interferometer
for autocorrelation
Qu i c k T i m e ™ a n d a
T I F F (L Z W ) d e c o m p re s s o r
a re n e e d e d to s e e th i s p i c t u re .
UCLA
THz in Wider Use
 Screening/remote sensing
 Many chemical and organic
molecules have distinct absorption
spectra in THz
 Transparency of many materials
 Safe for living tissue
 Atmosphere spectroscopy
 Detection of chemical and
biological hazards
 Defect analysis
 Synergy with LCLS
Mittelman, et al.
Experimental Issues: Alternate DWA design,
cladding, materials
 Aluminum cladding used in T-481
 Vaporized at even moderate wake amplitudes
 Low vaporization threshold due to low pressure
and thermal conductivity of environment
 Dielectric cladding
 Lower refractive index provides internal reflection
 Low power loss, damage resistatn
 Bragg fiber?
 Alternate dielectric: CVD diamond
 High breakdown threshold
 Doping gives dow SEC
Bragg fiber
E-169 at SABER:







Implementation/Diagnostics
New precision alignment vessel?
Upstream/downstream OTR
screens for alignment
X-ray stripe
CTR/CCR for bunch length
Imaging magnetic spectrometer
Beam position monitors and
beam current monitors
Controls…
Heavy SLAC involvement
Much shared with E168
E-169 Timeline
SABER
operational
January
2007
3-week
run
3-week
run
January
2008
Phase 1: 3 weeks @ SABER
Phase 2: 3 weeks @ SABER
Phase 2+: + 6 months
Phase 3 ?
January
2009
Conclusions/directions
 Unique opportunity to explore GV/m dielectric
wakes at SABER
 Flexible, ultra-intense beams
 Only possible at SLAC SABER
 Low gradient experiments at UCLA Neptune
 Extremely promising first run
 Collaboration/approach validated
 Much physics, parameter space to explore
Marx panel recommendation
July 2006
“A major challenge for the accelerator science community
is to identify and develop new concepts for future energy
frontier accelerators that will be able to provide the
exploration tools needed for HEP within a feasible cost to
society. The future of accelerator-based HEP will be limited
unless new ideas and new accelerator directions are
developed to address the demands of beam energy and
luminosity and consequently the management of beam
power, energy recovery,
accelerator power, size, and
cost.”