CNI, 9 December 2013 Starting the Conversation University-wide Research Data Management Policy Ricky Erway Senior Program Officer OCLC Research @rickyerway.
Download
Report
Transcript CNI, 9 December 2013 Starting the Conversation University-wide Research Data Management Policy Ricky Erway Senior Program Officer OCLC Research @rickyerway.
CNI, 9 December 2013
Starting the Conversation
University-wide Research Data
Management Policy
Ricky Erway
Senior Program Officer
OCLC Research
@rickyerway
Overview
• Genesis and approach
• Benefits and advocacy
• Stakeholders
• The conversation
Source
Source
• OCLC
• OCLC
• OCLC Research
• OCLC Research
• OCLC Research Library Partnership
• OCLC Research Library Partnership
• Advancing the Research Mission
• Activity: Advancing the Research
• Library’s Role in Data Curation
Mission
• Data Curation
Working
Group
• Library’s
Role in Data
Curation
• Data Curation Working Group
Jon Platek, Map of the course, watershed, and major tributaries of the Mississippi River.
Data Curation Working Group
• Daniel Tsang, University of California, Irvine
(Chair)
• Anna Clements, University of St. Andrews
• Joy Davidson, Digital Curation Centre
• Mike Furlough, Pennsylvania State University
• Amy Nurnberger, Columbia University
• Sally Rumsey, University of Oxford
• Anna Shadbolt, University of Melbourne
• Claire Stewart, Northwestern University
• Beth Forrest Warner, Ohio State University
• Perry Willett, California Digital Library
Distribution
• Data Curation Working Group
• OCLC Research Library Partnership
Listservs
• OCLC Publication
• EDUCAUSE Review Online
• CNI Fall Briefing
• ????
Benefits of data management
•Validation of results
• Reuse in new areas of research
• Curation throughout data lifecycle
• Efficiencies of scale
• Clear expectations for data managers
• Uniform requirements for researchers
• Consistent standards foster harmony
• Ease compliance and improve access
• Benefit all research
Stakeholders
• The University
• Office of Research
• Research Compliance
• IT Department
• Researchers
• Academic Units
• Library
The University
•Assets from research mission
•Safeguard investment
•Balance commercialization with sharing
•Responsible steward
•Economical and sustainable
•Contribution to the public good
•Ensure future research funding
•Commitment to open access
•Contribute to academic integrity and
responsible stewardship
Office of Research
•Administers sponsored research
•Key contact with funding agencies
•Responsibility for technology transfer, patent, IP
•Tracks awards, progress reports, and completion
•Point of coordination
•Interest in funding, policy, and governance
•Assists researchers with data mgmt costs
•Embed data management into workflows
Research Compliance
•Compliance with policies and regulations
•Reviews policies, weighs benefits and risks
•Training, communication, and enforcement
•Uniformity of data management expectations,
requirements, and standards
•Measures of validation
•Responsibilities to data housed elsewhere
•Impacts of changing data retention requirements
IT Department
•Data acquisition, storage, management,
security, integration, mining, and visualization
•Systems for documenting, depositing,
managing, archiving, and preserving data
•Search and retrieval and access
•Economies of scale, integration
•Coordinating technology and expertise
•Integration with CRIS, VRE to make data
management part of the researchers' workflow
Researchers
•Career advancement depends on research
outputs.
•Confront a mix of requirements
•Negotiate publishing agreements
•May deposit data in external repositories
•Resist new administrative burdens
•Trust is critical
•Must be informed of decisions and procedures
Academic Units
•Manage research projects
•Support proposal writing, budgets
•Administration and tracking
•Some have their own technology
infrastructure
•Close relationships with the researchers
•Good conduits for communication
•Might welcome guidance and infrastructure
The Library
•Experience with selection,
repositories, preservation, and access
•Subject area and functional liaisons
•Help with appraisal, deposit, retention,
metadata
•Researcher name disambiguation
•Copyright and privacy issues
•Guidance for deposit in external repositories
Creation of data-management plans
Elements of the Conversation 1/4
•Making
data sets
availablethe
can support
validation of results.
• Who
Owns
Data?
•Data can be repurposed in new areas of research.
Funding
agency?
Researcher?
•Curation University?
activities can be much
easier throughout
the data lifecycle.
Efficiencies can be achieved when not treated as one-off occurrences.
•Clear expectations will ease the way for data managers.
•What
Requirements
Imposed
Others?
•Uniform
requirements
will facilitate data are
understandability
andBy
sharing
among
researchers.
Funders? Publishers? Other institutions?
•Consistent data management standards and training and tracking programs
can foster harmony within the university.
•A standardized approach to data management will ease compliance and
•Which Data Should Be Retained?
improve management of and access to the university's intellectual assets.
•Positive impacts
efficiencies
cankeeping.
benefit all research
conducted
the
Only and
data
worth
Data
fromat failed
university, not just that funded by agencies requiring a data management plan.
experiments? Data derived from secondary
analysis?
Elements of the Conversation 2/4
• Who decides which data to keep?
•Making data sets available can support validation of results.
Researcher?
Someone
Domain experts?
•Data can
be repurposed in
new areas ofelse?
research.
•Curation
activitiesReuse?
can be much
easier throughout
the data lifecycle.
Peers?
Validation?
Expensive
to recreate?
Efficiencies can be achieved when not treated as one-off occurrences.
•Clear expectations will ease the way for data managers.
•Howrequirements
Long Should
Datadata
Beunderstandability
Maintained?and sharing among
•Uniform
will facilitate
researchers.
Long-term value? Subject to review? How
•Consistent
data management
standardsExtension?
and training andMetrics?
tracking programs
tracked?
Reappraisal?
Who
can foster harmony within the university.
reassesses?
Destroy?
Document?
•A standardized
approachHow
to datamanaged?
management will
ease compliance
and
improve management of and access to the university's intellectual assets.
•Positive
andDigital
efficiencies
can benefit
all research conducted at the
•Howimpacts
Should
Data
Be Preserved?
university, not just that funded by agencies requiring a data management plan.
Unique needs? Cloud storage? DMPs preserved?
File formats? Descriptors? Standards?
Elements of the Conversation 3/4
• Aredata
there
Ethicalcan
Considerations?
•Making
sets available
support validation of results.
•Data can
beor
repurposed
in new areas of research.
IRB
grant conditions?
IP, privacy, or access
•Curation activities can be much easier throughout the data lifecycle.
restrictions? Consent forms? Risk management?
Efficiencies can be achieved when not treated as one-off occurrences.
•Clear expectations will ease the way for data managers.
•Uniform
facilitate data understandability and sharing among
• Howrequirements
are Datawill
Accessed?
researchers.
Metadata discoverable? Deeper support? Which
•Consistent data management standards and training and tracking programs
indices?
can foster
harmony Service-level
within the university.assurances? Monitor and
•A standardized
approach
to data
management
will ease compliance and
quantify
access?
Impact?
Measure?
improve management of and access to the university's intellectual assets.
•Positive impacts and efficiencies can benefit all research conducted at the
• How not
Open
Should
the
Data requiring
Be? a data management plan.
university,
just that
funded by
agencies
Constraints? Share case-by-case? Embargoes?
Justification provided?
Elements of the Conversation 4/4
•Making
data
setsCosts
availableBe
canManaged?
support validation of results.
• How
Will
•Data can be repurposed in new areas of research.
Include
proposals?
costs? Time•Curation
activitiesin
can
be much easierIndirect
throughoutor
the direct
data lifecycle.
limited?
Co-investment?
Which
Efficiencies
can be Share
achievedcosts?
when not treated
as one-off occurrences.
•Clear services
expectations covered?
will ease the way
for data
managers.costs? ROI?
How
to assess
•Uniform requirements will facilitate data understandability and sharing among
researchers.
• What data
are management
the Alternatives
Management?
•Consistent
standards to
andLocal
training Data
and tracking
programs
can foster
harmony within
the university.or discipline-based data
National,
international,
•A standardized approach to data management will ease compliance and
center?
Other
institutions?
Local metadata
for
improve
management
of and
access to the university's
intellectual assets.
external
data?
Multiple
homes?
•Positive
impacts and
efficiencies
can benefit
all research conducted at the
university, not just that funded by agencies requiring a data management plan.
Changes ahead
• Office of Science and Technology Policy mandate
• ARL, AAU, and APLU’s proposal, "SHared
Access Research Ecosystem (SHARE)
• 30 organizations that archive scientific data
released a call for action urging the creation of
sustainable funding streams
Ricky Erway
[email protected]
Oc.lc/datamp
©2013 OCLC. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Suggested attribution: “This work uses content from [presentation title] © OCLC, used under a
Creative Commons Attribution license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/”