Fire effects on vegetation recovery Summary of Results and Project Deliverables Jill Johnstone, Teresa Hollingsworth, Emily Bernhart & Katie Villano.
Download ReportTranscript Fire effects on vegetation recovery Summary of Results and Project Deliverables Jill Johnstone, Teresa Hollingsworth, Emily Bernhart & Katie Villano.
Fire effects on vegetation recovery Summary of Results and Project Deliverables Jill Johnstone, Teresa Hollingsworth, Emily Bernhart & Katie Villano All sites grouped by severity Burn severity is HIGHLY correlated with the Axis 1 Significant changes key species pre to post-fire • Increase in Salix pulchra • Increase in Salix diversity (4 Salix sps. that only occur post-fire (Feltleaf, Bebb’s, Firmleaf, and Scouler’s) • Decrease in moss abundance and diversity including Sphagnum sps. • Decrease in lichen abundance and diversity including 3 Cladonia species Wildfire as a conduit for invasive species colonization Are black spruce forests more susceptible to invasion after fire? 45 a 40 35 30 % survival In the greenhouse, invasive plants in burned soil cores showed higher survival than in unburned cores. a Unreproductive Reproductive 25 20 15 10 5 b 0 2 year old burns 7-19 year old burns Unburned 0.50 0.40 0.35 log total biomass (g) Does burn severity and soil moisture influence the success of invasive plant establishment? M. alba 0.45 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.50 0.00 0.45 H. aurantiacum 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 0.50 B. inermis 0.45 0.40 log total biomass (g) No significant differences between invasive biomass (or survival) in different burn site types at any point in the experiment. log total biomass (g) 0.40 0.35 0.30 0.25 0.20 0.15 0.10 0.05 0.00 Low Severity/ High Moisture Low Severity/ Low Moisture High Severity/ High Moisture Burn Type High Severity/ Low Moisture MANAGEMENT IMPLICATIONS • Burned areas with both high invasive propogule pressure and most suitable soils should take highest management priority (i.e. Dalton Highway). • Even low severity burns are susceptible to invasive species Fire and Site Effects on Tree Regeneration 4 6 8 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 0 20 40 60 80 1 2 3 4 5 6 6 0 4 5 6 7 0 2 4 Conif.sqrt 2 4 6 8 2 8 0 60 80 0 1 2 3 Decid.sqrt 4 5 6 0 20 40 org.cov 1 2 3 drainage 1 2 3 4 5 6 Modeling Seedling Recruitment 0.98 0.91 0.87 BS WS LP 0.50 drainage R2=0.48 conifer -0.42 resid.org -0.48 0.31 0.36 elevation -0.35 Model χ2=19.2, df=15, p=0.2 (no significant lack of fit) deciduous R2=0.57 TA PB 0.86 0.85 Drivers of forest regeneration • Differential sensitivity of functional groups – Deciduous most sensitive to post-fire seedbeds – Conifers more responsive to site moisture • Important role of fire severity in potentially tipping the balance between deciduous and conifer dominance Successional trajectories modelling • How might changes in fire severity affect landscape forest composition? • Simulation experiments: – ALFRESCO (Alaska frame-based ecosystem model) – 2004 Boundary Fire – Examine potential patterns of forest recovery 2004 Boundary Fire • Start with prefire vegetation white spruce deciduous black spruce 2004 Boundary Fire • Start with pre-fire vegetation high crown low surface • Add on fire severity (NBR) • Include scenarios for low or high surface severity moderate or low crown severity high crown high surface 2004 Boundary Fire • Start with pre-fire vegetation high crown low surface • Add on fire severity (NBR) • Include scenarios for low or high surface severity moderate or low crown severity high crown high surface 2004 Boundary Fire • Start with pre-fire vegetation • Add on fire severity (NBR) • Include scenarios for low or high surface severity • Model black spruce recovery trajectories – extended deciduous phase under high surface severity 6 8 10 0 log(fire.hss.severe.100R[, 1, 1]) 2 4 6 8 10 8 10 70 0 30 12 0 log(fire.lss.severe.100R[, 1, 1]) 2 4 6 8 10 12 0 log(fire.lss.severe.100R[, 2, 1]) 2 4 6 8 10 12 log(fire.mix.severe.100R[, 1, 1]) 2 4 6 8 12 4 6 8 10 12 10 12 log(fire.mix.severe.100R[, 2, 1]) 40 0 Frequency 0 10 mix|t=100|sev 0 10 Frequency 10 20 Frequency 0 2 8 log(fire.lss.severe.100R[, 3, 1]) Scenario mix|t=50|sev 3: 50% High-low surface fire severity mix|t=75|sev 0 6 log(fire.hss.severe.100R[, 3, 1]) Frequency 0 4 lss|t=100|sev 50 12 2 lss|t=75|sev 0 20 Frequency 10 Frequency 0 2 6 log(fire.hss.severe.100R[, 2, 1]) Scenario lss|t=50|sev 2: Low surface fire severity 0 4 Frequency 15 30 0 12 80 4 hss|t=100|sev 100 years post-fire 40 2 hss|t=75|sev 75 years post-fire 0 0 Frequency 15 50 years post-fire 0 Frequency Scenariohss|t=50|sev 1: High surface fire severity 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 log(fire.mix.severe.100R[, 3, 1]) Boundary Fire Simulations • Possible to use real landscape and fire data to project future forest composition • Including variations in surface fire severity – Alters projections of future forest cover – Leads to vegetation effects on fire propagation – even in conservative scenarios • Can this knowledge be made useful to managers? Successional trajectories workbook • Aim: to predict potential changes in post-fire trajectories – Focused on black spruce forest – Integrates moisture and severity effects – Rapid assessment of post-fire stands – Identify conditions leading to change Subhygri c Very Considerable Moisture; saturated by with less than <5% standing water <10cm deep Mesic to subhygric Considerable moisture; depressions Subxeric to mesic Very noticable moisture; flat to gently sloping Subxeric Noticable moisture; welldrained slopes ridges Xeric Little moisture; stabilized sand dunes, dry ridge tops % Gravel of soil Moderate moisture; flat or shallow depressions Shallow permafrost Mesic Moist site with intact organic layer • Rapid assessment: – thick organics but good moisture – trees standing with cones intact • Predicted recruitment: – very little deciduous – low to high black spruce (depending on quality of organics) • Trajectory: open to closed black spruce Moist site with low residual organics • Rapid assessment: – shallow organics with good moisture – trees fallen (reduced seed dispersal) – deciduous seed source within 1-2 km • Predicted recruitment: – high deciduous – low to moderate black spruce • Trajectory: mixed deciduous – black spruce Well drained site with intact organics • Rapid assessment: – thick organics with low surface moisture – trees standing with cones intact – no deciduous seed source nearby • Predicted recruitment: – very little deciduous – moderate black spruce • Trajectory: open to intermediate black spruce Well-drained site with low organics • Rapid assessment: – shallow organics with low surface moisture – trees fallen – strong nearby deciduous seed source • Predicted recruitment: – dense deciduous – very low black spruce • Trajectory: deciduous forest Conditions leading to trajectory shifts • Substantial combustion of surface organic layers => exposed mineral soil – favors deciduous recruitment • Deep charring of cone balls or toppling of trees – reduces black spruce seed rain • Adjacent unburned stands of alternative species – provides strong propagule pressure