The Medical Home in Pediatric Practice

Download Report

Transcript The Medical Home in Pediatric Practice

The Medical Home in
Pediatric Practice
EMRs and Care Plans
Medical Home Conference
Washington State
May 30, 2007
A High-Performing System for
Well-Child Care:
A Vision for the Future*
‘…an ideal system would be characterized by:
• Advanced access to services
• Team-based care
• Individualized developmental and behavioral
screening
• Cultural beliefs and practices accommodated
• Care coordination through a medical home
• Knowledge transfer and electronic health records
• Health care financing
*Bergman D, Plsek P, Saunders M. CMWF
Report, October 2006.
In a nutshell, what is your vision of
an ideal system of well-child care?
David Bergman, M.D.
• First, we have to have some sense of biopsychosocial risk. A lot of
this can be determined at birth: Is the child born premature? Does
the baby have a congenital defect? Is the family situation chaotic?
These are all risk factors. We then have to assign the content of
care according to the level of risk. High-risk kids need more
visits with a different mix of health care professionals.
• In terms of financing, we need to align incentives to more
appropriately reimburse for kids with special health care
needs. This can be done through tiered capitation—defining kids
at a level of biopsychosocial risk and assigning a capitated rate.
• Leveraging new technologies is also key.
A High-Performing System for
Well-Child Care:
A Vision for the Future*
• Advanced access to services - Secure messaging
• Team-based care - Develop comprehensive plan,
including education and socialization
• Care coordination through a medical home
• Knowledge transfer and electronic health records
• Health care financing - Reimbursement for non-physician
members of health care teams (Care coordinators)
• Individualized developmental and behavioral screening
(Vanderbilt in EMR – MBCH, On-line form completion, e.g.
ASQ)
• Cultural beliefs and practices accommodated (Parent
information sheets, screening tools)
EMRs
• Scope:
– Practice-based
• Othello: Columbia Basin Health Association [CHARTLOGIC*],
• Spokane: Olson Pediatrics
– Hospital-based/System-based
• Mary Bridge - EPIC (with SmartSet subprogram – ADHD Module)
• Group Health Cooperative
– Community-wide
• Kittitas
• Whatcom
• Patient accessibility
–
–
–
–
PHRs - test results, visit summaries, input health information
Email communication
Information resources
Other
EMRs – Discussion Points
• Pediatric-specific record issues/CSHCNspecific record issues (Needs/hopes/problems)
– Provider viewpoint
• Individual patient
• Diagnosis specific management
– Family/Child viewpoint (?cultural, PHRs, email
interface, adult child with DD,etc.)
– Health plan issues
• ID CSHCN
• Data pulls for
– Patient care issues (often by diagnostic group)
– Contract/reimbursement documentation
Olson Pediatrics
•
•
•
•
•
•
Spokane Medical Community
One Pediatrician
Three Mid-level providers
Office Staff of 10 FTE’s
Approx. 9,000 patients
1212 CYSHCN
Data Collection
• Data person
• FACCT survey criteria – CSHCN
Screener (5 item, parent-survey
based tool)
• Excel spreadsheet/Access
• Disease-specific data collection
• Insurance plans
Diagnosis - CYSHCN
11%
1%
3%
24%
1%
1%
4%
2%
3%
2%
1%
3%
4%
40%
ADHD
Asthma
Asthma +
Autism
CF
Cleft Lip
CP
Depression
Devel. Delay
Diabetes
Downs
Seizures
Myleodysplasia
Other
Severity
8%
4%
15%
Severity
Severity
Severity
Severity
73%
1
2
3
4
Insurance Coverage
9%
24%
DSHS
Molina
PVT
PVT + Medicaid
26%
41%
Care Plans
• Who creates them? What do they look
like?
– Health plan
– PCP
– Family
•
•
•
•
What else is needed?
Sample forms
Leveraging personnel and time
(Coding and Reimbursement)
Care Plans
Examples:
– Jack Stephens
– Jean Popalisky
• Health plan
• Primary care office
– CCSN website – Family
– Notebook - other examples
• Resources:
– WA medical home site
– National medical home site
– HRTW site