OECD work on fossil fuel subsidies www.oecd.org/env/cc/econ Helen Mountford Acting Deputy Director OECD Environment Directorate 14 December 2009
Download ReportTranscript OECD work on fossil fuel subsidies www.oecd.org/env/cc/econ Helen Mountford Acting Deputy Director OECD Environment Directorate 14 December 2009
OECD work on fossil fuel subsidies www.oecd.org/env/cc/econ Helen Mountford Acting Deputy Director OECD Environment Directorate 14 December 2009 Removing energy subsidies can reduce GHG emissions by over 10% % deviation relative to Business as Usual Impact of energy subsidy removal on GHG emissions in 2050 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 -30 -35 -40 -45 World China India Oilexporting countries Russia Non-EU Eastern European countries Source: joint OECD-IEA analysis, cited in OECD (2009), Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action beyond 2010, based on IEA data on subsidies Greater GHG benefits if subsidy removal is combined with caps on emissions 15 2050 10 % deviation from baseline 5 0 -5 -10 -15 -20 -25 carbon leakage : 20% -30 -35 World EU27 plus EFTA Japan United States Canada Australia and New Zealand Brazil Rest of the World China India Oil-producing countries * Russia Rest of Annex I -40 Source: joint OECD-IEA analysis, cited in OECD (2009), Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action beyond 2010, based on IEA data on subsidies Unilateral removal of energy subsidies brings real income gains… % deviation relative to the baseline 2.5 2050 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Brazil Rest of the world China Oilproducing countries ** India Russia 0.0 Source: joint OECD-IEA analysis, cited in OECD (2009), Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action beyond 2010, based on IEA data on subsidies … but not everybody will gain from multilateral removal 4 2050 % deviation relative to the baseline 3 2 1 0 -1 -2 GDP -3 Income -4 -5 Rest of Annex I Oil-producing countries ** Russia Canada Australia and New Zealand WORLD Rest of the World United States Brazil China Japan EU27 plus EFTA India -9.3 -15.2 Source: joint OECD-IEA analysis, cited in OECD (2009), Economics of Climate Change Mitigation: Policies and Options for Global Action beyond 2010, based on IEA data on subsidies Conclusions & next steps Removing fossil fuel subsidies will: • Reduce GHG emissions • Reduce the costs of global mitigation action • Increase economic efficiency and, in most countries, real income Best to combine subsidy phase-out with: • Emission caps in developed countries (reduces carbon leakage) • Targeted measures to address social impacts Next steps in OECD work: • Methodology for estimating producer & consumer subsidies in developed countries • Analysis of GHG, economic, trade, & social impacts of subsidy phase-out • Advice & recommendations on how to implement phase-out in practice www.oecd.org/env/cc/econ