The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 3: Informed Consent Acknowledgements We thank the University of Texas at Austin for permission to adapt.
Download ReportTranscript The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 3: Informed Consent Acknowledgements We thank the University of Texas at Austin for permission to adapt.
The Goals and Principles of Human Participant Protection Part 3: Informed Consent Acknowledgements We thank the University of Texas at Austin for permission to adapt and use their IRB training materials. Much of the material in this presentation was taken from the Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45, part 46; Protection of Human Subjects. Other material came from the Food and Drug Administration Regulations, 21 CFR, parts 50 & 56. Objective The purpose of this presentation is to raise the level of understanding of all Tarleton State University faculty, students, and staff regarding the regulations governing research involving human subjects, and Enable them to apply these regulations to specific research studies. Informed Consent Informed consent is the voluntary consent of a person to participate in a study once they have had the study explained to them and they understand the following: Informed Consent Confidentiality procedures What to do in case of injury Possible conflict of interest Study purpose Study procedures Expected benefits Possible risks Withdrawal of consent Participation alternatives Contact telephone numbers Informed Consent: Documentation Informed consent must be documented before the person participates in any study protocol. Documentation of informed consent involves the person signing a formal consent form. The consent form should clearly explain: Study procedures Risks Benefits Contact information Withdrawal options and procedures Participants should always be given a copy of the consent form. Informed Consent The PROCEDURES section of the consent form must include: Identification of the methodology used. All steps involved in participation in the study. Informed Consent The RISKS section of the consent form must include: Psychological risks or discomforts Social risks Legal risks Financial risks Possible disclosure of confidential study data to persons outside the study Physical or medical risks Informed Consent The BENEFITS section of the consent form: May not list payment as a benefit May not overstate the benefits Due to the tenuous nature of research, benefits should be stated as ‘possible’ The phrase ‘will benefit’ should be avoided Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality Subjects should be told the extent to which their private, identifiable information will be kept in confidence and should be informed as to who will have access to their records. Be careful not to use the word ‘anonymous’ in place of ‘confidential’. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality Confidentiality refers to the treatment of information an individual has disclosed to the researcher in trust and with the expectation it will not be divulged without that individual’s permission in any manner inconsistent with the informed consent. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality In some studies keeping a participant’s identity confidential may be as or more important than keeping the data about that person confidential. For example, having one’s name linked to a study of pedophiles may be more damaging than the data itself. In cases such as this, any written record linking a particular person to the study, including a signed consent form, may create a threat to confidentiality. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality Current federal policy allows the IRB to waive the requirement for a researcher to obtain a signed consent form in cases where it will be the only record linking participants to the research and when a breech of confidentiality is the principal risk that may result from the research. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality When data is being collected dealing with sensitive issues the data may become of interest to law enforcement agencies. Judges are rarely responsive to a researcher’s claim that the information cannot be released due to a promise of confidentiality. More than one researcher has been jailed for refusal to comply with a subpoena. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality Federal law allows researchers to obtain a Certificate of Confidentiality prior to beginning the research. These certificates may create a measure of protection for the researcher who refuses to violate promises of confidentiality. Such certificates are not ‘iron clad’ and may not protect the researcher from certain inquiries, subpoenas, or open records requests. Informed Consent: Protecting Confidentiality In most research, confidentiality my be assured through routinely: Substituting codes for identifiers. Encrypting identifiable data. Removing face sheets containing identifiers such as names and addresses from survey instruments containing data. Properly disposing of computer sheets and other papers. Limiting access to identifiable data. Storing paper records in locked cabinets and/or providing security codes for computerized records. Educating the research team on the importance of confidentiality. Informed Consent: Privacy Private information is defined as any information about behavior occurring within a context in which an individual has a reasonable expectation that no observation or recording is taking place. It also includes information provided by someone for specific purposes with the expectation it will not be made public. The IRB reviews studies to ensure adequate privacy protections and to prevent invasions of privacy. Informed Consent: Privacy The informed consent process should disclose any risks to privacy and explain how the research team specifically plans to protect privacy. The best means of protecting privacy is by maintaining anonymous data collection. Informed Consent: Withdrawal From the Study Federal regulations require a clear statement in all consent forms: Participation in the study is voluntary Refusal to participate will not involve a penalty or loss of benefits Subjects may withdraw from the study at any time Informed Consent: New Findings Federal regulations require the inclusion of a separate statement regarding new information (for example, a change in the risk-benefit ratio or new alternatives to participation) that may affect a subject’s willingness to continue their participation. The subjects should be told they will be informed promptly of any new findings related to the study. Should new findings occur during the study, the IRB will advise the lead researcher whether subjects should be asked to sign a revised consent form. Informed Consent: Non-English Speaking Participants Non-English speaking participants must have informed consent information presented in a written language they can understand [-21 CFR 50.20-27]. IRB approved informed consent documents must be available in English and other languages as appropriate to the subject population(s). Informed Consent: Waiver of Consent A waiver of informed consent can be granted by the IRB if all of the following conditions are met: The research involves minimal risk A waiver will not adversely affect rights and welfare of subjects Research could not practicably be carried out without the waiver Subjects will be debriefed, when appropriate. Informed Consent: Written versus Oral For research purposes, oral consent is not the same as written consent and should not be regarded as such.