Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org Goals • Define the logic and core features of Check-in/Check-out (CICO) as a Tier II intervention.
Download ReportTranscript Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org Goals • Define the logic and core features of Check-in/Check-out (CICO) as a Tier II intervention.
Check-in/ Check-out with PB4L Schools Rob Horner University of Oregon www.pbis.org Goals • Define the logic and core features of Check-in/Check-out (CICO) as a Tier II intervention within the PB4L approach. • Provide empirical evidence supporting CICO, and practical examples from local schools. • Build an action plan for CICO implementation • Define the process for self-assessing CICO implementation CICO within PB4L • The basic logic of CICO is to build self-regulation o To teach a student how manage his/her own behavior o To teach a student how to get the support he/she needs from adults • CICO is highly efficient in use of staff time • All Tier II interventions are more effective, and more durable, if they are done with Tier I school-wide behavioral expectations as a foundation. Major Features of Targeted (Tier II) Interventions • • • • • • • Intervention is continuously available Rapid access to intervention (72 hr) Very low effort by teachers Consistent with school-wide expectations Implemented by all staff/faculty in a school Home/school linkage Flexible intervention based on assessment o Functional Assessment • Adequate resources (admin, team) o weekly meeting, plus 10 hours a week for coordination • Student chooses to participate • Continuous monitoring for decision-making Check-in Check-out Cycle Student Recommended for CICO CICO Plan Morning Check-In Class Check out Request for Assistance ODR Level Family or Student request CICO Coordinator Weekly CICO Behavior support team Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Teacher Checks Home Check-In Class Check in Afternoon Check-out Program Update EXIT Check-in Check-out Cycle Student Recommended for CICO CICO Plan Morning Check-In Class Check out Home Check-In Class Check in Afternoon Check-out Morning Check-In •Check student “status” •Review home card Weekly CICORpt •Provide Daily Progress Meeting •Greet and praise 9 Week Graph Sent TeacherChecks Teacher Program Checksgive card to teacher •Student Update •Teacher praise/ prime •Provide Daily Progress Rpt •Greet and praise •End of class feedbackEXIT Check-in Check-out Cycle Student Recommended for CICO Home Check CICO •Student give Plancard to parent Morning •Parent praise/ prime Check-In •No negatives •Parent signs Class Check out Teacher Checks Home Check-In Afternoon checkout •Review day •Retrieve card •Send copy to family •Record points in SWIS Weekly CICO Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Class Check in Afternoon Check-out Program Update EXIT Check-in Check-out Cycle Student Recommended for CICO Team Meeting CICO Planstudent progress Morning •Review Check-In •Adjust support plan if no Class improvement in two weeks Check out Teacher Home •Build self-management steps when Checks Check-In appropriate Class •Exit when appropriateCheck in Afternoon •Report to School-wide Team, Check-out Administration, Whole Faculty Weekly CICO Meeting 9 Week Graph Sent Program Update EXIT CICO Record Name: _______Darin_________________ 0 = Need work, 1 = “OK” 2 = Nice Job Safe Date: __March 2, _______ Responsible Respectful Total Check In 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 5 Before Recess 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 6 Before Lunch 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 6 After Recess 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 5 Check Out 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 6 Today’s goal Comments: 28 Today’s total points 28 HAWK Report Student ______________Teacher___________________ Date ________ 0 = Not Yet 1= Good 2= Excellent Be Safe Be Respectful Keep hands, feet, and objects to self Use kind words and actions Be Your Personal Best Follow directions Class 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Recess 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Lunch 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Recess 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Class 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Total Points = Points Possible = Today ______________% 50 Working in class 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Goal ______________% Teacher initials Daily Progress Report 1/5 Goals 2/6 3/7 HR 4/8 Be respectful 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Be responsible 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Keep Hand & Feet to Self 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Follow Directions 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 Be There – Be Ready 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 TOTAL POINTS 0 Why does CICO work? • Improved structure and predictability • Prompts are provided throughout the day for correct behavior. • System for linking student with at least one positive adult. • Student chooses to participate. • Student is “set up for success” • First contact each morning is positive. • “Blow-out” days are pre-empted. • First contact each class period (or activity period) is positive, and sets up successful behavioral momentum. • Increase in contingent feedback • Feedback occurs more often. • Feedback is tied to student behavior. • Inappropriate behavior is less likely to be ignored or rewarded. Why does CICO work? • Student recruits adult support o Student uses card to recruit adult attention. o Very low “effort” for teacher • Program can be applied in all school locations o Classroom, playground, cafeteria (anywhere there is a supervisor) • Elevated reward for appropriate behavior o Adult and peer attention delivered each target period o Adult attention (and tangible) delivered at end of day Why does CICO Work? • Linking behavior support and academic support o For academic-based, escape-maintained problem behavior incorporate academic support • Linking school and home support o Provide format for positive student/parent contact • Program is organized to morph into a selfmanagement system o Increased options for making choices o Increased ability to self-monitor performance/progress Getting CICO Started • Use the CICO Self-Assessment • Use the CICO Action Plan • Team o Recorder o Facilitator 39 Logistics for Setting up a CICO program • 1. Faculty and staff commitment Activity1: • Is problem behavior a major concern? • Are staff willing to commit min per day? a) 5All-Faculty Orientation to CICO • Is CICO a reasonable option for us? o o o o More than 5 students need extra support b) with Assessment of need (ODR rates, CICO is designed to work 10-12% of kids in a school CICO typically “works” (50%staff reduction) with 67% of students. assessment) CICO does NOT replace need for individualized supports. c) Team to manage CICO • 2. Team available / Coordinator available • Team leader d) CICO Team Lead • CICO coordinator (morning, afternoon) • Team (meets at least once every two weeks) e) CICO coordinator Logistics for Setting up a CICO program • 3. School-wide PBS in place Activity 2: • School-wide expectations defined and taught a) SWPBIS Tier I in place (TIC = 80%; • Reward system operating SET = 80/80) for problem behavior • Clear and consistent consequences b) Request for assistance process defined. • 4. Process for identifying a student who may be appropriate for CICO c) Criterion for CICO support defined. • Student is not responding to SWPBS expectations o Request for Assistance • Student finds adult attention rewarding • Student is NOT in crisis. • Example: > ODRs, Teacher nomination, Student/Parent nomination Logistics for Setting up a CICO program • 5. Daily CICO progress report card Activity 3: • Same expectations for all a) Daily Progress Report developed • Common schedule • All staff taught rules for accepting, completing and returning the card. b) Home report routine developed • 6. Home report processc) Define how families will be informed • Can be same as progress card of • Can be a unique reporting form process Logistics for Setting up a CICO program • 7. Trading menu • Reward for collecting and turning in daily progress card • Reward for meeting daily goal • Exchange system for points earned • 8. Collecting, summarizing and using data • Daily updates • Weekly review by team • Referral for individualized interventions. 28 P e r c e n t a g e o f P o in t s Daily Data Used for Decision Making Ryan's BEP Performance 2000-2001 100 80 60 40 20 0 03/07 03/08 03/09 03/12 Date 03/13 03/14 P e r c e n t a g e o f P o in t s Daily Data Used for Decision Making Rachelle's BEP Performance 2000-2001 100 80 60 40 20 0 02/05 02/08 02/13 Date 02/20 02/23 Check-in Check-out SWIS Check-in Check-out Embedded Within SWIS Decision-making • Is CICO being implemented? • CICO self-assessment checklist (80%) Activity 4: a) Rewards for CICO points defined • Who is receiving CICO support? and available • How many students/ % of student body (9-12%) • Which students b) Process for collecting, entering, • Is CICO working? summarizing and reporting data is • % of student on CICO with 80% points? defined. • Trends? • Who needs more support?c) When would a student be referred for more intense support? • Modification of CICO • Referral to Individual Student Supports Logistics for Setting up a CICO program Activity 5: a) Check-in location defined • 9. Morning Check-in Routine • Teaching students when, what, how • Teaching check-in coordinator • Assess • Reward • Set-up or Redirect b) Process for teaching students check-in routine defined c) Teacher Routine check-in/check-out routine • 10. Teacher Check-in/Check-out defined • Teach students when, when, how • Teaching staff/faculty • Reward d) Teacher check-in/check-out • Set-up for success, positive momentum • Evaluation presented to staff. routine Logistics for Setting up a CICO program Activity 6: • 11. Afternoon Check-out Routine a) End of day check-out routine, • Teach students when, where, how location, staff defined. • Teach CICO coordinator data collection, acknowledge success, encourage improvement. b) Family check/signature • Consider self-recording system for older students routine defined. • 12. Family Review Routine c) Procedure for family • Teach students when, where, how orientation to CICO • Teach family only to acknowledge success, sign defined. Logistics for Setting up a CICO program • 13. Team Meeting Decision Making a) b) • c) d) Activity 7: Sample of Decision o Reporting student Rules status a) Team meeting schedule defined for the o Process for adjusting when CICO is not successful current year. Stay as is: * < 6 weeks of success or upward trend b) Team meeting agenda defined (data Move to Self-management 14. Planning for success review, decision protocol) * > 6 weeks with 4 days per week of o Identifying success success. c) Decision-rules: o Fading support Move to more intense support • Stay as is Embedding self-management * o2 weeks without improvement • Move to self-management Graduate off CICO • Move to individual support. * 4-6 weeks of success on Self• Move off CICO management Logistics for Setting up a CICO program Activity 8: • 15. Planning for more intensive, individualized a) Define self-management process. support. o Functional behavioral assessment o Tier III support team • • Use card, but no teacher review No, card, but still check in b) Substitute teacher orientation • 16. Substitute Teacher routine materials o How to inform and orient new teachers c) Use of card in non-structured areas • 17. Playground, cafeteria, bus routines Empirical Support for Check-in/ Check-out The Effects of a Targeted Intervention to Reduce Problem Behaviors: Elementary School Implementation of Check-In/Check-Out Todd, A. W., Kaufman, A., Meyer, G., & Horner, R. H. (2008). The Effects of a Targeted Intervention to Reduce Problem Behaviors: Elementary School Implementation of Check-In/Check-Out. Journal of Positive Behavioral Interventions, 10(1), 46-55. 100 90 Baseline 80 70 Todd, Kauffman, Meyer & Horner Check-in Check-out Trevor 60 50 40 Peer Composite 30 20 Percentage of Intervals with Problem Behavior 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 100 90 80 Chad 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 100 90 Kendall 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 100 90 Eric 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Evaluation of a Targeted Intervention Within a School-Wide System of Behavior Support Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Evaluation of a targeted group intervention within a school-wide system of behavior support. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12(3), 225-240. The Importance of Functional Assessment in Targeted Interventions March, R. E., & Horner, R. H. (2002). Feasibility and contributions of functional behavioral assessment in schools. Journal for Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 158-170. • Leanne Hawken Video 5:30 Check-in/ Check-out Self-Assessment • Individually score the elements of the CICO SelfAssessment • In place; In progress; Not in place • As a team review your ratings, and agree on a single summary for the school • For elements not scored as “in place” define the actions that will move you toward implementation. Who will do what, when? • Define a schedule for meeting to review progress and implement your CICO plan. Summary • Targeted interventions o Highly Efficient, structured support • CICO is one option emphasizing self-regulation o Assess for whom it will work o Enlist whole faculty involvement • CICO will still need supplement from Tertiary, Function-based support system