ELEC 5770-001/6770-001 (Fall 2004) ELEC 7770-001 (Spring 2005) (Prof. A. D. Singh) Low-Power Design of CMOS Circuits Vishwani D.
Download ReportTranscript ELEC 5770-001/6770-001 (Fall 2004) ELEC 7770-001 (Spring 2005) (Prof. A. D. Singh) Low-Power Design of CMOS Circuits Vishwani D.
ELEC 5770-001/6770-001 (Fall 2004) ELEC 7770-001 (Spring 2005) (Prof. A. D. Singh) Low-Power Design of CMOS Circuits Vishwani D. Agrawal James J. Danaher Professor Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Auburn University http://www.eng.auburn.edu/~vagrawal [email protected] 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 1 Motivation • Low power applications – Remote systems (e.g., satellite) – Portable systems (e.g., mobile phone) • Methods of low power design – Reduced supply voltage – Adiabatic switching – Clock suppression – Logic design for reduced activity – Reduce Hazards (40% in arithmetic logic) – Software techniques • Reference: Chandrakasan and Brodersen 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 2 Low-Power Design • Design practices that reduce power consumption at least by one order of magnitude; in practice 50% reduction is often acceptable. • General topics – High-level and software techniques – Gate and circuit-level methods – Power estimation techniques – Test power 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 3 VLSI Chip Power Density Source: Intel Sun’s Surface Power Density (W/cm2) 10000 Rocket Nozzle 1000 Nuclear Reactor 100 8086 Hot Plate 10 4004 8008 8085 386 286 8080 1 1970 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 1980 P6 Pentium® 486 1990 Year 2000 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 2010 4 Specific Topics on Low-Power • • • • • Power dissipation in CMOS circuits Low-power CMOS technologies Dynamic reduction techniques Leakage power Power estimation 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 5 Components of Power • Dynamic – Signal transitions • Logic activity • Glitches – Short-circuit • Static – Leakage 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 6 Power of a Transition isc R VDD Power Vo Vi CL R = CLVDD2/2 + Psc Ground 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 7 Short Circuit Current, isc(t) VDD VDD - VTp Vi(t) Volt Vo(t) VTn 0 45μA iscmaxr isc(t) Amp 0 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 tB tE ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 1 Time (ns) 8 Peak Short Circuit Current • Increases with the size (or gain, β) of transistors • Decreases with load capacitance, CL • Largest when CL= 0 • Reference: M. A. Ortega and J. Figueras, “Short Circuit Power Modeling in Submicron CMOS,” PATMOS’96, Aug. 1996, pp. 147-166. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 9 Short-Circuit Energy per Transition • Escr=∫ tE tB VDD isc(t)dt = (tE – tB) IscmaxrVDD /2 • Escr = tr (VDD+ VTp-VTn) Iscmaxr /2 • Escf = tf (VDD+ VTp-VTn) Iscmaxf /2 • Escf = 0, when VDD = |VTp| + VTn 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 10 Short-Circuit Energy • Increases with rise and fall times of input • Decreases for larger output load capacitance • Decreases and eventually becomes zero when VDD is scaled down but the threshold voltages are not scaled down 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 11 Short-Circuit Power Calculation • Assume equal rise and fall times • Model input-output capacitive coupling (Miller capacitance) • Use a spice model for transistors – T. Sakurai and A. Newton, “Alpha-power Law MOSFET model and Its Application to a CMOS Inverter,” IEEE J. Solid State Circuits, vol. 25, April 1990, pp. 584-594. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 12 Psc vs. C 0.7μ CMOS 45% Psc/Ptotal 3ns 0% 35 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 Input rise time 0.5ns C (fF) ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 75 13 Technology Scaling • Scale down by factors of 2 and 4, i.e., model 0.7, 0.35 and 0.17 micron technologies • Constant electric field assumed • Capacitance scaled down by the technology scale down factor 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 14 Technology Scaling Results L=0.17μ, C=10fF Psc/Ptotal 70% L=0.35μ, C=20fF 10% L=0.7μ, C=40fF 0% 0.4 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 tr (ns) ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 1.6 15 Effects of Scaling Down • • • • 1-16% short-circuit power at 0.7 micron 4-37% at 0.35 micron 12-60% at 0.17 micron Reference: S. R. Vemuru and N. Steinberg, “Short Circuit Power Dissipation Estimation for CMOS Logic Gates,” IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems I, vol. 41, Nov. 1994, pp. 762-765. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 16 Summary: Short-Circuit Power • Short-circuit power is consumed by each transition (increases with input transition time). • Reduction requires that gate output transition should not be slower than the input transition (faster gates can consume more short-circuit power). • Scaling down of supply voltage with respect to threshold voltages reduces short-circuit power. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 17 Components of Power • Dynamic – Signal transitions • Logic activity • Glitches – Short-circuit • Static – Leakage 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 18 Leakage Power IG Ground VDD R n+ Isub IPT IGIDL 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power n+ ID 19 Leakage Current Components • Subthreshold conduction, Isub • Reverse bias pn junction conduction, ID • Gate induced drain leakage, IGIDL due to tunneling at the gate-drain overlap • Drain source punchthrough, IPT due to short channel and high drain-source voltage • Gate tunneling, IG through thin oxide 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 20 Subthreshold Current Isub = μ0 Cox (W/L) Vt2 exp{(VGS-VTH)/nVt } μ0: carrier surface mobility Cox: gate oxide capacitance per unit area L: channel length W: gate width Vt = kT/q: thermal voltage n: a technology parameter 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 21 IDS for Short Channel Device IDS = μ0 Cox (W/L) Vt2 exp{(VGS-VTH+ηVDS)/nVt} VDS = drain to source voltage η: a proportionality factor 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 22 Increased Subthreshold Leakage Scaled device Log Isub Ic 0 VTH’ VTH 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 Gate voltage ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 23 Summary: Leakage Power • Leakage power as a fraction of the total power increases as clock frequency drops. Turning supply off in unused parts can save power. • For a gate it is a small fraction of the total power; it can be significant for very large circuits. • Scaling down features requires lowering the threshold voltage, which increases leakage power; roughly doubles with each shrinking. • Multiple-threshold devices are used to reduce leakage power. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 24 Components of Power • Dynamic – Signal transitions • Logic activity • Glitches – Short-circuit • Static – Leakage 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 25 Power of a Transition isc R VDD Power Vo Vi CL R = CLVDD2/2 + Psc Ground 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 26 Dynamic Power • Each transition of a gate consumes CV2/2. • Methods of power saving: – Minimize load capacitances • Transistor sizing • Library-based gate selection – Reduce transitions • Logic design • Glitch reduction 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 27 Glitch Power Reduction • Design a digital circuit for minimum transient energy consumption by eliminating hazards 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 28 Theorem 1 • For correct operation with minimum energy consumption, a Boolean gate must produce no more than one event per transition 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 29 Theorem 2 • Given that events occur at the input of a gate (inertial delay = d ) at times t1 < . . . < tn , the number of events at the gate output cannot exceed tn – t1 min ( n , 1 + -------d ) tn - t1 t1 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 t2 t3 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power tn time 30 Minimum Transient Design • Minimum transient energy condition for a Boolean gate: | t i - tj | < d Where ti and tj are arrival times of input events and d is the inertial delay of gate 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 31 Balanced Delay Method • All input events arrive simultaneously • Overall circuit delay not increased • Delay buffers may have to be inserted 4? 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 1 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 1 1 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 32 Hazard Filter Method • Gate delay is made greater than maximum input path delay difference • No delay buffers needed (least transient energy) • Overall circuit delay may increase 2 1 1 1 1 1? 3? 1 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 1 1 1 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 2 33 Linear Program • Variables: gate and buffer delays • Objective: minimize number of buffers • Subject to: overall circuit delay • Subject to: minimum transient condition for multi-input gates • AMPL, MINOS 5.5 (Fourer, Gay and Kernighan) 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 34 Variables: Full Adder add1b 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 1 0 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 1 35 Objective Function • Ideal: minimize the number of non-zero delay buffers • Actual: sum of buffer delays 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 36 Specify Critical Path Delay 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 Sum of delays on each I/O path ≤ maxdel 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 37 Multi-Input Gate Condition d1 0 0 0 1 d d 1 0 0 1 0 1 d1 - d2 ≤ d d2 - d1 ≤ d 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power d d2 38 AMPL Solution: maxdel = 6 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 2 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 39 AMPL Solution: maxdel = 7 3 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 40 AMPL Solution: maxdel ≥ 11 5 1 1 1 2 3 1 3 4 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 41 Power Estimates for add1b Power* with respect to Ref. No. maxdel of Ref: model del. Ref: unit del. buf. Peak Ave. Peak Ave. 6 2 0.60 0.89 0.60 0.90 7 1 0.56 0.85 0.56 0.86 ≥11 0 0.52 0.80 0.52 0.81 * Hsiao et al., ICCAD-97 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 42 A Limitation • Constraints are written by path enumeration. • Since number of paths in a circuit can be exponential in circuit size, the formulation is infeasible for large circuits. • Example: c880 has 6.96M constraints. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 43 Timing Window • Define two timing window variables per gate output: – ti Earliest time of signal transition at gate i. – Ti Latest time of signal transition at gate i. t1, T1 . . . ti, Ti i tn, Tn Ref: T. Raja, Master’s Thesis, Rutgers Univ., 2002 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 44 Linear Program • Gate variables d4 . . . d12 • Buffer Variables d15 . . . d29 • Corresponding window variables t4 . . . t29 and T4 . . . T29. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 45 Multiple-Input Gate Constraints For Gate 7: T7 > T5 + d7; T7 > T6 + d7; 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 t7 < t 5 + d 7; t7 < t6 + d 7; ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power d7 > T7 - t7; 46 Single-Input Gate Constraints Buffer 19: T16 + d19 = T19 ; t16 + d19 = t19 ; 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 47 Overall Delay Constraints T11 < maxdelay T12 < maxdelay 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 48 Advantage of Timing Window • Path constraints (exponential in n): 2 × 2 × … 2 = 2n paths between I/O pair • A single variable specifies I/O delay. Total variables, O(n). • LP constraint set is linear in the size of circuit. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 49 Number of constraints Comparison of Constraints Number of gates in circuit 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 50 Results: 1-Bit Adder 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 51 Estimation of Power • Circuit is simulated by an event-driven simulator for both optimized and unoptimized gate delays. • All transitions at a gate are counted as Events[gate]. • Power consumed Events[gate] x # of fanouts. • Ref: “Effects of delay model on peak power estimation of VLSI circuits,” Hsiao, et al. (ICCAD`97). 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 52 Color codes for number of transitions Original 1-Bit Adder 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 53 Color codes for number of transitions Optimized 1-Bit Adder 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 54 1-Bit Adder Design Simulation over all possible vector transitions •Average power = optimized/unit delay = 244 / 308 = 0.792 •Peak power = optimized/unit delay = 6 / 10 = 0.60 Power Savings : Peak = 40 % Average = 21 % 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 55 Results: 4-Bit ALU maxdelay Buffers inserted 7 10 12 15 5 2 1 0 Power Savings : Peak = 33 %, Average = 21 % 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 56 Physical Design Gate Gate Gate l/w l/w l/w Gate l/w Gate delay modeled as a linear function of gate size, total load capacitance, and fanout gate sizes (Berkelaar and Jacobs, 1996). Layout circuit with some nominal gate sizes. Enter extracted routing delays in LP as constants and solve for gate delays. Change gate sizes as determined from a linear system of equations. Iterate if routing delays change. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 57 Physical Level Verification • Assumptions in the logic level power analysis – Leakage and short circuit power are a small portion of the entire power consumption of the circuit. – Area overhead is tolerable for the achieved power savings. – Glitches are a major portion of the power consumption of the chip. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 58 VDD Open at t = 0 Large C V Circuit Energy, E(t) Power Calculation in Spice Ground t 1 1 2 E(t) = -- C VDD - -- C V 2 ~ C VDD ( VDD - V ) 2 2 Ref.: M. Shoji, CMOS Digital Circuit Technology, Prentice Hall, 1988, p. 172. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 59 Power Dissipation of ALU4 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 60 Signal Amplitude, Volts F0 Output of ALU4 Original ALU, delay = 7 units (~3.5ns) 5 0 Minimum energy ALU, delay = 21 units (~10ns) 5 0 0 40 80 120 160 nanoseconds 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 61 Benchmark Circuits Circuit Maxdel. (gates) No. of Buffers C432 17 34 95 66 0.72 0.62 0.67 0.60 C880 24 48 62 34 0.68 0.68 0.54 0.52 C6288 47 94 294 120 0.40 0.36 0.36 0.34 c7552 43 86 366 111 0.38 0.36 0.34 0.32 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 Normalized Power Average Peak ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 62 Bufferless Design 1 2 3 5 4 d=2 1 2 3 7 d=1 Unoptimized Circuit d=1 d=1 d=2 5 4 d=1 1 2 3 6 4 7 d=1 d=2 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 d=2 d=1 Buffered optimization d=1 5 7 6 d=2 6 d=1 d=1 Bufferless optimization d=1 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 63 Buffer optimized Circuit Unoptimized Circuit time 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 nMOS optimized Circuit Example Circuit – Spectre Results time ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power time 64 Example Circuit – Energy Consumption 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 65 Example Circuit – Leakage Analysis 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 66 Physical Level Verification AMPL Delays Technology Mapping Transistor Sizes Create Cells using Prolific Standard Cell Library Standard Cell Place and Route No Routing Acceptable ? Yes Optimized Layout 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 Layout Extract Routing Capacitance Routing load Analog Power simulations Energy Consumption ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 67 Design of Benchmark C7552 c7552 Un-optimized Gate Count Transistor Count Critical Delay Area 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 = 3827 ≈ 40,000 = 2.15 ns = 710 x 710 um2 c7552 optimized Gate Count = 3828 Transistor Count ≈ 45,000 Critical Delay = 2.15 ns Area = 760 x 760 um2(1.14) ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 68 Instantaneous Power Savings Peak Power Savings = 68% 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 69 Average Energy Savings Average Energy Saving = 58% 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 70 Patents and Dissertations • Patents – – • V. D. Agrawal, “Low Power Circuits Through Hazard Pulse Suppression,” U.S. Patent 5,983,007, November 1999. T. Raja, V. D. Agrawal and M. L. Bushnell, “Variable Input Delay CMOS Logic and Its Application to Low Power Design,” to be submitted to USPTO through Rutgers Univ., May 2004. Dissertations – – – T. Raja, Minimum Dynamic Power Design of CMOS Circuits using a Reduced Constraint Set Linear Program, MS Thesis, Dept. of ECE, Rutgers University, May 2002. T. Raja, Minimum Dynamic Power CMOS Design with Variable Input Delay Logic , PhD Thesis, Dept. of ECE, Rutgers University, May 2004. S. Uppalapati, Low Power Design of Standard Cell Digital VLSI Circuits, MS. Thesis, Dept. of ECE, Rutgers University, October 2004. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 71 Papers • V. D. Agrawal, “Low-Power Design by Hazard Filtering,” Proc. 10th Int. Conf. VLSI Design, Jan. 1997, pp. 193-197. • V. D. Agrawal, M. L. Bushnell, G. Parthasarathy, and R. Ramadoss, “Digital Circuit Design for Minimum Transient Energy and a Linear Programming Method,” Proc. 12th Int. Conf. VLSI Design, Jan. 1999, pp. 434-439. • T. Raja, V. D. Agrawal, and M. L. Bushnell, “Minimum Dynamic Power CMOS Circuit Design by a Reduced Constraint Set Linear Program,” Proc. 16th Int. Conf. VLSI Design, Jan. 2003, pp. 527-532. • T. Raja, V. D. Agrawal, and M. L. Bushnell, “CMOS Circuit Design for Minimum Dynamic Power and Highest Speed,” Proc. 17th Int. Conf. VLSI Design, Jan. 2004, pp. 1035-1040. • T. Raja, V. D. Agrawal, and M. L. Bushnell, “Variable Input Delay CMOS Logic for Low Power Design,” Proc. 18th Int. Conf. VLSI Design, Jan. 2005, pp. 598-605. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 72 Other References • R. Fourer, D. M. Gay and B. W. Kernighan, AMPL: A Modeling Language for Mathematical Programming, South San Francisco: The Scientific Press, 1993. • M. Berkelaar and E. Jacobs, “Using Gate Sizing to Reduce Glitch Power,” Proc. ProRISC Workshop, Mierlo, The Netherlands, Nov. 1996, pp. 183-188. • M. Hsiao, E. M. Rudnick and J. H. Patel, “Effects of Delay Model in Peak Power Estimation of VLSI Circuits,” Proc. ICCAD, Nov. 1997, pp. 45-51. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 73 Books on Low-Power Design • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A. Chandrakasan and R. Brodersen, Low-Power Digital CMOS Design, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. A. Chandrakasan and R. Brodersen, Low-Power CMOS Design, New York: IEEE Press, 1998 L. Benini and G. De Micheli, Dynamic Power Management Design Techniques and CAD Tools, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. T. D. Burd and R. A. Brodersen, Energy Efficient Microprocessor Design, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002. M. S. Elrabaa, I. S. Abu-Khater and M. I. Elmasry, Advanced Low-Power Digital Circuit Techniques, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. R. Graybill and R. Melhem, Power Aware Computing, New York: Plenum Publishers, 2002. J. B. Kuo and J.-H. Lou, Low-Voltage CMOS VLSI Circuits, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1999. J. Monteiro and S. Devadas, Computer-Aided Design Techniques for Low Power Sequential Logic Circuits, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. W. Nebel and J. Mermet, Low Power Design in Deep Submicron Electronics, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1997. N. Nicolici and B. M. Al-Hashimi, Power-Constrained Testing of VLSI Circuits, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2003. J. M. Rabaey and M. Pedram, Low Power Design Methodologies, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996. K. Roy and S. C. Prasad, Low-Power CMOS VLSI Circuit Design, New York: Wiley-Interscience, 2000. E. Sánchez-Sinencio and A. G. Andreaou, Low-Voltage/Low-Power Integrated Circuits and Systems – Low-Voltage Mixed-Signal Circuits, New York: IEEE Press, 1999. W. A. Serdijn, Low-Voltage Low-Power Analog Integrated Circuits, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995. G. K. Yeap, Practical Low Power Digital VLSI Design, Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 74 Conclusion • Minimum dynamic power high speed circuits can be designed if gates with variable input delays are used. • It is possible to suppresses all glitches without any delay buffers. • Power is reduced without reduction in speed and with very little increase in area. • Linear program provides an effective design. Technique is scalable for large circuits. • Experimental result show average power savings up to 58% • Future directions: Reduction of leakage power. 9/30/04, 10/7/04, 1/20/05 ELEC 5770-001/6770-001/7770001, Guest Lecture, Low-Power 75