GMES/KOPERNIKUS Background, progress, opportunities, future options “An insider view” Jean-Paul Malingreau Head of Unit Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre European commission Brussels A reminder… In 1998… The Baveno initiative.
Download ReportTranscript GMES/KOPERNIKUS Background, progress, opportunities, future options “An insider view” Jean-Paul Malingreau Head of Unit Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre European commission Brussels A reminder… In 1998… The Baveno initiative.
Slide 1
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 2
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 3
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 4
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 5
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 6
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 7
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 8
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 9
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 10
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 11
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 12
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 13
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 14
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 15
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 16
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 17
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 18
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 19
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 20
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 21
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 22
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 23
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 24
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 25
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 26
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 27
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 28
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 29
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 30
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 2
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 3
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 4
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 5
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 6
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 7
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 8
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 9
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 10
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 11
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 12
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 13
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 14
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 15
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 16
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 17
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 18
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 19
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 20
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 21
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 22
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 23
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 24
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 25
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 26
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 27
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 28
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 29
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30
Slide 30
GMES/KOPERNIKUS
Background, progress, opportunities, future
options
“An insider view”
Jean-Paul Malingreau
Head of Unit
Work Programme of the Joint Research Centre
European commission
Brussels
1
A reminder…
In 1998…
The Baveno initiative was launched for 2 key reasons:
•
put into motion a user driven process for developing
further the use of remote sensing from space
•
help Agencies, Stakeholders, Industry and SMEs
Key actors were:
the European Commission – mainly DG JRC and RTD
Space Agencies i.e. ESA,BNSC, ASI, and
International Organisations i.e. EUMETSAT, EARSC
In 2001…
The Baveno initiative became GMES with a clear mandate to:
•
develop the Community effort
•
assess requirements and have them drive the technology
•
identify a possible European architecture
•
maintain the dialogue between all actors
2
In a 2001 Resolution the EU Council,
“urges the Commission to start, in close coordination with the ESA,
the initial period of GMES,….STRESSES the importance of the
initial period in preparing the next phase of GMES, aimed
at
achieving by 2008 an operational and autonomous
European capability for global monitoring for
environment and security…..”
3
“We must aim to become a global civil power at
the service of sustainable global development.
After all, only by ensuring sustainable global
development can Europe guarantee its own
strategic security”.
R. Prodi, European Parliament, February 2000
4
2008 Copernican ® evolution
GMES 1999-08
KOPERNIKUS
2008 +
5
GMES Higher order objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
6
KOPERNIKUS Higher objectives
To develop/maintain a data gathering and information system to
support the sustainable management of our environment and
our resources at the EU and global levels.
(By extension develop applications to a broader range of EU
policies)
Setting up of European capacity to independently acquire
information that is necessary to secure Europe’s vital interests and
for Europe to play an active role globally
(questions of autonomy, independence,”non-dependence”)
7
Incidentally, the GMES will
-Help space programs to hook on mid to long term
community objectives (re: EU Space Policy)
-Provide fertile grounds for innovation and new
initiatives, especially when combined with
capacities provided by telecom and
navigation/positioning
-Contribute significantly to “knowledge society”.
8
-Stimulate the activities of value added industry
-Provide more material for research in the “nature
of things”
-Link satellite observations, functioning models
and ground data measurements
9
It was/is expected that GMES/KOPERNIKUS satisfies the
user’s requirements for
-MONITORING : securing an observation service along the
frequency, resolution, spectral characteristics… required by
the particular application
-DETECTION : securing a capacity to detect, interpret and
assess events of significance in the area of concern
-VERIFICATION : securing system of such quality that it can
be used to guarantee (or otherwise) the application of public
policies
(compliance regimes, mutually assured observation,
contractual situations, emergencies, etc..)
10
KOPERNIKUS bonuses
Promoting novel approaches to generate knowledge
-Global governance based on awareness and facts
-Making information available to all – ambient information
-From NIMBY! to WIMBY?
(or from Not In My Back Yard! to What’s In My Back Yard? )
-Added capacity to make sense of events
-Enhancing forecasting (development of spatial models)
-Adding to security technologies
11
KOPERNIKUS and European
“independence”, “autonomy”, “non-dependence”
“…European autonomy for Kopernikus services is
essential….”- Kopernikus draft Communication 2008
“The European citizens are increasingly dependent upon
space systems but these systems are themselves not
independent from non-European technologies …” –
Seminar on “Critical Space Technologies in Europe”Brussels 09/08
12
Selective autonomoy only can be considered
It requires:
-A political decision on what is essential to know
independently of others (e.g world food supply in 2014?)
-A political decision on what will be shared with others for
example in the context of GEO (e.g. cartographic data base)
-An assessment of what will be needed to maintain
competitive advantage of Europe in international
negotiations (e.g climate change in post-post-Kyoto)strategic posturing (!)
13
Selective autonomoy (cont’d)
- An evaluation of what it will take to address “mutual
verification” (e.g geographical position of critical
installations)
- Setting up Europe as a champion of “positive surveillance”
for global stewardship
- The technological capabilities to assume those choices
(real politik!)
Note: The above political debate has yet to start !
14
Main areas of relevance (classical; innovation opportunities)
Core service 1a: land monitoring service- EUROPE
-Basic land cover mapping “à la Corine”
-Regular update of land cover change at different scales
--thematic applications to agriculture, forestry, soils,
urbanisation, infrastructure, transport, ..
15
Core service 1b: land – World
-Global land cover mapping (see GlobCover2000 and much
improved GlobeCover2006) – see site Medias
-Global land use and changes – yearly/5yr update or
automatic Delta detection
-Forest monitoring : watching the disappearance of tropical
rainforest, assessing aforestation.deforestation
-Analyses addressing hot spots, infringement, risks,
-WIMBY on line with regular updating
16
Core service 1b: land – World Cont’d
-Detection of hot spots of relevance for development,
agriculture production, investments, markets etc…
-Carbon balance: carbon fluxes in the biosphere
-Land degradation world wide
-Addressing risk mapping, stand-by cartographic material in
case of emergencies etc..
-Monitoring food production world wide (food security)
-The State of the World Resources – strategic options, alarm
17
Soya bean agriculture –biofuels-feedstock-tropical
deforestation-Matto Grosso. Meris August 22.08
18
-GMES/KOPERNIKUS Atmosphere services
-Intense R&D on detecting atmospheric components
from space and addressing local air quality issues
-Potential is seen in linking air quality ground
monitoring systems and modelling
-Can impact on quality of life, individual decision
making process, life style.
19
Highlight TRAENVIA
Real-world CO2 emissions from a loaded truck driving from Maribor
to Barcelona. For comparison: new passenger cars emit 160-180 g/km
CO2 (g/km)
20
Core service : Emergency Response
This requires the capacity to bring the relevant data/information
to those directly involved in reacting to crises, providing
immediate assistance, assessing the damages.
- cartographic support (support to rapid response)
- event monitoring (continuous watch)
- assessment of impacts (details are usually needed)
21
Core service : Emergency Response (Cont’d)
Challenges are
- responsiveness to unexpected events
- availability of data at right resolution
- speed of delivery under adequate format
- validation, trust, reliability
In the long term Europe must address the “anywhere,
anytime” capacity issue.
22
Disaster Risk Management Cycle
23
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
Reminder: Kopernikus construction
Satellites (other technologies)
Users demand/public
response
feeding core services
stimulating user’s services
All embedded in a multilayer governance scheme
24
Is the GMES/Kopernikus model already obsolete…?
New model ?
profit
Satellites– (public service/market driven)
(feeding core services)
internet
stimulating applications via
“googelisation”,mash-ups*,mass
use, digital earth
Governance scheme is only “facilitator of innovation”
* ex: links with :air quality “on line”, security services, GPS
etc..
25
La Guardia di Finanza sta indagando !!!.
Consultando Google Earth, un anonimo internauta ha scoperto un'enorme macchia intorno
a una nave. a largo di Montalto di Castro, nel Lazio. Ha così scoperto un mercantile che
stava scaricando in mare, creando una chiazza di probabile origine oleosa.
La Repubblica, 23.09.2008
http://www.repubblica.it/2006/12/gallerie/ambiente/nave-scarica/1.html
Leçon - Insegnamento
-Tous gendarmes – tutti carabinieri?
-Tous gardiens du phare – tutti guardiani del faro?
-Tous responsables de la terre? – tutti custodi della
terra?
-Other technological “signals”
* CNES e-Corce : globally interconnected web-systems will
channel data from constellation of very high resolution
satellites directly to “consumer”;
new services ( yet to be set up ) addressing individual
/collective interests will act as leverage for “massive
demand for earth observation data”.
* European space policy has so far not given rise to public
investments in VHR satellite data and their open use in the
public domain (re Sentinel program). This void is being filled
by private sector.
28
Concluding remarks
GMES/Kopernikus
-
has been an engine of change in European space
landscape
-
will represent the main European public
effort in EO for the decade to come
-
offers numerous opportunities for
applications, innovations
-
will provide key geo data/information asset for
the conduct of EU public policy
29
Concluding remarks
Technology changes rapidly
New operational models already appear on the horizon
Earth observation seems to have been caught unaware of
those developments
Europe needs to better exploit such opportunities
Innovation (often using unintended exploitation of
technological offer) is the key
Public authorities have to create the necessary conditions
for this to happen (infrastructure, risk taking,
education,support)
30