UPA Package 1, Module 3 POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION 1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation Objective Objective • enable the students to discuss and analyse.
Download ReportTranscript UPA Package 1, Module 3 POVERTY ALLEVIATION PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION 1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation Objective Objective • enable the students to discuss and analyse.
Slide 1
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 2
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 3
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 4
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 5
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 2
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 3
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 4
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5
Slide 5
UPA Package 1, Module 3
POVERTY ALLEVIATION
PROJECT MONITORING
AND EVALUATION
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
1
Objective
Objective
• enable the students to
discuss and analyse the concepts and procedures of
monitoring and evaluating poverty alleviation
projects
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
2
Monitoring and Evaluation
• “Project evaluation”: attempt to assess the results of
an activity, as a function of the results, of the means
employed to achieve them
• “effectiveness” refers to results, meeting objectives
• “efficiency” refers to “means;” mobilization and
organization of resources. (capital-output ratios,
output per working hour)
• “Monitoring”: make regular observations of project
status, through reports and inspections,
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
3
Ex Post Evaluation
• Ex post evaluation: retrospective in focus; takes
place after project completion
• Ascertain reasons for project success or failure
• Identify features for replication and pitfalls to avoid
• Inform public manager and policy-makers of
effectiveness and efficiency of a project
• Determine impact of project on target group and the
environment
• Review of each phase to determine contribution to
project
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
4
Follow-Up
Additional related activities as a result of an evaluation
may have to be carried out for a project to fully
achieve its objectives.
Another activity as a result of the evaluation:
refinement of policy and process
policy makers and public managers need to
refine policies, plans and procedures based on each
completed project.
refinement of policies and plans: to keep pace
with changing situations with information provided
by project evaluation
1.4.3.2 Poverty Alleviation Project Monitoring and Evaluation
5