ANATOMY OF SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES THROUGH TIME {on the web at http://www.oregonstate.edu/instruct/st571/urquhart/anatomy/index.htm} by N.

Download Report

Transcript ANATOMY OF SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES THROUGH TIME {on the web at http://www.oregonstate.edu/instruct/st571/urquhart/anatomy/index.htm} by N.

Slide 1

ANATOMY OF SAMPLING STUDIES
OF

ECOLOGICAL RESPONSES THROUGH TIME
{on the web at http://www.oregonstate.edu/instruct/st571/urquhart/anatomy/index.htm}

by

N. Scott Urquhart
Oregon State University, USA
and

Anthony R. Olsen
US EPA

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 1


Slide 2

THE AUTHORS
 N. SCOTT URQUHART



Trained in Statistics
About 40 Years of Experience in Applications
 Worked With Ecologists in Desert, Arctic, Pacific Northwest
 Many Surveys with Rural Sociologists and Ag Economists
 Including 10 years with EPA’s Environmental Monitoring and
Assessment Program (EMAP)
 ACADEMIC And AGENCY; PLANT And ANIMAL

 ANTHONY (Tony) R. OLSEN



Trained in Statistics
30+ Years of Experience in Private and Government Applications
 Worked With Atmospheric Modelers And Air Pollution Field
Scientists
 Survey Experience With Health Professionals And Large-scale
National Resource Monitoring
 Now Statistical Lead with EPA’s EMAP

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 2


Slide 3

EVOLUTION OF THE “ANATOMY”
 The first step in the development of the
ANATOMY focused on experimental design
situations.
 Served as the structure for several part-semester
courses in advanced statistical methods at New
Mexico State University
 Eventually published as
 Urquhart, N. S. (1981). Anatomy of a study.
HortScience 16:621-627.

 Experience with EMAP led to its expansion to
surveys
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 3


Slide 4

TODAY’S CONTEXT for
SURVEYS
 “EMAP-type Situations”
EMAP = US EPA’S Environmental
Monitoring and Assessment Program
 Estimate Status, Changes ...
In Indicators
 Estimate Status, Changes, ...
In Extent
 Describe Associations ...

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 4


Slide 5

Objective #1: Estimate the status, changes and trends in
selected indicators of the condition of our Nation's
ecological resources on a regional scale
with known confidence
17.6%
± 10%
6.8%
± 6%

31.8%
± 8%

43.8%
± 12%

Hypereutrophic

(N=258)

Eutrophic
Mesotrophic
Oligotrophic
Source: EMAP Northeast
MSTS/2004

Lakes Study

ANATOMY # 5


Slide 6

Objective #2: Estimate the status, changes and trends
in the extent and geographic coverage of our Nation's
ecological resources on a regional scale with known
confidence
12000
Est.

Lake #
North
east

SE

Est.
Area

SE

10000
8000

11,455

1,251

4,030

814
6000

Adir

1,506

285

1,082

395
4000

NEU

C/L/P

5,689
4,280

1,206
1,048

2,099

758

850

254

2000
0
Northeast

Adir = Adirondacks;
NEU = New England Uplands;
MSTS/2004
C/L/P
= Coast & Lake Plains

Adir

NEU

C/L/P

Source: EMAP NortheastANATOMY
Lakes Study
#6


Slide 7

Objective #3: Describe associations
between indicators of anthropogenic stress
and indicators of condition
Fish Index of Biotic Integrity

Relative Ranking of Stressors

Good
Sedimentation

(Insufficient
Data)

17%

Riparian Habitat

24%

Mine Drainage

17%

31%

11%
10%

Tissue Contamination

Fair

Phosphorus

5%

Nitrogen

5%

Acid Mine Drainage
0%

Proportion of Stream Length

Source: EMAP Mid-Atlantic
MSTS/2004

14%

Acidic Deposition

36%

Poor

25%

Highlands Assessment

1%
10%

20%

30%

40%

% of Stream Length

ANATOMY # 7


Slide 8

WHO MUST COMMUNICATE







MSTS/2004

Ecologists & Other Biologists
Statisticians
Geographers
Geographic Information Specialists (GIS)
Information Managers
Quality Assurance Personnel
Managers, At Various Levels
ANATOMY # 8


Slide 9

“SAMPLING”
 A WORD OF MANY MEANINGS
 Statisticians Often Associate It With Survey
Sampling
 An Ecologist May Associate It with the Selection of
Local Sites or Material
 A Laboratory Scientist May Associate It With the
Selection Of Material to be Analyzed from
Material Supplied
 Common General Meaning, Varied Specific
Meanings
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 9


Slide 10

THE SPECIAL NEED


Communication Demands a Distinction
Between
 The

Local Process of Evaluating a Response,
and

 The Statistical Selection of a Sampling Unit,
 For example,
A LAKE
A POINT ON A STEAM

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 10


Slide 11

THE SPECIAL NEED - continued
 The Terms
 Response Design
 Sampling Design or Survey Design

 Can Be Used to Make this Distinction
 But a Complex Ecological Survey
Clearly Has More Parts Than These!
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 11


Slide 12

BASIC ROLES
 Survey Design Tells Us Where to Go to
Collect Sample Information or Material
 Response Design Tells Us What to Do
Once We Get There

 But These Two Components Exist in a
Broader Context

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 12


Slide 13

AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION
 Monitoring Strategy
 Conceptual
 Impacted by Objectives
 Addressable Without Regard to
the Inference Strategy

 Inference Strategy
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 13


Slide 14

AN IMPORTANT DISTINCTION
- continued



Monitoring Strategy
 ..........



Inference Strategy
 Places to Evaluate the Response – “the
WHERE”
 Relation Between Points Evaluated and
the Population
 IE, the Basis for Inference

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 14


Slide 15

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE


Monitoring Strategy
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design

 Response Design

These components
exist regardless
of the
inference strategy

Inference Strategy



 Survey Design
 Temporal Design

These components
exist for any
monitoring strategy

 Quality Assurance Design
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 15


Slide 16

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY





Universe Model
Statistical Population
Domain Design
Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 16


Slide 17

The MONITORING STRATEGY
 The MONITORING STRATEGY MUST
RESPOND TO
 Monitoring Objectives
 State of Knowledge in Ecological Sciences

 Characteristics of Ecological Resource(s)
of Interest
 EXPECTED FUNDING Compared To COSTS

 Operational Constraints

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 17


Slide 18

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 18


Slide 19

The UNIVERSE MODEL
 Reality (Universe): Ecological Entity Within
a Defined Geographic Area to Be Monitored
 Model of the Universe:
 Development of a Monitoring Approach
Requires Construction of a Model for the
Universe

 Elements Of The Universe Model: Set of
Entities Composing The Entire Universe
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 19


Slide 20

The UNIVERSE MODEL
 Population Description and Its Sampling
Require Definition of the “Units” in the
Population


Discrete Units:
 Lakes May Be Viewed This Way



Continuous Structure in Space of Some
Dimension:
 2-space: forests or agroecosystems
 1-space: Streams
 3-space: Ground Water

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 20


Slide 21

THE MODEL FOR STREAMS
Strahler Orders
Second
Order
First Orders
First Orders

First Orders
First Order

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 21


Slide 22

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 22


Slide 23

The STATISTICAL POPULATION
 The Collection of Units (as modeled) Over Some
Region of Definition
 Spatial
 Temporal

 SPATIAL And TEMPORAL
 Population Definition Could Include Features
Which Depend on Response Values

 EX: acid sensitive streams at upper elevations

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 23


Slide 24

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 24


Slide 25

The DOMAIN Design
 Specifies Subpopulations or “Domains” of
Special Interest
 May Specify Meaningful Comparisons
Between Domains
 Similar to Planned Comparisons in
Experimental Design Situations

 Domain Design May Depend on Response
Values
 Ex: Warm Versus Cold Water Lakes

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 25


Slide 26

The DOMAIN DESIGN - continued
 Specifies Subpopulations or

“Domains” of

Special Interest

 Determined From Defining Factors For
The Monitoring Activity
 Must Have Critical Connection To Clients
 Other Domains May Be Used For Analysis,
Without Having Been Used In Defining The
Monitoring Strategy
 EX: EMAP domains include ECOAREAS
and STANDARD FEDERAL REGIONS
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 26


Slide 27

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 27


Slide 28

The RESPONSE Design
 The Response Design Specifies


The Process Of Obtaining A Response
 At An Individual Element (Site)
 Of The Resource
 During A Single Monitoring Period



Response: What Will Be Determined
On An Element –
 Needs To Be Responsive to the Objectives of the
Monitoring Activity

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 28


Slide 29

The RESPONSE Design - continued


EMAP Responses Focus On Indicators of
 STRESS and
 Condition

 The Response Design Also Defines


Plot Design



Measurement Protocols
 Support Region – area around the site where material
is collected, or measurements are taken



Data Reduction Protocols



Calculation Of The Final Indicator Value for the
Element

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 29


Slide 30

The RESPONSE Design
- Continued
 For example, consider a response related to
macroinvertebrates in streams


MSTS/2004

RESPONSE = proportion EPT (This is the
proportion of collected macrobenthos
organisms, mainly insects, which fall in the
taxonomic classes of Ephemeroptera ,
Plecoptera , or Trichoptera. Low values
indicate polluted streams; high values indicate
rather pristine streams)
ANATOMY # 30


Slide 31

The RESPONSE Design - continued - 2
 ... response related to macrobenthos ...


The COLLECTION UNITS could be 10
30cm x 30cm areas, systematically organized, at
the stream site, sampled with a “Surber
sampler”



The EVALUATION UNIT could be a jar
containing the composite of all macroinvertebrate
organisms collected at the 10 collection sites, or



MSTS/2004

The EVALUATION UNIT also could be a jar
containing a 1/6 subsample of the composite of
macroinvertebrate organisms collected in the
10 collection units.
ANATOMY # 31


Slide 32

The RESPONSE Design - continued - 3
 ... response related to macrobenthos ...


The LABORATORY EVALUATION of the
material would consist of determining and
recording the taxa (like family, genus, or
species) of each organism in the evaluation
material



The RESPONSE would be determined by
computing the number of organisms in the
evaluation material belonging to the E, P, T
taxonomic classes, and dividing this by the
number of organisms classified.
ANATOMY # 32

MSTS/2004


Slide 33

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY





Universe Model
Statistical Population
Domain Design
Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 33


Slide 34

The INFERENCE STRATEGY


Is The Basis For Scientific Inference



Provides The Connection Between Objectives and the
Monitoring Strategy



Monitoring Strategy Usually Must Rely on Obtaining
Information on a Subset Of All Possible Elements in
the Universe



Specifies Which Elements of the Universe Will Have
Responses Determined on Them



Can Be Based On Either ... (continued )

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 34


Slide 35

The INFERENCE STRATEGY
(continued)

 ... Connection ...

 ... Subset ...
 ... Have Responses

 Can Be Based On Either


Judgment Selection Of Units
 Inferential Validity Rests on Knowledge Of Relation
Between the Universe And the Units Evaluated



Probability Selection Of Units
 (The Focus Here)

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 35


Slide 36

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 36


Slide 37

The SURVEY Design
 Probability Based Survey Designs Are
Considered Here
 May Be Somewhat Limited To Sedentary Resources

 Positive Features
(As An Observational Study)




MSTS/2004

Permit Clear Statistical Inference to
Well-Defined Populations
Measurements Often can be Made in Natural
Settings, Giving Rise to Greater Realism
Eventual Results

ANATOMY # 37


Slide 38

The SURVEY DESIGN - CONTINUED
 Disadvantages


Limited Control Over Values of Predictor
Variables



Restricts Causative Inference



Usually Will Produce Inaccessible Sampling
Points
 Good - For Inference
 Bad - For Logistics

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 38


Slide 39

The SURVEY DESIGN - CONTINUED
 Execution of a Sampling Plan Requires
 A Sampling Frame
 A way to identify elements in the population
 Usually somewhat inaccurate for ecological
resources
– Example selecting vegetation sites along the Colorado
River in the Grand Canyon

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 39


Slide 40

VIEW DOWN TRANSECT AT
MILE 12.3

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 40


Slide 41

CLIFF AT
MILE 135.2
(PARTIAL
HEIGHT)

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 41


Slide 42

The SURVEY DESIGN - CONTINUED
 Execution of a Sampling Plan Requires
 A Sampling Frame
 A way to identify elements in the population
 Usually somewhat inaccurate for ecological
resources
– Example selecting vegetation sites along the Colorado
River in the Grand Canyon

 Example: Frame for selecting field sites on streams
in the Western US

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 42


Slide 43

FRAME ERRORS
TO BE DOCUMENTED SHORTLY

 Water Body Size
 Flow Status -- re Perennial
 Identified As Perennial, but not correct
 Wastes Effort Of Field Crews

 Identified as Non-perennial, but Really is
Perennial
 Missed Resource
 Inaccurate Assessment

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 43


Slide 44

EMAP-West Stream/river Length
(km ± 95% CI)
from Peck, et al (2002) - EMAP symposium

Fram e S ource

R F 3 F ram e
S iz e

RF3 Coded
P e re n n ia l

6 5 6 ,7 0 6

(P e re n n ia l S u rve y )

RF3 Coded
N o n - p e re n n ia l

1 ,6 2 8 ,9 8 0

(N o n - p e re n n ia l S u rve y )

T o ta l
MSTS/2004

2 ,2 8 5 ,6 8 6

E va lu a te d

E va lu a te d

“P e re n n ia l” N o n - p e re n n ia l
5 0 1 ,0 6 0

1 2 8 ,3 2 8

 1 5 ,5 9 0

 1 2 ,7 0 9

1 1 2 ,5 3 7

1 ,4 6 9 ,2 7 7

 2 1 ,2 7 8

 6 3 ,5 1 5

6 1 3 ,5 9 7

1 ,5 9 7 ,6 0 5

 2 6 ,3 7 8

 6 4 ,7 7 4

ANATOMY # 44


Slide 45

EMAP-West Stream/river Length
(km ± 95% CI)
from Peck, et al (2002) - EMAP symposium

Fram e S ource

R F 3 F ram e
S iz e

RF3 Coded
P e re n n ia l

6 5 6 ,7 0 6

(P e re n n ia l S u rve y )

RF3 Coded
N o n - p e re n n ia l

1 ,6 2 8 ,9 8 0

(N o n - p e re n n ia l S u rve y )

T o ta l
MSTS/2004

2 ,2 8 5 ,6 8 6

E va lu a te d

E va lu a te d

“P e re n n ia l” N o n - p e re n n ia l
5 0 1 ,0 6 0

1 2 8 ,3 2 8

 1 5 ,5 9 0

 1 2 ,7 0 9

1 1 2 ,5 3 7

1 ,4 6 9 ,2 7 7

 2 1 ,2 7 8

 6 3 ,5 1 5

6 1 3 ,5 9 7

1 ,5 9 7 ,6 0 5

 2 6 ,3 7 8

 6 4 ,7 7 4

ANATOMY # 45


Slide 46

EMAP-West Stream/river Length
(km ± 95% CI)
from Peck, et al (2002) - EMAP symposium

Fram e S ource

R F 3 F ram e
S iz e

RF3 Coded
P e re n n ia l

6 5 6 ,7 0 6

(P e re n n ia l S u rve y )

RF3 Coded
N o n - p e re n n ia l

1 ,6 2 8 ,9 8 0

(N o n - p e re n n ia l S u rve y )

T o ta l
MSTS/2004

2 ,2 8 5 ,6 8 6

E va lu a te d

E va lu a te d

“P e re n n ia l” N o n - p e re n n ia l
5 0 1 ,0 6 0

1 2 8 ,3 2 8

 1 5 ,5 9 0

 1 2 ,7 0 9

1 1 2 ,5 3 7

1 ,4 6 9 ,2 7 7

 2 1 ,2 7 8

 6 3 ,5 1 5

6 1 3 ,5 9 7

1 ,5 9 7 ,6 0 5

 2 6 ,3 7 8

 6 4 ,7 7 4

ANATOMY # 46


Slide 47

The SURVEY DESIGN - CONTINUED
 Execution of a Sampling Plan Requires
 A Sampling Frame
 A way to identify elements in the population
 Usually somewhat inaccurate for ecological
resources
– Example selecting vegetation sites along the Colorado
River in the Grand Canyon

 Example: Frame for selecting field sites on streams
in the Western US
 May change over time
– As, for example, land use changes
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 47


Slide 48

SITE SELECTION
 Needs to Accommodate Realities Such As
 Frame Imperfection
 Frame Which Changes Over Time

 Sites nearly Uniform Over the Resource
 But with substantial randomization

 Supports Variable Probability of Selection

 Generalized Randomized Tessellation Stratified
Sampling = GRTS
 The topic of the next session
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 48


Slide 49

The EMAP SURVEY Design
 Assures Representation and Inference to





Populations
Adapted to Resource Characteristics
Emphasizes Spatial Allocation of Samples
Uses Two-phase Sampling; Phase I
Based on a Randomized Point Grid and
Associated Areas

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 49


Slide 50

EMAP EXAMPLE OF SELECTED
SITES
Mid-Appalachian Highlands Stream Pilot

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 50


Slide 51

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 51


Slide 52

EMAP EXAMPLE OF SELECTED
SITES
 Western Stream Pilot
 Non-perennial/perennial survey
 Survey of perennial streams

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 52


Slide 53

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 53


Slide 54

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 54


Slide 55

The TEMPORAL Design
 The TEMPORAL DESIGN specifies the
pattern of revisits to sites selected by the
Survey Design


Sampled population units are partitioned into
one (degenerate case) or more PANELS.



Each population unit in the same panel has the
same temporal pattern of revisits.



Panel definition could be probabilistic or
systematic

 Several temporal designs follow
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 55


Slide 56

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

ROTATING PANEL
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex : Y E A R S )
PA N EL

1

2

3

4

5

1

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

MSTS/2004

6

7

8

9

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 ...

X
X

ANATOMY # 56


Slide 57

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

ROTATING PANEL
 A ROTATING PANEL DESIGN IS THE TEMPORAL
DESIGN USED BY THE NATIONAL AGRICULTURAL
STATISTICAL SERVICE (US - “NASS”)
 THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED” IN THE
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
 IT IS FAIRLY WELL SUITED FOR ESTIMATION
“STATUS,” BUT NOT NEARLY PARTICULARLY
POWERFUL FOR DETECTING TREND OVER
INTERMEDIATE TIME SPANS

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 57


Slide 58

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
T IM E PE R IO D ( ex: Y E A R S )
PA N E L

1

1

X

2
3
4

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

X
X

X
X

X
X

10 11 12 13 ...

X
X

X

9

X
X

X

 THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “UNCONNECTED”
IN THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE. THIS
WAS
THE TEMPORAL DESIGN INITIALLY PRESCRIBED
FOR EMAP, BUT ...
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 58


Slide 59

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

AUGMENTED SERIALLY ALTERNATING
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex: Y E A R S )
PA N E L

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

0

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X X

1

X

2
3
4

X
X

X

X
X

X
X

X

X

X
X

X

10 11 12 13 ...

X
X

X

THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED”
IN THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 59


Slide 60

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

PARTIALLY AUGMENTED
SERIALLY ALTERNATING
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex: Y E A R S )
PA N E L

1

2

3

4

5

0

X

X

X

X

X

1

X

2
3
4

6

7

8

X
X

10 11 12 13 ...

X
X

X

9

X
X

X
X

X
X

X

THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED”
IN THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 60


Slide 61

TEMPORAL DESIGN:

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
WITH CONSECUTIVE YEAR REVISITS
T IM E PE R IO D ( ex: Y E A R S )
PA N E L

1

2

1

X

X

2
3
4

X

3

4

5

6

X

X

X
X

X
X
X X

7

8

9

10 11 12 13 ...

X

X

X
X

X
X
X

X
X
X

X

X
X

X

THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED” IN THE
EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
 BUT IT PROVIDES VISITS TO ONLY HALF AS MANY
SITES AS THE BASE SERIALLY ALTERNATING DESIGN
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 61


Slide 62

TEMPORAL DESIGN: SPLIT PANEL

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
PLUS SERIALLY ALTERNATING WITH CONSECUTIVE YEAR
REVISITS
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex : Y E A R S )
PA N EL

1

1

X

1A

X

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

X
X

2

X

2A

X

X

9
X

X

X

X
X

3

X

3A

X

X

4

X

4A

X

X
X

X
X

X
X
X

X

X

X
X

X
X

X
X

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 ...

X

X
X

X

X

X

THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED” IN THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 62


Slide 63

TEMPORAL DESIGN: SPLIT PANEL

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
PLUS SERIALLY ALTERNATING WITH WITHIN YEAR
AND CONSECUTIVE YEAR REVISITS
THE TEMPORAL DESIGN IN USE BY EMAP - SURFACE WATERS
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex: Y E A R S )
PANEL

1

1

X

1A

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

MSTS/2004

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

X

9

10

11

12

X

X

13

...

X

2

X

X

2A

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

3

X

X

X

3A

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

4

X

X

X

4A

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

X

ANATOMY # 63


Slide 64

THE REVISIT SPLIT PANEL OF THE
THE TEMPORAL DESIGN IN USE BY
EMAP - SURFACE WATERS
T IM E P E R IO D ( ex : Y E A R S )
PA N EL
1A
2A
3A
4A

MSTS/2004

1

2

X
X

X
X
X
X

3

4

5

6

X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X

7

9
X
X

X
X
X
X

X
X

8

1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 ...
X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X

X
X
X
X
X
X

X
X

X
X
X
X

X
X
ANATOMY # 64


Slide 65

TEMPORAL DESIGN: SPLIT PANEL

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
PLUS SERIALLY ALTERNATING WITH WITHIN YEAR
AND CONSECUTIVE YEAR REVISITS
THE TEMPORAL DESIGN IN USE BY EMAP - SURFACE WATERS

 THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED” IN
THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
 IT ALSO SUPPORTS ESTIMATION OF THE
SITE by TIME PERIOD (SITE by YEAR)
INTERACTION

 REVISITS TO ABOUT 10% OF SITES ALLOCATES
ABOUT 30% OF RESOURCES TO REVISITS

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 65


Slide 66

TEMPORAL DESIGN: SPLIT PANEL

SERIALLY ALTERNATING
PLUS SERIALLY ALTERNATING WITH WITHIN YEAR
AND CONSECUTIVE YEAR REVISITS
THE TEMPORAL DESIGN IN USE BY EMAP - SURFACE WATERS

 THIS TEMPORAL DESIGN IS “CONNECTED” IN
THE EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN SENSE
 IT ALSO SUPPORTS ESTIMATION OF THE SITE by
TIME PERIOD (SITE by YEAR) INTERACTION
 WE WILL RETURN TO THIS MATTER AFTER WE
CONSIDER THE QUALITY ASSURANCE DESIGN.

 REVISITS TO ABOUT 10% OF SITES ALLOCATES
ABOUT 30% OF RESOURCES TO REVISITS

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 66


Slide 67

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 Universe Model
 Statistical Population
 Domain Design
 Response Design

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 Survey Design
 Temporal Design
 Quality Assurance Design

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 67


Slide 68

QUALITY ASSURANCE DESIGN


Defines Those Activities Intended to Provide Data
of Known Quality:
 Blind duplicates
 Accepted chemical standards, Etc

 Can Provide Valid Estimates of the Variance of
Pure Measurement Error

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 68


Slide 69

RELEVANT COMPONENTS OF
VARIANCE FOR EMAP
 POPULATION = LAKE or STREAM, for example







YEAR YEAR by SITE CREW SHORT TERM TEMPORAL - index window PROTOCOL ERROR -

 MEASUREMENT ERROR -

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 69


Slide 70

RELEVANT COMPONENTS OF
VARIANCE FOR EMAP


WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO ESTIMATE THESE?

 WHICH ONES SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN
“RESIDUAL” VARIANCE
 WHICH TREND MUST OVERCOME TO BE
DEMONSTRATED?

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 70


Slide 71

COMPARISONS TO USUAL PERSPECTIVES
OF FINITE POPULATION SAMPLING

 UNIVERSE MODEL
(AS DISTINCT FROM THE UNIVERSE)



NOT RELEVANT



VIEWED AS A LIST

 POPULATION


MSTS/2004

VERY SIMILAR, OTHER THAN DIFFERENCES
IMPLICIT IN THE UNIVERSE MODEL

ANATOMY # 71


Slide 72

COMPARISONS TO USUAL PERSPECTIVES
OF FINITE POPULATION SAMPLING
continued
 DOMAIN DESIGN
 USUALLY NOT EXPLICITLY ACKNOWLEDGED,
BUT VIEWED AS PART OF THE DESIGN
PROCESS

 RESPONSE DESIGN



QUESTIONNAIRE CONSTRUCTION AND DESIGN
SOME ELEMENTS OF INTERVIEW PROTOCOLS

 SURVEY DESIGN

MSTS/2004

RELATIVELY SIMILAR
ANATOMY # 72


Slide 73

COMPARISONS TO USUAL PERSPECTIVES
OF FINITE POPULATION SAMPLING
continued - 2
 TEMPORAL DESIGN


PRESENT, BUT





MANY FINITE POPULATION SURVEYS ARE ONE-TIME
MANY LARGE SURVEYS HAVE A TEMPORAL
DIMENSION

CHANGE USUALLY IS OF FAR MORE INTEREST
THAN TREND
 SURVEY LITERATURE DISTINGUISHES
BETWEEN
 GROSS CHANGE - follows units across time
 NET CHANGE - recognizes that change can occur
MSTS/2004
ANATOMY # 73
in


Slide 74

COMPARISONS TO USUAL PERSPECTIVES
OF FINITE POPULATION SAMPLING
continued - 3
 QUALITY ASSURANCE DESIGN
 SURVEYS OF HUMANS (OR BUSINESSES, ETC)
HAVE A VERY SIMILAR INTENT, BUT DETAILS
DIFFER SUBSTANTIALLY
 SUPERVISION IN PHONE SURVEYS
 QUESTIONS TO CONFIRM RESPONDENT
CONSISTENCY
 REINTERVIEWS and SIMILAR
REEVALUATIONS

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 74


Slide 75

SAMPLING STUDIES OF ECOLOGICAL
RESPONSES THROUGH TIME HAVE
 MONITORING STRATEGY
 UNIVERSE MODEL
 STATISTICAL POPULATION
 DOMAIN DESIGN

 RESPONSE DESIGN

These components
exist regardless
of the
inference strategy

 INFERENCE STRATEGY
 SURVEY DESIGN
 TEMPORAL DESIGN

These components
exist for any
monitoring strategy

 QUALITY ASSURANCE DESIGN
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 75


Slide 76

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
 Links to various monitoring programs,
 To the program’s site
 One to its methods, and

 One to a current report.

 As links change in an unpredictable fashion,
 The “search words” should provide a quick path to the
current link.

 Speaker on this program representing that program
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 76


Slide 77

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 Adelaide Coastal Waters Study
 Program site:
http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/epa/acws.html
http://www.clw.csiro.au/acws/ (more technical of the two)

 Current Report:
http://www.environment.sa.gov.au/epa/pdfs/acwsnewsno5.pdf

 Methods:
http://www.clw.csiro.au/acws/IS1.html
 Search words: adelaide coastal waters study; acws au
 Speaker: David Fox, University of Adelaide

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 77


Slide 78

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 Alberta Biodiversity Monitoring Program (ABMP)
 Program site:
http://www.abmp.arc.ab.ca/

 Current Report:
http://www.abmp.arc.ab.ca/AnnualReport2003.pd

f

 Methods:
http://www.abmp.arc.ab.ca/ScienceProtocols.htm

 Search words: alberta biodiversity monitoring
program; abmp ca
 Speaker: None, unfortunately
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 78


Slide 79

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Program (EMAP)
 Program site:
http://www.epa.gov/emap/

 Current Report:
http://www.epa.gov/maia/html/maha.html

 Methods:
http://www.epa.gov/emap/html/pubs/docs/groupdocs/
surfwatr/field/ws_abs.html

 Search words: epa environmental monitoring assessment
program; emap epa

 Speaker here: Tony Olsen
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 79


Slide 80

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA)
 Program site:

http://fia.fs.fed.us/

 Current Report:
http://www.fs.fed.us/research/sustain/
(for example)

 Methods:
http://fia.fs.fed.us/FIAProgramInformation.htm
(accessible at this link)

 Search words: forest inventory analysis; FIA USDA
 Speaker here: Mike Williams
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 80


Slide 81

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 National Agricultural Statistical Service
(NASS)
 Program site:

http://www.usda.gov/nass/

 Current Reports:
http://www.usda.gov/nass/pubs/catalog2004.pdf


Research:
http://www.nass.usda.gov/research/SERS.htm

 Search words: national agricultural statistical service;
nass

 Speaker here: Carol House
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 81


Slide 82

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 National Park Inventory and Monitoring Program
 Program site:
http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/index.htm

 Current Reports:
http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/reports.htm

 Methods:
http://science.nature.nps.gov/im/standards.htm

 Search words: national park monitoring natural
resources; nps im
 Speaker here: Steve Fancy
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 82


Slide 83

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 National Resources Inventory( NRI)
 Program site:
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/NRI/
 Current Report:
http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/land/nri02/
 Methods:
http://www.statlab.iastate.edu/survey/nri/#Nussera
ndGoebel
 Search words: national resources inventory;
web path: nrcs to technical to NRI

 Speakers here: Wayne Fuller & Jeff Goebel
MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 83


Slide 84

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 National Wetlands Inventory (NWI)
 Program site:

http://wetlands.fws.gov/

 Current Report:
http://training.fws.gov/library/Pubs9/wetlands86
-97_highres.pdf
 Methods:

documented in above report

 Search words:

national wetlands inventory

 Speaker here: Tom Dahl

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 84


Slide 85

LINKS TO MONITORING
REPORTS/DOCUMENTATION
(Continued)

 LEARNING MATERIALS RELATED TO
ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING
 (From a course at Oregon State University)
 ST571
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/stat/urquhart/st5
71/index.htm

MSTS/2004

ANATOMY # 85