Washington State Center for Court Research What Exactly Is It That We Do? Improve Accountability and Effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with Analysis, Evaluation, and Operational Management.
Download ReportTranscript Washington State Center for Court Research What Exactly Is It That We Do? Improve Accountability and Effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with Analysis, Evaluation, and Operational Management.
Washington State Center for Court Research What Exactly Is It That We Do? Improve Accountability and Effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with Analysis, Evaluation, and Operational Management Tools Court Contact and Recidivism Database •1980 to now Dependency •Person, case, court, charge, case and charge outcome, dependency case processing, RCW, charge severity, DOB, race (ðnicity), sex, jurisdiction, LFO, warrants, referral agency, WSIPP law category •Need better data for detention, jail, prison, and felony sentencing •A person-level file Demographics Offender History (juvenile and adult) Status Offending (Becca) 473S32,81-7-01643-7 S 473S32,84-7-00092-1 S 473S32,87-7-00340-2 S 473J32,90-R-011723 J 473J32,90-R-011724 J 473S32,90-8-01135-2 S 473J32,90-R-011725 J 473S32,90-8-01378-9 S 473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D 473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D 473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D 473SPD,SPPCK0518416CN D 473SPD,SPPCK0528564CN D 473SPD,SPPCK0528564CN D 473SPM,SPPK00538599CN M 473SPM,SPPK00538443CN M 473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M 473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M 473SPM,SPPK00540706CN M 473SPM,SPPK00538868CN M 473SPM,SPPM00004730CN M 473SPM,SPPK00539973CN M 473SPM,SPPM00005963CN M 473SPM,SPPM00007906CN M 473SPM,SPPM00022662CN M 473SPM,SPPM00026589CN M 473SPD,SPPM00034833CN D 473SPD,SPPM00034833CN D 473SPM,SPPM00031846CN M 473SPM,SPPM00031846CN M 473SPM,SPPM00031847CN M 473SPM,SPPB00038596CN M 473SPM,SPPB00038687CN M 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S 473S32,05-1-00298-1 S DEP DEP DEP JO JO JO JO JO CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CN CR CR CR CR CR CR 10/22/1981 3/20/1984 10/1/1987 8/30/1990 10/17/1990 10/19/1990 12/17/1990 12/28/1990 8/19/1996 8/19/1996 8/19/1996 8/19/1996 8/19/1996 8/19/1996 5/30/1997 6/2/1997 6/3/1997 6/3/1997 6/3/1997 6/16/1997 2/2/1998 2/18/1998 3/27/1998 6/2/1998 11/2/1999 11/15/1999 8/25/2000 8/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 9/25/2000 11/15/2004 12/30/2004 1/28/2005 1/28/2005 1/28/2005 1/28/2005 1/28/2005 1/28/2005 *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY *SW 13.34.030 DEPENDENCY 8/28/1990*SW 9A.56.050 THEFT-3 10/16/1990*SW 9A.48.090(2)(A) MALICIOUS MISCHIEF-3 HARM>$50 10/19/1990*SW 9A.48.080(1)(A) MALIC MISCHIEF-2 PROP DMGE >$250 12/14/1990*SW 9A.36.041 ASSAULT-4 12/28/1990*SW 9A.36.041 ASSAULT 4TH DEGREE 8/17/1996*SW 66.44.270.2A MINOR POSS AND/OR CONSUMPTION 8/17/1996*SW 9A.76.020 OBSTRUCT LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER 8/17/1996*SW 9A.48.090 MALICIOUS MISCHIEF 3 DEGREE 8/17/1996*SW 66.44.100 OPEN OR CONSUME LIQUOR IN PUBLIC 8/17/1996*SW 9A.36.050 RECKLESS ENDANGERMENT 8/17/1996*SW 9A.52.080 CRIMINAL TRESPASS-2ND DEGREE 5/29/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND 5/31/1997SPM 10.12.050.A TRESPASS BUILDING 1ST 6/3/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND 6/3/1997SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA 6/3/1997SPM 10.12.050.A TRESPASS BUILDING 1ST 6/14/1997SPM 10.12.050.B TRESPASS PREMISES 2ND 1/31/1998SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA 2/17/1998*SW 9A.52.080 CRIMINAL TRESPASS-2ND DEGREE 3/27/1998SPM 10.11.010DV ASSAULT DOMESTIC VIOLENCE 6/1/1998SPM 10.15.110 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 10/28/1999SPM 10.10.100 UNLAWFUL BUS CONDUCT 11/13/1999SPM 10.10.025 PEDESTRIAN INTERFERENCE 8/24/2000*SW 9A.48.050 RECKLESS BURNING-2ND DEGREE 8/24/2000*SW 9A.84.030 DISORDERLY CONDUCT 9/22/2000SPM 10.15.100 POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA 9/22/2000SPM 10.15.110 POSSESSION OF DRUG PARAPHERNALIA 9/25/2000SPM 10.08.210.A FURNISH LIQUOR TO MINORS 11/13/2004*SW 10.99.050 NO CONTACT ORDER VIOLATION 12/29/2004SPM 10.09.060DV VIOL OF PROTECTION ORDER 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.401(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATION 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D) 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.401(1) CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE VIOLATION 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D) 1/23/2005*SW 69.50.4013(1) CONT SUB-POSSESS NO PRESCRIPTION 4/5/2004*SW 69.50.401(D) CONT SUBST VIOL - SECTION (D) the eggs and flour… Multisystem Involvement the cake Multisystem involvement by race and ethnicity, youth with offender referrals 2005 to 2009 100% CA accepted referral, truancy petition, & delinquency referral 90% CA accepted referral & delinquency referral 80% Truancy petition & delinquency referral 70% 60% 34% 50% 20% 15% 16% 40% 30% 26% 9% 13% 23% 17% 11% 16% 19% White Asian/ Pacific Islander 20% 10% 26% 16% 15% American Indian/ Alaska Native Black 0% Hispanic Race, CA, and Prior Offender Referrals 80% 70% Percent with Substantial CA History (either investigation or legal action) 70% 60% White Black 50% 55% 54% 48% 42% 40% 30% 24% 20% 10% 0% No Prior 1 Prior NCJJ Cross-Systems King County Study 2+ Priors 60% 50% 40% 18 month recidivism after first offender referral, by CA involvement 30% 20% 38% 38% Referral Only CA Investigation 53% 26% 10% 0% No CA History NCJJ Cross-Systems King County Study Legal Action/Placement Youth Referred on Offender Matters with Prior CPS Referral 47% – 62% 42% – 46% 17% – 41% CCRD also supports DMC analysis for juveniles and adults 2. Select calendar year 2010 4 .TYPE in shaded cell to change minimum values 10 [default is 10 observations; min of 1 is required] Summary: Relative Rate Index Compared with White Juveniles Reported data (unadjusted) Data displayed for Pierce Calendar year 2010 Black, nonHispanic Hispanic 2. Juvenile Arrests*** 2.79 ** 0.71 0.80 1.81 per 1,000 population 3. Refer to Juvenile Court 2.93 0.94 0.80 1.54 1.62 per 1,000 population 1.77 1.38 0.93 X 1.55 5. Cases diverted 0.56 0.94 1.17 0.66 0.72 per 100 referrals 6. Non-petitioned referrals 0.71 0.86 1.09 1.01 0.81 per 100 referrals 7. Petitioned referrals 1.52 1.26 0.83 0.98 1.34 per 100 referrals 8. Adjudicated cases 1.06 0.98 0.96 1.11 1.03 per 100 petitioned 9. Adjudicated cases with JRA dispositions 1.68 1.10 X X 1.61 per 100 adjudicated cases 10. Cases with local dispositions 1.52 1.26 0.83 0.98 1.34 per 100 referrals 11. Cases handled in adult court X X X X X per 100 referrals Yes Yes Yes Yes 4. Referrals filed with JDO codes B+ or above Group meets 1% threshold? Key: ** No data available for this stage X too few cases to calculate a reliable rate Bold : significant Asian or Pacific Islander, American Indian or Alaska non-Hispanic Native, non-Hispanic All Minorities Base for rates per 100 referrals Assessment Research Database – 2004 to now – All juveniles screened as moderate or high risk – record of treatment eligibility, participation, and completion – A person-level file Criminal History, School, Use of Free Time, Employment, Relationships, Family History, Current Living Arrangements, Alcohol and Drug Use, Mental Health, Attitudes/Behaviors, Aggression, Skills Evidence Based Programs Utilization Aggression Replacement Training # Eligible: # Referred: # Started: Functional Family Therapy MultiSystemic Therapy 3,055 2,347 1178 1,075(35%) 883(38%) 149(13%) 578(54%) 451(51%) 65 (44%) # of Courts (2010) (N=29) Number of Cases = 4,474 (N=24) (N=2) Proportion of Youth Successfully Completing EBP's by Fiscal Year, 2007-2010 % Successful Complete 100 80 WSART 60 COS 40 FFT FIT 20 MST 0 2007 2008 2009 2010 Washington State Aggression Replacement Training Among Offenders, 2004-2006 21% 32% Not Eligible Started ART Eligible For ART 68% Did Not Start 79% Felony Recidivism: 36.7% Felony Recidivism: 30.8% 31% Did Not Complete Completed ART 69% Felony Recidivism: 27.6% 13 Court Contact? Check Needs Assessment? Check Anything Else? Tools for QA Education Research Database SKYWARD STUDENT MANAGEMENT Assessments Attendance Census/Demographics Discipline Food Service Gradebooks Report Cards & Transcripts ERD & Fundamental Research ERD and the old Truancy Petition Process Washington Assessments of the Risks and Needs of Students WARNS Youth Survey 80-item self-report 10 – 20 minutes 5th grade reading-level (English) Needs Scales Paper & Online versions Real-time individual-level results FREE Other areas of assessment • AGGRESSION-DEFIANCE • Demographics • DEPRESSION-ANXIETY • School • SUBSTANCE ABUSE • Barriers to Attendance • PEER DEVIANCE • Family • FAMILY ENVIRONMENT • Traumatic Experiences • SCHOOL ENGAGEMENT • Criminal Justice Need Categories: Low Moderate High bullying, gang affiliation, smoking Goals • Develop a risk and needs assessment for schools, courts, and service providers: (1) identify youths at risk of truancy, delinquency, and dropping out of school (2) assess youth development in the educational, social, and psychological domains (3) brief and easy to administer, interpret (4) provide immediate, real-time scoring and reporting WARNS Versions Paper Online WARNS Reports: Student-identified Administrations Online: Individual WARNS Report Paper: Indiv. Needs Summaries Report Needs of Truant Kids… Percentage of Truant and Non-truant High School Students Scoring in the HIGH Needs Category % Non-truant Truant 50 47 40 40 39 34 30 32 30 20 18 10 18 14 12 15 6 0 AggressionDefiance DepressionAnxiety Substance Abuse Peer Deviance Family Environment School Engagement WARNS + School + Juvenile Court Information = Insight Percentage of Community Truancy Board Participants, Status Offenders, and Criminal Offenders Scoring in the HIGH Needs Category % CTB Status Off. Criminal Off. 60 54 50 49 47 53 52 49 40 37 39 37 30 31 20 10 21 16 23 25 19 12 12 12 0 AggressionDefiance DepressionAnxiety Substance Abuse Peer Deviance Family School Environment Engagement Washington State Center for Court Research accountability and effectiveness for Washington’s Courts with analysis, evaluation, and operational management tools Carl McCurley, Ph.D. Manager, Washington State Center for Court Research Administrative Office of the Courts 360-705-5312 [email protected] http://www.courts.wa.gov/wsccr/