A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl.

Download Report

Transcript A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl.

A Comparison of International Rating Tools
17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference
23 - 26 June 2010 Milano
Richard Reed
Sara Wilkinson
Anita Bilos
Karl Werner-Schulte
Deakin University
Australia
IRE|BS University Regensburg
Germany
Overview
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Overview
Challenges facing the rating of sustainable
buildings
Complex systems of sustainable rating tools
Comparison of sustainable rating tools
Current questions about rating tools
Where are rating tools heading?
2
3
4
5
Figure 1. Diversity of Climatic Zones
6
Figure 2. Complex System of International Rating Tools
Source: IRE|BS
7
Figure 3. Countries with Various Rating Tool Development Levels
Source: IRE|BS
8
Figure 4. Timeline of the Development of Rating Tools in Different Countries
Source: IRE|BS
9
Table 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools
BREEAM
1990
PASS/GOOD/VERY
GOOD/EXCELLENT/
OUTSTANDING
LEED
Green Star
1998
2003
Certified/Silver/Gold/Platinu One Star/Two Star/Three
m
Star/Four Star/Five Star/Six Star
CASBEE
2004
C/B-/B+/A/S
DGNB
2009
Gold, Silver, Bronze
Applied to each issue
category (consensus based
on scientific/open
consultation)
Applied to each issue category
(industry survey based)
Highly complex weighting
system applied at every
level
Applied to each issue
category
Information Gathering Design/management team
or assessor
All credits equally
weighted, although the
number of credits related
to each issue is a de facto
weighting
Design/management team
or Accredited Professional
Design team
Design/management team
Design/management team
or Accredited Professional
Third Party Valuation
BRE
N/A
GBCA (Green Building Council of
Australia) nominated assessors
Third Party Agencies e.g.
JSBC (Japan Sustainable
Building Consortium)
Federal Ministry of
Transport, Building, and
Urban Affairs (BMVBS)
Certification labelling
BRE
USGBC (United States
Green Buildings Council)
GBCA
JSBC
DGNB
Update Process
Governance
Annual
UK Accreditation Service
(UKAS)
Competent persons scheme
As required
USGBC
Annual
GBCA
As required
JSBC
As required
DGNB
Passed exam
Training scheme and exam
N/A
Training scheme and exam
Assessor/AP CPD
requirements
Compound Annual
Growth Rate
Assessment Collation
Fee*
Certification fee
Carry out at least one
assessment per year
93% (1998-2007)
No CPD requirements
N/A
86% (2002-2007)
Status renewed every three
years
Not available
Not available
No CPD requirements at this
moment
Not available
£2000-£10000 ($397119857)
£740-£1500 ($1469-2979)
Up to £37,770 ($75000)
£2015-4030 ($4002-8004)
Unknown
6.000 – 15.000 €
£2550-£7185 ($5063-14268)
Unknown
Unknown
Cost of credit appeals
Free
£1133-£11331 ($225022500)
£252 ($500)
£403 ($800)
Unknown
Unknown
Credit interpretation
requests
cost/allowance
Number of units
certified**
Domestic
Non-Domestic
Availability of
assessment
information
Free/unlimited number
£111 ($220) unlimited
number
Free/Maximum of two
Unknown
Unknown
110808
1823
50
23
109450
1358
Estimator tools are available
free of charge. Guidance is
currently only available to
people who attend the
training courses
540
1283
The tools are available free
of charge and technical
guidance is available for
£100 ($200)
N/A
50
The tools are available free of
charge and the technical manual
is available for £224 ($444)
N/A
23
The assessment tool and
guidance is available free of
charge in Japanese and
English.
19 certified, 28 precertification
All
Guidance and checklists are
only available for DGNB
member. The website with
general information is
available in English.
Launch Date
Ratings
Weightings
Required qualification
10
Table 2. Issue weighting comparison table
DGNB
Ecological Quality
22,5
Economical Quality
22,5
Socio-cultural and Functional
Quality
22,5
Technical Quality
22,5
Quality of process
10
Source: BRE2008 & DGNB
11
Current questions about rating tools…
12
Is a five star building with one rating
system directly comparable with a
building using another rating system?
13
14
Table 3. A Broad Comparison of Four Rating Tools
?
?
?
Gold
Silver
Bronze
DGNB
Source: BRE2008 modified by Authors
15
Which rating system is the most
popular or which tool is the
cheapest ?
16
Table 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools
BREEAM
1990
PASS/GOOD/VERY
GOOD/EXCELLENT/
OUTSTANDING
LEED
Green Star
1998
2003
Certified/Silver/Gold/Platinu One Star/Two Star/Three
m
Star/Four Star/Five Star/Six Star
CASBEE
2004
C/B-/B+/A/S
DGNB
2009
Gold, Silver, Bronze
Applied to each issue
category (consensus based
on scientific/open
consultation)
Applied to each issue category
(industry survey based)
Highly complex weighting
system applied at every
level
Applied to each issue
category
Information Gathering Design/management team
or assessor
All credits equally
weighted, although the
number of credits related
to each issue is a de facto
weighting
Design/management team
or Accredited Professional
Design team
Design/management team
Design/management team
or Accredited Professional
Third Party Valuation
BRE
N/A
GBCA (Green Building Council of
Australia) nominated assessors
Third Party Agencies e.g.
JSBC (Japan Sustainable
Building Consortium)
Federal Ministry of
Transport, Building, and
Urban Affairs (BMVBS)
Certification labelling
BRE
USGBC (United States
Green Buildings Council)
GBCA
JSBC
DGNB
Update Process
Governance
Annual
UK Accreditation Service
(UKAS)
Competent persons scheme
As required
USGBC
Annual
GBCA
As required
JSBC
As required
DGNB
Passed exam
Training scheme and exam
N/A
Training scheme and exam
Assessor/AP CPD
requirements
Compound Annual
Growth Rate
Assessment Collation
Fee*
Certification fee
Carry out at least one
assessment per year
93% (1998-2007)
No CPD requirements
N/A
86% (2002-2007)
Status renewed every three
years
Not available
Not available
No CPD requirements at this
moment
Not available
£2000-£10000 ($397119857)
£740-£1500 ($1469-2979)
Up to £37,770 ($75000)
£2015-4030 ($4002-8004)
Unknown
6.000 – 15.000 €
£2550-£7185 ($5063-14268)
Unknown
Unknown
Cost of credit appeals
Free
£1133-£11331 ($225022500)
£252 ($500)
£403 ($800)
Unknown
Unknown
Credit interpretation
requests
cost/allowance
Number of units
certified**
Domestic
Non-Domestic
Availability of
assessment
information
Free/unlimited number
£111 ($220) unlimited
number
Free/Maximum of two
Unknown
Unknown
110808
1823
50
23
109450
1358
Estimator tools are available
free of charge. Guidance is
currently only available to
people who attend the
training courses
540
1283
The tools are available free
of charge and technical
guidance is available for
£100 ($200)
N/A
50
The tools are available free of
charge and the technical manual
is available for £224 ($444)
N/A
23
The assessment tool and
guidance is available free of
charge in Japanese and
English.
19 certified, 28 precertification
All
Guidance and checklists are
only available for DGNB
member. The website with
general information is
available in English.
Launch Date
Ratings
Weightings
Required qualification
17
Where are rating tools heading ?
18
Figure 5. Timeline of the Development of Rating Tools in Different Countries
2015 2020 2025 2030
Source: IRE|BS
19
Conclusion and further research






International rating tools are very complex
Substantial differences between each rating tool
Little movement towards a generic rating tool
Stakeholders need to discuss current challenges
e.g. at conferences
Where are rating tools heading?
On-going research is required
20
A Comparison of International Rating Tools
17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference
23 - 26 June 2010 Milano
Richard Reed
Sara Wilkinson
Anita Bilos
Karl Werner-Schulte
Deakin University
Australia
IRE|BS University Regensburg
Germany