A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl.
Download ReportTranscript A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl.
A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl Werner-Schulte Deakin University Australia IRE|BS University Regensburg Germany Overview 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Overview Challenges facing the rating of sustainable buildings Complex systems of sustainable rating tools Comparison of sustainable rating tools Current questions about rating tools Where are rating tools heading? 2 3 4 5 Figure 1. Diversity of Climatic Zones 6 Figure 2. Complex System of International Rating Tools Source: IRE|BS 7 Figure 3. Countries with Various Rating Tool Development Levels Source: IRE|BS 8 Figure 4. Timeline of the Development of Rating Tools in Different Countries Source: IRE|BS 9 Table 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools BREEAM 1990 PASS/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT/ OUTSTANDING LEED Green Star 1998 2003 Certified/Silver/Gold/Platinu One Star/Two Star/Three m Star/Four Star/Five Star/Six Star CASBEE 2004 C/B-/B+/A/S DGNB 2009 Gold, Silver, Bronze Applied to each issue category (consensus based on scientific/open consultation) Applied to each issue category (industry survey based) Highly complex weighting system applied at every level Applied to each issue category Information Gathering Design/management team or assessor All credits equally weighted, although the number of credits related to each issue is a de facto weighting Design/management team or Accredited Professional Design team Design/management team Design/management team or Accredited Professional Third Party Valuation BRE N/A GBCA (Green Building Council of Australia) nominated assessors Third Party Agencies e.g. JSBC (Japan Sustainable Building Consortium) Federal Ministry of Transport, Building, and Urban Affairs (BMVBS) Certification labelling BRE USGBC (United States Green Buildings Council) GBCA JSBC DGNB Update Process Governance Annual UK Accreditation Service (UKAS) Competent persons scheme As required USGBC Annual GBCA As required JSBC As required DGNB Passed exam Training scheme and exam N/A Training scheme and exam Assessor/AP CPD requirements Compound Annual Growth Rate Assessment Collation Fee* Certification fee Carry out at least one assessment per year 93% (1998-2007) No CPD requirements N/A 86% (2002-2007) Status renewed every three years Not available Not available No CPD requirements at this moment Not available £2000-£10000 ($397119857) £740-£1500 ($1469-2979) Up to £37,770 ($75000) £2015-4030 ($4002-8004) Unknown 6.000 – 15.000 € £2550-£7185 ($5063-14268) Unknown Unknown Cost of credit appeals Free £1133-£11331 ($225022500) £252 ($500) £403 ($800) Unknown Unknown Credit interpretation requests cost/allowance Number of units certified** Domestic Non-Domestic Availability of assessment information Free/unlimited number £111 ($220) unlimited number Free/Maximum of two Unknown Unknown 110808 1823 50 23 109450 1358 Estimator tools are available free of charge. Guidance is currently only available to people who attend the training courses 540 1283 The tools are available free of charge and technical guidance is available for £100 ($200) N/A 50 The tools are available free of charge and the technical manual is available for £224 ($444) N/A 23 The assessment tool and guidance is available free of charge in Japanese and English. 19 certified, 28 precertification All Guidance and checklists are only available for DGNB member. The website with general information is available in English. Launch Date Ratings Weightings Required qualification 10 Table 2. Issue weighting comparison table DGNB Ecological Quality 22,5 Economical Quality 22,5 Socio-cultural and Functional Quality 22,5 Technical Quality 22,5 Quality of process 10 Source: BRE2008 & DGNB 11 Current questions about rating tools… 12 Is a five star building with one rating system directly comparable with a building using another rating system? 13 14 Table 3. A Broad Comparison of Four Rating Tools ? ? ? Gold Silver Bronze DGNB Source: BRE2008 modified by Authors 15 Which rating system is the most popular or which tool is the cheapest ? 16 Table 1. Complex System of International Rating Tools BREEAM 1990 PASS/GOOD/VERY GOOD/EXCELLENT/ OUTSTANDING LEED Green Star 1998 2003 Certified/Silver/Gold/Platinu One Star/Two Star/Three m Star/Four Star/Five Star/Six Star CASBEE 2004 C/B-/B+/A/S DGNB 2009 Gold, Silver, Bronze Applied to each issue category (consensus based on scientific/open consultation) Applied to each issue category (industry survey based) Highly complex weighting system applied at every level Applied to each issue category Information Gathering Design/management team or assessor All credits equally weighted, although the number of credits related to each issue is a de facto weighting Design/management team or Accredited Professional Design team Design/management team Design/management team or Accredited Professional Third Party Valuation BRE N/A GBCA (Green Building Council of Australia) nominated assessors Third Party Agencies e.g. JSBC (Japan Sustainable Building Consortium) Federal Ministry of Transport, Building, and Urban Affairs (BMVBS) Certification labelling BRE USGBC (United States Green Buildings Council) GBCA JSBC DGNB Update Process Governance Annual UK Accreditation Service (UKAS) Competent persons scheme As required USGBC Annual GBCA As required JSBC As required DGNB Passed exam Training scheme and exam N/A Training scheme and exam Assessor/AP CPD requirements Compound Annual Growth Rate Assessment Collation Fee* Certification fee Carry out at least one assessment per year 93% (1998-2007) No CPD requirements N/A 86% (2002-2007) Status renewed every three years Not available Not available No CPD requirements at this moment Not available £2000-£10000 ($397119857) £740-£1500 ($1469-2979) Up to £37,770 ($75000) £2015-4030 ($4002-8004) Unknown 6.000 – 15.000 € £2550-£7185 ($5063-14268) Unknown Unknown Cost of credit appeals Free £1133-£11331 ($225022500) £252 ($500) £403 ($800) Unknown Unknown Credit interpretation requests cost/allowance Number of units certified** Domestic Non-Domestic Availability of assessment information Free/unlimited number £111 ($220) unlimited number Free/Maximum of two Unknown Unknown 110808 1823 50 23 109450 1358 Estimator tools are available free of charge. Guidance is currently only available to people who attend the training courses 540 1283 The tools are available free of charge and technical guidance is available for £100 ($200) N/A 50 The tools are available free of charge and the technical manual is available for £224 ($444) N/A 23 The assessment tool and guidance is available free of charge in Japanese and English. 19 certified, 28 precertification All Guidance and checklists are only available for DGNB member. The website with general information is available in English. Launch Date Ratings Weightings Required qualification 17 Where are rating tools heading ? 18 Figure 5. Timeline of the Development of Rating Tools in Different Countries 2015 2020 2025 2030 Source: IRE|BS 19 Conclusion and further research International rating tools are very complex Substantial differences between each rating tool Little movement towards a generic rating tool Stakeholders need to discuss current challenges e.g. at conferences Where are rating tools heading? On-going research is required 20 A Comparison of International Rating Tools 17th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference 23 - 26 June 2010 Milano Richard Reed Sara Wilkinson Anita Bilos Karl Werner-Schulte Deakin University Australia IRE|BS University Regensburg Germany