Dissertation Locating EU’s anti-corruption policies in external relations: An organizational study of the anti-money laundering/combatting the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime in Georgia Rachel.

Download Report

Transcript Dissertation Locating EU’s anti-corruption policies in external relations: An organizational study of the anti-money laundering/combatting the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime in Georgia Rachel.

Dissertation
Locating EU’s anti-corruption policies in external relations: An
organizational study of the anti-money laundering/combatting
the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) regime in Georgia
Rachel Naylor
October 2010-May 2014
www.eurogaps.eu
0
EuroGaps
External Relations and External Perceptions in Sub-Saharan
Africa and the Black Sea Region
Department of Human Geography, Goethe UniversityFrankfurt am Main
www.eurogaps.eu
1
Four Cases Studies
www.eurogaps.eu
2
Partner Institutions
Black Sea Region: Ukraine and Georgia
Caucasus Research
Resource Center, Tbilisi
www.eurogaps.eu
3
Overview
Background
Aims and Objectives
Research Question
Conceptual Background
Research design
 Approach to field work
 Phases
Conclusion and Future Challenges
Bibliography
www.eurogaps.eu
4
European
Neighbourhood Policy
Priority area 2:
 business and investment climate
 fight against corruption
Further actions:
Fight against organised crime, trafficking in human beings, drugs
and money laundering
www.eurogaps.eu
5
Anti-Money Laundering and Combatting the Financing of Terrorism
(AML/CFT)
www.eurogaps.eu
6
Research Questions
Specifically, two dimensions will be addressed:
i) how AML is being mobilized, practiced, and evaluated within
the context of Georgia;
ii) how it is being constructed as a model from those networks of
transnational actors
www.eurogaps.eu
7
Governmentality
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern
society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
“How the regime has a technical or technological dimension
and analyses the characteristic techniques, instrumentalities
and mechanisms through which such practices operate, by
which they attempt to realize their goals , and through which
they have a range of effects” (Dean 1999: 22).
www.eurogaps.eu
8
EU Integration: Harmonization
Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological Society. London
and New York: Athlone Press.
“The process of standardization is intended as a process of
deterritorialisation in which the mobility of capital or labor is unimpeded
and across which uniform forms of social and environmental regulation are
possible. But it is also a process which simultaneously forms new zones of
control and regulation and creates new sites, object and forms of political
conflict” (84).
www.eurogaps.eu
9
Policy Mobility Paradigm
Peck J. and Theodore, N. 2010. “Mobilizing Policy: Models,
methods, and mutations” . Geoforum. 41(2), 169-174.
www.eurogaps.eu
10
Research Design
Phase 1
Document Analysis
Council of
Europe
Moneyval
GRECO
MOLI
International
Organizations
IMF
EBRD
World Bank
Basel Comm.
Wolfsberg Group
www.eurogaps.eu
EU
ENP
ENPI
ENP-AP
EaP
Black Sea
Synergy
Literature
and
Manuals
for
Experts
NGOs
Transparency
International
Transnational Crime
and Corruption
Center
Rankings Tables
Global Integrity
Work Bank
TI
Freedom House
Moneyval
IMF
11
11
Research Design – Trace the network
www.eurogaps.eu
12
Research Design
Phase 2
In-Depth,
Semi-Structured
Interviews
(40-50)
Government Officials (Georgian)
EU-Atlantic Integration Dept.
Georgian Financial Supervisory Agency
(GFSA)
Anti-Corruption Agencies
Private or Semi-Private
Regulated credit institutions
Banks
Microfinance
www.eurogaps.eu
Phase 1
Experts
UPGN (UK-Georgian Professional
Network
Consultants)
AML-Related
AYEG (Assoc. Of Young Economists in
Georgia)
OECD-ACN
FATF
Council of Europe
MOLI
GRECO
Moneyval
FSM (FIU)
IMOLIN
NGOs
Transparency InternationalGeorgia
TRACC
Synergy
13
Research Design
Phase 3
Phase 1
Phase 2
Ethnography
NGOs
TI
www.eurogaps.eu
Private actors
Banks
Micro-finance Institution
Moneyval
FIU
14
Conclusion and Future Challenges




Summary
Open Questions
Results?
EU Integration-lite for Georgia?
www.eurogaps.eu
15
Bibliography
Barry, A. 2001. Political Machines: Governing a Technological
Society. London and New York: Athlone Press.
Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: power and rule in modern
society. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Commission of the European Community. 2005. European
Neighborhood Action Plan Georgia.
http://ec.europa.eu/world/enp/pdf/action_plans/georgia_enp_
ap_final_en.pdf.
Peck J. and Theodore, N. 2010. “Mobilizing Policy: Models,
methods, and mutations”. Geoforum. 41(2), 169-174.
www.eurogaps.eu
16
Thank you
Rachel Naylor
[email protected]
June 2011
www.eurogaps.eu
17