Study of IUD insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women Dr Andrea Brockmeyer Dr Meera Kishen Abacus Clinics Liverpool, UK Background Increased interest in IUDs from nulliparous women
Download ReportTranscript Study of IUD insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women Dr Andrea Brockmeyer Dr Meera Kishen Abacus Clinics Liverpool, UK Background Increased interest in IUDs from nulliparous women
Study of IUD insertions and clinical performance in nulliparous women Dr Andrea Brockmeyer Dr Meera Kishen Abacus Clinics Liverpool, UK
Background Increased interest in IUDs from nulliparous women Proven efficacy and safety of standard IUDs No increased risk of PID in nulliparous women
Background No studies about acceptability removal rates for pain and bleeding rate of spontaneous expulsions in the standard IUDs and the IUS in nulliparous women in the UK
Objectives To assess experience of IUD/IUS fitting and use by nulliparous women (< 24 weeks)
Methodology Prospective pilot study Recruitment of 100 nulliparous women at Central Abacus Routine IUD/IUS insertions or IUD insertions for EC but long-term use Questionnaire at time of IUD/IUS insertion
Methodology Follow-up by postal questionnaire or contact by phone three months and one year after insertion
STI screening Sexual history CT/GC testing offered if appropriate Antibiotics (Azithromycin) offered if high risk of CT
Recruitment Recruitment from May-October 2005 Total recruited IUD/IUS fitted 118 113 Available for follow-up 112 Failed insertions Other problems 2 4
Age range
50 40 30 20 10 0 16-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 Age in years > 40
Reasons for IUD/IUS fitting EC and long-term use 30 (25.4%) Interval fitting 88 (74.6%)
STI testing CT test at fitting CT test in current relationship CT test declined 48 65 5 Antibiotics given No positive CT tests reported 15
Fitting procedure Local anaesthesia Difficulty sounding Use of dilators 27 (24%) 17 (15%) 10 (9%) Problems Failed IUD insertion 10 (9%) 2 (1.8%) Client felt faint 7 (6%)
Clinicians impression of fitting Easier than expected As expected Worse than expected 46 (41%) 56 (50%) 9 (8%)
Client’s impression of fitting
30 25 20 15 10 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Client’s impression of fitting Less painful than expected 37 (33%) As expected 51 (45%) More painful than expected 22 (19%)
Three-month follow-up (interim results) No of women contacted Questionnaire received 112 72 (64.2%)
Problems No, not at all Yes 23 (32%) 49 (68%) Symptoms but not a problem 10
Abnormal bleeding Abnormal bleeding Periods heavier -Unable to cope Intermenstrual bleeding Postcoital bleeding Other 46 (63.8%) 39 (54.1%) 4 (5.5%) 21 (29.1%) 5 (6.9%) 8 (11.1%)
Pain Pain Periods more painful Dyspareunia Other - pain between periods - constant pain 45 (62.5%) 35 (48.6%) 10 (13.8%) 13 (18.0%) 11 2
Pelvic infection Pelvic infection 1 (1.3%)
Have you still got your IUD/IUS in?
Yes No 65 (58%) 7 (6%) (+3 removed in 3/12) Expulsion Removal 3 5 - Bleeding 2 - Pain 3
Satisfaction with IUD/IUS
18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Conclusion In general, IUD/IUS fittings well tolerated Majority of women satisfied with device NICE Guidance: All women should be given full choice of methods incl. IUD/IUS Numbers too small to compare devices