Toulmin Model of Reasoning Backing (Clarification) Data Warrant Claim (Evidence) (Reasoning) (Conclusion) Qualifier Rebuttal (Probability) (Reservation) FIP Argument Data: Remo stayed at the vet’s with kidney failure & soon returned to die of FIP. Backing: Immune systems protect from disease. Warrant: A cat with.
Download ReportTranscript Toulmin Model of Reasoning Backing (Clarification) Data Warrant Claim (Evidence) (Reasoning) (Conclusion) Qualifier Rebuttal (Probability) (Reservation) FIP Argument Data: Remo stayed at the vet’s with kidney failure & soon returned to die of FIP. Backing: Immune systems protect from disease. Warrant: A cat with.
Toulmin Model of Reasoning Backing (Clarification) Data Warrant Claim (Evidence) (Reasoning) (Conclusion) Qualifier Rebuttal (Probability) (Reservation) FIP Argument Data: Remo stayed at the vet’s with kidney failure & soon returned to die of FIP. Backing: Immune systems protect from disease. Warrant: A cat with a low immune system can contract FIP. Qualifier: Possibly. Claim: Remo contracted FIP at the vet’s. Rebuttal: Unless the virus was latent. What’s happening here? Line Drawing Argument Data: We see two cups on the table between the two people. Backing: Our experience with coffee is common. Warrant: We drink coffee out of cups in the U.S. Qualifier: Probably. Claim: The couple is drinking coffee. Rebuttal: Unless this is in England. Burglary Argument Data: Police officers saw John leave a house carrying a VCR which was not his. Backing: The law Qualifier: specifically defines Beyond doubt. responsibility. Warrant: Burglary means taking another’s property w/intent. Claim: John is guilt of burglary. Rebuttal: Unless he cannot understand his actions. Highway Argument Backing: We spend a lot on safety. Data: A threelane highway between Hemet and Temecula would be safer. Warrant: We want to be safe. Qualifier: Definitely. Claim: We should build such a 3-lane highway . Rebuttal: Unless we can achieve safety in other ways. Exercise C1 Data: Many Americans cannot afford adequate health care. Warrant: When citizens cannot afford a vital service, the government must assist them. Claim: A national health care plan is vital. Exercise C3 Data: More people would have access to [that canyon area]. Warrant: What benefits more people is what should be done [implied]. Claim: The canyon area ought to be developed.