Long-Term Salinity Prediction with Uncertainty Analysis: Application for Colorado River Above Glenwood Springs, CO James Roger Prairie Dept.

Download Report

Transcript Long-Term Salinity Prediction with Uncertainty Analysis: Application for Colorado River Above Glenwood Springs, CO James Roger Prairie Dept.

Long-Term Salinity Prediction
with Uncertainty Analysis:
Application for Colorado River Above Glenwood
Springs, CO
James Roger Prairie
Dept. of Civil, Architectural, and Environmental Engineering
Masters Defense
Spring 2002
Motivation
• Colorado River Basin
– arid and semi-arid climates
– irrigation demands for agriculture
• “Law of the River”
– Mexico Treaty Minute No. 242
– Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act of
1974
Motivation
• Salinity Control Forum
– Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of
1972
– Fixed numerical salinity criteria
• 723 mg/L below Hoover Dam
• 747 mg/L below Parker Dam
• 879 mg/L at Imperial Dam
• review standards on 3 year intervals
– Develop basin wide plan for salinity control
Salinity Damages and Control Efforts
• Damages are presently, aprox. $330
million/year
• As of 1998 salinity control projects has
removed an estimated 634 Ktons of salt from
the river
– total expenditure through 1998 $426 million
• Proposed projects will remove an additional
390 Ktons
– projects additional expenditure $170 million
• Additional 453 Ktons of salinity controls
needed by 2015
Data taken from Quality of Water, Progress Report 19, 1999 & Progress Report 20,2001
Existing Colorado River
Simulation System (CRSS)
• Includes three interconnected models
– salt regression model
• USGS salt model
– stochastic natural flow model
• index sequential method
– simulation model of entire Colorado River
basin
• implemented in RiverWare
Existing Salt Model Over-Prediction
Research Objectives
• Investigate and improve generation of natural salt
associated stochastic natural flow
• Investigate and improve modeling natural hydrologic
variability (stochastic natural flow)
• Apply modifications to a case study in the Colorado River
Basin
Case Study Area
• Historic flow from 1906 - 95
• Historic salt from 1941 - 95
USGS gauge 09072500
(Colorado River near Glenwood Springs, CO)
Stochastic Simulation
• Simulate from the conditional probability
function
f  yt y , y ,..., y  
t 1
t 2
t p
f ( yt , yt 1 , yt  2 ,..., yt  p )
 f (y , y
t
t 1
, yt  2 ,..., yt  p ) dyt
– joint over the marginal densities
Index Sequential Method
• Current stochastic hydrology model utilized
by the USBR
data wrapped from beginning
1906
1995
1st synthetic hydrology
1906
1931
90 extracted overlapping 25
year ISM sequences
2nd synthetic hydrology
1907
1932
89rd synthetic hydrology
1993
1929
90th synthetic hydrology
1994
Adapted from Ouarda, 1997
1930
Parametric PAR(1)
• Periodic Auto Regressive model (PAR)
– developed a lag(1) model
y ,    1, y , 1   1    ,
  year
  season (month)
– Stochastic Analysis, Modeling, and Simulation (SAMS)
(Salas, 1992)
• Data must fit a Gaussian distribution
• Expected to preserve
– mean, standard deviation, lag(1) correlation
– skew dependant on transformation
– Gaussian probability density function
Traditional K-NN Model
• K- Nearest Neighbor model (K-NN) (Lall and Sharma, 1996)
• No prior assumption of data’s distribution
– no transformations needed
• Resamples the original data with replacement using
locally weighted bootstrapping technique
– only recreates values in the original data
• Expected to preserve
– all distributional properties
• (mean, standard deviation, lag(1) correlation and skewness)
– any arbitrary probability density function
K-NN Algorithm
k N
90  9
yt *
yt-1
Modified Nonparametric K-NN
Natural Flow Model
• Improvement on traditional K-NN
• keeps modeling simple yet creates values
not seen in the historic record
• perturbs the historic record within its
representative neighborhood
• allows extrapolation beyond sample
Local Regression
4.5
Local Regression
alpha = 0.3
or 27 neighbors
Residual Resampling
yt = yt* + et*
yt *
e t*
yt-1
Model Evaluation
• Natural flow 1906 to 1995
• Basic Statistics
– mean,standard deviation, autocorrelation,
skewness
• Higher Order Statistics
– probability density function
– conditional probability
• Minimum and Maximum Flows
Conditional PDF
Summary
• Comparison of 3 stochastic hydrology
models
– ISM, PAR(1), modified K-NN
• Modified K-NN addresses limitations of
both the ISM and PAR(1) models
– generates values and sequences not seen in the
historic record
– generates a greater variety of flows than the
ISM
Climate Links
• Search for climate indicator in Northern Hemisphere
related to flows in the Upper Colorado River basin
– USGS gauge 09163500: Colorado River at Utah/Colorado stateline
– represents flow in Upper Colorado River
– climate indicators
• sea surface temperature, sea level pressure, geopotential height 500mb,
vector winds 1000mb, out going long wave radiation, velocity potential,
and divergence
• Correlations
– search DJF months
– only present in certain regions
• Composites
– identify climate patterns associated with chosen flow regimes
• high, low, high minus low
USGS gauge 09163500
(Colorado River at Utah/Colorado Stateline)
climate and flow data available from 1951 to 1995
Low flow
Composites
High minus Low flow
High flow
USGS Salt Model
• 12 monthly regressions
– based on observed historic flow and salt mass
from water year 1941 to 1983
– historic salt = f (historic flow, several
development variables)
– natural salt = f (natural flow, development
variables set to zero)
Statistical Nonparametric Model
for Natural Salt Estimation
• Based on calculated natural flow and
natural salt mass from water year 1941-85
– calculated natural flow = observed historic flow
+ total depletions
– calculated natural salt = observed historic salt
- salt added from agriculture
+ salt removed with exports
• Nonparametric regression (local regression)
– natural salt = f (natural flow)
• Residual resampling
Nonparametric Salt Model and
USGS Salt Model
Comparison with
Observed Historic Salt
Natural Salt Mass from Nonparametric
Salt Model and USGS Salt Model
USGS Salt Model and New Salt Model
with K-NN Resampling Comparison
Summary
• The new nonparametric salt model removed
the over-prediction seen with the USGS salt
model
• Provides uncertainty estimates
• Can capture any arbitrary relationship
(linear or nonlinear)
CRSS Simulation Model
for Historic Validation
calculated natural flow
flow
historic agriculture
consumptive use
estimated natural salt mass
Natural salt 1941-95
salt
irrigated
lands
agricultural
salt loadings
historic exports
Natural flow 1906-95
salt removed
with exports
historic municipal and industrial
Constant salinity pickup
137,000 tons/year
Exports removed
@ 100 mg/L
historic effects of off-stream
reservoir regulation
USGS stream gauge 09072500
simulated historic flow
simulated historic salt mass
Compare results to
observed historic
for validation
Model Validation
Historic Flow
• 1941-1995 natural flow
• Subdued peak
Model Validation
Historic Salt Mass
• 1941-1995 natural flow
• 1941-1995 monthly and annual
salt model
12 monthly regressions
1 annual regression
Determining Salinity
Concentration
salt concentration (mg/L) 
salt mass (tons) 735.29
flow volume(acre- feet)
Model Validation
Historic Salt Concentration
• 1941-1995 natural flow
• 1941-1995 monthly and annual
salt model
12 monthly regressions
1 annual regression
Natural Flow vs. Total Depletion
Annual Model With Resampling
• Based on 1941-1995 natural flow
• 1941-1995 annual salt model
• Simulates 1941-1995
• Historic Flow and Concentration
Modified and Existing CRSS Comparison
Historic Flow
• Based on 1906-1995 natural flows
• Simulates 1941-1995
Modified and Existing CRSS Comparison
Historic Salt Mass
• Based on 1906-1995 natural flows
• 1941-1995 monthly salt models
• Simulates 1941-1995
Policy Analysis
• Fictional Salinity Standards
– Colorado River near Glenwood Springs, CO
– Salinity standards
• mass remains below 650,000 tons
• salt concentration below 350 mg/L
– Standards occur in tails of distribution
Policy Analysis
Historic Simulation
> 650,000 tons salt
> 350 mg/L salt concentration
CRSS Simulation Model
for Future Prediction
synthetic natural flow
flow
associated synthetic natural salt mass
• Natural flows based on
1906-1995
salt
• Natural salt model based
on 1941-1995
future agriculture
consumptive use
irrigated
lands
agricultural
salt loadings
salt removed
with exports
future exports
future municipal and industrial
• Constant Ag salt loading
of 137,000 tons/year
• Constant salt removal
with exports of 100
mg/L/year
USGS stream gauge 09072500
simulated future flow
• Projected depletions
2002-2062
simulated future salt mass
Stochastic Planning Runs
Projected Future Flow and Salt Mass
• Passing gauge 09072500
• Based on 1906-1995 natural flows
• 1941-1995 monthly salt models
• Simulating 2002 to 2062
Policy Analysis
Future Projections
> 750,000 tons salt
> 600 mg/L salt concentration
Conclusions
• Developed a modified modeling system for
the Colorado River Simulation System
– stochastic natural flow model
• modified nonparametric K-NN natural flow model
– salt regression model
• statistical nonparametric natural salt model
– simulation model in the Colorado River basin
• demonstrated on a case study for basin above USGS
gauge 09072500
Conclusions
– includes both flow and salt uncertainty
• improved representation of flow variability
• better representation of natural salt and flow
relationship
– discussed nonparametric techniques
• flexible and easy to implement
• can preserve any arbitrary distribution
• conditioning with additional data
– validation of observed historic record
– demonstrated future projection
Future Work
• Extend the modified K-NN flow model to perform spacetime dissaggregation to simulate flow and salt over the
entire basin
• Move operational policy to an annual time step
• Incorporate total depletions as a function of natural flow
• Further research into the relationship between salt loading
and land use
• Continue work to incorporate climate information in
streamflow generation
Acknowledgements
• Dr. Balaji Rajagopalan, Dr. Terry Fulp, Dr. Edith Zagona
for advising and support
• Upper Colorado Regional Office
of the US Bureau of Reclamation,
in particular Dave Trueman for
funding and support
• CADSWES personnel for use of their
knowledge and computing facilities
Extra Slides Follow
Case Study
• Colorado River above USGS gauge
09072500 (Colorado River near Glenwood
Springs, CO)
– flow data available from water year 1906-1995
– salt data available from water year 1941-1995
– model at a monthly timestep to accommodate
the reservoirs operating policy in the simulation
model
Motivation
• Generating synthetic natural flow
– future variability
• Index Sequential Method (ISM)
– cannot produce values or traces that had not
occurred in the past
– limited variability among traces
ENSO response in Colorado
River Basin
• Published by Cayan
and Webb, 1992
• A weak response seen
over Upper Colorado
River Basin
Correlation
Sea Surface Temperature
Sea Level Pressure
Comparison with
Calculated Natural Salt
CRSS Simulation Model
• Receives data from the;
– Modified Nonparametric K-NN Natural Flow
Model
– Statistical Nonparametric Natural Salt Model
• Simulates flow, salt mass, and salt
concentration at USGS gauge 09072500
(Colorado River near Glenwood Springs, CO)
Model Validation
Natural Flow
•1941-1995 natural flow
•Utilizes subset of available record
Model Validation
Natural Flow
•1906-1995 natural flow
•Utilizes entire available record
Model Validation
Natural Salt Mass
• 1941-1995 natural flow
• Utilizes subset of available record
• 1941-1995 monthly and annual
salt model
Model Validation
Natural Salt Mass
•1906-1995 natural flow
•1941-1995 monthly salt models
Annual model with
no resampling
•1906-1995 natural flow
•1941-1995 annual salt model
•Historic Flow and Concentration
Modified and Existing CRSS Comparison
Historic Salt Concentration
• Based on 1906-1995 natural flows
• 1941-1995 monthly salt models
• Simulates 1941-1995
Policy Analysis
Historic Simulation
• > 350 mg/L salt concentration
Incorporates total depletion as a
function of natural flow
Historic Salt Mass
Future Salt Mass
Modified Colorado River
Simulation System (CRSS)
• Includes three interconnected models
– stochastic natural flow model
• modified nonparametric K-NN natural flow model
– salt regression model
• statistical nonparametric natural salt model
– simulation model of entire Colorado River
basin
• demonstrated on a case study for basin above USGS
gauge 09072500