Transcript Document
核物理学(12月14日、特別講義) 研究の内容についての発表を外部で活発に行っていますが、内部 の学生に余り伝える機会がありません。 (今年10月:北海道地区の学生に集中講義 来年後期:大阪大学で集中講義 国内学会:岡山大学2件、九州工業大学2件、高エネ研 国際学会:ポーランド2回、スペイン2件、韓国(来年予定)、大阪(先週)2件) == 比連崎+永廣分のみ、ほとんどが招待講演== そこで、外部で使ったスライドで、内部の学生にも研究に関して、 お話しする機会を持とうと思います。研究内容の紹介に併せて、 「研究」と「勉強」の違い、研究室の紹介もしようと思っています。 まずは、研究内容に関するイントロです。 Interests of Meson-Nucleus systems Nara Women’s University Satoru Hirenzaki Hokkaido area school, 2010 1. Introduction and Motivation 2. Some formulation 3. Recent Topics 4. Summary 1. Introduction and Motivation Object Hadron – Nucleus bound systems. Coulomb + Strong ・・・ Exotic Atoms (Deeply Bound) p atom, Kaonic Atom, p atom … Strong ・・・ Exotic Nuclei Mesic Nuclei (K, η, η(958), ω, Φ…), Hypernuclei, … ex.) 1s 2s 3s Nuclear radius of Kaonic Atoms And 15N Kaonic Nuclei By J. Yamagata K meson(mK~ Kaonic Atoms 500 MeV) Binding energy order of 10keV~MeV K- cf.) Normal atom electron(me~0.5MeV) Binding Energy -- order of eV~keV Kaonic Nuclei Very Deep !! Binding Energy 10 ~100 MeV K- 1. Introduction and Motivation 1. Exotic Many Body Physics 1s 2s 3s Ex.) Nuclear radius of 15N Pionic Atoms in halo nuclei Co-existence of Pion-Neutron-halo 2. Hadron Physics at finite density Fundamental theory (QCD) Effective theory Hadron property at finite r Infinite System Finite System Mesic Atoms and Mesic Nuclei Kunihiro, Hatsuda, PLB206(88)385, Fig.3 Anomaly effect in vacuum • Higgs mechanism • Spontaneous Chiral Symmetry Breaking •UA(1) Anomaly Effect : J p = 0- Information on P at finite r ~ r0, (T~0) T r Eigen state observation Quantum number fixed Invariant Mass Method Selective information Umemoto et al., PRC62 (2000) Ericson-Ericson, Ann. Phys. 36 (66) 323 Seki-Masutani, Phys. Rev. C27(83)2799 with b1 Observation of Mesic Atoms by x-ray Kaonic Atom data 4f 3d S. Hirenzaki, Y. Okumura, H. Toki, E. Oset, A. Ramos, Phys.Rev.C61:055205,2000. C.T.A.M. De Laat, et al., Nucl.Phys.A523:453-487,1991. Theoretical Level Structure – How can we observe? Observed by X-ray Spectroscopy Toki, Yamazaki(1988), Toki, Hirenzaki, Yamazaki, Hayano (1989) Toki, Hirenzaki, Yamazaki, Hayano (1989) 11 Mesons in Nuclei …… seems interesting. However, x-ray method has limitation, Obviously! New methods are proposed. π atom in GSI (1996, 1998, 2002) Proposals to RIBF and JPARC Proposed experiments at JPARC (http://j-parc.jp/NuclPart/Proposal_e.html) JPARC Day 1 Experiment at Hadron Hall *Search for Kaonic Nuclear Bound states By K. Itahashi, 17-24 Oct. 2010 By H. Ohnishi By K. Ozawa By K. Itahashi ちょっとブレイク ーーー日本の現状ーーー 新しい加速器2台が極最近稼働して、新しい結果が色々 出てくる前夜のような状況です。 *理化学研究所(埼玉):RIBF 加速器 宇宙における元素合成、中性子星の内部状態の研究など に 繋がる成果 *JPARC 研究所(茨城):30GeV 加速器 質量の起源、クォーク・ハドロンの性質、ストレンジネスを 持つ原子核の研究。 いろんなテーマで最先端に入る切り口があります。 How can we observe it ? Missing Mass Spectroscopy Incident particle proton -hole emitted particle target In-Medium Dispersion Relation meson Medium Effects look carefully !! Peaks!! (K,N) (d,3He) * p-atom - theory (S. Hirenzaki, H. Toki, T. Yamazaki, PRC44(91)2472,…) - experiment (K. Itahashi et al., PRC62(00)025202,…) (g,p) * Kaonic Atoms and Kaonic Nuclei - J. Yamagata et al., PTP114 (05)301.(Errata:114(05)905) PRC74(06)014604. - T. Kishimoto Group * w-nucleus (Marco, Weise, PLB502(01)59) (M. Kaskulov, H. Nagahiro, S. Hirenzaki, E. Oset ; nucl-th/0610085) * p-atom (Hirenzaki, Oset, PLB527(02)69) - M. Iwasaki Group Missing Mass Spectroscopy look carefully !! initial final N meson In-Medium Dispersion Relation Medium Effects Peaks!! Formation Cross Section by ‘pick-up’ reactions, (d,3He), (g, N), etc. Effective Number approach Experimental data Recoilless Substitutional States formation Various activities, (n,p), (d,2He); (n,d), (p,2He); (p,g) … Good Reaction : d + Nucleus 3He + p atom lower Outgoing particle energy higher Deeply bound p- states in the 208Pb(d,3He) reaction K. Itahashi et al. PRC62(00)025202 22 Deeply bound 1s and 2p Pionic States in the 206Pb(d,3He) reaction Hirenzaki, Toki, Hirenzaki and Toki, PRC55(97)2719 23 H. Geissel et al, PRL88(02)122301 Pionic 1s states of Sn nuclei Deepest 1s states in Pb and Sn : observed Nice spectra were obtained. Theoretical H. Geissel et. al., PRL88(02)122301 Potentials are classified as Rank - A, B, C, D Information on P at finite r ~ r0, (T~0) T r Eigen state observation Quantum number fixed Invariant Mass Method Selective information Umemoto et al., PRC62 (2000) Ericson-Ericson, Ann. Phys. 36 (66) 323 Seki-Masutani, Phys. Rev. C27(83)2799 with b1 Deeply Bound Pionic Atom by (d,3He) K. Suzuki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(2004) 072302 GOR relation + Tomozawa-Weinberg Relation 27 There have been active discussions K. Suzuki et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(2004)072302 Kolomeitsev, Kaiser, Weise, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90(2003)092501 observation in two-loop chiral perturbation Energy dependent of P Gauge coupling of Vc Phenomenological pieces (Br2, p-wave terms) Daisuke Jido, Tetsuo Hatsuda, Teiji Kunihro, Phys.Lett.B670:109-113,2008. ‘In-medium Pion and Partial Restoration of Chiral Symmetry’ --------- Garcia-Recio, Nieves, Oset, Phys. Lett. B 541(2002)64 Discussion on rn (n>1) ? M. Doring, E. Oset, arXiv:0705.3027 [nucl-th] s-wave pion-nucleus optical potential in chiral unitary model E. Friedman and A. Gal, Phys. Lett. B578 (2004)85 G. Chanfray, M. Ericson, M. Oertel, Phys. Lett. B563(2003)61 Hadron Physics at finite density Fundamental theory (QCD) Effective theory Hadron property at finite r Infinite System Finite System Mesic Atoms and Mesic Nuclei seems to be interesting and possible. However, ……not so simple… Many researches !! さて研究室の状況 1、この分野に関しては、世界的な業績を上げています。 (おおげさでも誇張でもありません。) 2、研究室の学生は、国際的な業績を普通にあげられます。 (4回生が終わった時点で物理学会発表、 M1でハワイの国際会議発表(旅費は研究室から)等、 十分できます。) 3、あんまり今まで勉強が出来なかった人も、 これからのやる気で大丈夫! (勉強と研究は違うし、ちゃんと教えるから) 1−3に関しては、次で詳しく やる気のある人には理想的な研究室なんですよ。。。。 1、この分野に関しては、世界的な業績を上げています。 ===たとえば、あちこちでの講演。。 これで今年の分だけです。HP 見て下さい。 2、研究室の学生は、国際的な業績を普通にあげられます。 (4回生が終わった時点で物理学会発表、 M1でハワイの国際会議発表(旅費は研究室から)等、 十分できます。)ーー例:池野さん (4回生:卒研テーマで) (以下M1) うちでは、これぐらいは、やる気があれば十分出来るのです。。。。 研究室から補助貰って海外の国際会議に行ってキャリアアップもいいのでは? *国際会議発表(旅費は研究室から)ですが。。。。。。 2国間共同研究 日本代表:比連崎 うちの研究室は予 算あります。でも 研究室人数少な い。 私は外部の人たち より奈良女の学 生に補助を出し て、どんどん国 内外で活躍して もらいたい! 3、あんまり今まで勉強が出来なかった人も、 これからのやる気で大丈夫!(勉強と研究は違うし、ちゃんと教えるから) 勉強と研究: 研究は「教科書に無い新しい発想」。 現存するものの理解とは違う。 「ちゃんと教える」人数が少ない方が圧倒的に 先生の指導を独占できる(有利!)と思いませんか? 私は東京理科大(私学)出身です。一人の先生に 多くの学生がついて、緻密な指導が可能かどうかは 疑問があります。当時、国立大の「学生/教員」の比は、 ものすごくうらやましかった。 もちろん基礎的な勉強も必要ですが、、 =>次ページの図 永廣さんの図 やる気のある人には理想的な研究室なんですよ。。。。 また、学生を教える事に、大変意欲を持っています。 それから。。。。。 *就職希望の人も、もちろん welcome! いままでの研究室出身 者のほとんどは就職してます。研究室在籍する間に、一生懸 命やってくれれば良い。 *卒研のテーマも相談に乗ります。(詳しくはHP 見て下さい。) *就職担当をしていた時の経験から、企業の担当者は、 =ちゃんと専門(物理)の能力を備えているか =卒研をきっちり指導されているか 等も見ています。 推薦した学生に対して「物理がこんなに出来なくては。。」と 言われた事もあります。 *物理出身を「うり」にして生きて行くのに、物理を修得するの は、まぁ必須でしょうね。 さて閑話休題 この後は、先週の国際会議(招待講演)で発表した 最新の話題。 ちょっと難しいかもしれません。 3. Recent Topics Structure and Formation of Meson Nucleus Systems S. Hirenzaki (Nara Women’s Univ.) International conference BARYONS’10 Dec. 7-11, 2010, Osaka, Japan Introduction and Motivation Mesons in nuclei and main interest (and my collaborators) Pionic Atom … fpi at finite density (Toki, Yamazaki, Hayano, Itahashi, K. Suzuki,,,) K-atom & nuclei … deeply bound nuclear state ? (Yamagata-Sekihara, Jido) h-mesic nuclei … N*(1535) in medium (Nagahiro, Jido,,,) h’(958)-mesic nuclei … UA(1) anomaly in medium (Nagahiro, Takizawa) Φ –mesic nuclei … mass shift, OZI rule (Yamagata-Sekihara, Cabrera, Vicente-Vacas) w-mesic nuclei ... bound state ? mass shift ? (Kaskulov, Nagahiro, Oset) s-mesic nuclei … ms ~ 2mp enhancement ? (Nagahiro, Hatsuda, Kunihiro) 41 -------- Q+ in medium … S=+1 hypernuclei [(K+,p+)] (Nagahiro, Oset, Vicente-Vacas) Formation of mesic nucleus at JPARC and COSY With H. Nagahiro, D. Jido Introduction of h-mesic nuclei Motivation and our aim » h-N system … strongly couples to the N*(1535) resonance h-mesic nuculei … doorway to in-medium N*(1535) » N*(1535) … a candidate of the chiral partner of nucleon chiral symmetry for baryons Many works for h mesic nuclei from 1980’s Theor. Exp. 43 Liu, Haider, PRC34(1986)1845 Kohno, Tanabe, PLB231(1989)219; NPA519(1990)755 Garcia-Recio, Nieves, Inoue, Oset PLB550(02)47 C. Wilkin, T. Ueda, S. Wycech, …… Chrien et al., PRL60(1988)2595 TAPS@MAMI (g + 3He p0 + p + X) COSY-GEM (p + Al 3He + Mg-h) WASA-at-COSY (d + d 3He + p + p) JPARC, Chiral model for N and N* Chiral doublet model DeTar, Kunihiro, PRD39 (89)2805 Jido, Oka, Hosaka, Nemoto, PTP106(01)873 Jido, Hatsuda, Kunirhiro, NPA671(00)471 Chiral unitary model Kaiser, Siegel, Weise, PLB362(95)23 Waas, Weise, NPA625(97)287 Garcia-Recio, Nieves, Inoue, Oset, PLB550(02)47 Inoue, Oset, NPA710(02) 354 * In this study, we directly take the eta-self-energy in the ref.NPA710(02)354 A coupled channel Bethe-Salpeter eq. Lagrangian Physical fields N* : chiral partner of nucleon Mass difference * C~0.2 :the strength of the Chiral restoration at the nuclear saturation density 44 * reduction of mass difference * the N* is introduced as a resonance generated dynamically from meson-baryon scattering. * No mass shift of N* is expected in the nuclear medium. h self-energy h-nucleus interaction : potential descriptions optical potential + (crossed term) potential nature at h threshold repulsive core 60 attractive energy w mN*-mN Re [Vopt] [MeV] repulsive Chiral doublet model C=0.2 40 medium effect 20 0 attractive pocket -20 Chiral Unitary model -40 (Inoue, Oset, NPA710(02)354) mh -60 t-r approximation (CDM : C=0.0) -80 0 45 r/r0 1 2 3 r [fm] 4 5 6 •D.Jido, H.Nagahiro and S.Hirenzaki, PRC66(02)045202 momentum transfer spectra : experiment at Brookhaven 500 400 Chrien et al., PRL60(1988)2595 pp = 800 MeV/c : proton angle : 15 deg. (Lab.) search for predicted narrow bound state by Liu, Haider, PRC34(86)1845 negative results (bound state peak was not observed) [MeV] (p+,p) 15 deg. 300 200 100 0 deg. 0 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 pp [GeV/c] Chrienatatal., al.,PRL60(88)2595, PRL60(88)2595,Fig.1 Fig.1 Chrien 80 Li 0 deg. Li chiral doublet 0 deg. chiral unitary 40 C C 0 30 O 15 deg. O 15 deg. 20 Al 46 Al 10 0 -100 -50 0 50 Eex – E0 [MeV] 100 -100 -50 0 50 Eex – E0 [MeV] 100 (p+,p) spectra : experiment at Brookhaven momentum transfer 500 Chrien et al., PRL60(1988)2595 pp = 800 MeV/c : proton angle : 15 deg. (Lab.) search for predicted narrow bound state by Liu, Haider, PRC34(86)1845 negative results (bound state peak was not observed) [MeV/c] 400 15 deg. 300 200 100 0 deg. Chrien at al., PRL60(88)2595, Fig.1 0 0.4 0.6 15 deg. Li 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 pp [GeV/c] 30 doublet 20 C unitary 10 O 0 Al • wider energy range -100 • proton angle = 0 degree 47 • S/N ~ 1/10 need background reduction H.Nagahiro, D.Jido, S.Hirenzaki, PRC80(09)025205 -50 0 50 Eex – E0 [MeV] 100 150 A Simple Theoretical Model for Some remarks (COSY Proposal) (P.Moskal, arXiv:nucl-ex/09093979) • Momentum transfer pd = 1.025 GeV/c, pa = ph= 0 at threshold in C.M. • Data of d d 4He h • Simple spectral structure for light systems • System consists of 2 Nucleon + 2 Nucleon 4 Nucleon + 1 meson 48 A Simple Theoretical Model for Some remarks • Transition (h-production) part h High q transfer at each propagator Parameterize this part. Fix by h production data 49 A Simple Theoretical Model for Schematic picture d h d a s Green function method with h-a optical potential s total s(dd4Heh) data escape conversion threshold 50 Etot threshold Etot Numerical Results stot [nb] 8 25 20 15 7 10 5 0 Arbitrary unit 6 5 (V0,W0) = (−100, −10) MeV p0 = 500 MeV/c 4 3 2 1 51 0 −20 −15 −10 −5 0 5 Eh − mh [MeV] 10 15 Numerical Results 6 stot [nb] 25 20 15 Arbitrary unit 5 10 5 0 4 (V0,W0) = (−100, −20) MeV p0 = 500 MeV/c 3 2 ~ 0 52 −20 ~ −15 −10 −5 0 5 Eh − mh [MeV] 10 15 ’(958) –mesic nucleus h’(958) mesic nuclei formation H.Nagahiro., S. H, PRL94(05)232503 H. Nagahiro, M. Takizawa and S. H, PRC74(06)045203 h’(958) meson … close connection to the UA(1) anomaly many theoretical works in PLB206(88)385 vacuum / at finite temperature / at Kunihiro, finiteHatsuda, density poor experimental information at finite density effect in vacuum UA(1) anomaly in medium from the viewpoint of “mesic Anomaly nuclei” R. D. Pisarski, R. Wilczek, PRD29(84)338 T. Kunihiro, T. Hatsuda, PLB206(88)385 / T. Kunihiro, PLB219(89)363 V. Bernard, R.L.Jaffe and U.-G.Meissner, NPB308(1988)753 Y. Kohyama, K.Kubodera and M.Takizawa, PLB208(1988)165 K. Fukushima, K.Onishi, K.Ohta, PRC63(01)045203 P. Costa et al.,PLB560(03)171, PRC70(04)025204, etc … the h’ properties, especially mass shift, at finite density Nambu-Jona-Lasinio model with the KMT interaction 54 explicit breaking the UA(1) sym. Kobayashi, Maskawa Prog.Theor.Phys.44, 1422 (70), G. ’t Hooft, Phys.Rev.D14,3432 (76) h’ mass shift in medium we consider the SU(2) sym. matter as the sym. nuclear matter. anomaly term effect meson mass [MeV] 1000 parameters (in vacuum) 800 steep 600 flat h’ h 400 200 0 P. Costa et al.,PLB560(03)171, PRC70(04)025204, etc … flat p P. Rehberg, et al., PRC53(96)410. L = 602.3 [MeV] gS L2 = 3.67 gDL5 = -12.36 mu,d = 5.5 [MeV] ms = 140.7 [MeV] Mu,d = 367.6 [MeV] Ms = 549.5 [MeV] 〈uu〉1/3 = -241.9 [MeV] 〈ss〉1/3 = -257.7 [MeV] mh’ = 958 [MeV] mh = 514 [MeV] mp = 135 [MeV] h and h’ mass shifts @ r0 Dmh’ ~ -150 MeV @ r0 Dmh ~ +20 MeV @ r0 We can see the large medium effect even at normal nuclear density. 55 h’(958) mesic nuclei by (p,N) reaction Potential description Real Part V0 … evaluated by possible h’ mass shift at r0 Imaginary part W0 … unknown 20 MeV, for example elementary cross section p+ n h’p Momentum transfer q [MeV/c] momentum transfer 500 mh’ 400 s(p+nh’p) ~ 100 mb 300 mh’ – 50 MeV 200 100 56 0 mh’ – 100 MeV 1 2 pp [GeV/c] 3 4 R.K.Rader et al., PRD6(72)3059 h’-mesic nuclei formation spectra : 12C target • pp = 1.8 GeV/c : (p+,p) reaction By H. Nagahiro • proton angle = 0 deg. case with no mass reduction 2.5 V0 = −(0, 20i) MeV with 150 MeV reduction @ r0 V0 = −(150, 20i) MeV 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 -150 57 -100 -50 0 Eex – E0 MeV 50 -150 -100 -50 0 Eex – E0 MeV 50 100 Suppose we have nice data (spectra) …. 1, Mass reduction will be equivalent to attractive V in Eq. of Motion.. 2, But “ Attractive Mass reduction ’’ is wrong. Ex.) Coulomb case. Origin of the attraction is important. 3, Both NJL and Optical potential are approximations, describing a (different) part of truth. Then, if the one of them is dominant, the interpretation of data could be relatively easier. 4, η(958)-proton scattering length 〜0.1fm =>V(0) ~ 10MeV Weak! P. Moskal et al., Phys. Lett. B 482, 356 (2000) [arXiv:nucl-ex/0004006] And Oset-Ramos theoretical results, Nanova talk this morning.. 5, η(958) seems interesting. With Jido, Nagahiro h’-mesic nuclei formation spectra : 12C target • pp = 1.8 GeV/c : (p+,p) reaction case • proton angle = 0 deg. with no mass reduction 2.5 V0 = −(0, 20i) MeV By H. Nagahiro with 150 MeV reduction @ r0 V0 = −(150, 20i) MeV 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 -150 59 -100 -50 0 Eex – E0 MeV 50 -150 -100 -50 0 Eex – E0 MeV 50 100 Pionic atoms at RIBF Deeply Bound Pionic Atom by (d,3He) – Data at GSI K. Suzuki et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 92(2004) 072302 GOR relation + Tomozawa-Weinberg Relation T. Yamazaki, S. Hirenzaki PLB557(03)20 Density Probed by pion – Too much stable….. pdensity Peak positions of the overlapping density are almost same for all states. Nuclear density The effective nuclear density re is almost same, re~ 1/2r0 for all states. re Rovpeak Overlappin g N p Overlapping density π atom at RIBF Exp. plan by Ito, Itahashi (RIBF-027) 2 ~ 3 times better energy resolution 1s and 2s observation better determination of p-A interactions Various ρ probe ? In future, pionic atom in unstable nuclei - Hirenzaki, Kajino, Kubo, Toki, Tanihata, PLB(87) - Umemoto, Hirenzaki, Kume, Toki, Tanihata, NPA(01) - Fujita, Hirenzaki, Kume, PRC(03) - Kienle, Yamazaki, Toki, ‘ Inverse kinematics idea’ 91~92 EXPERIENCE at GSI FWHM394kev THEORY FWHM394kev THEORY FWHM150kev! 2speak will be seen. By R. Kimura, N. Ikeno 5. Summary Mesic Atoms and Mesic Nuclei Nucleus as Finite Density Laboratory Exotic Nuclei with Meson impurities We are interested in … = how to connect to the fundamental theory = how to get reliable experimental information η (958) -Nucleus System η-Nucleus System at JPARC and COSY π-Atom at RIBF Study of meson-nucleus bound states is interesting !! *いつでも研究室に話しを聞きに来て下さい。 一緒に国際的な場に出られる仕事をしませんか?比連崎、永廣 (あと、研究で充実しているときの宴会(学会打ち上げとか)は楽しいもので すよ(笑))