Work Optimization Ch. 13
Download
Report
Transcript Work Optimization Ch. 13
Dr. Ron Lembke
SCM 462
How accurately can you measure?
1 mm = 1/25”
1/16”
1/32”
Calipers
0.05mm
1/64”
Micrometer = 0.01mm
Calipers
“Lord Chancellor” Micrometer
Accurate to
1/10,000”
Created when?
1805
Henry Maudslay
1771-1831
“Powder monkey” at age 12, cabinet shop
Joseph Brama’s (hydraulic press) lock shop
Invented (or pioneered) slide rest lathe
Standardized screws
Block making
Machines for Marc Brunel, Used for 100 years
Waited for “American System”
Beginning of Standards
Before standardized parts, need Screws
1860s Machine Tool industry: Silicon Valley of its day
All screws custom made by tool & die shops according
to what they thought best
William Sellers: 1864 “On a Uniform System of Screw
Threads”
Sellers vs. Whitworth
3 cutters & 2 lathes vs. 1 cutter & 1 lathe
Simple geometry vs. difficult
Rounded top vs. straight: ease of manufacturing, ease of assembly
Not Just What you Know
Machine tool makers didn’t want to be
commoditized like gun makers
The standard people expect to win usually does.
Navy Board found it superior, asked Singer
Sewing Machine, Baldwin Locomotive which
would win (already adopted).
Pennsylvania RR adopted (Sellers on the Board)
British tanks & trucks couldn’t be repaired in
WWII because Britain adopted Whitworth
Eiji Toyoda’s Ambitious Plans
Post-WWII Japanese industry in ruins
Early 1950s – toured Rouge plant
2,500 cars in 13 years. Ford: 8,000 per day
“Catch up to Americans in 4 years!”
Toyoda made delivery trucks and motorcycles, and not
many of either
, the early years
First two Toyotas imported to U.S. 1957
Elimination of Waste
Knew they wouldn’t beat U.S. with product
innovation, concentrated on licensing
patents, and producing more efficiently
Costs prevented mass-production, volume
strategy of American firms.
Find ways to reduce waste, cost
Shigeo Shingo & Taiichi Ohno, pioneers
Ohno & Shingo
Couldn’t Emulate GM
GM huge batches in huge factories
Japan’s area is 10% less than California and 70%
agricultural.
Put entire population of CA into 30% of state, then
add 6 times as many people. (and you thought LA was
crowded).
Land extremely expensive
Sprawling factories not an option
Small Batches
GM’s large batches require large amounts of storage
space.
GM produces in large batches because of significant
setup costs.
If Toyota had the same large setup costs, it could
never afford small batches.
Reduce setup cost to reduce batch size.
GM didn’t think of doing this.
Two Pillars of Toyota System
Just-in-Time: produce the right parts, at the right
time, in the right quantity
Autonomation: ‘Automation with a human touch’
(make machine mistake-proof)
Just-in-Time
Downstream processes take parts from upstream as
they need.
Like an American Supermarket:
Get what you want
when you want it
in the quantity you want.
Kanban
Japanese for ‘signboard’
Method for implementing JIT
In order to produce, you need both material to work
on, and an available kanban.
Each work station has a fixed # kanbans.
Kanban
2
Flow of work
3
Worker 2 finishes a part, outbound moves over
2 has a blue tag avaliable, so 2 gets another part to
work on:
2 takes off 1’s green tag giving it back to 1, and
puts on her blue tag and moves it into position.
Kanban
2
Flow of work
3
When 3 finishes a part,
Finished parts move over one spot
He has to have a red tag available to put on,
He gets a part from 2’s outbound pile,
And gives the blue back to 2
Kanban
2
Flow of work
3
When 3 finishes a part,
Finished parts move over one spot
He has to have a red tag available to put on,
He gets a part from 2’s outbound pile,
And gives the blue back to 2
3’s production will be taken by 4, offstage right.
Tag goes back into 3’s bin
Kanban
2
3
Red finishes his part next.
2
3
But 4 hasn’t freed up any of the red kanbans, so there is
nothing for 3 to work on now.
3 could maintain his machine, or see if 4 needs help
How is this Different?
Processes can become idled (blocked) or starved
This makes you painfully aware of problems in your
system.
Material moves through the system so quickly no inprocess recordkeeping is needed.
Total Quality Management
Not a lot of parts to sift through to find a good one
Can’t afford high defect rates
Since low WIP, get quick feedback on errors
WIP Level
Less WIP means products go through system faster
reducing the WIP makes you more sensitive to
problems, helps you find problems faster
Stream and Rocks analogy:
Inventory (WIP) is like water in a stream
It hides the rocks
Rocks force you to keep a lot of water (WIP) in the
stream
Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste
WIP hides problems
Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste
WIP hides problems
Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste
Reducing WIP makes
problem very visible
STOP
Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste
Remove problem, run
With less WIP
Lowering Inventory Reduces Waste
Reduce WIP again to find
new problems
Importance of Flow
Ohno was very clear about this:
“Kanban is a tool for realizing just-in-time. For this tool
to work fairly well, the process must be managed to flow
as much as possible. This is really the basic condition.
Other important conditions are leveling the product as
much as possible, and always working in accordance with
standard work methods.
-- Ohno, 1988, p. 3
Setup Reduction
Can’t afford to do huge runs
Have to produce in small batches
Toyota Die Change: 3 hours down to 3 SMED:
under ten minutes
Techniques
Make internal setups into External
Eliminate Adjustments
Eliminate the Setup
Continuous Process Improvement, anyone?
Lot Sizing
Q
2 DS
H
Takt time = available time (day) / Customer demand
rate per day
Uniform Plant Loading (heijunka)
Any changes to final assembly are magnified
throughout production process
Smoothing
Master production schedule: 10,000 /mo.
500 day, 250 a shift
480 minutes means 1 every 1.92 minutes
Sequencing:
If mix is 50% A, 25% B, 25% C, produce
A-B-A-C-A-B-A-C…