Transcript Slide 1

Safety and Efficacy for Children and Young
Adolescents
By:
Sunday Rivers
Walden University
PUBH-8165-2 Environmental Health
Water Fluoridation
 In 2000, the center for disease control and prevention
(CDC) estimated that 162.1 million Americans were
receiving fluoridated water, which is 57.6% of the total
population and includes 65.8% of those on public
water systems (Macek, Matte, Sinks, and Malvitz,
2006, p.130).
Water Fluoridation
 Fluoridation of drinking water began 60 years ago in
the United States, and it continues in 60% of public
water supplies in the country (Kauffman, 2005, p.38).
 Harmful effects my include bone and tooth fractures
and increased cancer rates.
Water Fluoridation
 70% of cities in the United States with populations >
100,000 have community fluoridated water programs.
 42 of the 50 largest cities in the United States had
fluoridated water supplies by 1992
Other Sources of Fluoride
 Toothpaste
 Most widely used topical source of fluoride
 Fluoridated food
 meat, fish, poultry
 Beverages (tea)
 Breast milk
 Professional Use
 Mouth rinse
Community Water Fluoridation
• Remains one of the most successful public health programs
•
•
•
•
in American history.
Fluoridated water is accessible to all people regardless of
socioeconomic status, educational attainment or other
social measures
Members of the community do not need to change
behavior to obtain the benefits of fluoride
The frequency of exposure is higher and is present over
time, making it effective through the life span in
preventing caries
Community water fluoridation is more cost effective than
other forms of fluoride application
No Water Fluoridation
• Although safety and efficacy of water fluoridation is
well established in the scientific community, some
oppose its practice.
• Opponents of fluoridation have argued that
fluoridation is associated with increased risk of cancer,
congenital anomalies Alzheimer’s disease, AIDs, bone
fractures, and Gilberts disease
Fluorosis
 Dental fluorosis is a hypomineralization of enamel of
teeth caused by the chronic ingestion of excessive
amounts of fluoride during the period when teeth are
forming within the jaw.
 Fluorosis does not affect the health of teeth or of an
individual, but, it in its more severe forms, may cause
cosmetic concerns.
No Water Fluoridation
 Other arguments against community fluoridation
center around cost, freedom of choice, violation of
individual rights and religious beliefs
• Antifluoridation activists have also argues that
fluoridation is conspiracy involving the US
government, the health care establishment, and
industry.
Why Water Fluoridation?
 Starting of continuing water fluoridation in a
community can decrease tooth decay by as much as
50%, while discontinuing the practice can increase
dental caries by as much as 60% (Water Fluoridation
crucial for community health., 2002).
Why Water Fluoridation
 Fluoride has change the face of dental diseases in this
country
 Dental caries or tooth decay, is a symptom of bacterial
infection in the mouth that causes a physiological
disturbance resulting in demineralization of the teeth.
Why Fluoridated Water?
 Dental caries and periodontal disease are the most
common oral health problems of children and adults
in the United States.
 20% of children, however, have 80% of all dental
problems.
Intervention
 If prevention is to be maximized, initial examinations
and the education of parents in the application of
preventive procedures should begin during the first
year of life.
Barriers
 Many of the challenges facing the post-fluoride
generation have to do with poverty other
socioeconomic disparities
 Lifestyle
 Limitations in access to care
 Dental fear
Strategies for Public Health
 Dental health needs should transcend the local and
state level. It must gain national attention
 More community outreach programs
 Early intervention
 Increase periodontal care
 Increase attention to smoking cessation and oral
cancer.
References
 Horowitz, H. (1999). Proper use of fluoride products in fluoridated communities. Lancet,
353 (9613), 1462.
 Kauffman, J. (2005). Water Fluoridation: a Review of Recent Research and Actions.
Journal of American Physicians & Surgeons, 10 (2), 38-44.
 Macek, M., Matte, T. Sinks, T. and Malvitz, D. (2006). Blood lead concentrations in
children and method of fluoridation in the United States, 1988-1994. Environmental
Health Perspectives, 114, (1), p.130-134.
 Milgrom, P. and Reisine, S. (2000). Oral Health in the United States: The Post-Fluoride
Generation. Annual Review Public Health, 21, 403-436.
 Water Fluoridation crucial for community health. (2002). Nation's Health , 6.