Transcript Fluoride – The Curse

To Fluoridate or NOT?
 Is this a question of who is the cleverest &
therefore who wins the debate
– the PRO’s or the CON’s?
OR
 Is it Too Late/Coup de Grâce/Fête Accompli
(If you think so you shouldn’t be here. Remember the smallest flame at night)
OR
 Is this a more vital issue concerning
OUR RIGHTS?
Freedom- Do we Have Rights
Freedom & a Choice?
 What is Freedom “A state of liberty where an
individual or group does not have unreasonable
external restraints or persuasions applied to them
by another individual or group”
Churchill – The Freedom
Fighter
 “Have our rights & our freedom been invaded? YES!
Do we Consent? NO !
The decision to Fluoridate our water supply is totally
dictatorial and I for one would not hesitate to sue the
Queensland Government if I was one of the
unfortunate people to suffer a serious side effect as a
consequence of fluoridation”.
Dr. Michael Tait
Can we learn from History?
The desire to Control –Absolute Power is absolute
Control which is absolutely CORRUPT
 1877 Nathan Rothschild
(The founder of the IMF)
(130 years ago!)
 Monsanto
(GM foods founders)
 2008 Qld Gov
“I care not what power controls the
people, for if I control their money
supply, then I control their Empire”
“If I control your food supply then I
control your Nations”
“I don’t care what you say, because
we are doing it” This is effectively
saying “I care not what you say. If
I control your water supply then
I control you”
Should We Conform & What does
“To Conform” Mean?
 STARTLING RESEARCH: To conform to a dictator
because you have been at school together or belong to
the same club or to the same social class sounds
ridiculous & is extremely dangerous. Yet more
freedom has been lost during this century through
this reason for conforming, than through the
actions of the dictators themselves!!
 Immediately after World War 11 a Court was
assembled in Nuremburg for charging top ranking
German military officers & scientists. The charge was
“medical experimentation on people against their
wish”. All were found guilty & some were executed.
So is Forcing Fluoride on us Against
our Will Any Different?
 Dr. Moolenburgh in the Netherlands stated that
fluoridation is not acceptable in many European
countries which had been occupied by the Nazis.
Why? Because the people were quick to see the
true nature of a totalitarian program & they
formed "resistance" groups against fluoridation
like the "resistance" to the Nazis in the 1940’s.
 I also ask “What next after Fluoride?” ?Microchips
 Our Rights - If Fluoridation is introduced it
totally disregards the Nuremberg Code of
Medical Practice and the perpetrators should be
reported and charged at the International Court of
Justice in The Hague.
The Nuremberg Code (1947)
 We must be convinced by the evidence before us that medical
experiments conducted on human beings, are kept within welldefined bounds & must conform to the ethics of the medical
profession generally. The protagonists of the practice of
human experimentation justify their views on the basis that
such experiments yield results for the good of society & they can
not be procured by any other methods. Everyone agrees
however that the basic principles of experimentation must
satisfy the following moral, ethical and legal concepts:
 The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
essential. This means that the person involved should have legal
capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to
exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any
element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, overreaching, or other
ulterior form of constraint or coercion; and should have
sufficient knowledge and comprehension of the elements of the
subject matter involved as to enable him to make an
understanding and enlightened decision
What ARE our RIGHTS?
 It is obvious that our rights are being threatened by the
dictatorial attitude of the government on the fluoridation
issue – without our consultation or after poor consultation.
Some of the fundamental questions about the fluoridation
of public water supplies are ethical in nature:
 1. Is
medication with an uncontrolled dose
wrong?
 2. Is compulsory mass medication wrong?
 3. Is fluoridation right if its risks are less
than its benefits?
 4. Is this medication or experimentation?
Facts – Existing Global Experience
 Germany: "Generally, in Germany fluoridation of drinking water is
forbidden. The relevant German law allows some exceptions only on
application. The argument of the Federal Ministry of Health against a
general permission of fluoridation of drinking water is the problematic
ethics of compulsory medication."
 France: "Fluoride chemicals are not included in the list of 'chemicals for
drinking water treatment'. This is due to ethical as well as medical
considerations."
 Belgium: "The addition of Fluoride to water treatment has never been
used and will never be used in the future. The main reason for this is that
it is not the Governments task to deliver medicinal treatment to
people. This is the sole responsibility of Health Services."
 Denmark: According to the Danish Ministry of Environment and Energy,
toxic fluorides have never been added to the public water supplies.
Consequently, no Danish city has ever been fluoridated.
Global Experience 2
 Sweden: Drinking water fluoridation is not allowed in
Sweden... “No new scientific documentation or
changes that could alter the conclusions of the
Commission have been demonstrated”
 Associate Editor of the British Medical Journal,
Douglas Carnall, stated: “Professionals who propose
compulsory preventive measures for a whole population
have a different weight of responsibility on their shoulders,
than those who respond to the requests of individuals for
help. Previously neutral on the issue, I am now persuaded
by the arguments that those who wish to take fluoride
(like me) had better get it from toothpaste rather than
the water supply”
Global Experience 3
 Czech Republic:"Since 1993, drinking water has not been
treated with fluoride throughout the Czech Republic for the
following reasons:
(a) UNECONOMICAL -only 0.54% of the water treated is
used for drinking, the remainder is employed for hygiene etc.
Furthermore, an increasing amount of consumers (particularly
children) are using bottled water for drinking (underground
water which usually contains fluorine)
 (b) UNECOLOGICAL It is an environmental load by a foreign
substance.
 (c) UNETHICAL because it is "forced medication”
 (d) TOXILOGICALLY & physiologically debatable.
Fluoridation represents an untargeted form of supplementation
which disregards actual individual intake and requirements
and may lead to excessive health-threatening intake in certain
population groups.
Side Effects
The 3 Stages of Fluorosis
 Phase 1: sporadic pain; stiffness of joints;
osteosclerosis of pelvis and vertebral column
 Phase 2: chronic joint pain; arthritic symptoms;
slight calcification of ligaments; increased
osteosclerosis/cancellous bones; with/without
osteoporosis of long bones.
 Phase 3: Crippling Skeletal Fluorosis: limitation of
joint movement; calcification of ligaments/neck
and vertebral column; crippling deformities of
spine and major joints; muscle wasting;
neurological defects/ compression of spinal cord
Some Examples of Fluorosis
hyperostosis, osteopetrosis
50 Reasons to Oppose Fluoride
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
No disease has ever been linked to fluoride deficiency
Fluoridation is not necessary
A trial of 39,000 children showed no decay difference
Stopping the use of Fluoride did not result in > decay
Family income is a > important factor than Fluoride
Decay incidence was decreasing before Fluoride use!
Effects are Topical not Systemic so why swallow it?
Toothpaste
8. FDA has never approved Fluoride for systemic use
9. 48% of children using Fluoride suffer from Fluorosis
10 Fluorosis means overdosing with Fluoride
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
No benefits only risks for infants ingesting Fluoride
Fluoride accumulates – 50% is retained by bones
It inhibits a number of enzyme actions
Aluminum-fluoride combination interferes with
many hormonal and some neurochemical signals
It is mutagenic & can interfere with DNA repair
Combines with Mg & Calcium leading to depletion
Research revealed kidney & brain damage (mice)
The Environmental Protection Agency warned about
the high potential neurotoxicity effects
19 Many reports confirm Brain Damage from Fluoride!
20 Five China studies showed IQ lowering in children
21 Jennifer Luke Ph.D Confirmed accumulation effects
22 USA studies confirm decrease in Thyroid function
23 Skeletal fluorosis mimics arthritis & can be missed
24 High doses resulted in an > in bone fractures
25 11/19 studies showed >in hip fractures in the elderly
26 There may be > tendency to bone liver & oral cancer
27 New Jersey study ? 6X risk bone cancer > young men
28 Fluoridation programs are very poorly monitored
29 Research reveals sperm & fertility damage. I urge
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
you to do a search for “The disappearing Male”
It is not possible to monitor an individuals intake
once Fluoride is in the water supply
It’s unethical – we’re not asked for informed consent
Individual rights (v) majority rule means a
referendum is unnecessary.
1% of individuals are highly sensitive to Fluoride
The elderly, diabetics & kidney disease patients are
vulnerable to toxic effects
The poor or malnourished are also very vulnerable
The real oral health CRISIS is poverty NOT Fluoride
38 In 2000 a British Government Review could give no
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
fluoridation trial a grade A classification. NONE
USA introduced Fluoridation in 1950 with no trials!
Fluoride does not reduce pit & fissure decay.
85% of teeth with pits & fissures
dental decay!
Fluoride in USA comes from hazardous wastes
These wastes have NOT been tested – only
pharmaceutical grades have been tested
There is an > uptake of lead in children on Fluoride
1 teaspoon of Sodium Fluoride will kill an adult
46 14 Nobel Laureates won’t endorse Fluoridation
47 Nobel Laureate in Medicine 2000: “I am quite
convinced that water fluoridation, in a not-toodistant future, will be consigned to medical history”
48 American College of Toxicology. “No credible people
support the fluorophobics' view.”
49 Many scientists, doctors and dentists who have
spoken out publicly on this issue have been
subjected to censorship and intimidation.
50
The Union representing the scientists at US EPA headquarters
“The requirement for every man, woman and child in
America to ingest Fluoride borders on criminal
behaviour on the part of the government.“
Is This Enough to say NO FLUORIDE?
NO! HERE’S MORE….
 Question -What is the source of the Fluoride
 Answer – Japan & European Countries
 Question – Why do they pay us to take their Fluoride
 Answer – Because we are a dumping ground for waste!
 Question – Is this a Meaningful Health Issue
 Answer – Most definitely NOT. It is an unfortunate
truth that most major international issues: wars,
finance (IMF & Federal Reserve) and Health (FDA Big
Pharma etc) are concerns of greed and power.
Life is Always a Matter of Choices
 What do YOU want to do?
FIGHT IT
 Approach/Fight the
Government
 Check your Constitutional Rights
 Take it The Hague
AVOID IT
 Don’t drink
the Water – Use Tanks
 Investigate an efficient filter system
http://www.pwgazette.com/problemfluoride.htm
(distillation, reverse osmosis, & filtration through a special
fluoride/arsenic reduction medium called activated alumina)
SO Remember – A Massive Fire
Can Begin with the Smallest Ember.
That Ember is YOU
Campylobacter Can Kill