Transcript www.cccco.edu

Carl D Perkins (Perkins IV)
Career
Technical
Education
Act
Click and
to edit
Master
title style
Foundations for Perkins
Accountability:
Core Indicators, Annual Reports,
Targets, and Gap Evaluation
Dr. Chuck Wiseley
Spring 2011
1
Session Goals
Click to edit Master title style
• Describe the Foundational requirements for:
–
–
–
–
Core Indicators (CI),
Reports,
Performance Targets
Evaluation and Sanctions.
• Perkins ties funds to improving student success
through accountability requirements.
Perkins Accountability Foundations
2
Session Objectives
Click to edit Master title style
Participants will be able to:
• Describe the requirements in the law that are
the foundation for the Perkins IV
– Core Indicators,
– CI Reports,
– Negotiated targets,
– Performance gaps analysis,
– And, sanctions for not meeting targets
Perkins Accountability Foundations
3
Accountability Requirements
Click
to edit
Master
title style
Section
113(b)
& 123(b)
Section 113(b)
• Core indicators of performance
• Report results annually
• Disaggregate by specific population groups
• State & Local “adjusted levels of performance”
• Levels of performance negotiated with USDE/State
Section 123(b)
• Assess performance against negotiated levels and
initiate sanctions to assure continuous improvement
Perkins Accountability Foundations
4
Section 113(b):
ClickIndicators
to edit Master
title style
Core
of Performance
Student
1. attainment of technical skill proficiencies;
2. attainment of credential, certificate, or degree;
3. retention in postsecondary education or transfer;
4. placement in military, apprenticeship, or
employment;
5. participation/completion of training in nontraditional fields.
Perkins Accountability Foundations
5
Section 113(b): Disaggregate
Click
to edit
Master title
style
by Special
Population
groups
• Disaggregation categories include:
–
–
–
–
–
–
–
race/ethnicity & gender
migrant student
individuals with disabilities;
economically disadvantaged;
individuals preparing for non-traditional fields;
single parents, including single pregnant women;
displaced homemakers; and
– individuals with limited English proficiency.
Perkins Accountability Foundations
6
Section 113(b): Identify and
Click to edit
Master
style
Quantify
Gaps
amongtitle
groups
• Additionally in the reports,
– identify and quantify gaps in performance
– among the subgroups
– compared to all students.
• Reported in the Local Application.
Perkins Accountability Foundations
7
Section 113(b):
Click
to edit Master
title style
Performance
Targets
• Assess CTE effectiveness & progress
• State & Local
“adjusted levels of performance”
• Levels of performance negotiated
– State with USDE
– Local recipients with State
• Included in Local Application
Perkins Accountability Foundations
8
Section 123(b):
Click
to edit Master
title style
Activities
& Sanctions
• Annually assess performance
against 90% of negotiated levels
• Initiate sanctions to assure:
– continuous improvement and
– increased student success
Perkins Accountability Foundations
9
Section 123(b): Sanctions
to edit
MasterImprovement
title style
InClick
the Law
– Program
• State:
< 90% of Target - Improvement Plan
3 years for any single target – Funds withheld
• Locals:
< 90% of Targets - Improvement Plan
No improvement in year 2
or 3 years < 90% for any single target
State SHALL provide technical assistance
State MAY withhold funds (all or part)
Perkins Accountability Foundations
10
Discussion
Click to edit Master title style
• Next Recommend Presentations:
1. Implementing Core Indicators
2. Core Indicator Reports
3. Negotiating Targets
Comments welcome:
– Improve the Content:
• Order, Detail, Other?
– Send comments to:
Chuck Wiseley at [email protected]
Perkins Accountability Foundations
11