Transcript Slide 1

Sensitivity, the Challenges
Jan Geralt Bij de Vaate
Bert Woestenburg
Rob Maaskant
Laurens Bakker
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
1
Outline
• SKA specification
• Aperture Array Noise Analyses
• Noise budget
• Conclusion
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
2
SKA, memo100
A
• Survey speed ~  eff
T
 sys
2

 FoV


N 
B FoV FoV
 N sa
2
A 

 f c eff  FoV


 m Tsys 
• E.g. SKA Tsys spec (0.5-1.0 GHz):
– If 35K will be 50K, Aeff has to double / Or FoV has to quadruple!
 Aeff
• Sensitivity ~ 
 Tsys




4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
3
SKA
• Memo100
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
4
SKA
• Memo100:
– Sparse aperture array 70-500MHz
• 4000 m2/K, Tsys~1000: 4 km2
– 2 million Antennas
– Dense aperture array 500-800MHz
• 10.000 m2/K, Tsys=50K: 0,9 km2, nearly 1 km2
– 45 million Antennas
» Aperture efficiency 80%, 45 degree scan
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
5
Costing
• A 45 million element system with a total system cost of
250M € can spend:
– 4 € per LNA for 50 35 Kelvin
• Given a bare die costs of:
• 0,5 € for Silicon technologies (only 500 12 inch wafers)
• 2 € for GaAs technologies (2000 6 inch wafers)
• Low cost technologies cannot compromise on noise!
• Also: memo100, 150M€ for AA scenario3
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
6
Aperture Array Tsys
2
TLNA
• Single LNA case
s  opt
4T0 Rn
 Tmin 
Z0 1   2 1   2
opt
s


• Noise Wave analyses
– Optimum Noise match if
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
opt  s
Sensitivity
JGBdV
7
Aperture Array Tsys
s  act
4T0 Rn
 Tmin 
Z0 1   2 1  
opt
act
2
TLNA

2

• T=Direct part + Reflected part + coupled part
– Optimum Noise match if
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
opt  act
Sensitivity
See also Arts, today
See also Kant, EMBRACE
Maaskant APS, 2007
JGBdV
8
Aperture Array Tsys
• Extreme example
• 2 element dipole array
• In principle different
matching required for
each scan angle
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
9
Aperture Array Tsys
• Clearly low Tmin and RN required
• Limited work on RN (process) optimization
Simulations Ref. Mateos et.al., 2004/2008
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
10
Noise budget
Aperture Array
Spill-over
0K
Vivaldi feed loss
9K
Low Noise Amplifier
16 K
Noise mismatch / coupling /2nd stage
7K
Sky
3K
Total
35 K
• TLNA ~ 50% of noise budget
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
11
Noise budget
APERTIF Focal Plane Array
Spill-over
10 K
Vivaldi feed loss
5K
Single chain receiver
30 K
Noise mismatch / coupling
5K
Sky
3K
Total
53 K
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
12
AA Tsys characterization
• Uniform Test Strategy might be required
• Even more importantly error budgets have to be known
– And reduced  eliminated!!
– For example Agilent noise sources are +/-7K
• Methods
– ‘standard’ noise diode equipment
– Hot cold liquid nitrogen loads
– Tuner set-ups correction software
– Cold noise tests
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
13
AA Tsys characterization
• Action plan..
– Establish available equipment list
– Including environment, e.g. Faraday cage
– Including noise parameter test sets, tuner set-up / F50 method
– Select AA relevant LNA for cross testing
– Including approach for differential LNAs
– Set-up small working group frequent cross test of new designs
• Involvement off all partners working on low noise
– UoM, OPAR, FG-IGN, Chalmers, Calgery, ASTRON…..and?
– Start with SKADS soon evolving in AAVP
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
14
AA Tsys characterization
• ASTRONs antenna array hot/cold test facility
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
15
• SKA workshop, in the Microwave Week, Amsterdam, 30th Oct
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
16
Conclusion
• Transistor modeling and optimization (still) crucial!
• Noise budget leaves not much room in 35K target
• Closer cooperation and system noise tests required
• And, Steve T, we indeed want to work in phase!
4th SKADS Workshop, Lisbon, 2-3 October 2008
Sensitivity
JGBdV
17