Transcript Folie 1

MILLIKEN – Domestic Network
Lagrange, GA
April, 20th 2006
Tibor Banach, Aixa Cintron, Benedikt Finkenauer,
Thilo Frankenhauser, Meeti Saraswat, Narendhra Seshadri
21.07.2015
1
Agenda
 Current Business Model
 Demand Distribution
 Proposed Solution
 Summary
21.07.2015
2
Current Network
 Milliken ships various products such as broadloom, tiles, rugs, mats
and chemicals out of their facility in Lagrange, GA
 Products are shipped via LTL carriers to various locations all over
the United States
 Depending on the size of the shipment, the destination and the
service required, Milliken uses a variety of shippers
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
3
Current Network
LTL
LTL
Lagrange, GA
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
4
Problem Outline
 Current shipments are mostly LTL and parcel
 Can shipments to the same geo be consolidated via FTL?
- Is consolidation economically feasible?
- Where should the consolidation hubs be located?
- How is service affected by consolidation?
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
5
Issues to Consider
 Can shipments to the same geo be consolidated via FTL?
 Is consolidation economically feasible?
 Where should the consolidation hubs be located?
LTL
TL
TL
TL
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
6
Agenda
 Current Business Model
 Demand Distribution
 Proposed Solution
 Summary
21.07.2015
7
Data Extraction
Chemicals and “Miscellaneous” items removed from the demand data
Shipments with 0 freight costs removed
Demand available in the form of units and yards. Conversion of data to
fraction of a 53 ft. trailer:





Item
Units/Truckload
Broadloom
6000 yds
Mats
800 units
Rugs
700 units
Tiles
4800 yds
Demand aggregated by 3-digit ZIP code
Demand averaged by number of days shipped to obtain a daily
fraction of TL
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
8
Demand Aggregation by 3 Digit ZIP
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
9
Agenda
 Current Business Model
 Demand Distribution
 Proposed Solution
 Summary
21.07.2015
10
Data Preparation for the Model
Distances
 Calculated from Lagrange to all 3-digit ZIP codes of demand points
 Calculated to and from all 3-digit ZIP codes of demand points
Freight Costs
 TL Costs calculated from existing TL shipments in customer data.
 LTL Costs calculated for shipments of different sizes and for
different distances traveled. For example:
Shipment Size(TL)
Cost Equation
0.001 - 0.002
6.77 + TL* 6819.82 + Dist * 0.0074
<0.001
5.15 + TL* 15290 + Dist * 0.002
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
11
Restrictions
 Discard extremely small orders
 Discard orders that fill over 0.6 of a truck
 Restrict assignment of demand points to hubs within a 500 mile
radius on the west and a 300 mile radius on the east
 This created two sub-models – one for NE and one for West
NE
WEST
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
12
Model
Decision Variables
xij =
21.07.2015
1

0
if customer j is assigned to hub i
otherwise
1
yi = 
0
if hub i is opened
1
wj = 
0
if customer j is served directly from Lagrange
otherwise
otherwise
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
13
Model
Parameters
LTLcij = Less-than-truck load cost for shipping from hub i to
customer j
TLci = Truck load cost for the shipment that goes from Lagrange to
hub i
LTLcj = Less-than-truck load cost for shipping from Lagrange to
customer j
Demandj = Demand of customer j
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
14
Model


z

Min
 i
Subject to:

j
 

 
 
xij LTL cos t ij     yi * TL cos t i    500 *  yi     w j * LTL cos tLagrange j 
 
  j
  i

i


x
  ij   w j  1
 i

xij  yi
x
ij
j
 i, j
* demand j  0.7 * yi
i
j
xij = binary
21.07.2015
Current Situation
yi = binary
wj = binary
Demand Distribution
Solution
15
Results - North East
The model recommends the opening of two hubs in the North East
region located at ZIP codes 023 and 231
023
Assigned to 023
(Boston area)
Assigned to 231
(Richmond area)
231
Assigned to 302
(Lagrange)
302 - Lagrange
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
16
Results - North East
Projected cost savings from consolidation:
Daily
Minimum
Savings
TL
@ 0.9 TL
Annual
Savings @
0.9 TL & 250
Days
Ideal
TL
Current
Demand
023
(Boston)
0.9
0.6
0.78
$201.31
$50,326
231
(Richmond)
0.9
0.73
0.76
$187.73
$46,932
Hub
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
17
Results - West
The model recommends
the opening of two hubs
in the western region
located at ZIP codes
752 and 850
850
752
Assigned to 752
(Dallas area)
Assigned to 850
(Phoenix area)
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
18
Results - West
Projected cost savings from consolidation:
Daily
Minimum Savings
TL
@ 0.9 TL
Annual
Savings @
0.9 TL & 250
Days
Hub
Ideal TL
Current
Demand
752
(Dallas)
0.9
0.35
0.71
$111.41
$27,853
850
(Phoenix)
0.9
0.77
0.62
$638.30
$159,576
21.07.2015
Current Situation
Demand Distribution
Solution
19
Agenda
 Current Business Model
 Demand Distribution
 Proposed Solution
 Summary
21.07.2015
20
Summary
 There is opportunity to consolidate shipments for projected
annual savings of $284,687 ($187,429 from the Western region
and $97,258 from the North-Eastern region)
 Orders that can be shipped as parcels or can fill a truck by
themselves should not be consolidated with other shipments
 On any given day, savings can be achieved by consolidating to
a hub if the minimum requirement for that hub is met. Eg. 0.71
of a TL for 752 (Dallas)
 Next Steps: Evaluate vehicle routing options among multiple
hubs
21.07.2015
21
Questions?
21.07.2015
22