Transcript Slide 1
Maryland’s State Implementation Strategies, Successes, and Outcomes www.pbismaryland.org Susan Barrett [email protected] 1 ACKNOWLWEDGEMENTS • Maryland State Department of • • • • • Education Sheppard Pratt Health System Johns Hopkins University 24 Local School Systems University of Oregon University of Connecticut 2 Pennsylvania D.C. 3 494 500 369 400 300 190 200 100 283 276 150 125 68 35 42 61 30 133 183 81 0 FY 99 FY 00 FY 01 FY 02 Schools Trained FY 03 FY 04 FY 05 FY 06 Coaches Trained 4 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 5 Political Support PBIS was part of the top ten MSDE state supplemental budget request for FY’ 00-FY’ 07. Section 7-304.1 Of the Annotated Code of Maryland • • • In this section, “Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Program” means the research-based, systems approach method adopted by the State Board to build capacity among school staff to adopt and sustain the use of positive, effective practices to create learning environments where teachers can teach and students can learn. Each county board of education and the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City shall require an elementary school that has a suspension rate that exceeds 18 percent of the elementary school’s enrollment to implement: – A Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Program; or – An alternative behavioral modification program in collaboration with the Department. The State Board shall adopt regulations to implement the provisions of this section. 6 Section 7-304.1 Of the Annotated Code of Maryland (a) In this section, “Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Program” means the research-based, systems approach method adopted by the State Board to build capacity among school staff to adopt and sustain the use of positive, effective practices to create learning environments where teachers can teach and students can learn. (b) Each county board of education and the Board of School Commissioners of Baltimore City shall require an elementary school that has a suspension rate that exceeds 18 percent of the elementary school’s enrollment to implement: (1) A Positive Behavioral Interventions and Support Program; or (2) An alternative behavioral modification program in collaboration with the Department. (c) The State Board shall adopt regulations to implement the provisions of this section. 7 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 8 State Leadership Team Visibility: MSDE Marketing Department is developing a tiered marketing/advertising plan targeting key PBIS stakeholders to generate more awareness for the initiative. Target Audiences: Parents and Community Members/Leaders, District Leaders, Instructional Leaders, State Leaders, Teachers, Students Politicians 9 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 10 State Leadership Team Funding: As the PBIS initiative prepares for a largescale expansion, we are in progress on a framework to identify and secure a broad base of funding support to ensure the infrastructure required to maintain the consistency and quality of technical assistance and evaluation support to districts. 11 Funding • PBIS has been one of the top ten line items of the Maryland State Department of Education supplemental budget request FY’ 00- FY’ 07. 12 Funding -Reality • Title IV-Safe and Drug Free Schools • Special Education • HIV prevention • Drop Out Prevention • Sheppard Pratt 13 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 14 Schools Trained and Active 140 126 126 120 94 85 100 91 67 80 60 54 51 60 30 40 20 49 20 12 17 14 3 0 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 Trained Active 2004 2005 2006 15 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 16 State Leadership Team: Diversified • • • • • • • • • MSDE Division of Special Education/ Early Intervention Services MSDE Division of Student and School Services Sheppard Pratt Health System Johns Hopkins University LSS Behavior Support Coaches Juvenile Justice Governor’s Office of Children University of Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene Management Team-Core Group MSDE, JHU, Sheppard Pratt 17 Mental Health Integration Grant • MARYLAND STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION • THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND, BALTIMORE, ON BEHALF • • • • • • • OF ITS CENTER FOR SCHOOL MENTAL HEALTH ANALYSIS AND ACTION DEPARTMENT OF JUVENILE SERVICES GOVERNOR’S OFFICE FOR CHILDREN MENTAL HYGIENE ADMINISTRATION THE MENTAL HEALTH ASSOCIATION OF MARYLAND THE MARYLAND COALITION OF FAMILIES FOR CHILDREN’S MENTAL HEALTH MARYLAND ASSEMBLY ON SCHOOL-BASED HEALTHCARE SHEPPARD PRATT HEALTH SYSTEM 18 State Leadership Team Functions • Set policy • Provide support for local leadership • Influence System of Change at District • • • • Level Assess Training Needs Event Coordination Provide Training and Technical Assistance Monitor Outcomes • Features of implementation • Referrals • Other indicators 19 Building Local Capacity Roles and Responsibilities 20 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 21 Behavior Support Coaches • 283 Behavior Support Coaches – Itinerant positions/funded by LSS • Meet 5 times/year – Networking – Regional Meetings – Workgroups • Coaches Reception • Coaches Newsletter/Coaches Calendar • Coach = Recruiter 8 LSS Coordinators 22 Roles of Coach • Sustainability & Accountability • • • • • • • • Hands-on technical assistance Guide problem solving Local training Team start-up & sustainability Public relations/communications Support local leadership Local coordination of resources Provide prompts & reinforcers 23 Behavior Support Coach Activities • • • • • • FTE allocated to complete tasks Consistently attend team meetings Assist team with data-based decisionmaking, planning, and implementation Attend Regional/State Coaches meetings/trainings Send information to PBIS State/District Coordinator (e.g., checklists, action plans, etc.) Assist with dissemination activities (e.g., presentations, case studies, articles, etc.) 24 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 25 Maryland Annual Events • • • • Spring Forum (April 6, 2006) July Institute (July 10, July 17) Coaches Meetings (5/year) Regional Team Leader/Coach Meetings (2/year) • Schools serving students with special needs - MANSEF (2/year) • High Schools – (2/year) 26 Spring Forum • • • • Purpose: Recruitment Date: April (set one year in advance) Overview & School Presentations Participants: – Administrators from “potential new” schools – “Key” system personnel – Potential coaches Planning Phase I Begins 27 Summer Training • New Coaches • New Teams • Returning Teams • Exemplar Schools • Receptions and Poster Sessions 28 Other Training Events • Local Coordinators/Trainers • State Coaches Meetings • Regional Meetings • Targeted Group • Behavioral Basics • School Wide Information System (SWIS) • SWIS facilitator • School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) 29 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Active Coordination Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 30 Evaluation Capacity Establishing Measurable Outcomes 1. What schools have been trained and are active? 2. How well are schools implementing PBIS? 3. What impact does PBIS have on student behavior? Achievement? 31 Monitoring Outcomes • Team Implementation Checklist • SWIS • SET • Coaches Checklist • Staff Survey • Satisfaction Surveys • Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI) 32 Evaluation Tools Access 2003 Database • Data entry/storage • Report Generation 33 Evaluation Tools Maryland website www.pbismaryland.org Various levels: Any user Team/coach LSS Point of Contact State Team Maryland Forms Matrix Access Database SWIS PBS surveys (www.pbssurveys.org) 34 35 How Well are Schools Implementing? • Systems-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) – Annually – 7 Features of SW Implementation • Implementation Phases Inventory (IPI) – Semi-annually – Levels of SW: Preparation, Initiation, Implementation, and Maintenance 36 School-Wide Evaluation Tool 35 Coaches trained as SET assessors 15 Contractual SET assessors • • • • • • 97 SETs completed 2004 154 SETs completed 2005 104 schools have at least two SET scores 80% Total score is considered Maintenance Phase (IPI) All regions met 80% criterion across schools 69% increase after one year of implementation 37 SET Scores by Region 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 93 91 86 90 84 43 42 29 25 Pre Western Special Southern Eastern Central 20 10 0 Post 38 IPI % of schools at phase 11.1% 16.0% 53.8% 19.1% P reparatio n Initiatio n * IPI: Implementation Phases Inventory Implementatio n M aintenance 39 PROJECT TARGET Evaluating PBIS in Maryland Project Target Dr. Catherine Bradshaw Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence Johns Hopkins University 40 Randomized Trial of PBIS: Project Target Project Target Sample • 37 Elementary Schools – Allegany(7), Anne Arundel(4), Baltimore (13), Charles(11), & Washington(2) – 3,057 Staff & 20,246 Students Design • Randomly Assigned • – 21 PBIS – 16 Comparison Baseline plus 4 years 41 Funding : NIMH & CDC to the Johns Hopkins Center for the Prevention of Youth Violence Data Collected • Disruptive behavior Project Target – Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation (TOCA; Werthamer-Larsson et al., 1991) – Student Interactions in Specific Settings (SISS; Cushing & Horner, 2002) – Office discipline referrals (SWIS; School-Wide Information System) • Academic information – Attendance – Academic performance • School climate – School Climate Survey (Haynes, Emmons, & Comer, 1994) • Organizational health – Organizational Health Inventory (Hoy et al., 1990) • Implementation fidelity – System-wide Evaluation Tool (SET; Sugai, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, & Horner, 2001) – Staff Survey (Sugai, Todd, & Horner, 2000) 42 Implementation of PBIS 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 PBIS Comparison 84 90 * * 62 56 37 43 Baseline Year 1 Year 2 Notes. No significant differences between groups at baseline, but differences at all other years, p<.05. 43 Impact of PBIS on Organizational Health 3.15 PBIS Comparison 3.12 Mean OHI 3.1 3.05 3.01 3.012 3 2.95 2.94 2.9 Baseline Year 3 Note. Adjusted means from 3-level model in Mplus. Intervention effect on slope of overall OHI significant at p<.05. 44 Summary of Preliminary Findings from Project Target • PBIS schools have high program fidelity • PBIS increased organizational health • Some positive effects on student outcomes – Behavior problems in classroom – Reduced office discipline referrals – Reduced suspensions Project Target 45 PBS Systems Implementation Logic Visibility Funding Political Support Leadership Team Action Plan Training Coaching Evaluation Local School Teams/Demonstrations 46 Anticipated Growth 50% of MD Schools will be trained by 2010 Chart Title 800 600 400 364 434 504 574 644 714 200 0 FY 05 FY 06 FY 07 Anticipated Growth at 5% FY 08 FY 09 FY 10 Linear (Anticipated Growth at 5%)47 5 YEAR GOALS • Goal 1: Increase state coordination by identifying regional coordinators for Southern, Central, Eastern and Western Maryland. • Goal 2: Increase evaluation capacity by expanding web site functionality i.e. online tutorials, data submission and retrieval. • Goal 3: Increase local training capacity by identifying training coordinator(s). • Goal 4: Increase visibility by identifying an individual to write grants, develop marketing material and interface with outside agencies. 48 Lessons Learned • • • • • • • Pacing Be Patient Exemplar Feedback Social Marketing-target audiences Role of Coach Process 49