SAS EVAAS - Appalachian State University

Download Report

Transcript SAS EVAAS - Appalachian State University



SAS EVAAS
A Way of Measuring Schooling Influence
Marty Ward and Dana Wrights
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools
SASEVAAS
Unites two respected entities:
1. SAS: a major software company that
produces powerful data analysis
capabilities
SAS is the world’s largest privately held
software company.
SASEVAAS
2. EVAAS is Educational Value-Added
Assessment System.
EVAAS is based on more than ten years of
research by Dr. William Sanders and his
colleagues on value-added assessment.
SASEVAAS
EVAAS was provided to all North Carolina
LEAs by the Department of Public Instruction
in 2007-08
Current tests included in EVAAS are End-ofGrade Reading and Math, all End-of-Course
subjects, Writing 4, 7, and 10, and SAT (school
level only)
What is value-added assessment?
It is a different approach to analyzing student
achievement data.
It is based on the simple notion of following a
student’s academic progress over time.
By linking each student’s test records from grade
to grade over subjects, the influence of the district,
school and teacher on the rate of academic
progress can be extracted via complex data
analysis.
What is value-added assessment?
Much of the value-added research looks at the
impact of the teacher.
Although reports can be made based on teacher,
the North Carolina package does not include
teacher-level value-added reports.
However, the State Board of Education funded the
addition of teacher-level reporting.
Value-added Assessment
Historically, accountability reporting is
based on a “snapshot” of student
achievement—proficiency or performance
composite.
SAS EVAAS methodology extracts
information from longitudinally linked
student test scores.
Value-added Assessment
ABCs growth is the closest available measure to
EVAAS
ABC growth looks at a student’s past performance
a maximum of two tests and “expects” relative
performance to be at least as good as in the past
EVAAS uses up to 5 years of test scores in every
available subject (at least 3 scores) to predict
performance
Limitations in Using EVAAS
Students’ school is where they were last
tested—not re-rostered (at the current time)
Another data tool, not perfect
Like any good data tool, it is more likely to
raise questions rather than provide answers
Limitations in Using EVAAS
Less useful for grade 3 (limited data)
Less useful when there are small numbers
of students
• Less reliable estimates
• Cannot reasonably disaggregate
Scores from alternate assessments not
robust enough for use (not included in
EVAAS)
SASEVAAS Advantages
The EVAAS methodology minimizes the
influence of measurement error by using up
to five years of data for an individual
student. Analyzing all subjects
simultaneously increases the precision of
the estimates.
SASEVAAS Advantages (cont.)
By including all students in the analyses,
even those with a sporadic testing history,
SAS EVAAS provides the most realistic
estimate of achievement available for a
district or school.
SASEVAAS Advantages (cont.)
SAS EVAAS allows educators to benefit from all
tests, even though their scales are different. The
EVAAS methodology accommodates all tests that:
• are reliable
• are highly correlated with curricular
standards
• have sufficient stretch in the reporting scale
to measure the achievement of both very
low- and very high-achieving students in a
grade or subject.
SASEVAAS Advantages (cont.)
With SAS EVAAS methodology, each
student serves as his or her own control,
creating a level playing field and
eliminating the need to adjust for race,
poverty, or other socioeconomic factors.
This innovative approach ensures that the
results are fair to both student and
educators.
EVAAS : Reflecting Back and
Looking Forward
1. Students’ score histories are used to
provide valuable diagnostic information
about past practices.
2. Each student’s previous scores are used to
predict success probabilities of numerous
academic milestones (future EOG and
EOC scores).
Value-Added Report
How effective was the school/district?
How much progress did students make
compared to the average effectiveness of
North Carolina schools?
Value-Added Report
This is the main type of EVAAS report. It
has the most rigorous statistical standards.
The value-added reports are conservative—
for a school or district to be labeled as
having progress “significantly below” or
“significantly above” average progress in
the state, it must be 2 standard errors below
or above.
Value-Added Report: Utility
Given how students were predicted to perform
if they received the average North Carolina
schooling experience, how effective were we?
Pinpoints overall strengths and weaknesses by
subject and grade - provides FOCUS
Diagnostic Report
Divides students into 5 groups based on
how they were predicted to perform.
(Quintiles: the bottom 20% in NC, the next
lowest 20%, the middle group, and so on).
Graphic shows how effective the
school/district was with each of the groups.
Can also look at subgroups, e.g. ethnic or
gender groups.
Diagnostic Report
Green line is reference line – the amount of
progress students were predicted to make
– Bar above the line – students progressed better
than average
– Bar below the line – students made less than
average progress
– Red vertical line – 1 standard error above &
below
Diagnostic Report: Utility
Given the rest of the state as a comparison,
how were our students predicted to perform
(quintiles)?
How did our students actually perform
compared to students with similar
performance predictions?
Were there differences for various
subgroups?
Diagnostic Performance Reports
Very similar to Diagnostic Reports, but
divides students into predicted Achievement
Levels (Level I, II, III, or IV)
Graphic shows how effective the school
was with each of the levels.
Can also look at subgroups, e.g. ethnic or
gender groups.
Diagnostic Performance Report:
Utility
Given the rest of the state as a comparison,
how were our students predicted to perform
(via achievement levels)?
How did our students actually perform
compared to students predicted to perform
at the same achievement level?
Were there differences for various
subgroups?
Diagnostic Reports Utility
Drill-down from Value-added
– Targets which subgroups and students need the
most intervention
– Finds success stories
– SHOULD NEVER BE USED FOR
ACCOUNTABILITY; ONLY FOR
DIAGNOSTIC PURPOSES
At Risk Reports
Students at risk to not be at grade level
(AYP At Risk), probability between 0% and
70% for math, 0% to 80% for Reading
(because of new standards).
Graduation At Risk (0% to 70% for courses
required for high school graduation)
Other at risk (other EOC tests)
Student Pattern List
Provides a list of students based on selected
subject, grade, course
Allows user to further select a subgroup, if
desired
Divides the group into thirds (lowest,
middle and highest) and estimates
effectiveness
Custom Student Reports
Provides ability for user to create and save
rosters of user-defined subgroups of
students.
For example, you can define a group likely
to be successful in the next grade or course
for planning purposes
Custom Student Reports
Allows a quick search for
Individual students
Groups by selected characteristics (e.g.
gender, ethnic group, LEP, predicted
scores)
Allows drill down to show 5 years of
student percentile scores (compares to
school and district)
Custom Reports: Utility
Flexibility to build school or teacherlevel reports (last year or possibly
current)
Sort capabilities can provide:
– Prioritized list of need
– Quick grouping of AYP groups
Custom Reports: Caution
Probabilities are calculated based on
the premise that NO INTERVENTION
OCCURS beyond the average NC schooling
experience
Should NOT be treated as a ‘score;’ simple
adjustments to a student’s education plan
can make tremendous improvements to
probability
Student Profile Reports
Click on a student name:
Provides line graph of student’s previous
performance in selected subject in terms of
percentiles
Includes district and school averages for
comparison purposes
Student Profile Reports: Utility
Quick graphic view of trends
Parent conferences
Comparison to school and district
Student Projection Reports
Click on a student’s probability:
Provides line graph of student’s previous
performance in selected subject in terms of
percentiles, PLUS a yellow projection line
of next test
Includes projected proficiency level average
percentile for comparison
Student Projection Reports: Utility
and Caution
Provides student probability of meeting
various academic milestones
Based on previous performance AND IF
NO INTERVENTION OCCURS beyond
the average NC schooling experience
Caution should be exercised when sharing
with student and/or parent – must carefully
explain meaning of probability
Things to Remember
Use the ‘Help’ Link
Don’t let it overwhelm you
– Consider this tool an investigative project; you
will learn more each time you enter the site
Improvements are coming
– Some things are difficult to manipulate right
now (e.g., rerostering), but SAS EVAAS is
working to improve the site
Things to Remember
Best use is a diagnostic tool
This is ONE of MANY tools available for
evaluating data to improve instruction
– Use with other tools to get a clear picture
• Goal Summaries
• District Assessments
• Formative Assessments
WEBSITE:
ncdpi.sas.com/evaas/login.jsp