Transcript Slide 1
MEPA Quantitative Tools “Taking advantage of numbers for effective decision-making” SESSION OBJECTIVES • At the end of the session, the participants are expected to: a. Discuss the basics and nuances in making Work Financial Plan (WFP) and M&E Plan; b. Explain how to prepare and use appropriately tools such as: S-CURVE, Trend Analysis, all types of Graphical Presentation in analyzing quantitative data and tracking progress of a particular program, project and activity; c. Develop deeper understanding on the importance of .quantitative tools in preparing Completed Staff Work (CSW) for MEPA. ACTIVITY: Self-Assessment Direction: Assess how knowledgeable and competent you are in making necessary plans for MEPA and in using quantitative tools in the preparation of CSW for MEPA, using the following rating scale: 1 – Developing 3 – Advanced 2 - Maturing No. Quantitative Tools Pre-test I have adequate knowledge and have already crafted/used: Post-test 1 Work Financial Plan (WFP) 1 2 3 1 2 3 2 M&E Plan 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 S-Curve 1 2 3 1 2 3 4 Data Trend Analysis 1 2 3 1 2 3 5 All types presentation graphical 1 2 3 1 2 3 of Total Score Level of Competence How is your assessment result? Directions: 1. Sum-up the total score and divide it by 5. 2. Determine your level of competence based on the table below: Numerical Rating Descriptive Rating Interpretation 1.0-1.49 Developing You are still in the process of acquiring the skill; hence, you need Technical Assistance. 1.50-2.49 Maturing You have acquired the skill to a larger extent, but you need to enhance it further. 2.50-3.0 Advanced Congratulations! You have fully acquired the skill to a largest extent, you are very much ready to prepare CSW for MEPA. ANALYSIS 1. How did you find the activity? 2. What is your level of competence? 3. What facilitating/hindering factors contributed for having such level? 4. Which specific tool do you need more TA? 5. Why do you need to have high level of competence in all these quantitative tools? DASHBOARD: QUALITY (1st Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPIs on QUALITY: NAT, CR, SReA, EGRA, Phil IRI, NCAE • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “PRODUCING CHILDREN WITH QUALITY LEARNING” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on quality DASHBOARD: ACCESS (2nd Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPI on ACCESS: - SMEPA: Enrolment Rate (Community Mapping), Attendance - DMEPA: Enrolment Rate, Enrolment Pattern RMEPA: Participation Rate, GER, Enrolment Pattern • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-àvis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on access - enrolment DASHBOARD: ACCESS (3rd Quarter) • Focus on DepEd’s KPI on ACCESS: - SMEPA: Drop-out Rate (Absolute number) - DMEPA: School Leavers (Absolute number) - RMEPA: Cohort Survival Rate, School Leavers • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-àvis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on access – CSR & SLR DASHBOARD: ALL KPIs (4th Quarter) • Focus on all DepEd’s KPIs on ACCESS & QUALITY: - SMEPA: Enrolment, Drop-out, NAT - DMEPA: Enrolment, School Leavers (Absolute no.), NAT - RMEPA: NAT, PR, GER, CSR, SLR • Review on the bottlenecks of all PPAs vis-à-vis “KEEPING ALL CHILDREN IN SCHOOL & PRODUCING WITH QUALITY LEARNING” • Leading review to a more systematic and systemic analysis of DepEd policies on quality & access. M&E TOOLS: QUANTITATIVE • Work Financial Plan (WFP) • M&E Plan • S-CURVE – to determine Physical & Financial Accomplishment based on WFP (Actual vs Target) • Trend Analysis • Graphical Presentation Work Financial Plan (WFP) • It is crafted to make the PPAs of the Implementation Plan (AIP) easy to realize. • It is the basis in determining Physical and Financial accomplishment • The Actual vs Target of the physical and financial aspect of the WFP is clearly indicated. • Without this, no objective M&E can be undertaken M&E Plan • It is based on the WFP. • The M&E Plan is based from the Physical Financial Target • The S-Curve is determined from the Physical Financial Target both and both and S-CURVE • It is the graphical presentation of the status of the implementation of the Physical and Financial Target • It can be determined by getting the difference between Actual and Target • This tool can provide the Physical and Financial Accomplishment of the implementation of the WFP Trend Analysis - % of Increase/Decrease • A Technique used to determine whether the KPIs is increasing, decreasing or fluctuating • Percentage of Increase is used. • Through this, decision-maker can be able to spot which KPI can be the focused of priority in terms of providing strategic directions GRAPHICAL PRESENTATION • Effective tool to present the trend of the KPIs for the last three or five years. • Varied types can be used: Bar Graph, Line Graph, Picto Graph, Pie Graph • Each type of graph serves a specific purpose APPLICATION 1. Perform any of the following: • S-CURVE of your Physical Financial Accomplishment and • Graph of the trend of your KPIs for the last three years 2. Make a simple analysis of your graph.