Transcript Requirements Analysis: Concepts

Intellectual Property & Legal
Regulation in Cyberspace
CSCI102 - Systems
ITCS905 - Systems
MCS9102 - Systems
What is Intellectual Property?
• “Property” originally referred only to land
• Typically refers to objects an individual can own
– Usually thought of as a tangible
• A relationship between individuals
in reference to things
– An individual X
– An object Y
– X’s relation to other individuals (A,B,C…) in reference to Y
• X can control Y relative to A,B,C …
• By this more sophisticated definition,
– control of data relative to others can make that data “property”
• But such claims are less straightforward than with tangible
objects
2
Intellectual Objects
•
•
•
•
•
Represent creative works & inventions
Are manifestations and expressions of an idea
Are non-exclusionary
Scarcity need not apply
No practical limit to the number of intellectual objects
that can be owned
• Legal protection can only be given to the expression
of ideas, not to possession of them
3
Why Protect Intellectual
Objects?
• Theory One: Labor (Locke)
property ownership in return for labor
– ~ a natural right
• Theory Two: Utilitarianism (Mill)
property rights are social constructs designed to
encourage creators and inventors to serve society.
– ~ an artificial right
• Theory Three: Personality (Hegel)
creations are expressions of personality, and thus the
creator has a right to how their personality is
displayed and distributed
– ~ a moral right
4
Software as Intellectual
Property
• Should software be protected by patents or by copyright?
Or both?
• Originally software was ineligible for either!
– Algorithms, like mathematics, represent mental-steps and are not
eligible for patent
• Software protection is a recent development,
late 80’s+
• Intellectual property protection falls into 4 categories:
– Copyright law
– Patents
– Trademarks
– Trade secrets
5
1: Copyright Law
• Granted to an individual or organisation
• To be granted, the work must be
– Original
– Nonfunctional
– Fixed in a tangible medium
• Under US law, copyright holders have exclusive rights to:
– Make copies of the work
– Produce derivative works
– Distribute copies
– Perform works in public
– Display works in public
6
1: Copyright Law
• Fair-Use & First-Sale Doctrines
– Balance exclusive author control with broader social interests
• Fair-Use:
– Criticism, Comment, News, Reporting
– Teaching, Scholarship, Research (incl. ‘reverse eng’)
• First-Sale:
– Original owner loses rights after first sale
• May destroy a book or give it away
– It is not clear however, if you can give away software that is
licensed for use but not, strictly speaking, owned by a user
7
1: Copyright Law
• Software Piracy as Copyright Violation
– With PC’s, in 80’s it was easy to copy software but unclear if
it was legal to do so
– Manufacturers claimed to have lost millions in revenue
(esp. Bill Gates)
• Exaggerated claims?
• Unrealistic as poor countries were never realistic markets for
overpriced products anyway?
– Nissenbaum (1995) argues that it may sometimes be moral
to copy software, even if its illegal, eg: to do the least harm
– Others argue there is no real harm is done
• Remember tho’ the slippery slope & virtuality fallacies
– Corporations more concerned with piracy as organised crime
8
1: Copyright Law
• DeCSS and Fair-Use
– Decrypt CSS (content scrambling system) which protects DVD’s
– Designed to allow DVD playing on Linux
• Argument for: - fair use
• Argument against: illegal to construct a workaround through a
process that decodes or decrypts a technology
• Counter argument that anticircumvention clause unconstitutional
as deprive individuals of fair use
– BTW: the right of SONY to commercially release the VCR
(opposed by Universal City Studios), and thus allow the
recording of TV programs, was only allowed under Fair-Use
by a 5-to-4 vote of the US Supreme Court!
9
2: Patents
•
•
Legal protection given to individuals who create an invention or process
Under US law, patents can be applied to inventions that satisfy:
– Usefulness
– Novelty
– Non-obviousness
•
Three kinds of patent
– Design patents
– Utility patents
– Plant patents
•
Patent holder has complete monopoly for twenty years
•
•
Have patents gone too far? Huge increase in applications
Concern over what should be elegible:
– Eg: Amazon.com vs BarnesandNoble.com
10
3: Trademarks
• Word, name, phrase or symbol that identifies a
product or service
• Trademark owner can argue another too similar may
be ‘diluting’ or ‘blurring’ their “mark”
• The “mark” is supposed to be distinctive, but recent
decisions may have gone too far …
11
4: Trade Secrets
• Consists of information used in the operation of a
business or other enterprise that is sufficiently
valuable and secret to afford actual or potential
advantage.
– Formulas
– Blueprints
– Chemical compounds
– Manufacturing processes
• Trade secret law is difficult to enforce internationally
12
An Alternative IP Framework
• Previously we saw: Labor, Utility, Personality
• Stallman (author of the Emacs editor) argues that information
“wants to be free”
– Humans desire to share information with each other
– Sharing requires access
– IP protection structures prevent information from achieving its
purpose
• Aristotle’s causes: nature, end, purpose
– Natural law suggests the ‘good’ of information is for it to be
communicated
• Consider the social nature of information
13
Information wants to be shared vs.
Information wants to be free
• A new idea with perhaps a better chance is:
“information wants to be shared” (Tavani
2002)
• Can share the benefits of information without
depriving others of it.
– Perhaps the “cyber age” allows us to move from
the level of the individual to the level of the
community
• Consider inter-library loans – allowable with
physical books, but potentially illegal with
electronic-storage material
14
Information wants to be shared vs.
Information wants to be free
• Has IP protection become oppressive?
• The Open-Source community promoted
the idea that information wants to be
shared, without adopting the far stronger
idea that information wants to be
(absolutely) free
15
Public Domain of Ideas
• Which information is part of “common ground”
available for the whole community?
• “Intellectual commons”
• John Perry Barlow (1994) predicted end of IP law in
cyberspace but opposite may have occurred
• IP protection is eroding the public domain through
over-regulation driven by economic interests
• Perhaps the success of the environmental movement
provides an analogy for cyberspace - to save the
“intellectual commons”?
16
Is the Internet a Medium or a
Place?
• Are “Internet” and “cyberspace” roughly equivalent
terms?
• MEDIA:
– Publisher
– Broadcast
– Distributor
– Common carrier
• A many-to-many medium?
• Or is it a kind of public space?
– Public space infers all sorts of moral arguments about
freedom and accessability
17
Two Categories of Internet
Regulation
• Broadcast Medium -> Comon Carrier model
– Centered on content
• Public Space -> Bookstore model
– Centered on standards
• Can the decentralised Internet be regulated at all?
• Lessig (1999) argues the architecture (code) is the key to
regulation
– Cyberspace
• Regulating content
– Speech
• Regulating process
– commerce
18
Lessig Modes of Regulation
• Four modalities of regulation
• Laws
– Explicit laws banning certain things
• Social norms
– What is socially acceptable
• Market pressures
– Regulation through pricing
• Architecture
– Physical or procedural constraints
• Lessig argues the architecture of the net is moving from freedom
to control, that the code is the law
19
Regulation by Code & Privatisation
• Information policy is becoming ‘privatised’
(Niva Elkin-Koren 2000)
– Achieved through the technological controls embedded in the
software code
• Tech that precludes immoral & illegal behaviour
– If there was ‘unpiratable’ software (or, say, an unstealable
car) that thus precluded human crime, what is the moral
ramification of removing the ability of the human to choose to
do right?
20
Regulation by Code & Privatisation
• Closing down public debate on copyright
– If manufacturers can decide what copyright rules should be,
and automate these into the code of the product, then at what
stage does the consumer or society get to debate these
decisions and policies?
– Embedded restrictions have all the “force of law, without the
checks and balances provided by the legal system”
(Spinello 2000)
• Privatising information policy
– Steady devolution of Internet control to commercial interests
– Lines blurring between common carriers and commercial
content providers
21
Internet Domain Names
• URL’s were assigned on a first-come-first-serve basis
• Cybersquatting
– Persons, organisations who registered URL’s related to
trademarks
• ICANN
– Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
• Not broadly representative
• Not accountable
22
HTML & Trademark Infringement
• Embedded metatags can influence the behaviour of
search engines
• What if these unfairly misrepresented a trademark?
• Or were used to embed defamatory remarks?
<meta name="description" content="An international research institution providing
undergraduate and postgraduate degrees, located near Sydney in the beautiful coastal
region of the Illawarra.">
<meta name="Keywords" content="wollongong, university, Sydney, uni, college,
campus, degree, academic, student, undergraduate, postgraduate, lecture, tutorial,
Illawarra, education, computer, information, technology, australia, new south wales,
NSW, arts, creative arts, commerce, education, engineering, health and behavioural
sciences, informatics, law, science, access, diploma, masters, doctorate, PhD, bachelor,
labs, opportunities, career, sydney, berry, dubai, management, Internet, research,
accommodation, UniCentre, Conferences, Innovation, scholarships, prizes, technology,
library"> <!-- #EndEditable -->
23
Hyperlinking & Deep Linking
• Links to sites that bypass the front-pages (which set
out context, and usage policy etc) and jump directly to
a “deeper” page of the site
– May bypass advertisements which are funding the site!
– May bypass counters
– Can thus cause commercial harm
24
Other issues
• SPAM
Is SPAM ethical?
• Free Speech vs. Censorship
– Controversial speech
– Software Filtering
– Defamation
• Moral Accountability & Legal Liability of ISP’s
25
Main Reference:
– Herman T. Tavani. Ethics & Technology:
ethical issues in an Age of Information and
Communication Technology. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley, 2004.
26