Transcript Chapter 8

Potential GDP and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
CHAPTER
8
EYE ONS
Classical macroeconomics
Keynesian macroeconomics
New macroeconomics
Demand of labor
Supply of labor
Quantity of labor demanded
Quantity of labor supplied
Potential GDP
Great Depression
Union wage
Efficiency wage
Union wage
Production function
Diminishing returns
Job rationing
Job search
CLASSICAL vs KEYNESIAN
CLASSICAL
KEYNESIAN
MONETARISTS
Agree with
Classical View
but add idea that
fluctuations in the
quantity of money
influence the
business
cycle
Works Well
Will Fluctuate and
Growth will Slow
Cannot Improve Market
Performance
Works but is Unstable
DEPRESSION &HIGH
UNEMPLOYMENT
Occur & Will Fix Itself
Natural consequence
Occur when households and
businesses do not spend
enough on consumption and
investment
DISPUTED
In the 30’s, The Great
Depression
- 25% unemployment
- 30% Decrease Prdxn
TWO Possible Problems:
1. Slow rate of RGDP
Increase
2. Persistent Inflation
Great Depression
Cause: natural
Fix: none
Cause: too little consumer
spending and investment
Fix: Increase Govt Spending
 that could cause worse
problems in the future
Cause: large decrease
in the quantity of money
Fix: none
Foundation
Popular until 1930’s
John Keynes, around 1930’s
Milton Friedman
MARKETS
ECONOMY
GOVERNMENT
Must Spend to Counteract
Decreased Private
Spending
Slow in growth rate of
money = recession
KEYNESIAN ISSUES
1. Slow rate of RGDP Growth
1. Job creation is SLOW
•
Short Term = Decrease in Unemployment
•
Long Term = Increase in Unemployment
2. Inflation
•
60’s saw increased inflation
•
70’s saw explosion of inflation
•
60’s & 70’s saw increased unemployment
•
60’s & 70’s saw Slow RGDP growth
NEW ECONOMIC THEORY- Today’s Consensus
Each School of Thought Provides Insight
Classical – during expansion (at/near full employment)
Keynesian – during recessions
When spending is cut and the demand for most goods, services, and labor all decrease, prices and wage rates
don’t fall but the quantity of goods and services sold and the quantity of labor employed do fall and the economy
goes into recession.
In a recession, an increase in spending by governments, or a tax cut that leaves people with more of their
earnings to spend, can help to restore full employment.
Monetarists –
Emphasizing that a contraction in the quantity of money brings higher interest rates and borrowing costs, which
are a major source of cuts in spending that bring recession.
Increasing the quantity of money and lowering the interest rate in a recession can help to restore full
employment.
And keeping the quantity of money growing steadily in line with the expansion of the economy’s production
possibilities can help to keep inflation in check and can also help to moderate the severity of a recession.
LT is more important than ST
MACRO outcomes depend on MICRO choices
Markets work well and adjust slowly to shocks
Even a small slowdown in economic growth brings a huge cost in terms of a
permanently lower level of income per person.
EYE ON US ECONOMY
The Lucas wedge is
equivalent to 6 years’
real GDP.
During the 1960s, U.S. real GDP per person
expanded at 2.9 percent a year.
The red line shows the actual path of real GDP.
The black line shows the path of real GDP if that
growth rate has been maintained.
The shaded wedge shows the lost output—
equivalent to $284,500 per person.
The Okun gap is
equivalent to about 3
months’ real GDP.
The red line shows the output gap—the percentage
deviation of real GDP from potential GDP.
When real GDP is below potential GDP, output is lost
and the gap is negative.
A negative gap is called an Okun gap.
The Okun gap since the end of 1960 is equivalent to
$12,850 per person.
So smoothing the business cycle has a smaller payoff compared to the
potentially huge payoff from restoring real GDP growth to its 1960s rate.
POTENTIAL GDP
 When is the economy at full employment?
RGDP = Potential GDP
 What is potential GDP?
The amount of GDP that would be produced if the economy were at
full employment
 Can RGDP exceed PGDP?
Yes, temporarily at the business cycle peak
 Why does RGDP = PGDP?
Because they fluctuate around each other – mathematically they
are equal.
 RGDP  is made by using ALL factors of production.
Land, Capital, Entrepreneurship are constant
Labor IS NOT constant  it depends on peoples choices
THUS, RGDP depends on the quantity of labor employed
FUNDAMENTAL CAUSES OF UNEMPLOYMENT
 Job Search  Looking for a job
 The amount of Job Search depends on
 Demographic Change
 Unemployment Benefits
 Structural Change
 Job Rationing  RWR > equilibrium
 RWR may be above equilibrium because
 Efficiency Wage
 Minimum Wage
 Union Wage
 RWR > Equilibrium Rate  $QLD and #QLS 
#Natural Unemployment Rate
POTENTIAL GDP
 Factors of Production
Labor & Human Capital
Physical Capital
Land
Entrepreneurship
 All Factors of Production
are FIXED at any given
point in time EXCEPT
LABOR
Labor employed depends on
choices of people
RGDP produced depends on
quantity of labor employed
 Diminishing Returns
Extra workers have less capital
with which to work
LABOR DEMAND
 Quantity of Labor Demanded
 Demand for Labor
$RWR = #QLD
 Movement
along the curve
 Shift in the

curve
Change in
Productivity
LABOR SUPPLY
 Quantity of Labor Supplied
 Supply of Labor
#RWR = #QLS
 Hrs/person #
 Labor Force
Participation
Rate #
 What matters
to people is
not the dollars
they earn
BUT
What those
dollars will
buy!
GRAPH SHELLS
DEMAND
SUPPLY
RWR
RWR
LS
LS1
LS2
LD2
LD1
LD
LABOR
LABOR
CURVE SHIFTS:
$ qty LD
= #Wages (on y axis)
$ LD
= $Productivity
CURVE SHIFTS:
$ qty LS = $Wages (on y axis)
$ LS = #income taxes
$ LS = #unemployment benefits
$ LS = $population
GRAPH RELATIONSHIP
 Notice Full Employment is
achieved at EQUILIBRIUM
 Notice the two graphs LINE UP at
Qty of Labor Employed
 When the economy is at Full
Employment  RGDP = PGDP
LABOR MARKET – Natural Unemployment Rate
 Full Employment = Natural Unemployment Rate
 IF RWR > Equilibrium Rate 
$QLD and #QLS 
#Natural Unemployment Rate
 Main causes of unemployment
at full Employment
 Job Search
 Demographic Change
 Unemployment Benefits
 Structural Change
 Job Rationing
 Efficiency Wage
 Minimum Wage
 Union Wage
EXERCISES
Table
Quantity of labor demanded (billions of hours per year)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Real GDP (billions of 2000 dollars)
0
5
9
12
14
15
5
4
3
2
1
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
Table
Quantity of labor supplied (billions of hours per year)
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Draw Labor Market graph
Draw Production Function
Show relationship between graphs
What is the equilibrium real wage rate
What is the equilibrium employment
What is potential GDP
Show the effect of a significant decrease in labor productivity
on both graphs
EXERCISES
Table
Quantity of labor demanded (billions of hours per year)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Real GDP (billions of 2000 dollars)
0
5
9
12
14
15
5
4
3
2
1
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
Table
Quantity of labor supplied (billions of hours per year)
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
1.
2.
3.
4.
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
Draw Labor Market graph
Draw Production Function
Show relationship between graphs
What is the equilibrium real wage
rate
5. What is the equilibrium employment
6. What is potential GDP
7. Show the effect of a significant
decrease in labor productivity on
both graphs
EXERCISES
Table
Quantity of labor demanded (billions of hours per year)
0
1
2
3
4
5
Real GDP (billions of 2000 dollars)
0
5
9
12
14
15
5
4
3
2
1
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
Table
Quantity of labor supplied (billions of hours per year)
Real wage rate (2000 dollars per hour)
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
0
1
2
3
4
5
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
3.50
4.00
$3
3 billion
$12 billion
Labor Demand Curve Shifts Left
Production Function Curve Shifts
down
EXERCISES
The economy of Sweden has seen changes during the past
50 years, but the change has been steady and population
growth has been modest. Sweden has high unemployment
benefits, a high minimum wage, and strong labor unions.
Use this information to answer 1 and 2.
1.
2.
1.
2.
Does the unemployment that Sweden experiences
arise primarily from job search or job rationing?
Which of the factors listed suggest that Sweden has a higher natural
unemployment rate than the United States and which suggest that Sweden
has a lower natural unemployment rate than the United States?
Does the unemployment that Sweden experiences arise primarily from job
search or job rationing?
•
High Unemployment benefits = increased job search
•
High minimum wage & strong labor unions = job rationing
•
Thus, not possible to determine
Which of the factors listed suggest that Sweden has a higher natural
unemployment rate than the United States and which suggest that Sweden
has a lower natural unemployment rate than the United States?
•
Lower  modest population growth
•
Higher  All others
EXERCISES
The figure illustrates the labor market on Sandy Island. In
addition (not shown in the figure), a survey tells us that
when Sandy Island is at full employment, people
spend 1,000 hours a day in job search. Use this
information to answer Exercises 3 and 4.
3. Find the full-employment equilibrium real wage rate
and quantity of labor employed and calculate the
natural unemployment rate.
4. If the government introduces a minimum wage of $4
an hour, how much unemployment is created?
3. Find the full-employment equilibrium real wage rate and quantity of
labor employed and calculate the natural unemployment rate.
• Equilibrium RWR = $3
• Equilibrium employment = 3,000 hours per day
• (1000 / (1000+3000)) x 100 = 25%
4. If the government introduces a minimum wage of $4 an hour, how
much unemployment is created?
• 2000 hours per day
EXERCISES
The following events occur in the United States one at a time:
•An oil embargo in the Middle East cuts supplies of oil to the United
States.
•The Anaheim Angels win the World Series.
•U.S. labor unions negotiate wage hikes that affect all workers.
•A huge scientific breakthrough doubles U.S. labor productivity.
•Migration to the United States increases the working-age population.
1.Sort the items into four groups that Change:
Production Function
Shifts down  Oil embargo
Shifts up  Scientific breakthrough
Supply of Labor
Increases  increased migration
Demand for Labor
Increases scientific breakthrough Inc. prdctvty
Do not Change any
world series, union negotiation
Union negotion does increase QLS and decrease QLD
EXERCISES
The following events occur in the United States one at a time:
•An oil embargo in the Middle East cuts supplies of oil to the United States.
•The Anaheim Angels win the World Series.
•U.S. labor unions negotiate wage hikes that affect all workers.
•A huge scientific breakthrough doubles U.S. labor productivity.
•Migration to the United States increases the working-age population.
2. Which of the events increase the equilibrium quantity of labor and which
decrease the equilibrium quantity of labor?
Increase Eq. Qty Labor scientific breakthrough and increased migration
Decrease Eq. Qty Labor  union negotiation higher wages
3. Which of the events raise the real wage rate and which of the events lower the
real wage rate?
Raise Eq. RWR  scientific breakthrough and union negotiation
Lower Eq. RWR increased migration
4. Which of the events increase potential GDP and which decrease potential
GDP?
Increase PGDP  scientific breakthrough and increased migration
Decrease PGDP  oil embargo and union negotiated wage increase
EXERCISES
.
Labor
hours
(per day)
Real GDP
(dollars
per year)
0
10
20
30
40
0
100
180
240
280
Real
wage rate
(dollars
per hour)
Quantity of labor
demanded
1.00
10
50
0.80
20
40
0.60
30
30
0.40
40
20
Quantity of labor
supplied
(hours per day)
2. What is the quantity of labor employed, potential GDP, the real wage rate, and
total labor income?
RWR = $0.60/hr
Eq. Qty Labor = 30 hrs/day
PGDP = 240/yr
3. Suppose that the government introduces a minimum wage of $0.80 an hour.
What is the real wage rate, the quantity of labor employed, potential GDP, and
unemployment? Does the unemployment arise from job search or job
rationing? Is the unemployment cyclical? Explain
RWR = $0.80/hr
Qty Labor employed = 20 hrs/day PGDP = 180/yr
Unemployment = 20 hrs per day due to job rationing from minimum wage
EXERCISES
Tsunami Social Cost Yet to Come
Relief experts estimate it could take up to a decade for some places to fully
recover, and reconstruction will cost about $9 billion. ... An assessment by the
Indonesian government estimated total damage from the tsunami at $4.5 billion to
$5 billion. ... Housing, commerce, agriculture, fisheries, and transport vehicles and
services suffered losses of $2.8 billion, or 63 percent of the total.
CNN, 19 December 2005
2. Explain the effect of the tsunami on employment in Indonesia. Did Indonesia
move along its production function or did its production function shift? How did
Indonesia’s potential GDP change?
Demand for Labor Decreased  decreased productivity
Supply of Labor Decreased  Due to deaths
Production function shifted down  due to destruction
Production function moved downward  due to fall in employment
PGDP decreases
FORMULAS
RWR
=
Nominal Wage Rate
Price Level
EYE on the
U.S.PAST
POTENTIAL GDP
Why Do Americans Earn More and
Produce More than Europeans?
The quantity of capital per worker is greater in the United
States than in Europe.
U.S. technology, on the average, is more productive than
European technology.
These differences between the United States and Europe
mean that U.S. labor is more productive than European
labor.
EYE on the
U.S.PAST
POTENTIAL GDP
Why Do Americans Earn More and Produce More
than Europeans?
Because U.S. labor is more
productive than European
labor, U.S. employers will
pay more for a given
quantity of labor than
European employers will
pay.
1. The U.S. demand for
labor in lies to the right
of the European
demand for labor.
EYE on the
U.S.PAST
POTENTIAL GDP
Why Do Americans Earn More and Produce More
than Europeans?
2. Higher European income
taxes and unemployment
benefits mean that the
European supply of labor
lies to the left of the U.S.
supply.
3. Americans work longer
hours than Europeans.
4. The equilibrium real
wage rate in the United
States is higher than in
Europe.
EYE on the
U.S.PAST
POTENTIAL GDP
Why Do Americans Earn More and Produce More
than Europeans?
Because U.S. labor is more
productive than European
labor, the U.S. production
function, lies above the
European production
function.
3. Americans work longer
hours than Europeans.
5. Potential GDP is higher in
the United States than in
Europe.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Lucas Wedge and the Okun Gap
During the 1960s, U.S. real
GDP per person expanded
at 2.9 percent a year.
The red line shows the
actual path of real GDP.
The black line shows the
path of real GDP if that
growth rate has been
maintained.
The shaded wedge shows
the lost output— equivalent
to $284,500 per person.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Lucas Wedge and the Okun Gap
The red line shows the
output gap—the percentage
deviation of real GDP from
potential GDP.
When real GDP is below
potential GDP, output is lost
and the gap is negative.
A negative gap is called an
Okun gap.
The Okun gap since the
end of 1960 is equivalent to
$12,850 per person.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Lucas Wedge and the Okun Gap
Since the end of the 1960s when the growth rate of real
GDP slowed:
• The Lucas wedge is equivalent to more than 6 years’
income.
• The Okun gap is equivalent to about 3 months’ income.
So smoothing the business cycle has a smaller payoff
compared to the potentially huge payoff from restoring real
GDP growth to its 1960s rate.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Potential GDP in the United States
and European Union
In 2008, potential GDP per
person in the United States was
$44,000 (in 2005 dollars).
In 11 major European
economies, potential GDP per
person was $32,000—a gap of
38 percent.
Part (a) of the figure shows this
large difference.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Potential GDP in the United States
and European Union
In the United States in 2008, the
real wage rate was $34 an hour
and in Europe, it was $29 an
hour—a 17 percent gap.
Part (b) of the figure shows this
large difference.
How can the average American
produce 38 percent more than
the average European but earn
in wages only 17 percent more?
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Potential GDP in the United States
and European Union
The answer is that Americans
work more than Europeans.
1. 48 out of every 100 Americans
have jobs compared with 46
out of every 100 Europeans.
2. Europeans work shorter hours
than Americans—30.5 hours a
week compared to the 34
hours that Americans work—a
12 percent difference shown in
part (c).
EYE on the PAST
Average Unemployment Rates over Six
Decades
If we look back at the U.S. economy decade by
decade, we can see through the ups and downs of the
business cycle and focus on the broad trends.
By looking at the average unemployment rates across
the decades, we get an estimate of the movements in
the natural unemployment rate.
EYE on the PAST
Average Unemployment Rates over Six
Decades
During the 1950s and 1960s, the unemployment rate
averaged less than 5 percent.
EYE on the PAST
Average Unemployment Rates over Six
Decades
During the 1970s and 1980s, the average unemployment
rate climbed to more than 7 percent.
EYE on the PAST
Average Unemployment Rates over Six
Decades
The 1990s and 2000s saw the average unemployment rate
fall but not quite back to the rate of the 1950s and 1960s.
EYE on the PAST
Average Unemployment Rates over Six
Decades
You will be a member of the labor force in the 2010s.
The average unemployment rate of the second decade of
the 2000s will have a big effect on your job market success.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
Europe has much higher unemployment benefits than the
United States.
Are the higher unemployment benefits the source of
Europe’s higher natural unemployment rate?
To isolate the effects of unemployment benefits, we need to
keep other things the same.
Canada provides an experiment in which things are similar.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
Before 1980, unemployment rates in the United States
and Canada were similar.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
The key change in the 1980s was an increase in
Canadian unemployment benefits.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
Almost 100 percent of Canada’s unemployed people receive
benefits compared to 38 percent in the United States.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
Unemployed benefits appears to have a large effect on
the natural unemployment rate.
EYE on the GLOBAL ECONOMY
Unemployment Benefits and the
Natural Unemployment Rate
The gap narrowed after 2000 as cyclical unemployment
rose less in Canada in the last two recessions.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Federal Minimum Wage
The Fair Labor Standards Act of
1938 set the federal minimum wage
in the United States at 25¢ an hour.
Over the years, the minimum wage
has increased and in 2009 it was
$7.25 an hour.
Although the minimum wage has
increased, it has not kept up with the
rising cost of living.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Federal Minimum Wage
The figure shows the real minimum wage rate in 2005
dollars from 1959 to 2009.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Federal Minimum Wage
During the late 1960s, the minimum wage in 2005
dollars was $7.50 an hour.
EYE on the U.S. ECONOMY
The Federal Minimum Wage
The minimum wage decreased during the 1970s and 1980s
and has fluctuated around $6 an hour since the mid-1980s.
EYE on YOUR LIFE
Natural Unemployment
You will encounter natural unemployment at many points
in your life.
If you now have a job, you probably went through a spell
of natural unemployment as you searched for it.
When you graduate and look for a full-time job, you most
likely will spend some more time searching for the best
match for your skills and location preferences.
In today’s world of rapid technological change, most of
us must retool and change our jobs at least once and for
many of us, more than once.
EYE on YOUR LIFE
Natural Unemployment
You might know an older worker who has recently lost a
job and is going through the agony of figuring out what
to do next.
Although natural unemployment can be painful for
people who experience it, from a social perspective, it
is productive.
It enables scarce labor resources to be re-allocated to
their most valuable uses.