Transcript Slide 1
Chapter 5: Needs and Motives Theories of Personality February 7, 2003 Class #3 Henry Murray (1893-1988) He coined the term personology to refer to the effort to understand the whole person rather than breaking a personality into parts We mentioned in class 1 that he believed in the idiographic approach centering on the uniqueness of each individual Murray’s Background As a child, he had a very poor relationship with his mother He was the middle child of three As a child, he had a stuttering problem and was crosseyed Undergraduate studies at Harvard where he concentrated in history and graduated in 1915 He admits that he really wasn’t focused on academics and his most passionate interests were rowing and romance Not until he entered medical school at Columbia did Murray become serious about his studies, graduating first in his class Following medical school, he earned a Master's in biology at Columbia and did a surgical internship at Presbyterian Hospital Murray’s Background Following his internship, Murray spent four years studying chicken embryos at the Rockefeller Institute, then continued his research at Cambridge University, where he earned a PhD in biochemistry in 1927 Murray became interested in psychology through reading Carl Jung's Psychological types in 1923 and meeting Jung for three weeks in Switzerland in 1925 His interest was spurred on by his “acquaintance” with Christiana Morgan, an artist who shared his fascination with Jung, the unconscious and the writings of Herman Melville Eventually, he went on to teach at Harvard Interesting note… You can see Murray received his bachelor’s degree at the age of 22, then went on to earn his MD at the age of 26 – Additionally, he earned his Master’s in biology and Ph.D. in biochemistry by the age of 34 – And then became famous in psychology – Not bad… Murray’s Background Murray had married Josephine Rantoul in 1916, but then fell in love with Morgan, and somehow, during the forty-six years of his first marriage, managed to balance his loyalties to both his wife and mistress After those women died in the 1960s, Murray married Nina Fish, with whom he lived until his death The brightest spot in Murray's later years was no doubt his relationship with Nina Murray told a friend, "If you get into your late seventies and you're debating whether you should get married again--do it!" Another interesting note… While at Harvard he was part of stimulating environment that included Gordon Allport and Raymond Cattell – At that time, Ted Kaczynski, the serial bomber was a participant in one of Murray’s psychological experiments – The study had to do with identifying men who would not break under pressure Murray’s Personological System Focus is on the process of personality rather than relying on the static concepts such as: – Enduring structures of the mind System-dynamic influences with feedback Emphasis on integrated, dynamic nature of individual as complex organism responding to specific environment Importance of needs and motivations Felt that motivational processes and the pressures that these processes placed on individuals basically made up much of our disposition…thus influencing our behavior Basic Theoretical Elements Needs Motives Environmental Press Basic Theoretical Elements Needs – An internal state that’s less than satisfactory – It lacks something necessary for a person’s well-being Needs Murray (1962) – Needs are internal (but can be provoked by environmental press) – Necessitate taking action in social environment – Readiness to respond in a certain way under given circumstances Types of Needs Viscerogenic needs – These are our primary needs which are biological in nature – Food, water, sex, avoidance of pain, etc. – helps us to achieve homeostasis – Homeostasis is the motivational phenomenon for primary drives that preserves our internal equilibrium Psychogenic needs – These are our secondary needs – These needs are basically psychological in nature – Secondary needs that are not crucial to a person's life Motives McClelland (1984) – Motives are clusters of cognition with affective overtones, organized around preferred experiences and goals Motives Motives are based on needs: – There are states of tension within a person, and as need is satisfied, tension is reduced – Motives propel people to perceive, think, and act in ways that serve to satisfy a need – Motivational psychologists stress the importance of internal psychological needs and urges that propel people to think, perceive, and act in predictable ways – Some motives are thought to operate outside awareness – Reliance on projective techniques Measuring Motives Manifest needs – Can be openly observed Latent needs – Are not openly displayed Thematic Apperception Test (TAT) Measures latent needs (needs that can not be openly observed) – Apperception is the process of projecting imagery onto an outside stimulus, such as a picture. The theory suggests the stories you describe reflect your latent motivations (dispositional needs) – It assesses your motives by telling or writing a story about ambiguous pictures Late in life Murray admitted that Christina Morgan was the true author of the TAT Environmental Press Basically, an external condition that creates an inner desire to obtain or avoid something Can be thought of as a push of the situation or from other people or events in the environment – Get out of rain, get enough to eat, deal with rejection or competition – Where concept of “Peer Pressure” arises Emphasis of social roles and situational determinants – E.g.: Need to excel leads to cheating Combination of internal motivations & external demands Murray’s Approach His interactionist approach combines: – Unconscious motivation of Freud, Jung & Adler – Environmental pressures of Lewin – Trait concept of Allport His definition of personality – Branch of psychology which concerns itself with the study of human lives and factors which influence their life course and which investigates individual differences Murray’s Approach System of Needs – Individuals have either high or low needs for the following… Achievement Power Affiliation Intimacy Exhibition Need for Achievement Murray(1938) – He defined achievement motivation as: A desire for significant accomplishment, for mastering skills or ideas, for control over things or people, and for rapidly attaining a high standard of excellence The desire to do things well and feel pleasure in overcoming obstacles –E.g., sports, science, business, etc. Need for Achievement People with a high need achievement are motivated to master tasks and take great pride in doing so – In contrast, people with low achievement needs seem to enjoy success because they have avoided failure Characteristics of High Need Achievers Easy, Hard, or Moderate Goals? – People with a high need to achieve set challenging but realistic goals that have clear outcomes They like these intermediate tasks because it provides the most information about their ability If they do well on an easy task – who cares If you fail at a hard task – well, no one does well on those Same thing applies to their risk-taking tendencies… – Moderate risk-takers Characteristics of High Need Achievers Feedback or not? – They like feedback from competent critics (ASAP, please) – Concrete feedback is best Stay or move on to easier things? – Stay and persevere – “never give up” Concern or no concern for measurements of success? – Very concerned – Bonuses, incentives, etc. are very important This is closely related to feedback Characteristics of High Need Achievers Social problems? – Unfortunately, often this is the case Strong need to be able to anticipate and make long term plans – Not really into surprises – Need to have things mapped out They use information well in their planning – This helps them to avoid those surprises mentioned above Characteristics of High Need Achievers Very energetic approach – To all things but especially to work – They like to work – They are especially invigorated by creative tasks Resultant Achievement Motivation Several researchers combined participants’ scores obtained on TAT and on test anxiety measures to determine a “RAM” score This is looking at achievement motivation at a slightly different angle… – Might be more to this than the early researchers suggested… – Do many of us have a simultaneous desire to do both??? Resultant Achievement Motivation Motive to succeed may actually be a combination of wanting to achieve something, but also wanting just as badly (maybe even more so) to avoid failing in an achievement-related situation – Hence you avoid failing if you don't try – However, you can also avoid failing if you succeed Resultant Achievement Motivation People high in RAM have a high motive to approach success and a low motive to avoid failure People low in RAM have a low motive to approach success and a high motive to avoid failure If this is true, it would appear that there are two distinct motivations occurring in these individuals… But maybe, they aren’t really that different? Or can we say the 11 year old who feigns a sickness on the day of the big spelling contest has a similar need for achievement as a friend who shows up with a tremendous desire and confidence to win??? Implications to these different motivations… Elliott and Sheldon (1997) – Reported findings that suggest that people who spend their time and effort trying to avoid failure report poorer well-being and less satisfaction with their performances than do people who are trying to approach success Need for Power The need to have influence over others, to have prestige, to feel strong, compared to others Found in those with a tendency to acquire high status possessions and to surround oneself with symbols of power Seek positions and offices which are controlling over others Can be expressed in a couple of ways… A high need for power may be expressed as: “personalized power” or "socialized power" Personalized Power People with high personalized power may have little inhibition or self control, and they exercise power impulsively Correlated with this are tendencies to be rude, excessive use of alcohol, sexual harassment, and collecting symbols of power – For example: big offices, desks, fancy cars, etc. When they give advice or support, it is with strategic intent to further bolster their own status In business these individuals demand loyalty to their leadership rather than to the organization When they leave the organization there is likely disorder and breakdown of team morale and direction Socialized Power Is often associated with effective leadership These leaders direct their power in socially positive ways that benefit others and the organization rather than only contributing to the leader's status and gain They seek power because it is through power that tasks are accomplished They are more hesitant to use power in a manipulative manner Need for Affiliation The motive to spend time with others, to be in social relationships Need to draw near to & win affection of others Motivation to have lots of friends Need for Affiliation These individuals want to be thought of as: – Agreeable – They go along with group pressure – Want to be accepted and liked by other people – Nervous if they think people are judging their interpersonal skills Low nAFF vs. High nAFF A person low in affiliation tends to be a loner who is uncomfortable socializing with others except for a few close friends or family (introversion?) They may lack motivation or energy to maintain high social contacts in networking, group presentations, public relations, and building close personal relations with peers and subordinates Those with high nAFF are reluctant to let work interfere with harmonious relationships Need for Intimacy (I) A desire to experience warm, close and communicative exchanges with another person To feel close to another person – High I: More one to one exchanges with other people than those lower in I – Men with higher intimacy motivation at age 30 have greater marital and job satisfaction at 47 than those with less I Helgeson and Sharpsteen (1987) Make the suggestion that strong intimacy needs may threaten men's sense of masculinity Need for Exhibition Need for emotional communication Need to show self before others and amuse, entertain, excite or even shock others Colorful, spellbinding, noticeable, dramatic & showy Expressive style is the clue to this need David McClelland (1917-1998) He received his B.A. degree in 1938 from Wesleyan University and his M.A. in 1939 from the University of Missouri. His received his Ph.D. in experimental psychology from Yale University in 1941 He taught at the Connecticut College for Women in New London, Connecticut and Wesleyan University prior to accepting a position at Harvard University in 1956. After 30 years at Harvard, he moved to Boston University in 1987, where he was a Distinguished Research Professor of Psychology until his death in March 1998 at the age of 80 McClelland’s Biography Along with John Atkinson, he developed the scoring system for the Thematic Apperception Test Later, he became interested in the relationship between achievement motivation and economic development Before his death, he conducted research on physiological influences on achievement motivation McClelland received numerous awards for his research, including the American Psychological Association Award for Distinguished Scientific Contribution in 1987 Patterned Needs: Inhibited Power Motivation McClelland (1979) – Some people have a low need for affiliation and a high need for power – Makes for a good leader? – How about for a good professor? Just kidding… McAdams (1995) Narrative Approach – Studying motivations of individuals through biographies (one’s life story) – Story of one’s life becomes one’s identity – At each stage of life, internal inclinations lead us to seek out and respond to certain situations which in turn help to further shape our inclinations and identity We want to continue to play our favorite character… Personality can be conceptualized at the level of identity Identity, or the life narrative, is the relatively coherent story or set of stories that people use to bring coherence and unity to their lives We are motivated to be consistent – when we aren’t sure what to do we look back in history – and thus are motivated to do what best fits our identity Assessment Self-Reports and TAT: Low Correlation – Why??? Power and Alcohol Abuse McClelland and his colleagues (1972, 1975): suggest that the need for power can lead to problem drinking… – Drinking alcohol leads to feelings of power? – They’re unaware of this? A power motive? McClelland (1975) – Argues that the alcohol-aggression relationship is conditional upon individual power needs – Substance abuse and woman abuse may share common origins in a need to achieve personal power and control – Small quantities of a substance tend to increase a social user's sense of altruistic power, or the power to help others McClelland (1975) A large quantity of a substance for social users, or any quantity of a substance for substance abusers, tends to increase the user's sense of personal power and domination over others rather than their altruistic power A gender difference? Graham (1980) – This power-using relationship seems to be specific to men and is reinforced by many cultures Major criticisms of motive theories… Murray developed his list of needs from his own intuition – much of scientific method was lacking Can’t understand the dynamics of personality by studying one motive at a time