Transcript Slide 1
IN THE NAME OF GOD Flagship Course on Health Sector Reform and Sustainable Financing; Module 4: : Scarcity & Choice Scarcity & Choice Scarcity and Choice • What do you want? • What are your desires? • What do you need?! • …… BUT • How much money do you have !? • Which one is better for you now? Scarcity and Choice • Our wants, our needs, our desires are unlimited. + • Resources are scarce • • We face with choices so What is resources? Human • MONEY Material Building Equipment & •TIME … ... What is choices ? • For Individuals: • What to do ? • Where to spend our money ? • How to spend our time ? … … • For countries: • what to produce … … • what to consume ... … IRAN Car What choice? • The choice depend on how the individual or society values alternatives … … Choices: • Making choices is Inevitable • Making choices is Hard • Why? … … • (Scarcity / Best Result) Difficult Decision: • Allocate Scarce Resources • Selection of a Choice means deleting many choices Government’s Role in the Health Sector Critical Task for Every Government • allocate resources 1. Between Sectors 2. Within Sectors … … Which choices we are referring to: • those related to public spending • Consumers will have to make choices when spending their own resources. … Reasons for government intervention in health 1. many health services represent public goods 2. health market is a form of market failure 3. impact on health status and poverty reduction Pure public goods have two main distinguishing properties: • 1- Inexhaustible: Once produced, there is no additional cost for having additional use a public good. Marginal cost of additional user is zero (formula of a pill). • 2- Nonexclusive: one person’s use of the service does not make it less available for someone else. This applies to things like control of contagious diseases and information. Government Objectives : • Efficiency • Quality • Equity • Sustainability • Access Government can : • Correct market failures • Protect the poor • Assured service availability How choices should be made? • Review of History: • What were the selected choices ? • What are the result of those choices? Major Health Problems in Developing Countries Major Health Problems in Developing Countries: • Infectious and parasitic diseases 45% of death • Latin America/Caribbean, SubSaharan Africa, Middle East/N. Africa, Asia • Mortality is not the only consequence of health problems. Figure 1.1 Burden of Disease Attributable to Premature Mortality and Disability, by Demographic Region, 1990 (DALYs) lost per 1,000 population DALYs LOST PER 1,000 POPULATION 600 500 400 Mort 300 200 100 Morb 0 SubSaharan Africa India Middle Estern crescent Disability Other Asia and islands Latin America and the Caribbean China Formerly socialist economies of Europe Premature Moratility Established market economies Main 10 Causes of Disease Burden in Children in Developing Countries in 1990 • • • • • • • • • • • • Respiratory infections Perinatal morbidity and mortality Diarrheal disease Childhood cluster (prevent. w/imniz) Congenital malformation Malaria Intestinal helminthes Protein-energy malnutrition Vitamin-A deficiency Iodine deficiency Subtotal TOTAL DALYs lost 98 96 92 65 35 31 17 12 12 9 467 660 14.8% 14.6 14.0 10.0 5.4 4.7 2.5 1.8 1.8 1.4 71.0 100 Main 10 Causes of Disease Burden in Adult in Developing Countries in 1990 • • • • • • • • • Sexually transmitted diseases/HIV Tuberculosis Cerebrovascular disease Maternal morbidity and mortality Ischemic heart disease Chronic Obstructive Pul. Dis. Motor vehicle accidents Depressive disorders Peri. Endo. and myocarditis and cardiomyopathy • Homicide and violence • Subtotal • TOTAL DALYs lost 49.2 36.6 31.7 28.1 24.9 23.4 18.4 15.7 12.4 12.2 252.6 550.0 8.9% 6.7 5.8 5.1 4.5 4.3 3.3 2.9 2.2 2.2 48.6 100 Provision of Health Services in Dev. Countries, Efficiency: (1) • PHC is cost-effective 1. the low cost 2. simple nature of the interventions • Comparison of the same health problems between PHC. at higher levels of the health care system, i.e. in hospitals. Provision of Health Services in Dev. Countries, Efficiency: (2) • PHC. services are often underconsumed by the population • owing to: 1. Lack of information 2. Not adequately financing Provision of Health Services in Dev. Countries, Efficiency: (3) • Share of Hospitals is Total Public Recurrent Health Expenditure Country Hospital Share Bangladesh 61% Burundi 66% China 61% CoteD’Ivoire 46% Ethiopia 49% Jamaica 72% Mexico 58% Philippines 71% Somalia 70% Turkey 63% Zimbabwe 54% OECD mean 54% Health sectors costs in Dev. Countries Hospital vs. Other health services: • The high Hospital Expenditure means: little left over for more basic services • Providing primary care at hospitals represents a waste of resources. • Many people seek care at hospitals due to the lack of personnel and supplies at health centers, actually providing that care in these settings reinforces the behavior of patients • Brazil: 66% of public spending on health in Brazil went to preventive and public health activities to 15% in 10 Years how the money is allocated : • Staff salaries is 70 or 80 percent of spending • Very few resources are left for supplies, drugs, and utilities Provision of Health Services in Dev. Countries, Equity: • populations reside in rural areas, most health spending occurs in urban areas: • resulting in highly inequitable access to services • In sub-Saharan Africa, UNICEF data: 10 people have access to health services in urban areas, only 2-3 have similar access in rural areas. • Nairobi, there is 1 doctor per 500 people; in rural Turkana 1 per 160,000 Mismach of Health Problems & Health Spending Gap between Health Problem and Health Spending 1. Budgetary methodologies 2. Incentives 3. Political and administrative processes 4. Lack of information 5. Costs 6. Political and social power Budgetary methodologies • Budget allocate on a historical basis • Budgeting has usually focused on incremental changes from the previous year’s patterns • No efforts made to assess how appropriate or valid last year’s spending • The result is often continued inefficiencies Incentives • For many health professionals, prestige and monetary rewards are generally associated with higher levels of care, the use of costly technology, and specialization. Political & administrative processes • Unnecessary staff may result from income-generation policies • Health workers are poorly paid (no incentives) and perhaps trained (no ability) to provide excellent care in difficult circumstances Inefficiencies and Waste in the Supply of Drugs from Budget Allocation to Consumer Budget allocation for drugs Value received by consumer 100 US DOLLARS 80 60 100 90 40 76 49 20 30 15 12 0 Inadequate buying practices Quantification problems Remaining value Inefficient procurement Inefficient distribution Irrational prescription Non-compliance by patients Cumulative losses Political & administrative processes; Drugs: • Cost-effectiveness criteria are not used to select drugs, (app 10%); • Purchases are done on small scales, foregoing volume discounts (app 15%) • procurement is rarely done through competitive bidding (app 25%); • Significant losses result from poor storage & inventory management, expiration, and theft (app 20%) • Irrational prescription practices (app 15%) • Problems of patient compliance (app 3%) Resource Allocation of Drugs • For every $100 spent on drugs in Africa, $88 are lost • Don't forget only 50% of drug budget is available for dispensing • 20% lost due to storage, expiration & theft remaining 30% of drugs available • 15% is also wasted by malpractice (really 50% of available drugs for use) • 15% remaining 3% isn't used by people & only 12% is used Lack of information • What consumers want may not necessarily be the same as what they should want • patients do not have full information Costs • Under-consumption of cost-effective services: 1. lack of demand 2. lack of information 3. unwillingness or inability to pay the prices of treatments, travel and time required to obtain these services. Political and social power : • Compounds existing inequities • Urban vs. Rural • Medical profession vs. public (additional hospitals and the purchase of expensive technology) Mismach of Need, Demand & Supply Perceptions of Need Community Perceived Need Professionally Perceived Need Perceptions of Need Community Perceived Need Professionally Perceived Need Demand: Means needs of which money is available for paying Willingness to pay Supply: • reflects what is available, from both private and public sectors, given technology and resource levels Need, Demand and Supply for Health Care NEED Poverty High Cost Market Incentives High Cost Lack of Information (*) Supplier Induced Demand (*) Lack of Information (*) Externalities (*) Public Goods (*) SUPPLY Lack of Other Barriers to Information (*) Competition (*) (*) Sources of Market Failure DEMAND Non-Market Incentives Mismatch among need, supply, and demand • • • • Some services are public goods High cost Lack of information Market failure • Government can play a role Bridging the Gaps: • Government facilitate some of the interaction between providers and consumers • Identifying Incentives • It is important not to allow those incentives to dominate the decisionmaking process Is Prioritizing Useful ? Why Prioritizing Could Be Useful? • Scarcity makes us not be able to provide all of the health services we would like to • We have to make hard choices Selection of a Choice means deleting many choices The Current Political and Economic Contex • Demand for health care is growing and will continue to do so • Per capita income is rising • Life expectancy increases, and people need to consume more (and perhaps different) health services. • Increased education levels, people are more aware The Current Political and Economic Contex • Demand is growing up • GOV budgetary restrictions • Demographic & epidemiological transition esp. In Dev countries International Issues: Demographic & epidemiological phenomena: • 1) aging population; • 2) more education and awareness on health issues increase demand; • 3) changing life styles toward risky behavior; • 4) cost of diagnostic and curative technology has increased rapidly during past 20 years (Mosley et al, 1993, Berman and Ormond, 1988, Bobadilla and Costello, 1961, Bronzino et al, 1990). Prioritization task? • • Many would readily agree on the need to prioritize Few people would like to do so in practice Prioritization task? Difficulty of task 1. Rationing of care; so, some services not provided or some people may not receive care 2. People react very negatively Making decisions like that may mean the difference between life and death hard choices Why Prioritize? (1) • Rationing health care is not new (now informal ways) • Methods: Willingness to pay ability to wait Why Prioritize? (2) • It forces decisions, which may currently be implicit, to be explicit and transparent Why Prioritize? (3) • Forcing decision-makers to discussions about what is good or not in terms of being an effective response to health problems Netherlands; physicians view of really effective services (covered by social Ins) ranged between 20 and 40%. Why Prioritize? (4) • Gov don’t omit less important services, don’t finance them • less critical services , can still be offered through 1. out of pocket expenditures or 2. private health insurance How to Prioritize Different Approaches 1. Categories of care 2. Specific criteria • • • • • Severity Community needs Effectiveness Efficiency Necessity of services How to Prioritize Different Approaches Cont, 3. guidelines or technology assessment methods (inform) 4. Adopt models or formulas that incorporate economic principles 5. Program budgeting and marginal analysis approach Why Design a Package Benefits • • • • • The link between treatment and prevention Multiple outputs from inputs Identification of all required inputs Coordination of resources Directing demand for services Why Design a Package Political Benefits • Defining a package of high priority HS. helps Gov. to overcome its inabilities: 1. 2. 3. Assure the highest priority activities Eases the task of planning investment, training Clear distinction between Gov. & Private, to prevent Gov. have fallen victim to the “try to do everything” approach, which has led to everything being done badly Design a Package Problems • Consumers may still demand other services and bypass those in the package 1. Unpopular package 2. Lack credibility among People & Doctors • Unavailable information Other Policy Tools: • Prioritization (Defining a Health package) is not the only policy tool of Gov. to influence efficiency and equity in health • 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Other policy tools: Provision of information Regulation/legislation Taxes and subsidies Direct investments Research Health sector allocation of resources is not fair • There are serious mismatches between the disease profile of population and the distribution of resources. This is attributed to: 1. 2. • the use of oversimplified models for setting health care priorities; lack of appropriate quantitative information (Bobadilla, 1998). Resources for health are either shrinking or are not growing fast enough. Many low and middle-income countries have reduced per capita public spending on health (Lafond, 1995).