Transcript Title

Going Against Goliath
23rd May 2010
Katrina Kurtz, MLIS
Carrie Iwema, PhD, MLS
Ansuman Chattopadhyay, PhD
Health Sciences Library System
University of Pittsburgh
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Photo credit: http://www.uncabaret.com/node?page=5
Bioinformatics Tools

Answer biological questions

Made by informatics researchers

Freely available to the public

Published in scholarly journals
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Bioinformatics Tools

Examples:

Protein structure prediction

Sequence alignment

Databases of genes associated with disease

Protein interactions
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Who Uses Bioinformatics Tools?

Biologists:



Faculty researchers
Graduate students
Undergraduate students

Doctors who do biomedical research

Biomedical informatics researchers
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Online Bioinformatics Resources Collection

Manually curated

Searchable collection of bioinformatics tools

Freely available to the public

2696 resources

http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics/obrc/
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Common Criticisms…

Why bother?

Everyone uses Google.

Google is taking over.
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Is Google Actually Better?

Large amount of data

Popularity ranking

Biologists are not librarians
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Research Project Hypothesis

OBRC is better than Google at

Locating bioinformatics tools




Quickly
Easily
Successfully
Leaving users happier with:


Results
Overall experience
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Research Project

10 biology graduate students

Three tasks on both OBRC and Google

Recorded search as they narrated

Search experience survey
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Research Project

Measured:





Time spent on each search
Number of search queries
Number of sites visited
Success rate
Users’ ratings
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Task 1: Protein Interaction

You are a pharmacologist interested in
drugs that target proteins. Where would
you find reliable information about how
drugs interact with proteins, specifically
information about the strength of the
binding between the protein and ligand?
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Task 2: Structure Prediction

Find a tool that performs protein structure
prediction. Determine from the search
engine how often it has been cited.
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Task 3: Ovarian Cancer

Where would you look for information
about all the published gene mutations
implicated in ovarian cancer, in one place?
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Is it faster?
Average Task Completion Time
350
300
Time (s)
250
200
Google
OBRC
150
100
50
0
Protein
Task 1
Interaction
Structure
Task 2
Prediction
Ovarian
Task 3
Cancer
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Average
Is it easier to find results?
Average Number of Search Queries
4
Number of Queries
3
Google
OBRC
2
1
0
Protein
Task 1
Interaction
Structure
Task 2
Prediction
Ovarian
Task 3
Cancer
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Average
Is it easier to find results?
Number of Sites Visited Before Success
Number of Sites Visited
4
3
Google
OBRC
2
1
0
Protein
Task 1
Interaction
Structure
Task 2
Prediction
Ovarian
Task 3
Cancer
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Average
Is it successful?
Rate of Success
Percentage of Successful Searches
100%
80%
60%
Google
OBRC
40%
20%
0%
Task 1
Protein
Interaction
Task 2
Structure
Prediction
Task 3
Ovarian
Cancer
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Average
Do users like it?
Survey Results
7
6
Rating
5
Google
OBRC
4
3
2
1
Appropriateness of Results
Ease of Use
Overall Experience
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
What do they say about Google?
“I was just frustrated
[by Google].”
“[Google is] time
consuming unless
we know what we
are searching for.”
“Google was difficult
to navigate with all the
information on cancer.”
“I realized that
Google is not an
effective search tool.”
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
What do they say about OBRC?
“Wow, this is
really direct!”
“OBRC is an excellent
resource, especially if
you don’t know
exactly what you’re
searching for.”
“[OBRC] was much
easier to locate
relevant information.”
“Gives good results,
but I don’t like
the interface.”
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
What did we learn about OBRC?

Time lag

Scopus and Google Scholar

Spell check

Long search queries

Unaware it exists
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Limitations

Small sample size

Potential bias from tasks

Previous experience with Google
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Future Work

Larger sample size

Other user groups

User-chosen task
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Conclusions…

Searches using OBRC are:



Faster
Easier
More successful

Users are more satisfied.

Users plan to use OBRC in the future.
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Conclusions…
…libraries can and
should compete!
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics




This study is IRB approved.
Funding provided by: NLM Grant 3 T15
LM007059-23S1
Thanks to my collaborators, Dr. Carrie Iwema
and Dr. Ansuman Chattopadhyay
Special thanks to Nancy Tannery and Dr.
Rebecca Crowley
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics
Thank you!
Any questions?
Katrina Kurtz
[email protected]
412-624-3508
Carrie Iwema
[email protected]
412-648-6887
Ansuman Chattopadhyay
[email protected]
412-648-1297
http://www.hsls.pitt.edu/guides/genetics