Transcript CLEO PROJECT

CLEO PROJECT
www.cleo.net.uk
Schools Remote Access Pilot
7th Sept 2004
Representatives
CLEO
Deborah Murrell – CLEO Project Manager
Cumbria County Council
Jeff Haslam – Broadband Manager
Lancashire County Council
Graham Fielden – Senior ICT Adviser
Dave Barratt – NGfL Consultant
Chris Byers – Lancs NGfL
Corporate IT – Neil Wakeford
Westfield Centre
Steve Davis
Martin Quinn
Lancaster University Network
Services Ltd (LUNS)
Barry Forde – Director
Matt Storey
Chris Pates
Solway Community College
Mark Jameson
The Queen Katherine School
Cumbria Schools
Norden High School
Ripley St Thomas School
Parklands High School
Burscough Priory High School
Whitworth Community High
School
Carr Hill High School
Alder Grange School
Padiham Primary School
Queen Elizabeth School
Beaconhill Community
School
William Howard School
John Ruskin School
Netherhall School
Settlebeck High School
Whitehaven School
Lancashire Schools
Format
Overview
Am - Demonstration of 2 proposed
solutions to be piloted
Lunch – 12.30 approx
Pm – Break out groups
 Requirements
 Comments on proposed approach
 Issues & Risks
 Feedback Summary & Conclusions
 Next steps for your school
CLEO PROJECT ROLE
To enable a pilot of possible solutions
To coordinate communications between
organisations
To evaluate pilot solutions for a trial
period
If successful, to consider proposals for
future CLEO service to support all schools
in region in enabling remote access
LEAs Role
First point of contact for
technical support
Cumbria – Jeff Haslem
Lancs – Westfield Centre
Liaise with LUNS on schools
behalf to resolve issues with pilot
LUNS Role
To ensure that the CLEO network can
technically support remote access
To provide options for solutions
To evaluate impact on CLEO network and
make recommendations for any future
CLEO service
To liaise with LEA technical support
teams
School’s Role
To provide all resources, required at school
level, to support pilot project
To ensure that any specific requirements of the
pilot project to address risks are adhered to
To evaluate security implications and decide
your school’s policy for access
To evaluate the technical success of the pilot in
your school
To complete evaluations of the impact on
teaching and learning and/or management and
administration and report back
LUNS Ltd
 Demonstration of 2 remote access
solutions



Overview of Remote Access – Mark
Jameson
Windows VPN – Matt Storey
Cisco’s VPN Concentrator – Chris Pates
Break Out Sessions
Nominate scribe & spokesperson
1 hr
2 themes:
1. Technical or
2. Management, use and policy
Each group to discuss from their perspective





Reasons for remote access – who/why
Schools suggestions & feedback
Advantages/disadvantages of 2 solutions (technical)
Issues
Risks – rank low/medium/high, probability – low/medium/high
Next Steps
 CLEO schools remote access project group to
produce a summary paper
 Discuss with Headteacher the implications of
enabling remote access – benefits, risks and
resources.
 Decide which pilot solution group you would
prefer to join - return authorisation form
 Project commences rollout of pilots
 Attend next solution group meeting (Oct 2004) &
final pilot evaluation meeting (Dec 2004)
 Install system for trial period – 2 months
 Complete evaluation documents
 Decide whether to continue as operational system
Proposed Schedule
 Tues 7th Sept 2004 – pilot overview
 Wed 15th Sept – deadline for return of forms
 Wed 15th Sept – CLEO schools remote access project
group meet to plan pilot rollout
 Schools contacted end Sept /early Oct with rollout
details
 Mon 4th Oct – target date for pilot to commence
 Wed 13th Oct – Interim meeting with Pilot schools
 Wed 15th Dec –Evaluation meeting with Pilot schools
 End of Autumn term – Pilot Phase ends
 Jan 2005 - CLEO schools remote access project group
makes recommendations to CLEO Project Executive
Remote Access Pilot
Thank you for your contribution
CLEO Project Office: 01524-592800