Transcript Bill Stone-
Live Load Effect in Reinforced Concrete Box Culverts Under Soil Fill Sarah Orton, Erik Loehr, Andrew Boeckmann, and Garrett Havens University of Missouri 1 Research Motivation Load Rating required for all bridge size culverts (span > 20ft) In the case of culverts under deep fill, effect of dead load much greater than live load – negligible live load effect Missouri has approximately 3000 culverts. About 700 (23%) have fill depths greater than 6 ft. Impact – significant reduction in number of man hours required to load rate culverts and reduction of unnecessary load posting of culverts 2 Research Methodology 10 culverts were selected for testing Culverts ranged in fill depth from 2.5 feet to 13.5 feet Determine the fill depth which Live Load becomes negligible Live Load utilized a Dump Truck loaded and parked at specific locations to maximize strains Effects of loadings were recorded via strain transducers, and an accelerometer attached to the underside of the culverts 3 Research Methodology Tests were conducted in Two Rounds. Five culverts with similar geometrics but varying fill heights made up first round Second round focused on various cell sizes, arrangements and design loads at depths near where live loads become negligible during the first round Computer models of each culvert were created to fully analyze the results 4 Culverts 10 culverts with fill depths from 2.55 ft to 13.25 ft were tested Culverts were built between 1954 and 2001 Design Load H10 and H15 Bridge # County Route Cell Size Year Built Design Load Design Fill Actual Fill Clear Height Slab Thickness Wall Thickness Skew 2.75 9.5 11 11.5 0 5.0 7.5 10.5 8 0 8 9.75 10 11 13.5 15.5 9.5 9.5 10 0 15 15 8 7.5 6 10 8 11 10 10.5 12 11 8 8.5 8 9 7.5 15 0 10 0 10 L0525 Callaway RT F E 2x12' 1953 Phase 1 Culverts H 15 2.58 N0936 Pettis RT J S 2x12' 1960 H 15 A2869 R0015 P0622 Macon Boone Callaway MO 3 S RT NN RT O E 2x11' 2x13' 2x12' 1972 1962 1954 A6330 N0793 N0502 X0749 N0059 Audrain Montgomery Montgomery Boone Gasconade RT AA RT J S MO 94 RT O S RT Y E 3x14 2x14 3x15 2x12 2x10 2001 1962 1958 1947 1957 H 15 6 6.48 H 15 7.8 8.15 H 10 11.51 13.25 Phase 2 Culverts 3 2.547 1.82 2.555 3.82 4.491 H 10 5.11 6.35 H 10 6.1 8.25 5 4 Instrumentation Each culvert was instrumented with 12 strain transducers, 11 LVDTs , and one accelerometer to capture maximum strains and displacements as truck moved over culvert 6 Phase 1 Phase II Live Loading Truck loaded to approximately 50 kips was positioned in 7 static positions above the culvert to induce maximum strains and displacements in gages Position 1 Centered over secondary span Position 2 Rear tire in middle of secondary span Position 3 Centered middle wall 7 Position 4 Front rear tire middle primary span Position 5 Centered over primary span Position 6 Rear tire in middle of primary span Position 7 Centered over far wall Results from data - Strains Maximum strain measured in top slab vs fill depth 1.0 E-05 ~ 40 psi 8 Results from data - LVDT Maximum displacement vs fill depth 9 Conclusions Culvert testing was successful and reasonable trends found in both strain and displacement data Culvert design is very conservative, especially at shallower fill depths A possible point for cutoff of load rating is around 6 ft. 10 Future Research NCHRP Study selected to evaluate Live Load Impact on Culverts Expand study to other states? 11 Reduce need for load rating in deep fill culverts Improve load rating procedures Reduce over-conservatism in design of culverts by better understanding load distribution through soil and pavement