Transcript Welcome to Assessing a Skill or Performance
FOL Part 1 2013 Dave Stewart Loyalist College
Welcome to Assessing a Skill or Performance
Agenda
1. Getting started
Welcome and session outcomes Story Time
(Connection Activity)
Identifying best assessment practices
2. Reviewing key concepts
(
Content Activity
) What, Why, How, When and Who of Performance Assessment
3. Exploring
– small group work (
Practice Activity
) Creating, administering and evaluating checklists, grading scales and rubrics
4. Summarizing and sharing
(
Summary Activity)
Session Outcomes
During this workshop you will identify tools that can be used with performance assessments, Distinguish between rubrics, checklists and rating scales, explore and share tips to guide the assessment of performances.
Assessing a Skill or Performance
Acknowledgement
Think pair share
On your own
think
of an assessment method (for a practical skill) you have used with students or that you have encountered in your past that left you feeling satisfied with the outcome. Record on the paper provided
1 minute
Think pair share
Pair
with a person beside you and
share
answer. your Be sure to include
WHY
you found it a valuable assessment tool
2 minutes
Group Brainstorming Exercise
In your group Further discuss what you believe are characteristics of “best assessment practices” and record individually on post-it notes provided When you are finished, place post it notes on the flip chart provided at the front of the class
5 minutes
What did you come up with?
Brilliant!
How have assessment practices changed?
The Way we Were!
Knowledge in the hands of the experts (Behaviorist paradigm)
Teacher - centered Focus on assessment of discrete, isolated knowledge and skills Traditional f-2-f delivery Norm-referenced testing Emphasis on summative assessments Limited perspectives (e.g. teacher) Product based
The Way we Are!
Knowledge collaboration, cooperation and community (Constructivist paradigm)
Immersive environments - Learning IN Technology - learning anytime any where – distributive learning Student centered – outcome based (complex, integrated learning)real world context Criterion-referenced Assessment as learning (Formative) Multiple perspectives (self, peer, teacher) Product and process based (authentic assessments)
5 minutes Reviewing key concepts
Definitions
Turn to page 8 of your handout. Complete the mix and match with a partner
Assessment Evaluation Performance/Authentic Assessment Validity Reliability Assessment Task Attributes Learning Outcome Diagnostic, Summative and Formative Evaluation Rubric Performance Scale Performance Check list Performance criteria (descriptors)
Answers!
What is Performance/Authentic Assessment?
Performance Assessment
close proximity to “actual criterion situation”. Usually – measures complex skills, cognitive processes and communication important in real world (contextualized tasks) (Palm, 2008).
Authentic Assessments
–defining features are the specific cognitive processes (disciplined inquiry) and products (knowledge beyond the mere reproduction of presented knowledge) considered important in the perspective of life beyond school (Newman & Archibald, 1992).
http://jolt.merlot.org/documents/vol1_no1_mueller_001.pdf
Definition for Today
Performance assessment, also known as alternative or authentic assessment, is a form of testing that requires students to perform a real life task rather than select an answer from a ready-made list. http://abcresource.loyalistcollege.ca/learningassessment.htm#performan ce
Assessment vs. Evaluation
Lots of controversy/confusion over these terms Definitions
Assessment
= feedback on practice; supports learning but may or may not generate marks/grades
Evaluation
= summary measurement providing some kind of grade/mark/final feedback
Why and When? The Purpose of Assessment:
Assessment FOR, AS and OF Learning (Earl, 2003)
Assessment FOR Learning Assessment AS Learning Assessment OF Learning
Diagnostic (before) Identifies level of knowledge and skill prior to instruction Enables instruction to adapt to learner needs (individualized) Formative (during) Summative (after) Provides feedback aimed at understanding expected learning and improving performance Summarizes student attainment of expected learning Self and peer assessment are a key component (multiple perspectives) Conducted at the end of the instructional period e.g. determination of final grade
Enables focus on required instruction (efficient)
Motivates student to improved performance (Crooks, 2001) Test scores and grades monitor learning but do little to motivate learning (Huba & Freed, 2000)
Validity and Reliability
Validity Reliability Validity refers to the degree to which an assessment measures the intended learning outcome.
Reliability refers to the consistency of test scores. Reliability affected by testing conditions, rater variability.
i.e. Does the test measure what it is intended to measure? (the learning outcome?) i.e. Does the test produce consistent results?
…is valid and reliable
Measures what it is supposed to measure (valid) Measures the same information consistently (reliable) Recognizes that some aspects of learning are hard to measure or may be unplanned
Who is the “assessor”?
Multiple perspectives Self Peer Teacher
Selecting an Assessment Tool
Assessment Tool
Checklist Rating Scale Rubric
Attributes
•
the least complex form of scoring
•
looking for the presence/absence of specific elements in the product of a performance
•
unlike the typical checklist, it allows for attaching quality to elements in the process or product
•
ratings can be numeric or descriptive
•
multiple criteria are applied to the assessment
•
quality of the performance & product are typically transparent in the assessment criteria
•
appropriate for complex tasks rather than discrete activities
Sample
Checklist
Sample Performance/Rating Scale
Participates in group problem solving: 4 (Outstanding) 3 (Satisfactory) 2 (Tolerable) 1 (Unsatisfactory)
Sample Rubric
Selecting the Performance/skill Task
Assessment task
(performance, product or process) determined to reflect learning outcome.
Assessment task attributes
– essential elements or characteristics of a good performance of an assessment task
Performance criteria (descriptors)
– specific behavioral descriptions of performance at each level of performance
Assessment task attribute Descriptors
Parts of a rubric
Page 6 Group Assignment
Group#1
•
Checklist
•
Rating Scale Group#3
•
Rubric Group#5
•
Checklist
•
Rating Scale Group#7
•
Checklist
•
Rating Scale
Assessment task
Group#2
•
Checklist
•
Rating Scale
•
Group#4 Rubric Group#6
•
Rubric Group#8
•
Rubric
Page 6
Learning Activity: collaboratively create, administer and evaluate a performance assessment tool.
Assign group roles as follows: Performance expert _________________ Student ___________________________ Peer (reporter)_____________________ Teacher (timekeeper)________________
Instructions
In consultation with the performance expert,
determine performance attributes
and
criteria
(what you feel is essential to achieve the learning outcome) for the identified task.
Learning Outcome
: Accurately measure and report a radial pulse.
OR Learning Outcome:
Design, construct and fly a paper airplane.
Complete the following steps
In consultation with the performance expert,
determine performance attributes
and
criteria
(what you feel is essential to achieve
the learning outcome
) for the identified task.
Collaboratively develop the assessment tool
(checklist, rating scale or rubric) using template provided.
The
performance expert instructs the student
task using the assessment tool as a guide.
on the performance The
student completes a “return demonstration”
performance task.
of the
Steps continued
The
teacher and peer complete the developed assessment tool
based on the observed student’s performance.
Discuss the
advantages and disadvantages
of the developed assessment tool from a variety of perspectives (student, peer and teacher). You can record on your handout.
Be prepared to share your group’s finding with the larger group.
Assessment
Checklists Performance Scales Rubrics
Advantages
Your Findings
Disadvantages
Final tips
Review the learning outcome and purpose of the assessment tool (validity) Collect samples of student work that exemplify levels of performance (validity) Consult with experts in fields to develop “authentic performance tests” and to validate task attributes and performance descriptors (validity, authenticity) Develop performance scoring instruments collaboratively with colleagues
Final tips Continued
Gather multiple perspectives on scoring of same performance (rater reliability) Share scoring rubric with students in advance of the performance task (equity, transparency, accountability) Share performance exemplars (sample projects, assignments, video depictions) with students in advance of performance task (transparency, accountability) Be prepared to review and revise assessment tool (accountability, validity)
A Checklist for Choosing Performance Tasks
Adapted from
Checklist for Choosing Performance Assessment Tasks
. Algonquin College, Professors Resource Site Yes No
Does the task match the expected learning (learning outcome or course learning requirement)?
Does the task adequately represent and elicit the content and skills you expect the student to attain?
Does the task enable students to demonstrate their capabilities and progress?
Does the assessment use “authentic”, real world tasks?
Does the task require the learner to integrate their learning?
Can the task be structured to provide a measure of several outcomes?
Does the task match an important outcome which reflects complex thinking skills?
Does the task pose an enduring problem type-- the type the learner is likely to encounter in the future?
Is the task fair and free of bias?
Will the task be seen as meaningful by important stakeholders?
Will the task be meaningful and engaging to students so that they will be motivated to show their capabilities?
In Conclusion
Did we achieve the learning outcomes of this session?
identify tools that can be used with performance assessments, Distinguish between rubrics, checklists and rating scales, explore and share tips to guide the assessment of Performances.