Transcript Document

OneGeology
IC GS
What is OneGeology?
A project to make web-accessible the best
available geological map data worldwide
at a scale of about 1:1 million,
as a Geological Survey contribution to the
International Year of Planet Earth
Contents of this presentation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The principles behind OneGeology
The objectives
Drivers behind idea
How do we plan to do it?
Where are we now?
Who is involved?
What are the challenges?
Summary
The principles behind OneGeology
The givens
•
•
geological map data are essential to societal
well-being and development
society has contributed through taxation for the
geological map data that exists and they have a
right of access to it
The principles behind OneGeology
Geological surveys and geoscientists around the world have
a responsibility to:
•
make accessible the best geological map data they
have available now
–
•
work towards consistent standards for data and access
and thus a consistent data architecture and schematic
interoperability
–
•
that means map data which currently exists right now - not
delaying access waiting for some hypothetically perfect, complete
and consistent mapping
and ultimately as much consistency in semantics/classification
and mapping as is practically possible
enhance and increase use of their data
The main objectives of OneGeology
• Stimulate a rapid increase in interoperability (ie
disseminate GeoSciML further and faster)
• Making available geological map data accessible
–
in whatever digital format is available in the
participating country
• Transferring know-how to those who need it
That means OneGeology is:
• focusing on Internet access to digital data rather
than paper maps
–
society increasingly wants its information on-demand and
thus digitally
• adopting an approach that recognizes that different
nations have differing abilities to participate.
–
Some are very well developed and provisioned, others barely have
stable power supplies, let alone equipment and know-how .
• facilitating the transfer of technical expertise and data
between nations
–
Cutting the learning curve and costs to nations with limited
resources but for whom the need for accessible geological data and
the benefits they bring are just as great.
A crucial point
• OneGeology is about schematic interoperability
first, ie accessibility without geological reconciliation
• The first objective is not about harmonising
geological units and scientific classification across
frontiers - that is something to be considered for the
long term
Schematic interoperability means:
• OneGeology aims to make accessible geological
map data in a common data format without
harmonizing the content and interpretation between
territories.
• This will allow geological mapping to be accessible
for any area of the world (cf Google-Earth)
• These map data may contain national "boundary
faults" caused by data not being harmonized.
• But this pragmatic approach will overcome the
intractable difficulties of projects which have gone
for complete data consistency
The drivers (1)
• The UN General Assembly of 1997 (Agenda 21) urged the
world to decrease the gaps in the availability, quality,
standardisation and accessibility of data between nations.
• The need to understand our global environment to solve
global environmental problems at a global scale.
• International Year of Planet Earth and the fact that geological
surveys were looking for a tangible way to contribute
• Around the world each geological survey had a treasure chest
of data that just needed unlocking
• The geoscience community needs to accelerate development
of basic digital geological map standards to improve
interoperability, sharing and accessibility of data and ……
The drivers (2)
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
…the great progress of GeoSciML, which gives OneGeology
the “technical engine” and in return GeoSciML the “wheels” it
needs to spread
The development of Spatial Data Infrastructures
The lessons learned in making digital map cover available
and accessible in UK and Europe
The availability of robust computing/information systems
Create an aspirational benchmark for all nations
Transfer know-how to developing countries and produce
maps/data to attract interest and investment.
A project that could involve and focus all geological surveys
Raise the profile of geoscience.
The Google Earth paradigm
How do we plan to do it?
• Get as many nations/surveys as possible to make a commitment to deliver
their piece of the global geological jigsaw puzzle
• The target scale is 1:1 million, but the project will be pragmatic and accept
a range of scales from 1:500 000 to 1:5 million
• Work with the best available data - raster or vector
• The concept is a distributed model - Geological Surveys will provide/serve
the data for their territories to a web portal.
• The project must be closely interlinked with the development and rollout of
the geoscience data model and exchange language – GeoSciML
• All those who have expressed interest have been invited to a kick-off
meeting in Brighton, UK, March 2007
• This will initiate the project and agree on high level specifications for the
geological and information systems and project governance.
• Plan is for first test datasets to be available 2007. Add data through 2008
present first results at the IGC in 2008 and keep adding data……
The basic OneGeology proposition
Where are we now?
•
•
•
•
•
•
53 Nations/Geological Surveys have expressed
interest in OneGeology
6 global bodies and 2 other international geoscience
organisations are supporting OneGeology
Draft MoU agreed between the 6 global bodies to
create the essential international umbrella/credentials
Kick-off Workshop organised in Brighton, UK for 1216 March
87 Participants from 42 Nations attending the Kick-off
Workshop
BGS are setting aside A$ 200 000 to move project
forward in 2007/08
Brighton Workshop Objectives/Success Criteria
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Understand the visions and concerns of the potential participants
Develop consensus and share understanding of what OneGeology is
Produce a high-level project plan and schedule
Recommendations for project governance
Communicate project status
Review what map/data content is available in participant nations.
Define formats/ways to participate (including participation strategy for
nations needing assistance)
Develop consensus on a high-level geological specification
Develop consensus on data input (data structure, data flow, etc)
Develop consensus on data output/access interface
Draft communication and recruitment plan
End the Workshop with broad participation in place (and a happy
bonded team!)
OneGeology project stages
Plan and Develop
Implementation
Hearts/Minds/Politics
Principles Specification
Design
Science and technology
The UK Workshop
Who is supporting OneGeology?
International Bodies
International Year of
Planet Earth (IYPE)
www.yearofplanetearth.org
IC GS
International Consortium of
Geological Surveys
www.icogs.org
Commission for the
Geological Map of the
World (CGMW)
http://ccgm.free.fr/
International Steering Committee
for Global Mapping (ISCGM)
www.iscgm.org
International Union of
Geological Sciences
(IUGS)
www.iugs.org/
UNESCO
http://portal.unesco.org/en/
International Lithosphere Program
http://sclilp.gfz-potsdam.de/
EuroGeoSurveys
http://www.eurogeosurveys.org/
Who is involved?
Surveys and organisations
Who is involved?
Nations
challenges and opportunities
What are the problems
•
•
Not getting the message across about what OneGeology is/is not
Diverse views of what OneGeology should be and do
–
•
•
Encouraging participation
Perceived overlap/conflict with other international geoscience
initiatives
Ownership and “geo-politics”
Internal national complications
•
•
–
•
•
•
map or interoperability, simple or sophisticated
(eg which survey/institute should be the representative; priority of
OneGeology against other tasks)
Range of participant capability
Where will the funds/resources come from?
Sustaining the initiative
Summary
OneGeology will ……
• increase standards/tools take-up (GeoSciML)
• help to make existing data accessible to the world
(adding value to existing resources)
• transfer know-how
One Geology is about ……
• pragmatism (accept what is given)
not about geological harmonization
any format: paper/raster/vector
1:1M is the target scale
Acknowledgements
John Broome, ESS, Canada
Harvey Thorleifson, AASG, USA
Kathryn Bull, BGS, UK
Jenny Forster, BGS, UK
Katy Booth, BGS, UK
Marie Cowan, BGS, UK
(OneGeology Workshop Organising Team)
Would you like to know more?
www.OneGeology.org
or
contact
[email protected]