Transcript defining games

defining games
Why even define games?
• Check for what is a game, what is not a game
– Ok, but why?
• Define borders, but also define possible directions and possibilities of
games evolution
• Define questions to ask about games… Right… and, perhaps, who should
be asking those questions…
• Definitions can be positive (what is a game) or negative (what is not a
game)
• Positive definitions are made up of lists of elements all games must "have"
to be called games (hence – they tend to be quite paradoxical)
• Negative definitions are often more precise, e.g. we tend to think about
games as "having" universal elements, such as play, rules, structure,
competition, but finding examples of activities or artifacts that have those
elements that build up a positive definition but are decidedly not games
help fine-tune the definition
game / play / work
• Play – no rules and free-form
– Always?
• Play – no goal
– Really?
•
•
•
•
Play – fluidity
Game – rules, structure, competition, outcome, etc.
Work
Game is not work
– In what sense, though?
• Is game play?
• Is play game?
Historical definitions
Johan Huizinga, 1950
[...] a free activity standing quite consciously outside
”ordinary” life as being ”not serious”, but at the same
time absorbing the player intensely and utterly. It is an
activity connected with no material interest, and no
profit can be gained by it. It proceeds within its own
proper boundaries of time and space according to fixed
rules and in an orderly manner. It promotes the
formation of social groupings which tend to surround
themselves with secrecy and to stress their difference
from the common world by disguise or other means.
Historical definitions
Roger Caillois, 1961
[...] an activity which is essentially: Free
(voluntary), separate [in time and space],
uncertain, unproductive, governed by rules,
make-believe.
Historical definitions
Bernard Suits, 1978
To play a game is to engage in activity directed
towards bringing about a specific state of
affairs, using only means permitted by rules,
where the rules prohibit more efficient in favor
of less efficient means, and where such rules are
accepted just because they make possible such
activity.
Historical definitions
Avedon & Sutton Smith, 1981
At its most elementary level then we can define
game as an exercise of voluntary control
systems in which there is an opposition
between forces, confined by a procedure and
rules in order to produce a disequilibrial
outcome.
Historical definitions
Chris Crawford, 1981
I perceive four common factors: representation
["a closed formal system that subjectively
represents a subset of reality"], interaction,
conflict, and safety ["the results of a game are
always less harsh than the situations the game
models"].
representation… careful… fishy…
Historical definitions
David Kelley 1988
a game is a form of recreation constituted by a
set of rules that specify an object to be attained
and the permissible means of attaining it.
Historical definitions
Katie Salen & Eric Zimmerman 2003
A game is a system in which players engage in
an artificial conflict, defined by rules, that
results in a quantifiable outcome.
Other definitions
Jane McGonigal, 2011
When you strip away the genre differences and
the technological complexities, all games share
four defining traits: a goal, rules, a feedback
system, and voluntary participation.
Game definition for dummies?
• Game is an artifact produced by game
developers.
• Well, not as stupid as you may think…
• Work of art is an artifact produced by an
artist, recognized as art by the Art World
(George Dickie).
"Classic Game Definition"
Jesper Juul’s Classic Game Definition,
Half-real, 2005, pp.36.
1.Rules: games are rule-based.
2.Variable, quantifiable outcome: games have variable,
quantifiable outcomes.
3.Valorization of outcome: the different potential outcomes
of the game are assigned different values, some positive and
some negative
4. Player effort: the player exerts effort in order to influence
the outcome (games are challenging).
5 . Player attached to outcome: the player is emotionally
attached to the outcome of the game in the sense that a
player will be winner and “ happy ” in case of a positive
outcome, but a loser and “ unhappy ” in case of a negative
outcome.
6 . Negotiable consequences: the same game [set of rules]
can be played with or without real-life consequences
Juul's definition
A game is a rule-based formal system with a
variable and quantifiable outcome, where
different outcomes are assigned different values,
the player exerts effort in order to influence the
outcome, the player feels attached to the
outcome, and the consequences of the activity
are optional and negotiable.
Paradoxical?
• Think how strange it is, that all these are games:
– Purely deterministic games
• Physical skill based (yet these may be difficult to find, when
physics is at play, you have to factor in chance)
• Memory based
• Analysis based
• Etc.
– Partially deterministic, partially chance based games
– Chance games
Once again, games and work
• "Game vs. work" (as "game vs. play") offer borderline
cases which may help define games more properly.
– In a way – in case you ever wondered why gamification is
so ineffective and bad for you...
– In a way – in case you ever wondered why gamification is
so effective and good for you…
• How can one phenomenon be two or three different
things at the same time for different people?
– e.g. Professional sports vs. amateur sports (can we say
even, that a professional football match is not a game?)
– Yo-yo and other "toys"
– Are we just "playing around" with those definitions?
Think language
Remember about polysemy, though
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
"This is not a game."
"Game the system"
"The game is the game. Always."
But: "It's all in the game." "It's a part of the game."
"It's game over for Tony."
"War games"
"Love games"
"Hunger games"
•
•
•
•
"They're playing us."
"He's playing with you."
"Play or get played."
"Play dead"
So, are there games?
• Game definitions and game theories often tend to discuss abstract
qualities of games, treated as a whole. This seems strange…
• (The real) Game theory... it's about games but not really, is it? It's not
about WoW, for example…
• So perhaps videogames ARE really different from other games, and they
need a different definition?
• Definitions tend to overlook the significance of all of the "surroundings" of
the defined object. E.g. it's agreed that games do not need to be violent,
but to study games comprehensively studies of game violence are needed.
Hence – interdisciplinary approaches on the one hand and "game
studying", on the other
• Remember, in a perfect world it should always be different (or is it) to deal
with:
– Sociology of games, psychology of games, history of games, health aspects of games,
xxxxx of games,
– Game studies (or whatever they are "supposed to be")
But is it?
Again – think sport…
Reading assignment
Ian Bogost, Video Games are a Mess
http://bogost.com/writing/videogames_are_a_
mess/