National Job Evaluation - publication of job scores
Download
Report
Transcript National Job Evaluation - publication of job scores
National Job Evaluation
Publication of job scores
Briefing for managers and trade
union representatives
February 2007
Speakers
Arthur
Deakin – Strategic Director of
Resources
Jill Turner – Chair of the Trade
Union Side
Deborah Hinde – Project Manager
Purpose of this session
Review
background
Explain
process
What your team needs from you
Support
Leadership
Information
Help
Why we are doing job evaluation
Single
Equal
status agreement 1997
pay for work of equal value
National
pay award 2004
The trade unions’ position
Equal
pay
National
Joint
Job Evaluation scheme
working
NCC’s pay strategy
Phase
I
Hay scheme
Not agreed with trade unions
1,500 employees
Phase
II
National scheme
Working jointly with trade unions
15,000 employees
Overall aim
To deliver pay and reward
structures that:
attract,
retain and develop a
skilled and flexible workforce
achieve value for money in
service delivery
support the delivery of the
Council’s objectives
Desired outcomes
Equal pay compliance
Single status compliance
TU endorsed
Affordable pay bill
Viable service units
Well informed workforce
A reward structure that is
transparent, objective, fair, clean
and competitive
Work strands
Job
evaluation
Pay modelling
Terms and conditions
Business implications
Implementation
Communications
The NJC scheme – 13 factors
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
Knowledge (8 x 20)
Mental skills (6 x 13)
Interpersonal and
communication skills
(6 x 13)
Physical skills (5 x 13)
Initiative and
independence (8 x 13)
Physical demands
(5 x 10)
Mental demands
(5 x 10)
Emotional demands
(5 x 10)
9. Resp for people (6 x 13)
10. Resp for supervision
(6 x 13)
11. Resp for financial
resources (6 x 13)
12. Resp for physical
resources (6 x 13)
13. Working conditions
(5 x 10)
The NJC job evaluation scheme
Developed
jointly by employers and
trades unions
Designed to be applied up to scp 49
(ie band D)
Covers full range of local authority
jobs
Small and large councils
Pay modelling – key points
Total
pay package
Scores mapped to jobs
New pay structure developed
Specialist software
Terms and conditions – key points
Total
reward package
Single-status compliant
Streamline - minimise administrative
costs
Improve clarity & transparency
Equal pay-proof
Business implications – key points
Potential
impact on council tax (cost)
Potential
impact on services and
users (service viability/best value and
recruitment and retention)
Business
IDS
implications database
market survey
Implementation – key points
Prepare
staff and managers
Inform people of outcomes
Pay people
Back pay
Protections
Close
links with communications
Communications – key points
Joint
Consistent
messages
Consistent style
Variety of media
Project management structure
Joint
strand teams
Joint project advisory group (JPAG)
Informal corporate joint forum
(ICJF)
Personnel Committee
Why we had to review job scores
High
degree of turbulence
Bunching of scores limited flexibility
External comparison suggested we
had operated scheme differently
Advice from two independent
experts
Pilot review required
Job evaluation approach
Amendments
to help text
Guidance to job analysts
Use of JDQ
Retained single panel
Quality checks
Publication of scores
Manager/TU
rep briefings – this week
Internet/Intranet:
Home
2 March
addresses: late March
Employee
briefings – April
Why publish ahead of pay structure?
Long-standing
commitment
Integrity/credibility
Scores
of the scores
are basis for appeals
What’s being published?
Scores
on internet
Scores booklet
Managers briefing note
Frequently asked questions
Individual notifications
Job scores – all you need to know
What about…
New
employees?
New
and changed jobs?
Appeals
Agreed
in principle
Subject to formal agreement
Appeals form
Grounds for appeal
Independent panel
Face to face element
Will take time
What your team needs from you
Support
Leadership
Information
Help
Support available to you
Information
pack
Big issues – ask a question
Job evaluation hotline
Your line manager
HR team