Repurposing virtual patients for clinical reasoning

Download Report

Transcript Repurposing virtual patients for clinical reasoning

Centre for Virtual Patients
Time And Effort Of Repurposing Virtual
Patients From CASUS To CAMPUS Using
The eViP Standard:
Automated Vs. Manual Transfer
Benjamin Hanebeck1; Stephan Oberle1; Jörn Heid2; Frank Hess2; Inga Hege3; Martin
Fischer4; Martin Haag2; Sören Huwendiek1
1Department
of General Paediatrics, University Hospital for Adolescent and Paediatric Medicine and Centre for Virtual Patients,
Medical Faculty of Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany ; 2Centre for Virtual Patients, Medical Faculty of Heidelberg
University, Heidelberg, Germany ; 3Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, Germany ; 4University Witten-Herdecke, Germany
2nd International Conference on Virtual Patients
& MedBiquitous Annual Conference, 28.04.2010
Centre for Virtual Patients
Introduction
• Developing new virtual patients (VP) is costly
• Repurposing existing VP is a reasonable means
to save resources
• However, transfer of VP between different VP
systems is complicated
Centre for Virtual Patients
Introduction
• VP Standard was established:
Medbiq VP taken as part of the eViP-standard as
a shared structure
• System specific features can be covered by
extensions
– QTI extension for knowledge-questions
– ...
Additionally, a repurposed VP needs to be
adapted to local needs (content, scenario)
Centre for Virtual Patients
Introduction
• Efforts, boundaries and benefits of using
the eViP-standard to transfer a VP from
one VP-system to another are, as yet,
unreported.
• Does the standard reduce efforts by
enabling automatic repurposing?
Centre for Virtual Patients
Introduction
• Efforts, boundaries and benefits of using
the eViP-standard to transfer a VP from
one VP-system to another are, as yet,
unreported.
• Does the standard reduce efforts by
enabling automatic repurposing?
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods
• Development of a new CAMPUS player
component enables playback of eViPStandard-compliant material
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods
Modification of the CAMPUS authoring
component to enable
• …import of eViP-Standard compliant VP with QTI
support
• … editing of the imported VP
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods
• Choice of an appropriate VP-System for
VP exchange / automated repurposing
• CASUS and CAMPUS
– linear VP structures
– QTI extension
• Selection of 15 VP from CASUS
in average 17,7 cards/VP (± 6,2)
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods - Manual repurposing
• A new blank CAMPUS VP was created
• The content was copied manually from the
existing CASUS VP into the CAMPUS authoring
component
• Question were recreated where possible, Media
was embedded
• Efforts were noted by using the eViP effort sheet
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods - Automated repurposing
• An eViP-Standard compliant export of the
CASUS VP was imported into the CAMPUS
authoring component
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods - Automated repurposing
• Playback and check of the VP
• Corrections were made where necessary
• Efforts were noted manually
• In all cases of manual and automatic import:
No efforts for content adaption were taken into
account
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – Manual repurposing
It took 11,3 hours in average / VP.
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – Automated repurposing
It took 1,8 hours in average / VP.
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – Automated repurposing:
Issues
Problems:
• Hyperlinks imported incorrectly
(concerning CASUS Expert Network, links to videos,
external resources…)
• Some questions displayed incorrectly (e.g. sorting task)
• Layout problems (e.g. different font types)
• Labels of pictures not displayed
Solutions: Manual corrections
Centre for Virtual Patients
Boundaries
• Originating VP has to be eViP-Standard compliant
• As many extensions as possible should be shared between
the used VP systems (e.g. QTI)
• Results were achieved with easy repurposing approach
(linear pathway, QTI extension, same language)
• Efforts increase with differences between VP systems (e.g.
linear vs. branched)
Centre for Virtual Patients
Benefits
• Repurposing VP is a lot more time efficient by using an
automated import
• Only little corrections necessary
• Adaptations / extension of content in target VP system
possible
• Improving of export/import-functionalities continuously
increases quality of interoperability
Centre for Virtual Patients
Conclusion
• Repurposing VP using the eViP-standard can save time and
efforts
• Not completely automated but semi-automated repurposing
process
+
Centre for Virtual Patients
Thank you!
Contact:
www.campusvirtuals.de
Is still done
• but beforehand
• only once
Resulting in an increase
in interoperability
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – manual repurposing
It took 11,3 hours in average / VP.
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – automated repurposing:
Problems and Solutions
Problem
Solution
Duplicated questions Manual deletion
(double import)
External links did not Manual integration
work (e.g. videos)
Answers to
questions were
doubled
Manual correction
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – automated repurposing
It took 1,8 hours in average / VP.
Centre for Virtual Patients
Introduction
• Remaining problem:
– Teaching content sometimes differs not only
internationally but also nationally
– Often an identical reproduction of a VP is not
satisfactory for teachers
• Need:
No playback-only solution, but possibilities
to edit and adapt a VP
Centre for Virtual Patients
Results – manual repurposing:
Problems and Solutions
Missing question types
• Problem: some types are not natively supported by
CAMPUS authoring component (e.g. rating of symptoms,
sorting tasks)
• Solution:
• manual substitution by an available question type
(e.g. MCQ, free text) covering the same content
• manual creation of an interactive graphic based on
Flash using an editor implemented in CAMPUS
Centre for Virtual Patients
Methods
• CAMPUS, a system for learning with VP exists
since 1996
• Consists of
–
–
–
–
An authoring system
A simulative Java based player
A card-based eViP standard compliant player
An application for secure, keyfeature-based
assessments
• Linear order of interactions