Transcript The Direction Ohio’s Going…
2011-2011 OIP TRAINING SERIES
GETTING RESULTS: IMPACTING EACH STUDENT WITHIN “ALL STUDENTS” Going Deeper with Teacher Based Teams & the Ohio 5-Step Process
Start Ready, Leave Ready
Components of a 21st Century Education •
College and Career Ready Academic Standards
•
An Aligned Curriculum
•
High Quality Instructional Supports
•
Modernized Assessments
What is College and Career Readiness?
Being qualified for:
– A degree-granting
postsecondary education
, without remediation – A
chosen career
, ready for advanced training.
Jobs Will Require More Education & Training
2018
38% 62%
NO COLLEGE REQUIRED COLLEGE REQUIRED
Source: Georgetown Center on Education and the Workforce, 2010.
Are Ohio Students Ready for College?
ACT, “The Conditions of College & Career Readiness, Class of 2011: Ohio.”
New Academic Content Standards
Ohio’s Integrated 21
st
Century Education System:
What?
How?
Common Core and State Revised Standards High Quality Instruction & Curricular Supports Aligned System of Assessments How Well?
Ohio’s New Academic Standards
COMMON CORE
English language arts
Mathematics OHIO’S REVISED STANDARDS
Science
Social Studies
Common Core and State Revised
Standards Reflect NEW FOCUS:
College and career readiness
Content and skills
Coherence, focus, rigor NEW FEATURES:
Fewer, clearer, and higher
Internationally benchmarked
An aligned model curriculum
Common Core State Standards Adoption ** Minnesota adopted the CCSS in ELA only Source: PARCC consortia
Attributes of the CCSS: English Language Arts
• • Shift in emphasis from
fiction to nonfiction
in reading and writing.
•
Focus on close analysis of texts
with evidence to back up claims and conclusions.
Emphasis in teaching literacy skills
in and through history/social studies, science, and technical content areas.
Based on Reading framework for the 2009 National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Attributes of the CCSS:
Mathematics
Engage students in the content through the Mathematical Practices:
–
Problem solving
–
Reasoning
–
Making arguments
–
Precision
Attributes of the Science Standards
Scientific Inquiry Engineering Technological Design
Attributes of the Social Studies Standards
A Comprehensive Curriculum that:
Promotes
• Historical Thinking • Civic Participation
Includes
• Economic Decision-making • Financial Literacy
Ohio’s New Standards Inform:
•
Curriculum Revision
•
Assessment Development
•
Career-Technical Programs
•
Special Education Programs
•
English as a Second Language Programs
•
Higher Education Alignment
Improve the Graduation Rate
• by 0.5% a year.
Reduce Graduation Rate Gaps
• by 50% • between under represented and majority students.
Reduce Performance Gaps
• by 50% on national and state-wide assessments • between under represented and majority students.
Reduce the State Performance Gap
•by 50% on reading and mathematics proficiency •between Ohio and the best performing states in the nation
Double College Enrollment
• For students age 19 and younger
Speech and Language Impairments 13% TBI 1% Visual Impairments 0% Specific Learning Disabilities 41% Autism 5% Cognitive Disabilities 12% Deafness 1% Developmental Delay 2% Emotional Disturbance 7% Multiple Disabilities 5% Disability Categories in Ohio 2010 Other Health Impaired 12% Orthopedic Impairments 1%
19
13 Categories of Disability
There are 259,454 children in Ohio on an IEP. Only 2 categories have a cognitive disability.
85% have average to above average intelligence.
100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2004
Gaps in Reading
2005 2006 2007 2008
Reading Typical Reading SWD
2009 2010 2011
90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2004 2005
Gaps in Math
2008
Math Typical Math SWD
2006 2007 2009 2010 2011
Focus Areas
Graduation Rate Least-restrictive environments Discipline
Race to the Top
Five Application Areas A. State Success Factors B. Standards and Assessments C. Data Systems to Support Instruction D. Great Teachers and Leaders E. Turning Around the Lowest-achieving Schools
High Quality Instruction
Focus on Problem-solving and Project based Learning
21 st Century Model Instructional Strategies 1.Technologically Enhanced 2.Inquiry-based 3.Problem solving 4.Performance Tasks
33
Implications for Learning
Fewer standards = more depth for mastery
Classrooms will become more hands-on, activity based
Skills will be taught along with content
New assessments will better measure student learning progress aligned to instruction
Teachers can address individual student needs through data reports
Student Implications
More students will graduate from high school, college and career ready:
–
Fewer students
need remediation in college –
More students
are prepared for meaningful employment or further training –
All students
possess 21 st century skills
Preparation for Districts
2010-2011
• Introduce new standards • Participate in creating model curricula
2011-2012
• Build awareness of new standards • Introduce model curricula • Conduct crosswalk activities • Initiate formative instruction PD
2012-2013
• Introduce performance tasks and scoring rubrics • Continue formative instruction PD • Practice online formative assessments • Introduce instructional improvement system
2013-2014
• Integrate standards and curricula into district curricula and teachers’ course planning • Integrate performance tasks in course activities • Prepare for online testing • Complete formative instruction PD 36
Ohio’s New Generation of Assessments
Ohio’s New High School Assessments Nationally standardized readiness test Series of end of course exams
Ohio’s New Assessments
ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA
English language arts
Mathematics STATE-DEVELOPED
Science
Social Studies
Assessment Consortia Comparison
SBAC
Computer-Adaptive Summative Assessment Performance Tasks during last 12 weeks Optional Formative Interim Assessment (Computer-adaptive and performance tasks) Rapid reporting system to inform instruction and accountability
PARCC
Computer-Based Comprehensive Assessment + Listening/Speaking Component Performance-based Assessments in final weeks Optional Early Diagnostic and Mid Year Assessment Components Rapid reporting system to inform instruction and accountability
New Assessments Introduce Online Testing
Alternate Assessments
For students with significant cognitive disabilities, assessments will:
–
Provide meaningful data
–
Demonstrate student growth
–
Be user friendly
–
Become available 2012-2013 school year (tentatively)
Assessment Timeline
State Board Adopted Standards
June, 2010
State Board Adopted Model Curriculum
March, 2011
• • •
Development Phase:
Test development Field testing Standards setting
2012 - 2014
First Assessment Administration
2014-2015
2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
IDEA Disclaimer Notice
There are no copyright restrictions on this document. However, please cite and credit the source when copying all or part of this document. This document was supported in whole or in part by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, (Award number H027A110111-11A, CFDA 84.027A, awarded to the Ohio Department of Education). The opinions expressed herein do not necessarily reflect the policy or position of the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, and no official endorsement by the Department should be inferred.