Transcript Touch lab

Body Awareness lab
December 2004
Duality of body representation
• The human body
– Sensory surface
– A physical object
– “Me”
• Everywhere in the world, self begins with body
(Baumeister, 1999)
General principles
• Spatially organised map
• Multimodal (touch, proprioception, vision)
• Plasticity
Body Surface Map
• Primary somatosensory cortex
• Raw sense of touch
• spatially extended
• composed of parts
• disproportionate
Penfield &
Rasmussen
(1950)
Body surface: Key concepts
• 1. Receptive field
Def: the part of the body that a
neuron receives from
Body surface: Key concepts
• 2. Threshold
The point at which some feature of a stimulus just
becomes detectable
Measure how much information the brain has about the
stimulus
Absolute detection threshold: “I can just feel it”
Body surface: Key concepts
• 2. Threshold
The point at which some feature of a stimulus just
becomes detectable
Measure how much information the brain has about the
stimulus
Absolute detection threshold: “I can just feel it”
Motion threshold: “I can just feel that it is moving”
Spatial threshold: “I can just feel its spatial form”
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
Tactile spatial threshold:
- depends on density of skin
receptors
- reflects somatosensory
cortex homunculus
Methods:
- 2 point discrimination
threshold
- measure of spatial
resolution
Body surface: Key concepts
Stimulus on finger
Brain activity
Neurons with finger RFs
Body surface: Key concepts
2 close stimuli
Brain activity
Neurons with finger RFs
Close stimuli: same set of neurons: feels like ONE stimulus
Body surface: Key concepts
2 distant stimuli
Brain activity
Neurons with finger RFs
Distant stimuli: different sets of neurons: feels like TWO stimuli
2PDT
2PDT is a measure of the separation between
two tactile stimuli at which the subject can
just tell there are two stimuli rather than one
Corresponds to size of the receptive field of a
virtual neuron in somatosensory cortex
Easy, sensitive measure of touch information
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
One
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
Er, one?
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
Two!
Effective RF size
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
One!
DUMMY TRIAL: stops subject
Saying ‘TWO’ continually
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
Two!
Easy dummy trial: remind what 2
Feels like
2 Point Discrimination Threshold
(2PDT)
Tactile spatial threshold:
- face/hands have many skin
receptors, and small RFs
- reflects somatosensory
cortex homunculus
Methods:
- 2 point discrimination
threshold
- measure of spatial
resolution
2PDT methods
• Prepare 2 point stimuli
• Range of separations appropriate for body part
• Random order
• Catch trials with 1 stimulus (25%)
– Prevents subject always responding “Two”
– Report errors, but don’t analyse
• 5-10 presentations per stimulus
2PDT methods
• Results
• 2PDT = separation at which subjects say “Two”
75% of the time
% "Two" responses
2PDT on palm
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
0
20
40
Separation (mm)
60
2PDT problems
• Watch out for:
• Training effects (give everyone same practice,
ideally 5 minutes minimum)
• Vision (subject mustn’t see if it’s 2 or 1)
• Exploratory movements
Modulating the sense of touch
• Use 2PDT as a measure of tactile resolution
• What factors influence tactile resolution?
• Repeated measures, within subjects:
– Visual adaptation (e.g., compare 2pdt on index finger pre-post 30
minutes viewing fingertip at high or low magnification: think of
suitable visual task w. feedback to maintain visual attention).
– Haptic training (e.g., compare 2PDT pre-post 30 minutes blindfold
coin sorting, with feedback)
Modulating the sense of touch
• Viewing the body improves 2PDT
• Kennett, Taylor-Clarke, Haggard (2001) Current
Biology, 11, 1198-1201.
• Visual-tactile enhancement
Modulating the sense of touch
• Does visual-tactile enhancement effect extend to:
– Viewing other people’s bodies
• Dependent variable: 2PDT estimate
• (View object/view body) * +/- other factor
– (self/other)
• Look for interaction in 2x2 ANOVA
• Counterbalancing very important: training effects
• Gaze direction and gaze depth MUST be fixed: spatial setup very important
• 10 subjects normally enough
From body surface to body space
How do we perceive our own body?
•
Touch subject at one of several locations
•
Errors are bigger and more interesting if touch is very
light (Q-tip, fine paintbrush)
•
Rapp et al. (2002) Neuroreport, 13, 207-211
•
Blindfold subject attempts to point to location with
other arm (pens, OHP slides, graph paper, digital
camera etc).
•
Several repetitions, random order, calculate mean
error, infer subjective body shape
•
Stats: ANOVA on mean errors
From body surface to body space
Ideas:
1.
Measure localisation errors using the Rapp method with:
- Variable delays 0, 2, 10 s between being stimulation and response
- An active displacement of the touched hand, passive displacement by experimenter, or no
displacement between stimulation and response (keep delay constant).
2. Are localisation errors on the arm aligned along the arm like the tactile RFs?
- even when arm is rotated?
- even with 5 s delay between touch and localisation movement?
(http://firmin.lyon.inserm.fr/534/534YR-Gros.pdf see p. 163)
3. Measure localisation errors on the arm and abdomen in people with/without high levels
of body image concern (Think carefully: needs 40 subjects to be worth it!)
Tactile patterns
Almost all work on touch involves a single
focal stimulus
How do we integrate large areas of body
surface to represent patterns?
Tactile patterns
E.g.,
Collinearity judgement
“Middle one is above”
“Middle one is below”
Tactile patterns
Methods: Either:
* 2 Alternative Forced Choice (2AFC)
Move middle one up/down at random. Identify distance of middle one
from line at which subjects score 75% correct (50%=chance)
OR
* Method of adjustment
Gradually move middle one from above or below until subject says “I
feel the points are colinear”. Record distance from the line
Tactile patterns
Methods: 3 Simultaneous Qtip stimuli, blindfold
Body parts: palm, cheek, abdomen, forearm-upperarm
Questions: Compare geometry of judgements on same body part:
above/below horizontal line
left/right of vertical line: Is there a body axis effect?
Does making the subject lean to one side impair performance?
(Spidalieri, J Neurophysiol, 78, 545; Spidalieri, Neuroreport, 10, 2473)
How is performance changed if the line terminators span 2 body parts:
is pattern integratio worse over upper+forearm than forearm alone
or upper arm alone (keep arm still, keep distance constant!)
Ethical issues
Be gentle!
(avoid touching eyes, eyelids, mouth etc).
Be hygienic!
Be respectful. Respect bodies, persons and cultures!
Have fun!
Useful references
A general intoduction to the idea of body representation:
Berlucchi G., Aglioti S. The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness. Trends
in Neurosciences, 1997
A general introduction to the sense of touch can be found in most
neuroscience textbooks, e.g.,
Goldstein: Sensation and Perception,
Kandel Schwarz and Jessell, Essentials of Neural Science and Behaviour, ch 18.,
To find ideas for experiments, try the following journals:
Perception and Psychophysics, Journal of Experimental Psychology: (Human Perc and
Perf), Brain, Neuroreport, Experimental Brain Research
Try the following keywords:
touch, tactile, haptic, cutaneous sensation, body representation, body schema
Useful references
This presentation is at:
http://www.psychol.ucl.ac.uk/patrick.haggard/lab_2004.ppt