slides - workshop 28
Download
Report
Transcript slides - workshop 28
Responsible European
Management
Prof. Maddy Janssens
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
Why good companies do bad
things?
The senior managers consider ethical or social issues as
matters for somebody else to resolve
They talk to the same circle of people and information
sources all the time and avoid people or organisations who
disagree with them or criticise them
They discourage employees from thinking about their
work as whole people, from using their moral and social
intelligence as well as their business intelligence
They focus exclusively on financial measures of
performance
(Schwartz & Gibb, 1999)
Structure
Responsible Management
Value Based Management
Stakeholder Engagement
A Place for Personal Development
Towards Implementation
Responsible Management
Responsibility
as
members of society, organizations have an
obligation to uphold social values
however, digression into debates among
competing moral positions
Responsiveness
technical
capability and willingness of
organizations to adjust to society as reflected in
the behavior of the organization
focus on specific issues
Value Based Management
Values - Identity - Behavior
Types of Values
Management of Values
Value Based Management
Values are central to the identity of an
organization
Social Values
Individual
Values
Stakeholder
Values
Organizational
Values
Value Based Management
Values
exist
in a hierarchical relationship to another
business
values
social values
drivers
of behavior
behaviors
are indicators of underlying values
critical events to identify values-in-use and espoused
values
Value Based Management
Business Values
profit
motive: success orientation - positive
cost/benefit ratio - competition orientation
future and product orientation: stability predictability - control - order
Value based management is for many
people: value for shareholders
Value Based Management
Social Values
f.ex.
values that strengthen collaboration with
stakeholders
systems thinking - service - authenticity and trust wisdom of the individual - spirit of inquiry/risk
taking
f.ex.
chemical company
participation - personal growth - autonomy - variety career development - minimalization of status
differences
Value Based Management
Social Values
social
mission statement
“…is a democratic, ethical and innovative provider of
financial services to its members. Through strong
financial performance, we serve as catalyst for the
self-reliance and economic well-being of our
membership and the community”
Value Based Management
‘Management of Values’
explicit
process of identifying the type of
values that drive decision making
skeleton principles: guide for actions applied in
a specific situation
--> balance between business and social goals
attention to process of defining the values: how
and who?
Value Based Management
building
a shared value set
Co-creating
Consulting
Testing
Selling
Telling
Degree of Active Involvement
Value Based Management
Concluding Reflections
link
between business goals with broader social
goals and responsibilities
behaviors and practices grounded in a specific
set of values are more credible
critical events are the test of value based
management
stakeholder dialogue: whose values have been
considered?
Stakeholder Engagement
Evolution of Stakeholder Theory
Input-output
model
Stakeholder model
Systems model
Notion of Dialogue
Concluding Reflections
Stakeholder Engagement
Management as ‘Input-Output’ Model
a
inputs
labor
capital
equipment
supplies...
b
management control
c
output
services
products
internal operations
a: cost containment
b: creation of needs
c: goal selection and direction of work process
Stakeholder Engagement
Input-Output Model
relationship
to society: independent
responsibility of corporation: to make a profit
role of managers: agents of shareholders
management style: defensive
Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Model
each
company has its own unique set of
stakeholder groups who are affected by
corporate activities and can affect the
corporation
primary and secondary stakeholders
primarily:
directly linked interests
secondarily: indirectly influence
Stakeholder Engagement
NGO’s
Customers
Competitors
Suppliers
Organization
Community
Unions
Employees
Shareholders
Stakeholder Engagement
Stakeholder Model
relationship
to society: interpenetrating
responsibility of corporation: to respond to
stakeholders
role of managers: relationship managers
management style: buffering
Stakeholder Engagement
Role of Managers? (Freeman, 1984)
expected
to serve as the internal representatives
of the various stakeholder groups
interaction on issues of mutual concerns
interaction should be voluntary, based on
cooperation, communication and negotiation
difficult task of weighing and prioritising the
conflicting demands and interests of various
stakeholders
Stakeholder Engagement
Critiques
balancing
conflicting interests is simply not
possible
only attention to powerful stakeholders whose
claim is then considered to be legitimate and
urgent
stakeholder management techniques seek to
direct and control interactions with
stakeholders: compliance instead of trust
Stakeholder Engagement
Towards Relational Conception of
Stakeholder Theory
emphasis
on relationships themselves instead of
interests of stakeholders
managers are not separate from stakeholder
relationships but part of it
the stakeholder relationships are multiple and
constitute social networks
Stakeholder Engagement
NGO’s
Customers
Competitors
Suppliers
Organization
Community
Unions
Employees
Shareholders
Stakeholder Engagement
Systems Model
relationship
to society: interdependent
responsibility of corporation: to find ethical
win-win opportunities with stakeholders
role of managers: relationship builders
management style: collaborative
Stakeholder Engagement
Role of Managers?
don’t
manage stakeholders’ relationships but
manage the expectations of the relationship
involve those stakeholders who are affected by
a decision, in making that decision
care for the needs of stakeholders - respect
different perspectives
-->evaluate decisions by the way they are made
and by whom, not by their content or
consequences
Stakeholder Engagement
Notion of Dialogue
≠ consensus
dialogue:
dialogue
explore
underlying patterns of meaning
allow addressivity, responsiveness of the other
parties
allow the differences to co-exist
dialogue
other
≠ argumentation
ways of communication: story telling
Stakeholder Engagement
Concluding Reflections
focus
not only on stakeholders’ interests but
also on relationships themselves
concern with process questions:
who
needs to be involved?: be concerned for the
‘silent’ stakeholders
what is the process of deciding?: create an inclusive
way of communication
A Place for Personal
Development
Development
conditions
of development
organizational barriers of development
Diversity in Development
different
needs within work context
different needs outside work context
A Place for Personal
Development
Development as Growth of ‘Whole Person’
as
employees, members of an organization
as ambassadors of the organization to its
customers, clients, audiences and suppliers
as citizens of the wider society in which the
organization exists
as human beings with the need to realize their
own capabilities
A Place for Personal
Development
Development?
integration
of work and learning
job
development programs
personal learning plan: personal skills
liaisons
bring
with local organizations
outsiders into the organization
stimulate outside links with community
A Place for Personal
Development
Conditions of Development
exploration
of new possibilities > exploitation
of old certainties
unlearning, experimenting with alternative
environments, intentionally creating instability,
variety
difference
as driver of development
A Place for Personal
Development
Organizational Barriers
organizations
tend to assign their resources to
exploitation
organizational practices tend to stress sameness
division
of labor
formalisation
socialisation
A Place for Personal
Development
Diversity of Needs within Work Context
of modal employee ≠ diverse employees
role of union
interests
content of the union agenda: discourse of equality and fairness
precludes the acknowledgement of the diversity of interests
process of the unions: development of arena’s, spaces in which
diverse employees can identify and articulate their concerns
--> focus on issues at the level of the workplace
A Place for Personal
Development
Diversity of Needs outside Work Context
development
may mean:
work-life balance, child care, part-time work, leave of
absence, ...
--> stepping ‘aside’ from the norm
A Place for Personal
Development
Concluding Reflections
Step
aside from the norm
development
Create
has different meanings
spaces to identify and articulate different
interests
Create spaces where a variety of options can be
further developed
Towards Implementation
Instead of a cry for tools, we should be
crying out for skills
skills
in bringing people together, in promoting
and facilitating dialogue
skills in creating a safe space within which
issues can be ventilated with minimum of pain
skills in guiding institutional learning and
collective strategizing