Research Philosophies
Download
Report
Transcript Research Philosophies
Research Philosophies
Planning Research
Chapter 4
Why is it important?
It can help you choose the research
method
Assist you to evaluate different
research methods
It may help you to be creative by
choosing or adapting research
methods
Two main philosophies
Positivism
A more objective interpretation of reality
Using hard data form surveys
Phenomenology
(interpretivism/constructionism)
Examine people and their behavior
Features
Positivism
The world is external
and objective
Science is value-free
Focus on facts
Structured and formal
Phenomenology
The world is socially
constructed and
subjective
Science is driven by
human interests and
motives
Focus on meanings
Evolving and flexible
The positivist researcher
Take the stance of a natural scientist
Remain distanced fram the object that
you study
Focus on facts
Use a structured methodology
The interpretive researcher
Seek insight into phenomena
Try to understand and interpret what is
occurring and why
Focus on finding and understanding
meanings
Less structured and less formal
methodology
Conjunction/Triangulation
Combining the strength of both
philosophies
May enhance the process of
systematizing your research
While retaining the ability to investigate
phenomena in depth
Research approaches
Deduction
Moving from the known to the unknown
Induction
The evidence leads the researcher to a
conclusion
Deduction
The conclusion is drawn first
The research is all about proving it to
be correct or incorrect
Develop a hypothesis
Express it in operational terms
Test the hypothesis
Examine the outcome
Eventually modify the theory
Induction
Advantages
Helps make causes between particilar variables
and the way they are interpreted
Helps you explain why a particular phenomena
is taking place
Disadvantages
More effective with a small sample
The risk og finding no useful data patterns and
theories are higher
Continuum
The deductive and theory-driven
approach
can be used alongside
The inductive and phenomena-driven
approach
Inductive /phenomenology
Particularly interrested in
understanding why something is
happening
Rather than
Describing what is happening
Qualitative/Quantitative
The phenomenology approach is
usually associated with
induction and
qualitative approach
Conclusions drawn from such research
designs cannot be generalized
Two systematic approaches
Quantitative
Qualitative
Objective
Deductive
Generalizable
Numbers
There are issues
about ”objectivity”
Inductive
Not generalizable
Words
Conjunction/Triangulation
A combination of the two offers the
best of two worlds!
If you think that a mixed methodology
is appropriate then do not hessitate to
adopt it.
Assignment
Positivism
Phenomenology
Constructionism
Apply the following terms to the
continuum above
Qualitative
Quantitative
Deductive
Inductive
The levels of scientific
approach
1.
2.
3.
Research Design – methodology
Research Strategy – case study,
observations, surveys
Research Methods – data collection,
interpretation, analysis
Apply these levels to the continuum in the
assignment above
Triangulation
Explain triangulation in relation to the
figure you have just constructed by
assembling the continuum and the
levels og scientific approach
How can triangulatoin be used in
planning a research?