Transcript Document
Forensic & Applied Cognitive Psychology
Sexual Offending:
Paedophiles & Child
Molesters
Dr Ann Henry
Tuesday 12th November 2013
Sexual Offending
Media coverage – recent Jimmy Saville case & other cases
of paedophilia/ child sexual abuse/ abusers
Extreme hostility & negative stigma towards paedophiles
Recidivism comparatively low
Megan’s law (USA) Megan abducted & murdered in 1994
Sarah’s Law (UK) abducted & murdered in 2000.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/1706396.stm
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/media/tabloid-endsits-naming-of-sex-offenders-711154.html
Controversial & inconclusive research on role of
pornography & sexual offending
Internet paedophiles (discussed fully in week 8 lecture)
Media images of Jimmy Saville
story
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i7rDUpgvx7g
Sexual Offending
Classifications of child molesters (Groth & Birnbaum,
1978)
Fixated Offenders
Developmentally fixated on a permanent or temporary
basis. Sexual interest in children rather than adults.
Sexual Offending
Regressed Offenders
Men matured in their sexuality but return to an earlier
level of psychosexual development.
Psychosexual history shows primary interest in peer
aged or adult individuals, rather than younger ones
Sexual Offending: Definitions
Paedophilia (Pedophilia in US): Persistent sexual interest in
pre-pubescent children as reflected by one’s sexual
fantasies, urges, thoughts, arousal patterns or behaviour.
Hebephilia: refers to a sexual interest in young
postpubescent children.
Ephebophilia: denotes interest in children in mid-to-late
adolescent range.
Seto, 2009 (cited in Miller, 2013) argues that Hebephilia &
Ephebophilia maybe distinct from Pedophilia.
DSM-V – Paedophilia under ‘Paraphilic Disorders’.
Sexual Offending: Paedophilic
offender typologies
Holmes & Holmes (1996) extended earlier work
a) Situational child molester – four sub-types
b) Preferential child molester – three subtypes
a) Situational child molester
Does not have preferential interest in children per se –
but will molest them as targets of opportunity if other
outlets are unavailable
Further divided into four sub-types:
a) Situational child molester:
Regressed pedophile
Usually molest female children in response to some egothreatening situation.
Can engage in sex with adults – but likely to regard child
as ‘pseudoadult’ –
a) Situational child molester:
Morally indiscriminate pedophile
Has sex with adults, but may forcefully or coercively
abuse children as a way of heightening his excitement
Enjoys controlling helpless victims
Fantasises using bondage-related pornography
a) Situational child molester:
Sexually indiscriminate pedophile
No particular preference for children, but abuses them –
often his own children or stepchildren
Part of a more generally sexually omnivorous pattern
involving a wide variety of common & unusual sexual
practices and partners
a) Situational child molester:
naive/ inadequate child molester
Suffers from some form of brain syndrome, intellectual
deficiency or mental disorder that makes him unable to
understand the wrongfulness of his actions and/or
control his impulses.
Abuse children because he is regarded as too weird or
undesirable by peers to obtain sex through usual social
channels
b) Preferential child molester
Prefers children to adults as sexual objects – divided into
two sub-types
Seductive molester
Fixated molester
Sadistic pedophile
b) Preferential child molester:
seductive molester
Courts & grooms his victims with gifts & attention
Likely to rationalise that he and child have special
relationship based on mutual affection
He may concurrently molest several children
Least likely of three sub-types to use violence
b) Preferential child molester:
Fixated molester
Fixated at a primitive stage of psychosexual
development
Finds children attractive because he is psychologically a
child himself – often appearing socially immature and
socially inept
Not likely to physically harm victims
Slowly wins victims over by gradual process of seduction
& physical affection
Intimacy with the children is as important as actual sex
b) Preferential child molester:
Sadistic pedophile
This is the most violent type of molester
Erotic gratification is based on fusion of sexual arousal &
sadistic aggression
Premeditated & ritualized- moves from place to place
Typically prefers young boys – will stalk them & abduct
them
Enjoys torturing, sexually assaulting & mutilating the
children.
Gains max pleasure from fear, pain & horror of victims
Child often dies, but sometimes lives with disfigurement
or permanent disability
Like a serial killer or serial killer with children as victims
Sexual Offending
How common is Paedophilia?
Unclear as depends on definition of sexual abuse used
e.g. indecent assault, gross indecency, buggery,
intercourse, rape.
Non-paedophile sexual arousal – using volume or
circumference phallometry (aka plethysmography)
conflicting findings (Hall et al, 1995)
Youthful offenders
Graves et al (1996) in USA found that up to half of child
sexual abuse carried out by persons under age of 21
Sexual Offending:
Theories of Paedophilia
Preconditions model
Psychotherapeutic/ cognitive model
Sexualisation model
Pathways model
Sexual Offending
Preconditions model of child molestation
Araji & Finkelhor (1985)
1) Emotional congruence with children (lack self-esteem,
psychosocially immature, may have need to dominate)
2) Social arousal by children (child pornography, hormonal
abnormalities/ imbalances)
3) Blockages preventing adult contact (lack effective social
skills, problems relating to adult females, repressive sexual
socialisation in childhood)
4) Disinhibition of norms against adult/child sex (offenders
may be senile, alcohol may decrease inhibitions, incesttolerant subculture)
Sexual Offending
Psychotherapeutic/ cognitive model
Suggests 4 steps
1) Cognitive distortions/ distorted thinking e.g. having
sex with a child is a good way of an adult teaching a
child about sex. Beliefs about sexual nature of children.
2) Grooming (bribes of sweets, other treats, trips out,
threats of violence)
3) Planning through fantasy
4) Denial – denying the consequences of their actions
Sexual Offending
Sexualisation model
Howitt (1995) Experience of sexual abuse in childhood is
a developmental process which can lead to paedophilia.
Early sexual abuse – especially if extreme or repeated possible sexual experience with peers- adolescent
paedophile career – paedophile adult
Controversial theory as women are more likely to be
victims of childhood sexual, but less likely to be sexual
offenders
Sexual Offending
Pathways model (Ward & Siegert, 2002)
Multi-factorial model – combining elements of previous
models/ theories
Distal & Proximal factors
Distal factors (predispositions e.g. genetic/ childhood
development)
Proximal factors (that might trigger predispositions e.g.
environment, negative mood state)
Pathways Model
4 psychological mechanisms
1) Intimacy & social skills deficits
2) Deviant sexual scripts
3) Emotional dysregulation
4) Cognitive distortions
Cognitive Distortions
Children as sexual objects
Entitlement- to have their sexual needs met
Dangerous world – children seen as reliable & trusting
& gives offender comfort against danger
Uncontrollable – claims not to be on control of own
actions & blames outside factors e.g. drugs/ alcohol
Nature of Harm – believes not all sexual activity is
harmful & children can benefit from sexual activity with
adults
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs)
Strickland (2008) true figure of FCSOs is unknown
In USA – average age of FCSOs 26-36, but can also be
younger & much older women
Finkelhor et al (1990) 17% of male victims reported being
abused as a child by women & 1% of female victims
FCOSs may choose victims of convenience of opportunity
e.g. may be family caregivers or take jobs working with
children as teachers/ child care workers etc.
Usually known to their victims & more likely to commit
offences with male co-perpetrator
Tend to use less physical force than men – rely more on
seduction or coercion
Less likely to use drugs or alcohol at time of offence
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs): Developmental
Background
Tend to come from more deprived backgrounds than
non-sexual female offenders.
Often subjected to poor living conditions, food
deprivation & lack of medical care
Frequently suffered extreme emotional, verbal, physical
& sexual abuse within their own families of origin
(Gannon & Rose, 2008)
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs):Psychological traits &
Disorders
Emotional immaturity & dependency
Low self-esteem
Physical/ psychological abuse as children
Domestic violence
Social isolation & impaired intimacy
Sexual dysfunction
Deficient or confused interpersonal boundaries
Suppressed needs & repressed anger
Substance abuse
View themselves as victims & powerless to change their
lives
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs):Psychological traits &
Disorders
Factors listed on previous slide might result in a stunting
effect of normal developmental pathways needed to
build appropriate coping and social skills, healthy
personality organisation, communication skills, social
relationships, and feelings of self-worth.
Borderline and paranoid personality characterise many
FCSOs – little evidence for psychopathy or anti-social
personality disorders (which are common with male sex
offenders)
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs): Typologies
Predisposed (intergenerational) FSO
Teacher/ Lover FCSO
Male-coerced FCSO
Psychologically disturbed FCSO
Heterosexual nurturer
Non-criminal heterosexual offender
Homosexual criminal offender
Female Sexual predator
Young adult child exploiter
Aggressive homosexual offender
Female child sex offenders
(FCSOs): typologies summarised
1) True Sexual predators of young adolescent boys
2) A romantic relationship with a young teenage boy to
compensate for unmet needs for intimacy and approval
3) Career criminals who exploit children & adolescents
for profit
4) Mentally disordered offenders
5) Female sex offender under the influence or coercion
of a male partner
Sexual Offending
Internet Paedophile offending
Controversial topic – whether linked to contact
paedophilia or not
Robbins & Darlington (2003) 27,000 people in the world
go onto child pornography sites every day. A million
images of child sexual abuse in circulation.
Internet chat rooms
Sexual fantasy vs contact sexual acts with children
Useful references
Craissati, J.,Falla, S. , McClurg, G & Beech, A. (2002). Risk reconviction rates
& pro-offending attitudes for child molesters in a complete geographical area
of London, The Journal of Sexual Aggression, 8 (11), 22-38.
Davidson, J (2006). Victims speak: comparing child sexual abusers & child
victims accounts, perceptions & interpretations of sexual abuse. An
international journal of evidence-based research, policy, & practice. 1, 159174.
Middleton, D. Elliott, I.A., Mandeville-Norden, R. & Beech, A,R, (2006). An
investigation into the applicability of the Ward & Siegert pathways model of
child sexual abuse with internet offenders, Psychology, Crime & Law, 12 (6)
589-603.
Miller, L. (2013). Sexual offenses against children: patterns & motives.
Aggression & Violent Behavior, 18, 506-519.
Murphy, W.D. & McGrath, R. (2008). Best Practices in Sex Offender Treatment,
Prison Service Journal, 178, 3-9.
Mark E. Olver, Stephen C.P. Wong (2013) Treatment programs for high risk
sexual offenders: Program and offender characteristics, attrition, treatment
change and recidivism. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 18, 579–591
Ward, T. & Brown, M. (2004). The Good Lives Model & conceptual issues in
offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10 (3), 243-257.