Transcript Document

Measuring Stress
Correctly
Recovering a
Stressed-out Workforce
Professor Craig Jackson
Prof. Occupational Health Psychology
Head of Psychology
Birmingham City University
Stress – The Basics
Stress is not a useful concept:
Definition problems
Not just at workplace (home, commuting)
Individual response
Work-life Balance issues
Control vs Demand
Personality types
Cause of many secondary health problems
Not even a medical diagnosis
Loose criteria
Too many triggers
Too many responses
Too many effect modifiers
Used too casually
Fashionable
Positive perceptions
Not reliably measured
Workplace Hazards – current status
Shiftworking:
Long hours:
Psychosocial:
Physical:
1 in 5 employed
likely to increase with growth
>48 hours per week
Fallen due to EWTD
Still > most of Europe
5 mill employees perceive effects
13 mill working days lost
Mundane occupations suffer
Chronic stress more problematic
Noise
Dust
Chemical
Vibration
technical
changes
monitoring
OELs
Fatigue
Somatic symptoms
Sleep
MSDs
Depression
Cardiovascular
Accidents
Depression
QoL
Stress Statistics
1995: Labour Force Survey
515,000 reported work-related stress
250,000 attributions of physical symptoms
30% increase in reports since 1990
1996: Institute of Management
270,000 daily absences for stress
£10.2 Billion cumulative annual cost
(sick pay, lost production, treatment)
2002: UK Health and Safety Executive
265,000 new “cases” in 2001
2000: Evans et al.
Scottish heart attack deaths higher
on Mondays
2004: UK Health and Safety Executive
13,000,000 working days lost / year
£12 Billion cost
Psychosocial factors at the core of ill-health
Individual vulnerability
MSDs
Personality type
Stress
Distress
Somatics
Mental Health
Experience
Learned behaviours
Incorrect Stress Definitions
A.
“Stress occurs when demands exist which are outside a person’s
capacity for meeting those demands”
B.
“Stress is a response to the presence of psychosocial hazards in the
workplace”
C.
“Stress is the reaction people have when they feel they cannot cope
with the pressures or demands placed upon them”
Over-simplistic definitions !
Responses to Hazards
Physiological changes
• Heart rate
• Blood pressure
• Biochemical
> adrenaline
> serotonin
> cortisol
> free histamine
Psychological changes
Anxiety
Depression
Tension
Tired
Apathy
Apprehension
Alienation
Resentment
Confidence
Aggression
Withdrawal
Restlessness
Indecision
Sleeping problems
Concentration
Worry
Acute Stress and Chronic Stress
Common
After-effects
Leave behind
Life threatening
One-off
Ever-present
By proxy
Demand-Control model of stress development
high
Productive,
Motivated
active
job control
low strain
high strain
low
passive
low
high
job demands
Karasek 1979
Risk of
psychological
strain and
increased illness
Demand-Control-Support model of stress
Productive,
Motivated
high
Social
Support
active
job control
low strain
passive
high strain
Heroes
&
Villains
low
Organisational
Justice
low
high
job demands
Karasek 1979
Peer
Support
Risk of
psychological
strain and
increased illness
Psychosocial Hazards
• Commonplace consideration in last 10 years
• Not straightforward
• All workplaces have potential to expose workers to psychosocial hazards
• All social relationships have potential for stress
• Little relation between stress incidents and occupational status
• Stress-Boom in last 15 years – VERY BIG INDUSTRY
• Intolerance of work in environments deemed psychologically stressful
“suffering from” & “recognising stress”
rapidly increasing issues
Acute Hazards
Work characteristics
1. Potential for violence
Accident & Emergency Services
2. Peril or Danger
Expected Dangerous Conditions
3. Potential for aggression
Hazardous conditions
1. Verbal abuse
Ordinary / Mundane Conditions
2. Physical abuse
Unpredictable Behaviour / Incident
3. PTSD inducement
Chronic Hazards
Job content
Work overload / underload
Hazardous conditions
Under utilisation of skills
Time pressures
Lack of control
Work organisation
Shift work
Working hours
Work Culture
Communication
Change / technology
Poor resources
No feedback
No decision process
unsociable
long
unpredictable
too little (home-working) / too much (email)
Chronic Hazards (cont)
Work role
Ambiguity
Conflict
Advancement structure
Insecurity
Promotion
under and over
Low status
Poor pay
Environment
Hazards physical / chemical
Home – work interface
Conflicting demands
Support
Domestic problems
Commuting
Interpersonal Conflict
Colleagues
Superiors
Subordinates
Personal Issues
Isolation
Lack of support
Harassment
Bullying
Violence
Organisational Justice
Fairness
Promptness
Equality
Avoidable psychosocial hazards
Eliminate exposure
Reduce exposure
Control exposure
Change physical environment
Change work organisation
Provide extra resources
Management / employee training
Career development systems
Increase participation
Increase control
Policies to identify and address future problem issues
Intrinsic & External Psychosocial Hazards
INTRINSIC HAZARDS
• Safe systems of working
• Training and education – Does this Work though? ? ?
• PTSD counselling / debriefing – Does this Work though? ? ?
EXTERNAL HAZARDS
• Provide protection and rehabilitation where necessary
• Counselling services
• Stress management training
• Health promotion activities
• Information relating to specific problems
(gambling, alcohol, substance abuse, domestic)
Commuting
“Cattle Truck Syndrome”
Chronic health problems exacerbated
by train travel?
Cumulative impact theory
Increased B.P, Anxiety,
Chronic Heart Conditions
Over-crowded trains / buses
Straining public transport system
Lack of control
Commuting
“People develop a constant internal
anger on crowded trains that they
cannot easily displace…an
individual's immune system could
also be suppressed by stress,
making passengers more susceptible
to illnesses”
45 minutes cut-off
Long Working Hours
“Workaholism”
Japan, South Korea, Indonesia, UK
(Karojisatsu)
uninterrupted heavy workload
heavy physical work
excessive demands from irregular
overtime and shift work
excessive workloads from emotional
stress, such as responsibility,
transfers, and conflicts
• irregular sleep habits
• decreases in rest
• decrease social time
• alcohol abuse
• increased smoking
• unhealthy diet
• neglecting medical checks
• breakdown in family life
Stress Measurement
Stress is the disparity between what needs to be done (required) and what
can be done (actual)
required
Problems
actual
demands are not static
required
actual
required
actual
abilities are not static
how to quantify disparity
meaningfulness of any quantification
individual modification
Potential Health Risks
3x
Cardiovascular problems
“High Demand
Low Control”
3x Back pain
2x Substance abuse
2-3x Injuries
5x Certain cancers
2-3x Conflicts
2-3x Infections
2-3x
Mental health problems
Shain & Kramer 2004
“High Effort
Low Reward”
Potential effects
cardiovascular
mental health
Stress
immune system
gastrointestinal
musculoskeletal
social effects
Fatigue
Exposure
performance impairment
safety problems
over-exposure
Potential Health Risks
How Widespread is it Really ?
• Mental health problems (some)
• Somatic symptoms
• Consumption consequences
• CHD
• Cancers
• Infection
• Immuno-suppression
Over investigated ?
Dutch truck drivers
Taiwanese Casino staff
Spanish fishermen
Indian shoemakers
Lebanese bank tellers
Performance effects
Accuracy
• Accuracy drops
• Errors increase
• Near-misses increase
• Accidents increase
• Inefficiency increases
• Speed increase (some tasks)
Attitudes
• Risk taking increases
• Reduced attention to Health & Safety of colleagues
• Reduced compliance with rules
Performance Indicators
Objective
Physical health
Quality control
Performance
Accidents
Errors
Near misses - recording problems
Mental health problems
Erratic / out of character behaviour – subjective
Disputes
Short term absence
Staff turnover
Trivial complaints
Poor timekeeping
Subjective
What workers expect
Reasonable expectations?
Financial
Achievable ?
Advancement
Affordable ?
Status
Respect
Perks
Education / Training
Autonomy
Dissatisfied workforce?
Aggrieved employees?
Unmotivated staff ?
Flexibility
Pensions
Support
Security
Individual Variability / Vulnerability
Best predictor of future stress responses are past stress responses
Differing Attitudes
Differing perceptions
Natural differences
Complex reasons
Experience
Personality
Learned behaviours
Stress is associated directly with workplaces BUT is also mediated by
individual differences
No universal profile of what will certainly provide stressful responses
Vulnerable People
Associated with socio-economic, cultural or demographic status
Females
Immigrant workers
Disabled
Excluded groups
Ethnic minorities
Any group by definition which is un-empowered
Personality – although some of this is spurious!
“Type A” (uptight, goal oriented)  likelihood of stress-illness and CHD (?)
“Type C” (high anxiety)  likelihood of Cancer (?)
“Type D” (negative affectivity, emotional inhibition)  likelihood of CHD (?)
“External” locus of control  poorer at handling stress
“Hardiness”  greater resistance and operability
Personality
A good sign or a bad sign?
Hi. I need to
see you first
thing tomorrow
in my office!
Personality type
Optimism vs Pessimism
Negative Affectivity
Hardiness
Common Coping Styles
Adaptive coping
Seek those with similar experiences
Stick to a plan of action
Day to day basis
Seek information
Confront issue
Support seeking
Change situation
LONG
TERM
SOLUTION
Maladaptive coping
Withdraw from people in general
Avoidance
Deny what has happened
Consumption
Drink, eat, smoke to relieve tension
Denial
SHORT
TERM
SOLUTION
Methods of Assessing Stress
Questionnaire Assessment
Symptoms
Behaviours
Performance: Typical vs Maximum
Checklist approach
“Normal” and “Abnormal” behaviours
Systematic scoring principles
Qualitative classification
cases
stressed
stress-prone
healthy
dysfunctional
Psychological Tests
Occupational & clinical
odd mix
Testing standards
blasé attitudes
over familiar
Administration types
open
controlled
supervised
managed
Provides…
consequences
perceptions
perceived sources of stress
“Usefulness of Stress” Model
am i happy?
potential for change?
no
no
make changes
yes
alternative plan: is my work…
safe?
yes
fun?
infinite options
should i worry about this?
should it make me ill?
yes
could it make me ill?
pleasant?
valued?
yes
no
no
does it make me ill?
yes
Stress!
infinite options
someone must act on this
Rights of test takers #1
ITC Guidelines
BPS is only recourse at present www.bps.org.uk
State purpose
outcomes?
specific tests used?
evidence of relevance & appropriateness?
Clarity of procedure
administration method?
competence of administrator?
locations suitable?
Inquiries and complaints
handled by?
competence of handler?
what actions will result?
fair treatment?
Rights of test takers #2
Test information
scoring
interpretation
evidence of competence
communication of scores
accurate and meaningful communication of scores
confidentiality of scores
who can access scores and why?
storage of scores / data
Competence
certificates of competence in testing
monitor competence
awareness of personal limitations
Recommended Reading
Carroll D, Davey Smith G, Sheffield D, Shipley MJ, and Marmot MG. Pressor reactions
to psychological stress and prediction of future blood pressure: data from the
Whitehall II study. BMJ 1995;310:771-775.
Chen C, David AS, Nunnerley H, Michell M, Dawson JL, Berry H, Dobbs J, and Fahy
T. Adverse life events and breast cancer: case-control study. BMJ 1995; 311: 15271530.
Jackson CA and Cox T. Health and well-being of working age people. ESRC Seminar
Series. ESRC. London. 2006
Jackson CA. Psychosocial Aspects of the Workplace. In Aw, T.C et al. (eds)
Occupational Health Pocket Consultant (fifth edition). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific
Publishing; 2006. 191-201
Jackson CA. Psychosocial Hazards. In Smedley, J et al. (eds) Oxford Handbook of
Occupational Health. Oxford. Oxford University Press; 2007. 167-179
Recommended Reading
Kivimäki M, Leino-Arjas P, Luukkonen R, Riihimäki H, Vahtera J, and Kirjonen J. Work
stress and risk of cardiovascular mortality: prospective cohort study of industrial
employees. BMJ 2002; 325: 857.
Levenstein S. Stress and peptic ulcer: life beyond helicobacter. BMJ 1998; 316: 538541.
Shain M and Kramer DM. Health Promotion in the Workplace: Framing the Concept;
Reviewing the Evidence. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 2004;61:643-648.
Work Stress: The Making of a Modern Epidemic. Michael Fitzpatrick. Open University
Press, 2002.