Transcript Document
WAFER EDGE EFFECTS CONSIDERING ION
INERTIA IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED
DISCHARGES*
Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner
Iowa State University
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering
Ames, IA 50011, USA
[email protected] [email protected]
http://uigelz.ece.iastate.edu
June 2006
* Work supported by Semiconductor Research Corp. and NSF
ICOPS2006_Natalie_01
AGENDA
Wafer Edge effects and their origin.
Description of the model:
Improvement of nonPDPSIM to include ion momentum
equation
Effect of wafer-focus ring gaps on Ar and Ar/Cl2 CCPs
Plasma penetration
Ion focusing
Concluding remarks
ICOPS2006_Natalie_02
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
WAFER EDGE EFFECTS
It is desirable to use wafer
area to the edge of the wafer
to maximize utilization.
Perturbation of fluxes may
occur by method of
terminating wafer and
matching to tool material
Wafer is beveled at edge
with small gap (< 1 mm)
between wafer and focus
ring.
Penetration of plasma into
gap is bad due to formation
of particles and deposition
of contaminating films.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_03
ION MOMENTUM EQUATION IN nonPDPSIM
Goal is to computationally investigate edge effects and
penetration of plasma into wafer-focus ring gap.
Large dynamic range (> 100) requires unstructured mesh.
Large Knudson number in gap requires accounting for inertia.
nonPDPSIM, a 2-dimensional plasma hydrodynamics model,
was improved by adding ion momentum equations on
unstructured mesh.
The coupling between the dynamics of charged and neutral
transport is through the species resolved collision terms in
momenta equations.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_04
nonPDPSIM CHARGE PARTICLE TRANSPORT
•
•
Poisson equation for the electric potential
( q j N j )
j
Transport equations for conservation of the charged species j
N j
t
•
S
Surface charge balance
q j S
t j
material
•
Full momentum for ion fluxes of species j
x , j
q j N j Ex
1
x , j V j
Px , j
N j j (Vx , j Vx ,i )
t
Mj
Mj
i
y , j
•
q j N j Ey
1
y , j V j
Py , j
N j j (Vy , j Vy ,i )
t
Mj
Mj
i
Equations are simultaneously solved using a Newton’s iterations.
ICOPS2006_Natalie_05
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
2-D GEOMETRY AND CONDITIONS
Conditions:
Ar, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Ar/Cl2 = 70/30, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Biased substrate, grounded housing
Showerhead to wafer distance = 4 cm
Transport of energetic secondary electrons from biased substrate
is addressed with a Monte Carlo simulation.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_06
MESHING TO RESOLVE WAFER-FOCUS RING GAP
Unstructured mesh
with multiple
refinement zones
was used to
resolve waferfocus ring gap.
Gaps of < 1 mm
were investigated.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_07
ELECTRON DENSITY NEAR THE GAPS
0.9 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
106 –108 cm-3
106 –108 cm-3
Electron penetration into
the gaps is nominal due to
surface charging and
sheath formation.
Electrons (106 – 3 x109 cm-3)
Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300
sccm, 500 V
Animation slide
MIN
ICOPS2006_Natalie_08
MAX
Log scale
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
EDGE REGION: NEGATIVE CHARGE
0.9 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
Negative charging of wafer surface (and focus ring)
extends beyond edge of bevel in large gap.
Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300 sccm, 500 V
MIN
ICOPS2006_Natalie_09
MAX
Log scale
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
EDGE REGION: IONS
0.9 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
106 – 3x108 cm-3
108 –3 x108 cm-3
Ions are modulated by 10 MHz e-field variation.
Ions penetrate into the large gap reaching the biased substrate.
Ions do not penetrate into the small gap but do respond to
“sentinal” surface charge.
Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz,300 sccm, 500 V
MIN
ICOPS2006_Natalie_10
MAX
Log scale
Animation slide
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
EDGE REGION: ELECTRON TEMPERATURE
0.9 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
Te is higher near the small gap due to overlapping os
sheaths and higher local electric fields.
Electron temperature (and electron density) is negligibly
small inside the gaps.
Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300 sccm, 500 V
MIN
ICOPS2006_Natalie_11
MAX
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
Ar/Cl2 DISCHARGE
[e]
[Cl2+]
[Ar+]
[Cl-]
Maximum electron density shifts towards the focus ring.
Negative ion density comparable to electron density, though
are trapped in the plasma bulk and do not reach the wafer
Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
MIN
ICOPS2006_Natalie_12
MAX
Log scale
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
EDGE REGION: Ar+ AND Cl2+ FLUXES
0.9 mm Gap
0.9 mm Gap
Cl2+ flux is larger and less collisional than Ar+ due to lower rate of
charge exchange.
There is some focusing of flux to the corner of the bevel that
could lead to excessive heating and sputtering.
Some ion trajectories terminate on the lower bevel.
Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_13
EDGE REGION: Ar+ AND Cl2+ FLUXES
0.3 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
Less focusing of ion fluxes to corner of bevel occurs
with the smaller gap due to lack of charging of wafer
into wafer-focus ring cavity.
Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_14
EDGE REGION: Ar+ FLUX STREAMTRACES
0.3 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
Streamlines penetrate into large gap throughout rf cycle.
In small gap, momentary penetration occurs at peak of cathode
cycle. Slightly conductive wafer is able to dissipate that charge.
Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Animation slide
ICOPS2006_Natalie_15
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
EDGE REGION: Cl2+ FLUX STREAMTRACES
0.9 mm Gap
0.3 mm Gap
Focusing of ion flux streamlines to edge of wafer is more severe
for Cl2+ than Ar+ due to lower collisionality.
Periodic flux into gap is also larger.
Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V
Animation slide
ICOPS2006_Natalie_16
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
CONCLUDING REMARKS
Penetration of plasma into narrow wafer-focus ring gap of a
capacitively coupled discharge was computationally
investigated.
Gap sizes > 0.5 mm allow significant penetration of the plasma.
Charging and ion fluxes may penetrate to bottom side of bevel.
Focusing of ion flux to the corner of the bevel depends on the
ion species and collisionality: chemically enhanced sputtering
is problematic.
Iowa State University
Optical and Discharge Physics
ICOPS2006_Natalie_17