Transcript Document
WAFER EDGE EFFECTS CONSIDERING ION INERTIA IN CAPACITIVELY COUPLED DISCHARGES* Natalia Yu. Babaeva and Mark J. Kushner Iowa State University Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Ames, IA 50011, USA [email protected] [email protected] http://uigelz.ece.iastate.edu June 2006 * Work supported by Semiconductor Research Corp. and NSF ICOPS2006_Natalie_01 AGENDA Wafer Edge effects and their origin. Description of the model: Improvement of nonPDPSIM to include ion momentum equation Effect of wafer-focus ring gaps on Ar and Ar/Cl2 CCPs Plasma penetration Ion focusing Concluding remarks ICOPS2006_Natalie_02 Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics WAFER EDGE EFFECTS It is desirable to use wafer area to the edge of the wafer to maximize utilization. Perturbation of fluxes may occur by method of terminating wafer and matching to tool material Wafer is beveled at edge with small gap (< 1 mm) between wafer and focus ring. Penetration of plasma into gap is bad due to formation of particles and deposition of contaminating films. Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_03 ION MOMENTUM EQUATION IN nonPDPSIM Goal is to computationally investigate edge effects and penetration of plasma into wafer-focus ring gap. Large dynamic range (> 100) requires unstructured mesh. Large Knudson number in gap requires accounting for inertia. nonPDPSIM, a 2-dimensional plasma hydrodynamics model, was improved by adding ion momentum equations on unstructured mesh. The coupling between the dynamics of charged and neutral transport is through the species resolved collision terms in momenta equations. Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_04 nonPDPSIM CHARGE PARTICLE TRANSPORT • • Poisson equation for the electric potential ( q j N j ) j Transport equations for conservation of the charged species j N j t • S Surface charge balance q j S t j material • Full momentum for ion fluxes of species j x , j q j N j Ex 1 x , j V j Px , j N j j (Vx , j Vx ,i ) t Mj Mj i y , j • q j N j Ey 1 y , j V j Py , j N j j (Vy , j Vy ,i ) t Mj Mj i Equations are simultaneously solved using a Newton’s iterations. ICOPS2006_Natalie_05 Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics 2-D GEOMETRY AND CONDITIONS Conditions: Ar, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Ar/Cl2 = 70/30, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Biased substrate, grounded housing Showerhead to wafer distance = 4 cm Transport of energetic secondary electrons from biased substrate is addressed with a Monte Carlo simulation. Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_06 MESHING TO RESOLVE WAFER-FOCUS RING GAP Unstructured mesh with multiple refinement zones was used to resolve waferfocus ring gap. Gaps of < 1 mm were investigated. Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_07 ELECTRON DENSITY NEAR THE GAPS 0.9 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap 106 –108 cm-3 106 –108 cm-3 Electron penetration into the gaps is nominal due to surface charging and sheath formation. Electrons (106 – 3 x109 cm-3) Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300 sccm, 500 V Animation slide MIN ICOPS2006_Natalie_08 MAX Log scale Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics EDGE REGION: NEGATIVE CHARGE 0.9 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap Negative charging of wafer surface (and focus ring) extends beyond edge of bevel in large gap. Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300 sccm, 500 V MIN ICOPS2006_Natalie_09 MAX Log scale Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics EDGE REGION: IONS 0.9 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap 106 – 3x108 cm-3 108 –3 x108 cm-3 Ions are modulated by 10 MHz e-field variation. Ions penetrate into the large gap reaching the biased substrate. Ions do not penetrate into the small gap but do respond to “sentinal” surface charge. Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz,300 sccm, 500 V MIN ICOPS2006_Natalie_10 MAX Log scale Animation slide Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics EDGE REGION: ELECTRON TEMPERATURE 0.9 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap Te is higher near the small gap due to overlapping os sheaths and higher local electric fields. Electron temperature (and electron density) is negligibly small inside the gaps. Ar, 90 mTorr, 10 MHz, 300 sccm, 500 V MIN ICOPS2006_Natalie_11 MAX Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics Ar/Cl2 DISCHARGE [e] [Cl2+] [Ar+] [Cl-] Maximum electron density shifts towards the focus ring. Negative ion density comparable to electron density, though are trapped in the plasma bulk and do not reach the wafer Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V MIN ICOPS2006_Natalie_12 MAX Log scale Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics EDGE REGION: Ar+ AND Cl2+ FLUXES 0.9 mm Gap 0.9 mm Gap Cl2+ flux is larger and less collisional than Ar+ due to lower rate of charge exchange. There is some focusing of flux to the corner of the bevel that could lead to excessive heating and sputtering. Some ion trajectories terminate on the lower bevel. Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_13 EDGE REGION: Ar+ AND Cl2+ FLUXES 0.3 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap Less focusing of ion fluxes to corner of bevel occurs with the smaller gap due to lack of charging of wafer into wafer-focus ring cavity. Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_14 EDGE REGION: Ar+ FLUX STREAMTRACES 0.3 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap Streamlines penetrate into large gap throughout rf cycle. In small gap, momentary penetration occurs at peak of cathode cycle. Slightly conductive wafer is able to dissipate that charge. Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Animation slide ICOPS2006_Natalie_15 Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics EDGE REGION: Cl2+ FLUX STREAMTRACES 0.9 mm Gap 0.3 mm Gap Focusing of ion flux streamlines to edge of wafer is more severe for Cl2+ than Ar+ due to lower collisionality. Periodic flux into gap is also larger. Ar/Cl2 = 85/15, 90 mTorr, 300 sccm, 500 V Animation slide ICOPS2006_Natalie_16 Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics CONCLUDING REMARKS Penetration of plasma into narrow wafer-focus ring gap of a capacitively coupled discharge was computationally investigated. Gap sizes > 0.5 mm allow significant penetration of the plasma. Charging and ion fluxes may penetrate to bottom side of bevel. Focusing of ion flux to the corner of the bevel depends on the ion species and collisionality: chemically enhanced sputtering is problematic. Iowa State University Optical and Discharge Physics ICOPS2006_Natalie_17