Transcript Slide 1

Disability Related Harassment
Review
Jackie Driver
Head of Good Relations
January 2013
Overview of presentation
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
About the Inquiry
Definitions of disability-related harassment
Forms of harassment
‘Hidden in Plain Sight’
Barriers to progression
‘Manifesto for Change’
Impact of inquiry
Why this Inquiry?
• Evidence of serious cases of abuse across GB
• Fiona Pilkington and Frankie Hardwick
• Serious cases only tip of the iceberg
• For many, harassment is commonplace and
goes un-reported
• Apparent failure of public authorities to
recognise extent of disability-related
harassment
• Previous research on the safety and security
of disabled people
What is ‘disability-related
harassment’?
• Unwanted, exploitative or abusive conduct
against disabled people which has the
purpose or effect of either:
– Violating the dignity, safety, security or
autonomy of the person experiencing it,
or
– Creating an intimidating, hostile,
degrading or offensive environment.
Forms of harassment
•Name calling
•Damage to property
•Exploitation, theft and fraud
•Anti-social behavior
•Cyber bullying and cyber harassment
•Sexual abuse, rape and sexual assault, and
•Physical assault, ranging from lower level
assaults up to murder
EHRC Inquiry Powers
• Equality Act 2006 section 16
– Inquiries into issues or sectors where there are
concerns relating to human rights and / or
equality
– Require organisations to provide evidence
– Publish authoritative evidence-based reports
– Make recommendations against which we expect
action
Legislative Framework
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
The Disability Discrimination Act 2005
The Equality Act 2010
Public sector equality duty
Criminal law
The European Convention on Human Rights
The Human Rights Act 1998
The United Nations Convention on the Rights
of Persons with Disabilities
• The Autism Act 2009
Policy framework
•
•
•
•
Antisocial Behaviour
Hate Crime
Adult Protection
Bullying
Inquiry Methodology
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Call for Evidence
Terms of reference
Evidence gathering
Formal hearings
Analysis
Publishing report
Follow up / Adverse Findings
Hidden in plain sight – Inquiry report
•
•
•
•
Ownership and Leadership
Availability of definitive data
An accessible and responsive criminal justice system
Understanding the motivations and circumstances of
perpetrators informs the design of interventions.
• Positive attitudes towards disabled people and a
better understanding the nature of the problem.
• Evaluation and dissemination of promising
approaches to preventing and responding
• Effective guidance and training for frontline staff
Systemic institutional failure
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Incidents often dealt with in isolation
Disability as a motivating factor
Opportunities to stop harassment are missed
Focus on the behavior and ‘vulnerability’ of the
victim rather than the perpetrator
Failure of agencies to work together
No understanding of the causes and prevention
Barriers to reporting and recording
Barriers accessing justice
Perpetrators face few consequences
A lack of shared learning across agencies
Barriers to progress
• Legal
• Policy
• Attitudinal
– Societal
– Organisational
– Individual
Manifesto for Change
• 81 formal responses
• Three national governments published their
commitments
• How the Commission will monitor progress
over the coming years
Impact in England
• LAPSO Act reviewed
• Law Commission Commit to review all
statutory and common laws
• Adult Safeguarding Boards given statutory
status
• National Housing Federation produces
guidelines regarding security of tenure
• Department of Transport published Disability
Action Plan
Impact in Scotland
• Shift perception from an individual’s
perceived vulnerability
• Multi-agency approach to adult protection
• Courts to record when and how aggravation
have been taken into account when sentence
is passed
• Scottish and Crime Justice Survey includes
questions on disability
Impact in Wales
• Action plan adopted by Welsh Government in
tackling disability-related harassment
• Wales Strategic Action Plan adopted
objective to reduce disability-related
harassment
How will the Commission follow up
the recommendations it makes?
• Ownership sits with the key authorities
identified in Hidden in Plain Sight
• Recommendations and findings integrated
into core work of the Commission.
• Where appropriate monitor the performance
of organisations.
• Measuring a key aspect of tackling disability
related harassment over the next 1, 3 and 5
years.
Points for discussion
• Common experiences of disabled people?
• Differences in legal and policy frameworks?
• What can we learn from each other?
‘Building a society built on fairness
and respect where
people are confident in all aspects
of their diversity.’