Transcript Slide 1

Cluster Classroom Grouping Model
What is the Cluster Classroom
Grouping Model?
 It is a method for providing full-time gifted education
services without major budget implications and with the
potential to raise achievement for all students.
 In this model, all students are purposely placed into
classrooms based on their abilities, potential, or achievement.
Gifted Cluster Classrooms – Numbers
of classes per grade level
Numbers of classes per grade
level
 2-3
 4-5
 6-8
Number of gifted
cluster classrooms needed
• 1
• 1–2
• 2–3
Example of Classroom Composition for Cluster Model
School
(source: The Cluster Grouping Handbook by, Susan Winebrenner, M.S. & Dina Brulles, Ph.D.)
Looking at FUSD’s TAG history & Pilot
Implementation of the Cluster Classroom Model
 Since my employment in this district (2004 to the end of the
2008-2009 school year each elementary school provided a 1
hour/week pull out program for TAG students using teachers
hired to teach this class)
 Budgetary concerns necessitated the removal of TAG teacher
positions at the end of the 2008 – 2009 school year
 Starting district wide – In July 2009 representatives from
each school were trained to be Differentiation Instruction
trainers at each of their schools – this training took place
throughout the district during the 2009 – 2010 school year
Looking at FUSD’s TAG history & Pilot Implementation of
the Cluster Classroom Model (continued)
 During the 2009 – 2010 school year, each school in the district
scheduled time for the DI (Differentiation Instruction) trainers to
review differentiation instruction strategies that can be used in
their classrooms
 Starting in the 2009 – 2010 school year and currently continuing
– TAG services are administered at varying times and in varying
ways based on individual elementary school sites:
 RTI time (enrichment activities/studies)
 Teachers establishing a routine enrichment time in their class or at
their grade level
 Programs such as Master Mind
 Teachers using DI strategies more consistently in their classrooms
Differentiation Instruction
 Student focused learning – developing independent learners
 Student paced learning (challenging advanced learners --



’buying time’ for struggling learners)
Use of collaborative flexible student grouping – interest,
ability, teacher directed heterogeneous grouping
Compacting
Extension menus
Independent study projects
Looking at FUSD’s TAG history & Pilot Implementation of
the Cluster Classroom Model (continued)
 The Cluster Classroom was a model that I became interested in
two years ago and I took the initial training with Dina Brulles
Gifted Coordinator of the Paradise Valley School District
 Visited the program in Phoenix
 Looked for district principals and volunteer teachers to pilot this
program- resulting in Marshall, DeMiguel, Cromer, and Knoles
 Many teachers participating in this pilot received training on
March 2, 2010, May 7, 2010, and May 12, 2010. In addition a few
of the teachers went to a DI training institute over the summer
Looking at FUSD’s TAG history & Pilot Implementation of
the Cluster Classroom Model (continued)
 School year 2010 – 2011 participating cluster classroom
pilot schools, Cromer, DeMiguel, Knoles, Marshall
 Support and additional training in the 2010 – 2011 school
year:
 9/24/10 – workshop on teaching skills that will assist in setting
up a thinking- centered classroom for gifted learners (fluency,
flexibility, originality, elaboration skills)
 10/29/10 – workshop on Independent Project Based Learning
 01/14/11– workshop on developing common assessments
 To be arranged – book study/discussion on DI strategies
 Day visit to a cluster classroom in the Phoenix area
 SIOP coach support of teachers implementing this pilot
What it means to place students into cluster
groups
A group of gifted identified students is clustered into a mixed
ability classroom with a teacher who is trained to
differentiate for gifted students
Cluster Grouping Classroom Model
allows:
 Critical elements of effective gifted programs




Flexible grouping
Differentiation
Continuous progress
Intellectual peer interactions
(Program elements identified by Barbara Clark)
Perception that cluster grouping is the same
as tracking
 NO – In tracking, students are grouped into classrooms with
others of similar ability and these students remain together
throughout their school years. Curriculum is based on the
ability levels of the students in each track.
 Clustering students – classes arranged this way have
students with a range of abilities. Teachers modify or extend
grade level standards according to student needs and abilities.
The classroom composition changes each year.
?: Why should gifted students be placed in a
cluster group instead of being assigned to all
classes?
 Gifted Students:
 Need to spend time learning with others of like ability to
experience challenge and make academic progress
 Better understand their learning differences when they are with
learning peers
 Teachers are more likely to differentiate curriculum when there
is a group of gifted students
?: Won’t the creation of a cluster group rob
the other classes of academic leadership?
 Looking at the earlier slide regarding the distribution chart of
students there are either gifted or high achieving students in
every class; therefore, all classes have academic leaders
 Gifted students do not make the best academic leaders
because they make intuitive leaps, and therefore do not
always appear to have to work as hard as others
 High average students have new opportunities to become
academic leaders
?: Can I create small groups of gifted
students in all classes?
 The desired outcomes of the Cluster Classroom Model
become diminished because:
 All teachers have the full range of abilities in their classrooms
 There is less accountability for teachers to facilitate progress of
their gifted learners
 Providing teacher training becomes difficult
Example of Academic Effects of Cluster Grouping in the area of
Math
(source: The cluster Grouping Handbook by, Susan Winebrenner, M.S. & Dina Brulles, Ph.D.)