Transcript Document
Evaluation of the National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System Among Men Who Have Sex With Men in Denver, Colorado Kathryn DeYoung, MS1, Arthur Davidson, MD, MS1, Alia Al-Tayyib PhD1 1Denver Public Health, Denver, USA Background Men who have sex with men (MSM) account for the majority of new HIV diagnoses in Denver. The National HIV Behavioral Surveillance System (NHBS) is a 20-site cyclical survey of those at increased HIV risk. Men who have sex with men (MSM) are surveyed every three years. Conclusions Demographic characteristics and HIV testing history among Denver MSM by data source Representativeness: Good Site works to represent African Americans and Hispanics Inclusion of younger MSM increasing but hindered by venue options Concern: representation of internet-based MSM population Total Race / Ethnicity American Indian Black Hispanic Other / Mixed race White Age 18 – 24 25 – 29 30 – 39 MSM cycles utilize a time-space venue-based sampling approach, recruiting at bars, restaurants, and other venues with a high ratio of MSM attendees. NHBS has not been previously evaluated in Denver. Objective To evaluate implementation of the MSM1, MSM2, and MSM3 cycles of NHBS in Denver, conducted in 2005, 2008, and 2011, respectively. Methods CDC guidelines for evaluating public health surveillance systems include these attributes: Acceptability, flexibility, simplicity (qualitative) Data quality, representativeness, system sensitivity (quantitative) Results NHBS n(%) 1919 Outreach2 n(%) 1794 STD Clinic n(%) 3560 24 (1) 126 (7) 454 (24) 124 (7) 1172 (62) 16 (0) 247 (7) 845 (24) 180 (5) 2272 (64) 19 (1) 105 (6) 346 (19) 136 (8) 1188 (66) 261 (14) 292 (15) 579 (30) 861 (24) 742 (21) 958 (27) 318 (18) 295 (16) 430 (24) 40– 49 >50 Mean Years Since Latest HIV Test4 (95%CI) Last Known HIV Status3 487 (25) 300 (16) 2.27 (2.08-2.45) 634 (18) 365 (10) 1.77 (1.57-1.98) 397 (22) 354 (20) 1.52 (1.30-1.75) Negative Positive 1505 (83) 281 (16) 960 (88) 102 (9) 911 (94) 47 (5) Indeterminate/Unknown New HIV Diagnosis4,5 25 (1) 34 (3) 32 (3) 37 (4) 8 (1) 23 (2) 1 US Census, Denver-Broomfield MSA, 2010 2Outreach:2008 and 2011 data only 3American Community Survey, Denver County, 2007-2011 Limitations There is no comparable population-based sample of MSM with which to compare NHBS. Recommendations Top locations where NHBS respondent met last male sex partner (by cycle) Local implementation of NHBS has good representativeness, sensitivity, acceptability. These could be improved by continuing efforts to include underrepresented groups and by meeting with venue owners before events to improve buy-in. 90 % of recent partners met here 80 70 60 50 System complexity reduces local usefulness. Possible solutions include acquisition of cleaned data and code from CDC; funding of additional resources for data analysis and communication of results; and production of a local operations manual to document changes in NHBS methods over time and other factors to be considered in interpretation of data. 40 30 20 10 0 MSM1 Bar/club © 2013 Denver Health Simplicity: Low The cyclical nature of NHBS does not allow adequate time or funding for local analysis, interpretation, dissemination of results Data management issues 101 errors corrected in MSM2, 298 corrected in MSM3 Quality and timeliness of final datasets from CDC improved after transition to data management by DCC (MSM3) Clinic and Outreach : 2011 data only 5NHBS: 2008 and 2011 cycles only Median age by NHBS venue Denver data sources: NHBS MSM cycles: 2005, 2008, 2011 Denver Public Health records from STD clinic patients and outreach HIV testing (census, not sample) Included patients who would have been eligible to participate in NHBS-MSM cycles (2005, 2008, 2011) Acceptability: Good Participants: In MSM2 and MSM3, 100% of eligible recruits interviewed; 84-92% accepted HIV testing Venue owners: Participating owners enthusiastic; nonparticipating owners concerned about client impact NHBS staff: Satisfied with venue selection, recruitment methods, and data security 4 STD Acceptability, flexibility, simplicity, and data quality: Assessed through local stakeholder input, reviews of protocols, local formative research, & process indicators Representativeness and system sensitivity to trends: Comparison of responses to demographic and HIV testing history questions among Denver NHBS-MSM participants with comparable samples from local sources Data quality: Good Quality as high as self-report data collection method permits Maintained by interviewer-guided data collection MSM2 MSM3 Internet Sex establishment This study was supported in part by an appointment to the Applied Epidemiology Fellowship Program administered by the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) and funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Cooperative Agreement Number 5U38HM000414-5. Contact Information: For more information or for additional copies of this abstract, please contact Kathryn DeYoung at [email protected]